研究生: |
盛致妤 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
漢字創意精緻化教材之發展評定及對以華語文為第二語言學習者之學習成效研究 The development and evaluation of Chinese Characters Materials (Creative Elaborate Mnemonics) and the learning result to Chinese as a Second Language Learner |
指導教授: |
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 91 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創意精緻化教材 、漢字學習 、以華語文為外語學習者 |
英文關鍵詞: | Creative Elaborate Mnemonics, Chinese character learning, Chinese as Second Language (CSL) |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:263 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以陳學志等人(2012)依據漢語組字規則資料庫建立之三階段漢字字本位教學模式第三階段漢字創意精緻化教材為研究材料,主要目的在發展並探討此教材之適切性及此教材運用於教學與漢字筆畫數多寡對以華語文為第二語言學習者漢字學習成效之影響。分為兩個研究,研究一以34名學習華語文兩年以上之英文母語者為研究對象,針對漢字創意精緻化教材進行評定,研究工具為英文線上評定問卷,以李克特式五點量表作為填答之評定方式,預期結果為漢字創意精緻化教材對於目標字之字形、字義的聯結具有關聯性(五點量表評定分數皆達到三分以上)。研究二為2(筆畫數高低)x2(漢字創意精緻化教材、反覆抄寫教材)的二因子混合實驗設計,以共23名不同國籍背景之精通英語的華語文初學者為研究對象,針對研究參與者進行實驗前測,實驗結束後進行立即與一週後的延宕後測,測量工具採用實驗目標字編製的字義識記作業及字形辨識作業,進行二因子混和變異數分析。研究一顯示,漢字創意精緻化教材與目標漢字之字形字義的聯結度之五點量表評定分數達到三分以上,顯示精緻化教材與目標字字形字義之間具有良好關聯性;研究二發現:漢字筆畫數多寡與不同漢字學習教材(漢字創意精緻化教材與反覆抄寫教材)之學習成效有交互作用效果,多筆畫數漢字在漢字創意精緻化教材之策略情境中之延宕字義識記學習效果優於反覆抄寫教材,少筆畫數在創意部件精緻化教材之策略情境中,延宕字義識記學習效果與反覆抄寫教材無顯著差異。而主要效果則顯示:不同漢字學習教材對於學習者之學習效果有差異,無論在立即學習效果或延宕學習效果,漢字創意精緻化教材的字義識記作業及字形辨識作業正確率顯著高於反覆抄寫教材。而漢字筆畫數多寡對學習者之學習效果皆無顯著差異。綜合研究一與研究二的結果可知:漢字創意精緻化教材本身具聯結字形字義的功能,將此教材運用於漢字教學時具有良好學習成效,顯見創意教材有助於CSL之漢字字形辨識與字義識記。
Based on the Chinese orthographic database established by Chen et al., the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Chinese Character Materials:Creative Elaborate Mnemonics of Chinese orthographic database, strokes of Chinese characters on CSL learners. There were two parts in this study. First part takes 34 English native speakers who had learned Chinese at least two years before as sample, and evaluated Chinese Character Materials (The Creative Elaborate Mnemonics.) Second part takes 23 participants who also know English very well as sample to investigate the impact of Chinese Character Materials (The Creative Elaborate Mnemonics), simple or complex strokes on effect of Chinese character learning. First part showed that the point of association Chinese character association picture and the meaning of the characters is over 3 in 5 point scale. Second part takes 23 CSLs who had learned Chinese less than three months before as sample showed that the Chinese Character Materials (The Creative Elaborate Mnemonics). Second part shows that the effect for learner is significant better than that with Characters-writing condition. However, the effect of simple or complex strokes on CSLs Chinese learning is not significant difference. There is interaction between the Chinese Character Materials (Creative Elaborate Mnemonics) and strokes in delay meaning-test. The effect of complex strokes learning on Chinese Character Materials:Creative Elaborate Mnemonics condition for learner is significant better than that with simple or complex strokes condition. In main effect, the result of Creative Elaborate Mnemonics to CSLs is significant better than Characters-writing condition. Accordingly, materials itself can link character-form and meaning together. Through Chinese Character Materials:Creative Elaborate Mnemonics, learners can further understand the Chinese characters. This study demonstrated that the effect of Chinese Character Materials:Creative Elaborate Mnemonics can be improved the way of memory coding. This study also verified the Dual-coding theory, and highlighted the importance of writing in Chinese character learning.
