簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李青芬
Ching-Fen Lee
論文名稱: 原生家庭資源挹注、家庭權力與婚姻滿意度之探究
The relations among original-family supports,family power, and marital satisfaction
指導教授: 唐先梅
Tang, Shain-May
周麗端
Chou, Li-Tuan
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 家庭權力婚姻滿意度原生家庭資源挹注
英文關鍵詞: family power, marital satisfaction, original family supports
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:227下載:26
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究架構是建構在資源交換論、規範資源論的基礎之上,主要目的是欲了解身處華人文化脈絡下原生家庭資源挹注、家庭權力與婚姻滿意度間的關係。本研究主要是採用「台灣社會變遷基本調查(Taiwan Social Change Survey)第六期第二次家庭組問卷」中的資料來對相關變項進行分析。在研究對象的選取方面,限制婚姻狀況為「已婚有偶」;且受訪者或配偶原生家庭父母,其中至少有一人是健在者;同時受試者與其配偶至少一方原生家庭有提供一項資源者,始為研究對象再進行後續的統計分析,故本研究最後採計有效分析樣本為632份。
    本研究的主要發現:(1)雖然家庭權力直接影響婚姻滿意度,但有影響力的家庭權力面向因性別而不同,女性是受到夫妻相對資源所影響;男性則是受到原生家庭所影響。(2)原生家庭資源挹注乃扮演著調節夫妻家庭權力與婚姻滿意度關係間的角色。(3)原生家庭資源所扮演的調節效果是具有性別差異的。對女性而言,原生家庭資源是可以調節家務分工與婚姻滿意度間的關係;然而對男性而言,原生家庭資源所調節的是家庭決策與婚姻滿意度間的關係。最後,(4)對女性而言,家庭決策所代表的並不是婚姻權力的展現,而是額外的經濟責任與擔負,因此握有家中的家庭決策權並無助於女性婚姻滿意度的提升。

    The purpose of this study is to understand the relations among Original-family supports, family power, and marital satisfaction under Chinese cultural context. The framework of this study is based on resource exchange theory and normative resource theory. The research data are mainly sourced from the 2011 and 2012 second family questionnaire survey published on the 6th issue of "Taiwan Social Change Survey". The subjects are restricted to the currently married, at least one of each of the couple's parents is still alive, and one of their parents has provided resource for them. A total number of 632 people are selected in this study.
    The findings are: (1) women’s and men’s marital satisfaction are directly affected by different power dimensions, women are affected by the couple’s relative resources; men are affected by the supports from original families. (2) The original family resources make moderating effects on the relationship between family power and marital satisfaction. (3) The original family resources have different moderating effects between genders. For women, the original family resources can moderate the relations between housework division and marital satisfaction; while for men, the resources can moderate the relations between decision making and marital satisfaction. Finally, (4) family decision-making for women may represent extra economic responsibilities instead of the marital power, so increasing the women’s decision-making will not create more marital satisfaction for them.

    第一章 緒 論 6 第一節 研究動機 6 第二節 研究目的 12 第三節 名詞釋義 13 第二章 文獻探討 15 第一節 婚姻滿意度 15 第二節 家庭權力 20 第三節 原生家庭資源挹注 31 第三章 研究方法 39 第一節 研究架構與假設 39 壹、研究架構 39 貳、研究假設 42 第二節 資料來源 43 壹、資料來源 43 貳、次級資料分析 43 參、研究變項之操作型定義 50 第三節 研究對象 55 第四章 研究結果與討論 59 第一節 家庭權力、原生家庭資源挹注、婚姻滿意度之情形 59 第二節 影響婚姻滿意度的原因分析 66 壹、置中平減 66 貳、相關分析 67 參、影響婚姻滿意度的效果分析 70 第五章 討論與建議 77 第一節 討 論 77 第二節 研究建議 87 參考文獻 93