中文部分
王寧(2013)。漢字構形學講座。台北:三民。
王儷君(2013)。圖文聯想對以華語文為第二語言學習者的漢字學習成效:以創 造力為調節變項。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
白樂桑(1996)。漢語教材中的文、語領土之爭:是合併,還是自主,抑或分離。
第五屆國際漢語教學討論會論文選。北京:北京大學出版社。
艾偉(1949)。漢字問題。香港,中華書局。
江新(2000)。漢語作為第二語言學習策略初探。語言教學與研究,1。
江新、趙果(2001)。初級階段外國留學生漢字學習策略的調查研究。語言教學
與研究,4,10-17。
江新、柳燕梅(2004)。拼音文字背景的外國學生漢字書寫錯誤研究。世界漢語
教學,1, 60-70。
洪文斌(2009) 。華語文作為第二語言之字詞教學模式與學習歷程研究---子計畫
一,華語文字部件拆解教學模式與電腦輔助學習系統之研發報告。資訊工程
學系暨研究所 研究報告。
李培元、任遠 (1997)。詞彙、文字研究與對外漢語教學。北京:北京語言文
化大學出版社。
金龍勝(2007)。對外漢字教學研究─以教材、電腦軟體漢網站為分析材料(碩士
論文)。高雄師範大學華語文教學研究所,高雄市。
林季苗(2010)。漢語教學四大原則與法國經驗。華語文教學研究,8(2),65-79。
林姿君(2010)。運用心智圖法之漢字聯想研究:以英語母語漢語學習者為研究
對象。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
計惠卿、黃子瓔(2009)。數位教材之文字與圖像訊息的設計實務。國立新竹教
育大學主辦之「臺灣教育學術研討會」宣讀之論文(新竹)。
周碧香(2009)。圖解識字教學原理探討。臺中教育大學學報:人文藝術類,23
(1),55-68。
周碧香(2009)。從學習理論談漢字形似字教學。聯大學報,6 (1),81-95。
姚道中、劉月華(2005)。中文聽說讀寫。波士頓:劍橋出版社
胡永崇(2003)。國小四年級閱讀困難學生識字相關因素及不同識字教學策略之
教學成效比較研究。屏東師院學報,19,177-216。
紀壽惠(2009)。漢字教學的設計研究-以歐美學生為例(碩士論文)。國立台灣
師範大學華語文教學研究所,台北。
陳莉莉、郭婉儀 (2004)。學前兒童對華語文字形結構的認識。基礎教育學報。
13 (2),頁 23-38。
許錟輝(2005)1949年以來大陸地區說文論著專題研究,東吳大學中文系。
黃苕冠(2007)。外國學生以數位學習方式進行漢字書寫策略學習之成效研究設
計。第五屆全球華文網路教育研討會論文集。
陳莉莉、郭婉儀 (2004):學前兒童對中文字形結構的認識,《基礎教育學報》
13 (2),頁 23-38
陳瑩漣(2009)。對外漢字教學中的「同聲旁字組」分析與應用。(未出版之碩
士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
陳正田(2010)。圖像教學對國中生歷史學習成就之影響—以日治時期台灣史教
學為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
陳學志、張瓅勻、邱郁秀、宋曜廷、張國恩(2011)。中文部件組字與形構資料
庫之建立及其在識字教學的應用。教育心理學報,43,66-86
陳學志、陳仙舟、張道行(2012)。漢語組字規則資料庫暨漢字偏誤資料庫之建
置、擴充及運用。教育部頂尖大學計畫報告,未出版。
陳長益(修)(2006)。陶倫斯創造力測驗:成人適用精簡版 (Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults, ATTA)(原作者:Goff, Torrance)。臺北:心理。(原著 出版年:2002)
彭國慶(1997)。談漢字書寫教學及預防糾正錯別字。烏魯木齊成人教育學院學
報(綜合版),1,29-31.