    壹、中文部份
    中央研究院社會學研究所 (2012)。台灣社會變遷基本調查資料庫全球資訊網。http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/home.php。
    勾學玲 (2008)。社會交換理論視角下的離婚影響因素分析。黑龍江社會科學,1,146-148。 216
    孔祥明 (1999)。婆媳過招?哪樁?: 婆婆, 媳婦與兒子(丈夫) 三角關係的探討。應用心理研究,4,57-96。
    孔祥明 (2006年11月)。台灣「家庭社會學」研究之回顧與展望。「走出典範:五十年的台灣社會學: 2006 年台灣社會學年會暨國科會專題研究成果發表會」發表之論文,台中:東海大學社會科學院。
    王佳煌、潘中道 (譯) (2002)。當代社會研究法-質化與量化途徑 (原作者:W. Lawrence Neuman)。台北:學富文化。(原著出版年:2000)
    王俊豪 (2008)。台灣初婚夫妻的居住安排。人口學刊,37,45-85。
    田安里、黃財尉、楊素圓 (2006)。雙薪家庭夫妻間有一樣的婚姻滿意度嗎?--從夫妻性別角色態度與角色承諾的觀點研究。國立台北教育大學學報,19,255-280。
    田芳華 主編 (2000)。學術調查研究資料庫資料使用手冊。台北市 : 中研院調查研究工作室。
    伊慶春(2001)。華人家庭夫妻權力的比較研究。載於喬健、李沛良、馬戎主編,二十一世紀的中國社會學與人類學。高雄:麗文。
    伊慶春、高淑貴 (1986)。有關已婚婦女就業之性別角色態度。中央研究院三民主義研究所專刊第70卷。
    伊慶春、章英華 (2008)。父系家庭的持續與變遷:台灣的家庭社會學研究,1960-2000。載於謝國雄(主編),群學爭鳴:台灣社會學發展史(23-73頁)。台北:群學出版社。
    伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲 (1992)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。
    伊慶春、蔡瑤玲(1989)。台北地區夫妻權力的分析:以家庭決策為例。中央研究院三民主義研所叢刊,25,115-151。
    吉國秀(2007)。婚姻支付的變遷與姻親秩序的謀劃-遼寧Q鎮的個案研究。社會學研究,1,114-136。
    朱瑞玲、章英華 (2001年7月)。 華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動:文化及社會的變遷效果。「華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」發表之論文,台北:中央研究院。
    朱瑞玲、劉蓉果、王為蒨 (2005)。家庭倫理與婚姻衝突。論文發表於「2005年『華人家庭動態資料庫』學術研討會」,中央研究院經濟研究所,台北南港,12月2-3日。
    利翠珊 (2002)。婆媳與母女:不同世代女性家庭經驗的觀點差異。女學學誌-婦女與性別研究,13,179-218。
    利翠珊 (2005)。婚姻關係及其調適。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(331-362頁)。台北:遠流。
    利翠珊 (2007)。華人已婚女性代間矛盾情感之特色與測量。中華心理衛生學刊,20,357-386。
    利翠珊、陳富美 (2002,11月)。配偶親職角色的支持與分工對華人夫妻恩情的影響。「泛華心理學研究的切磋與交流-第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會」發表之論文,台北:中央研究院。
    利翠珊、陳富美 (2004)。配偶親職角色的支持與分工對夫妻恩情的影響。本土心理學研究,21,49-83。
    吳明燁、伊慶春(2003)。婚姻其實不只是婚姻:家庭因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響。人口學刊,26,71-95。
    吳嘉瑜 (2004)。子代夫妻對偶代間關係經驗:「他」的矛盾?「她」的矛盾?中華輔導學報,15,123-149。
    吳嘉瑜、趙淑珠 (2004)。以多重觀點建構代間矛盾經驗之新嘗試。中華心理衛生學刊,17,75-111。
    呂玉瑕、伊慶春 (2005)。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較。台灣社會學,10,41-92。
    李青芬、唐先梅 (2008a)。家務工作研究近30年之回顧。國立空中大學生活科學學報,12(4)77-109。
    李青芬、唐先梅 (2008年7月)。幫半子,伴子!談妻方父母托育提供對夫妻婚姻的影響。「2008年擇偶、婚姻與社會變遷學術研討會」發表之論文,台北:國立台北教育大學。
    李青芬、唐先梅 (2009年11月)。幸福的助力或阻力?台灣城鄉娘家父母托育協助對夫妻婚姻的影響。「兩岸社會政經文化國際學術研討會」發表之論文,金門縣:金門縣社區大學。
    李青芬、唐先梅 (2013)。編織翁婿的生命花布:翁婿關係發展之初探。應用心理研究,57,219-250。
    李美華、孔祥明、林嘉娟、王婷玉 (譯) (2005)。社會科學研究方法(第9版) (原作者:E. Babbie)。台北:時英。(原著出版年:1998)
    沈瓊桃 (2002)。一樣婚姻兩樣情:檢視婚姻中的性別差異。社會政策與社會工作學刊,6(1),159-183。
    周玉慧、 謝雨生 (2009)。夫妻間支持授受及其影響。中華心理學刊,51(2),215-234。
    周玉慧、黃宗堅、謝雨生 (2004)。家人關係中社會支持獲取策略之動用及其影響。中華心理學刊,46(4),329 -347。
    周麗端(2001)。夫妻的家庭價值觀與婚姻滿意度之研究。生活科學學報,7,133-156。
    林如萍 (2005)。家庭資源管理的發展。載於林如萍、周麗端、徐達光、柯澍馨、唐先梅 (主編),家庭資源與管理(4頁)。台北縣:國立空中大學。
    林秀慧 (2004)。國內傳碩士論文之婚姻滿意度研究的概況分析-以民70-92 年為例。家政教育學報,6,77-116。
    林津如 (2007)。父系家庭與女性差異認同:中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。台灣社會研究,68,1-73。
    林松齡 (1997)。台灣中部地區已婚婦女之婚姻品質的決定因素-一個社會學理論的解釋。台大社會學刊,25,179-220。
    林芳玫、張晉芬(1999)。性別,頁251-267 收錄於王振寰、瞿海源主編,社會學與台灣社會。台北:巨流。
    唐文慧、李惠茹(2004)。性別的多數、權力的少數-以台南市國中女教師的職業選擇與晉遷為例。師大學報(人文與社會類),49,29-52。
    唐先梅 (1996)。家務分工理論模型—從層級觀點的思索。空大生活科學學報,2,209-235。
    唐先梅 (1999)。從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工。應用心理研究,4,131-173。
    唐先梅 (2001a)。家庭決策與家事分工。載於黃迺毓,林如萍,唐先梅,陳芳茹(主編),家庭概論(160-163頁)。台北:國立空中大學。
    唐先梅 (2001b)。雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素。空大生活科學學報,7,105-132。
    唐先梅 (2005)。家庭資源管理的概念與原則。載於林如萍、周麗端、徐達光、柯澍馨、唐先梅 (主編),家庭資源與管理(53頁)。台北縣:國立空中大學。
    唐先梅 (2011)。臺灣家務工作之探析-意涵、變遷、理論與分工。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    唐先梅 (2012)。銀髮族家庭的家人互動。載於張德聰 林振春 王淑俐 周麗端 唐先梅(主編),銀髮族生活規劃 (173頁)。台北縣:國立空中大學。
    徐安琪 (2000)。婚姻關係評價:性別差異及其原因探討。中國社會科學季刊,29,175-187。
    晏涵文 (2002)。兩性關係與性教育。台北縣:國立空中大學。
    馬國勳 (2010)。夫家妻家誰較親:比較已婚子女和雙方家長之同住安排及聯絡頻率。研究台灣,6,47 -84 107
    高旭繁、陸洛 (2006)。夫妻傳統性/現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究,25,47-100。
    高淑貴 、林如萍 (1998)。農村老人與成年子女之代間交換。農業推廣學報,15,77 - 105。
    張志堯 (2003)。雙薪家庭中階級與夫妻權力關係之探討。應用心理研究,17,187-221。
    張思嘉 (1999)。從系統觀點看婚姻適應的研究。應用心理研究,2,111-123 。
    張思嘉 (2001)。婚姻早期的適應過程:新婚夫妻的質性研究。本土心理學研究,16,91-133。
    張思嘉 (2006)。家庭與婚姻:台灣心理學研究的現況與趨勢。本土心理學研究,26,3-34。
    張思嘉 (2009)。婚前關係與婚後適應:一個長期性的研究。中華心理學刊,51(1),1-26。
    張思嘉、周玉慧、黃宗堅 (2008)。新婚夫妻的婚姻適應:概念測量與模式檢驗。中華心理學刊,50(4),425-446。
    張春興 (1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。
    張燕滿 (2009)。以家庭生態學的觀點探討夫妻的婚姻問題。諮商與輔導,283,12-16。
    陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕 (2000)。婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例。台灣社會學刊,24, 1-58。
    陳秉璋 (1985)。社會學理論。台北:三民。
    陳建良 (2004)。夫妻間資源分派決策機制的形成及其對子女管教與教育的影響。應用心理研究,24,65-93。
    陳若琳 (2010)。親子關係。載於李青松、林歐貴英、陳若琳、潘榮吉(主編),老人與家庭 (121-150頁)。台北縣:國立空中大學。
    陳素秋 (譯) (2004)。性之性別(原著者:P. Schwartz, & V. Rutter)。台北:韋伯。(原著出版年:1998)
    陳皎眉(1989)。婦女的日常生活需求、支持系統與家庭及婚姻滿意度的關係。載於伊慶春、朱瑞玲主編,台灣社會現象的分析,25(頁153-179)。台北市:中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊。
    陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如(2002)。社會心理學。台北:國立空中大學。
    陸洛(1995)。社會支持之潛在的負向作用。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC83-0301-H037-008),未出版。
    陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。人文及社會科學,8,(1),115-137。
    陸洛、陳欣宏 (2002)。台灣變遷社會中老人的家庭角色調適及代間關係之初探。應用心理研究,14,221-249。
    章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊 (2012)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第六期第二次調查計畫執行報告。台灣社會變遷基本調查資料庫全球資訊網。http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/home.php。
    傅仰止、張晉芬 (2007)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第五期第二次調查計畫執行報告。台灣社會變遷基本調查資料庫全球資訊網。http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/home.php。
    黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生(2004)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式:以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究,21,3-48。
    黃馨慧(2000)。台灣成年男性婚姻觀及其家務參與之研究。中華家政學刊,29,59-80。
    楊國樞 (1992年12月)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭:運作特徵、變遷方向及適應問題。「家庭與心理衛生國際研討會」發表之論文,台北:中國心理衛生協會。
    楊國樞 (1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。載於楊國樞、余安邦(主編),中國人的心理與行為:理念與方法篇(一九九二) (87-142頁)。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
    楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1992)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。楊國樞、黃光國(編):中國人的心理與行為(一九八九)。台北:桂冠。
    葉光輝 (2009)。台灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究, 31,97-141。
    葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂 (2006)。華人的家庭文化特徵:以台灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究,25,141-198。
    葉明華、楊國樞 (1997)。中國人的家族主義:概念分析與實徵衡鑑。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,83,169-225。
    葉肅科(2011)。性別教育:超越兩性關係。台北:洪葉。
    葉茹萍 (2011)。非典型家庭家務分工:一個有娘家支持系統的遠距家庭實錄。家庭教育雙月刊,31,20-29。
    董秀珠、楊連謙 (2004)。丈夫經濟弱勢夫妻權力歷程的性別文化影響。中華心理衛生學刊,17,25-56。
    董秀珠、楊連謙、林萬億 (2004)。當丈夫不再為經濟的靠山時:夫妻間的權力與運作過程。應用心理研究,24,147-182。
    賈浩妃、陳秉華(1999)。祖父母協助托育孫子女的決定過程-運用家族治療中結構學派的分析。教育心理學報,31(1),109-137。
    劉秀娟 (1998)。兩性關係與教育。台北市:揚智文化。
    劉虹君、黃郁婷 (2008)。基層員警的工作和家庭衝突與婚姻滿意度之研究。華岡農科學報,22,107-126。
    劉惠琴 (1996年11月)。女性主義觀點看夫妻衝突與影響歷程。「健康的婚姻觀研討會」發表之論文,台北:國立政治大學。
    蔡文輝 (1989)。社會學理論(六版)。台北:三民。
    蔡文輝 (2002)。社會學 (五版三刷)。台北:三民。
    盧惠芬 (2005年12月)。家庭型態與婚姻權力。「2005年華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」發表之論文,台北:中央研究院經濟所。
    蕭文龍 (2009)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書--SPSS+LISREL(第二版)。台北:碁峰資訊。
    蕭英玲 (2012)。新婚前三年夫妻婚姻滿意度的變化與其影響因素。中華心理學刊,54(4),433-450。
    蕭英玲、黃芳銘 (2010)。婚姻滿意度與憂鬱傾向:貫時性對偶分析。中華心理學刊,52(4),377-396。
    賴淑娟 (2011)。台海兩地華人家庭圖像的變奏-評Understanding Chinese Family: A Comparative Study of Taiwan and Southeast China。台灣社會學,21,199-210。
    賴爾柔、黃馨慧 (1996)。已婚男性參與家務分工之研究。婦女與兩性研究通訊,41,10-18。
    謝雨生、周玉慧 (2012)。每下愈況或漸入佳境?:夫妻婚姻品質之變化與相互影響性。台灣社會學,23,101-154。
    謝美娥 (2000)。成年子女照顧者照顧失能父母之影響與因應經驗。台大社會工作學刊 , 3 , 1-36 。
    謝美娥 (2001)。成年子女與照顧失能老年父母之影響-一個量化的探討並以台北市為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊,5,57-112。
    簡文吟 (2008)。台灣婦女家庭地位研究-多維度家庭地位指標下的夫妻配對分析。國立台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。
    簡文吟、伊慶春 (2003年7月)。夫妻家庭價值觀共識與婚姻滿意度:以台灣、上海、香港夫妻資料為例。「夫妻對偶互動關係研究學術研討會」發表之論文,台北市:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
    藍采風 (1996)。婚姻與家庭。台北:幼獅。
    龐憶華 (2005)。婚姻故事初探。亞洲輔導學報,11,101–125。
    龔繼紅、鐘漲寶、孫劍 (2009)。教育背景對農村婦女家庭權力行為和家庭地位滿意度的影響研究-以荊門市某村為樣本的典型調查為例。浙江學刊,2,181 -186。

    貳、英文部份
    Acitelli, L. K., & Antonucci, T. C. (1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 688-698.