靳洪剛(2005)。多媒體漢字呈現與漢字習得研究:三個跨語言組的漢字測試分
析。第四屆全球華文網路教育研討會論文集(500-514)。台北:中華民國
僑務委員會。
張金蘭(2009)。「識寫分流」教學策略對外籍生漢字識寫能力之影響-以非漢
字圈零起點學生為主所做的調查。中原華語文學報,3,55-71。
張明虎、彭杰、劉志英(2009)。淺論漢語作為第二语言教學中的漢字教學。
紅河學院學報,7(1),112-115。
張欣怡(2009)。針對中級華語學習者之漢字課程設計(未出版之碩士論文)。
國立政治大學華語文教學所,台北市。
游奇英(2011)。零起點漢字教材編製研究-以78個兼具部首部件身分的最常用
字為學習的切入點。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
葉德明(1987)。漢字書寫錯誤之分析與教學。華文世界,43,56-66。
萬雲英(民80)。兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。輯於高尚仁、楊中芳(合編):
中國人中國心-發展與教學篇。臺北:遠流圖書出版公司。
楊智能(2000)。影像回饋及其時宜對太極拳動作模仿學習的影響。(未出版之
碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北。
楊慧雯(2011)。華語文教學中漢字書寫與字感建立之研究。(未出版之碩士論
文)。 國立政治大學,台北市。
廖隆傑、何英奇(2006)。集中識字教學法對國小四年級學生增進一般字彙知識
表現的效果之研究。中臺學報,18(1),133-166。
裴斐斐(2007)。關於字本位和詞本位爭議的思考。徐州教育學院學報,22(2),
94-95。
賴瑩玲(2011)。用成語故事語境之中級漢字課程設計。(碩士論文)。國立臺
灣師範大學華語文教學研究所,台北市。
潘先軍(2002)。形旁表意功能在留學生漢字學習中的負遷移及對策。漢字文化, 3,49-52。
鄭昭明(2009)。華語文的教與學-理論與應用。台北。正中書局。
賴惠德、黃榮村(2005)。漢字件屬性資料庫之建立。蘇州大學主辦之「第五屆
華人心理學家學術研討會」宣讀之論文。大陸江蘇。
戴汝潛(1999)。漢字教與學。濟南:山東教育出版社,187。
羅秋昭(1999)。國小語文科教材教法。台北:五南出版社。頁122
蘇宜芬(2000):華語文認字單位分析—認字自動化的發展研究。國科會專題研
究計畫成果報告(NSC 89-2413-H-003-033-F18)。
蘇宜芬、陳學志 (2007):認字自動化指標之建立與信效度研究。教育心理學報,
38卷4期,501-514頁。
謝佩珊(2013)。創意漢字學習教材、圖文聯想類別、圖文聯想性對以華語文為 第二語言者漢字學習成效之影響。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大 學,台北市。
教育部國語推行委員會(1996):常用國字標準字體筆順手冊。台北:教育部。
取自教育部全球資訊網
http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/M0001/bishuen/c8.htm?open 2013年1月5
日。
英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of
creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Anning, A. (1994). Play and legislated curriculum - back to basics: An alternative view. In J. R. Moyles (Ed.), The excellence of play (pp. 67-65). Buckingham, UK : Open University Press.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. NY: HarperCollins.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American
Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of human memory.,UK: Psychology. Chen, S.
(2010). Research on the emergent writing development of Chinese young children (Unpublished master’s thesis ). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. 69
Clark, J. M. , & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational
Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
Clark, R. C. , & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines
for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Cohen, A. D. (1987). The use of verbal and imagery mnemonics in second
language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 43-62.
Cronbach, L. (1967). How can instruction be adapted to individual differences. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Learning and individual differences , 2-39. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Cronbach, L. J. & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119-124.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
De Saussure, F. (1915). Cours de linguislique générale [Course in general linguistics] (pp. 48). Paris, France : Payot.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York, NY: D.C. Heath. 70
Diffily, D. (2001). From scribbles to stories: Supporting writing development. Texas Child Care, Summer, 1-7.
Flower, L. S. , & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Makingplans, juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. J. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Goff, K. , & Torrance, E. P. (2002). Abbreviated Torrance test for adults manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Gowan, J.C. (1972). Development of the creative individual. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3-14.
Guilford, J. P. (1971). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Howieson, N. (1981). A longitudinal study of creativity: 1965-1975. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 117-134.
Kogan, N. , & Pakove, E. (1974). Long-term predictive validity of divergent - thinking tests: Some negative evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 802-810. 71
Kuo, M. , & Hooper, S. (2004). The effects of visual and verbal coding mnemonics on learning Chinese characters in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 23-38.
McGinnis, S. (1999). Student goals and approaches. In M. Chu (Ed.), Mapping the Course of the Chinese language field (pp. 151-188). Kalamazoo, Michigan: The Chinese Language Teachers Association.
Mayer, R. E. , & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dualcoding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
Mednick, S. A. (1962).The associative bases of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L.(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 72
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive progresses in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 117-131.
Shagoury-Hubbard, R. (1996). Workshop of the possible: Nurturing children's creative development. York, Maine: Stenhouse.
Sterling , C. M. & Robson, C. (1992). Psychology, spelling and education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Sternberg, R. J. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1-31.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Strickland, D. S. , & Morrow, L. M. (1988). Emergent literacy: Young children learn to read and write. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
Teale, W. H. , & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent literacy as a perspective for examining how young children become writers and readers. In Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. New Jersey: Ablex.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1964). Education and creativity. In Taylor, C. W. (Ed.), Creativity: progress and potential. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 73
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B- Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Poole, M. (1980). Creative across the curriculum. London, England: George Allen and Unwin.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310 .
Hocevar, D. , & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, M. , Perfetti, C. , & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition: cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 67-88.
Whitaker, P. (1997). Primary schools and the future: Celebration, challenges and choices. Buckingham,UK: Open University Press.
Wiles, J. (1985). The mind of invention: Activities to stimulate creative thinking. New York, NY: Freeman Press. 74
Wu, L. Y. (2009). Children’s graphical representations and emergent writing: Evidence from children’s drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(1), 69-79.
Zhou, J. (2009). Change over time in research on emergent literacy education in kindergarten. Early Childhood Education, 12, 14-19.