    Adams, B. N., & Robert K. M. (1986). The family: a sociological interpretation. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Allen, C. M., & Straus, M. A. (1984). Final Say Measures of Marital Power: Theoretical Critique and Empirical Findings from Five Studies in the United States and India. Journal of Contemporary Family Studies, 15(3), 329-344.
    Ames, B. D., Brosi, W. A., & Damiano-Teixeira, K. M. (2006). I'm Just Glad My Three Jobs Could Be during the Day: Women and Work in a Rural Community. Family Relations, 55, 119-131.
    Antonucci T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 519–527.
    Beaton, J. M., Norris, J. E., & Pratt, M. W. (2003). Unresolved Issues in Adult Children's Marital Relationships Involving Intergenerational Problems. Family Relations, 52, 143-153.
    Bengtson, V. (2001). Beyond nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1-16.
    Bernard, J. (1981). The good-provider role. American Psychologist, 36(1), 1-12.
    Bird, C. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32-45.
    Blanton, H., Stuart, A. E., & Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2001). An introduction to deviance-regulation theory: The effect of behavioral norms on message framing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 848-858.
    Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. NewYork: The Free Press.
    Bolak, H. C. (1995). Towards a conceptualization of marital power dynamics: Women breadwinners and working-class households in Turkey. In S. Tekeli (Ed.), Women in modern Turkish society: A reader (pp. 173–198). London; Atlantic Heights, NJ: Zed Books.
    Botwin, M. D., Buss , D. M., & Shackel ford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction, Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136.
    Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964-980.
    Branje, S. J. T., Van Aken, M. A. G., & Van Lieshout, C. F. M. (2002). Relational support in families with adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 351-362.
    Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
    Broderick, C. (1971). Beyond the five conceptual frameworks: A decade of development in family theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 139-159.
    Broman, C. L., Hamilton, V. L., & Hoffman, W. S. (1990). Unemployment and its effects on families: Evidence from a plant closing study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 643-659.
    Brym, R. J., & Lei, J. (2007). Sociology: Your compass for a new world (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadworth/Thomson Learning.
    Bucx, F., Van Wel, F., & Knijn, T. (2012). Life Course Status and Exchanges of Support Between Young Adults and Parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 101–115.
    Burr, W. R. (1973). Theory construction and the sociology of the family. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
    Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health:Lectures on concept development. New York:Behavior Publication.
    Cicirelli, V. G. (1989). Helping relationships on later life: A reexamination. In J. A. Mancini (Ed.), Aging parents and adult children (pp.167-179). Lexington , Mass:Lexington.
    Clarke, E. J., Preston, M., Raksin, J., & Bengtson, V. L. (1999). Types of conflicts and tensions between older parents and adult children. The Gerontologist, 39, 261-270.
    Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin,98 (2), 310-351.
    Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, Gender and Work-Family Time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344-1361.
    Crawford, D. W., Houts , R. M., Huston, T. L., & George, L. J. (2002). Compatibility, leisure, and satis faction in marital relationships, Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 433-449.
    Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. H. (1975). Power in families. New York: Wiley.
    Cromwell, V. L., & Cromwell, R. E. (1978). Perceived Dominance in Decision-Making and Conflict Resolution among Anglo, Black and Chicano Couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 749-759.
    Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2013). Why Study Housework? Cleaning as a Window Into Power in Couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 63-71.
    Dominelli, L., & Gollins, T.(1997). Men, power and caring relationship.
    Sociological Review, 45(3), 396-415.
    Edwards, J. (1969). Familial behavior as social exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 518-526.
    Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41.
    Fowers, B. J. (1990). An interactional approach to standardized marital assessment: A literature review. Family Relations, 39, 368-377.
    Fox, B. (2009). When couples become parents: The creation of gender in the transition to parenthood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751-761.
    Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A Critical review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 818-831.
    Glenn, N. D. (1991). The recent trend in marital success in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 261-270.
    Goldsmith, E. B. (1996). Resource Management for Individual and Families. West Publishing Company.
    Gornick, J., & Meyers, M. (2009). Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (Vol. 6). London: Verso.
    Gray-Little, B. (1982). Marital quality and power process among black couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 633-646.
    Greensten, N. (1996). Husbans’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585-595.
    Hahlweg, K., Markman H. J., Thurmaier, F., Engl, J., & Eckert, V. (1998). Prevention of marital distress: Results of a German prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 543-556.
    Hantrais, L. (1995). Comparative Research Methods . In Department of Sociology, University of Surrey (Eds.), Social Research Update. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU13.html
    Hawkins, J. L. (1968). Association between companionship hostility and marital satistication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 647-650.
    Hesse-Biber, S., & Williamson, J. (1984). Resource Theory and Power in Families: Life Cycle Considerations. Family Process, 23, 261-278.
    Hildingssonab, I., Tingvallc, M., & Rubertssonc, C. (2008). Partner support in the childbearing period—A follow up study. Women and Birth, 21(4), 141-148.
    House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(4), 467-478.
    Jocobson, D. E. (1986). Types and timing of social support. Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 250-264.
    Jory, B. (2003). Family relationships. In J. J. Ponzetti, Jr. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of marriage and family (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1259–1265). New York: Macmillan Reference.
    Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The Longitudinal Course of Marital Quality and Stability: A Review of Theory, Method, and Research. Psychological BuZZetin, 118, 3-34.
    Kingsbury, N. M., & Scanzoni, J. (1989). Process Power and Decision Outcomes among Dual-Career Couples. Journal of Contemporary Family Studies, 20(2), 231-246.
    Klein, D. M., & White, J. M. (1996). Family Theories: An Introduction. CA: Sage Publications.
    Ko, C. F. (2012). Marital Power Relations and Family Life in Transnational Marriages-A Study of Asian-French Couples Residing in France. EurAmerica: A Journal of European and American Studies, 42, 249-279.
    Komter, A. (1991). Gender, power and feminist Theory. In Davis, K., Leijenaar, M. & Oldersma, J. (Eds.), The Gender of Power (pp 42-62). London: Sage.
    Kulik, L. (2009). Explaining the Sense of Family Coherence Among Husbands and Wives: The Israeli Case. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(6), 627-647.
    Lee, E., Spitze, G., & Logan, J. R. (2003). Social support to parents-in-law: The interplay of gender and kin hierarchies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 396-403.
    Lin, J. P., & Yi, C. C. (2008). The structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in Taiwan and Korea: Does Lineage Matter? Paper presented at Unfolding the Nuances of East Asian Families: Sociological Approaches to the Contemporary Dialogue (pp. 79-92), Seoul National University, Korea.
    Lopata, H. Z. (1999). In-laws and the concept of family. Marriage and Family Review, 28, 161-172.
    Loving, T. J., Heffner, K. L., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. B. (2004). Stress Hormone Changes and Marital Conflict: Spouses’Relative Power Makes a Difference. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 595-612.
    Luepton, L. B. (1984). Adolescent sex roles and social change. New York:Columbia University Press.
    Luescher, K., & Pillmer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence : A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the family, 60(2), 413-425.
    Lye. N., & Biblarz, J. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issuess, 14 (2), 157-188.
    Macionis, J. J. (1997) . Sociology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: George Routledge.
    Martin, C. L. (1988). Enhancing children’s satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms. The Physical Educator, 45(4), 196-209.
    Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (1999). The effects of job stressors on marital satis faction in Finnish dual-earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 879-895.
    Mauss, M. (1954). The gift. Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Cohen and West, London.
    McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family Power: The Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 841-854.
    McDonald, G. W. (1981). Structural exchange and marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 825-839.
    Measor, L., & Sikes, P. (1993). Gender and School. New York: Cassell.
    Michael, A. (1970). Wife’s satisfaction with husband’s understanding in parision urban families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 351-359.
    Milkie, M. A. (2011). Social and Cultural Resources for and Constraints on New Mothers' Marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 18-22.
    Mirowsky, J. (1985). Depression and Marital Power: An Equity Model. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 557-592.
    Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. (1984). Intergenerational Support Activities and Well-Being Among the Elderly: A Convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117-130
    Olson, D. H., & McCubbin, H. I. (1983). Families. California: Sage.
    O'Meara, K. A., & Campbell, C. M. (2011). Faculty Sense of Agency in Decisions about Work and Family. Review of Higher Education, 34(3), 447-476.
    Oppenheimer, V. (1977).The Sociology of Women’s Economic Role in the Family. American Sociological Review, 42, 387-406.
    Oropesa, R. S. (1997). Development and marital power in Mexico. Social Forces, 75(4), 1291–1317.
    Perry-Jenkins, M., & Ann, C. C. (1990). Men’s Provider-Role Attitudes: Implication for Household Work and Marital Satisfaction. Jonrnal of Family Issues, 11(2), 136-156.
    Pimentel, E. E. (2000). Just how do I love thee?: Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 32-47.
    Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Lexingtion: O. C. Health and Company.
    Rank, M. R. (1982). Determinants of Conjugal Influence in Wives’ Employment Decision Making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 591-604.
    Rettig, L. D., & Leichtentritt, R. D. (1999). A General Theory for Perceptual Indicators of Family Life Quality. Social Indicators Research, 47(3), 307-342.
    Ridley, A. M. (2004). Religion and gender in Christian, Jewish, and Muslim married couples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, State of Utah.
    Rodman, H. (1967). Marital Power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States: A Cross-National Discussion. Journal of Marriage and Family, 29(2), 320-324.
    Rodman, H. (1972). Marital Power and the Theory of Resources in Cultural Context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 3-78.
    Sabatelli, R. M., & Shehan, C. L. (1993). Exchange and Resource Theories. In P. G. Boss , W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, & W. R. Schumm (Eds.), Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods(pp. 385-417). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The Study of Family Power Structure: A Review 1960-1969. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 539-552.
    Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1976). A Macro- and Micro-examination of Family Power and Love: An Exchange Model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 355-362.
    Santos, J. D., & Levitt, M. J. (2007). Intergenerational Relations with In-Laws in the Context of the Social Convoy: Theoretical and Practical Implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 827-843.
    Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2010). Waiting to Be Asked: Gender, Power, and Relationship Progression Among Cohabiting Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(4), 482–506.
    Scanzoni, J. (1972). Sexual Bargaining: Power Politics in American Marriage. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
    Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social processes and power in families. In W Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary Theories About the Family ( Vol. I, pp.395-316). New York: Free Press.
    Scanzoni, J. H., & Szinovacz, M. (1980). Family Decision-Making: A Development Sex Role Model. Beveerly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Schneewind, K. & Gerhard, A. (2002). Relationship personality, conflict resolution, and marital satis faction in the first 5 years of marriage. Family Relations, 51, 63-71.
    Schumm, W. R., Bollman, S. R., & Jurich, A. P. (1997) Gender and marital satisfaction: a replication using a seven-point item response version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Reports, 81, 1004-1006.
    Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M, Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas marital satisfaction scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 381-387.
    Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5-14.
    Shehan, C. (1984). Wives’ work and psychological wellbeing: An extension of Gove’s social role theory of depression. Sex Roles, 11, 881-899.
    Shehan, C., & Dwyer, J. (1989). Parent-child exchanges in the middle years: Attachment and autonomy in the transition to adulthood. In J. Mancini (Ed.), Parent-child relationships and the life course. Lexington (pp. 99-116), MA: Lexington Book.
    Shu, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Patriarchy, Resources, and Specialization: Marital Decision- Making Power in Urban China. Journal of Family Issues, 34(7), 885-917.
    Smith, S. R., Hamon, R. R., Ingoldsby, B. B., & Miller, J.E. (2009). Exploring Family Theories (pp.9-37, pp. 201-212; New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Smith, T. W., Kim, J., Koch, A., & Park, A. (2005). “Social Science Research and the General Social Surveys. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 56, 68-77.
    Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. NewYork: Academic Press.
    Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 96-110.
    Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well- being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Suitor, J. J. (1991). Marital Quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle. Jonrnal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 221-230.
    Tang, S. M., & Lee, C. F. (2012). Effect of Resources Provided by Family-of-Origin on the Economic Decision Making between Husbands and Wives. Paper presented at the 74 th National Council on Family Relations Annual Conference. Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A..
    Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (1997). Social psychology, 9th Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Thompson, L., & Spanier, G. (1983). The end of marriage and the acceptance of marital termination. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 103-113.
    Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J., (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871.
    Treas, J., & Shampa, M. (2004). Kinkeeping and Caregiving: Contributions of Older People in Immigrant Families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35,105-122.
    Vaillant, C. O., & Vaillant, G. E. (1993). Is the U-curve of marital satisfaction an illusion? A 40-year study of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 230-239.
    Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 33, 101-160.
    Veevers, J. E., & Mitchell, B. A. (1998). Intergenerational exchanges and perceptions of support wjthin “booming kid” family environments. The Intergenerational Journal of Aging & Human Development, 46(2), 91-108.
    Voydanoff, P., & Donnelly, B. W. (1999). The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality. Journal of marriage and the family, 61, 739-751.
    Walker, A. J., & Thompson, L. (1984). Feminism and Family Studies. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 545-570.
    Warner, R. L., Lee, G. R., & Lee, J. (1986). Social organization, spousal resources, and marital power: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48,121-128.
    Westbrook, R. A. (1980). Intrapersonal affective influences on consumer satisfaction with products. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 49-51.
    White, L., & Kim, H. (1987). The family-building process: Childbearing choices by parity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49, 271-280.
    Wilcox, B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321-1345.
    Willigen, M. V., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571-597.
    Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., & Elder, G. H. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055-1072.
    Xu, X., & Lai, S. C. (2004). Gender ideologies, marital roles, and marital quality in Taiwan. Journal of Family Issue, 25(3), 318-355.
    Yount, K. M. (2005). Women’s Family Power and Gender Preference in Minya, Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 410–428.
    Zarit, S., Lee, J., & Kim, K. (2008). Do husbands and wives agree about the help they give to and receive from aging parents? The Gerontologist, 48, 92.
    Zipp, O. F., Prohaska, A., & Bemiller, M. (2004). Wives, Husbands, and Hidden Power in Marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 933-958.
    Zuo, J., & Bian, Y. (2005). Beyond resources and patriarchy: Marital construction of family decision-making. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(4), 601-622.
    Zuo, J. (2009). Rethinking Family Patriarchy and Women's Positions in Presocialist China. Journal of Marriage and Family , 71, 542-557.
    Zvonkovic, A. M., Cynthia J. S., & Leslie D. H. (1994). Influence Strategies Used When Couples Make Work-Family Decision and their Importance for Marital Satisfaction. Family Relations, 43, 182-188.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE