本研究旨在瞭解考生在寫作測驗中寫作表現的情形、影響考生在寫作測驗中寫作表現的因素、排除考生寫作能力的因素後，影響考生在寫作測驗中寫作表現的因素，以瞭解基測寫作命題是否具有公平性，測得學生真正之寫作能力。本研究採用內容分析及統計分析方法，將考生在寫作上的各表現進行分析編碼後，再以統計的方式考驗不同背景變項考生在寫作表現上的差異情形。研究結果發現，相同能力的考生在寫作表現上，不會受到其背景變項上的影響而有所不同，寫作題目具有公平性，但是，相同能力的考生在寫作文體類型表現上，則因性別不同而有明顯差異。最後，針對研究結果提出建議。

The purposes of this study were to (1) better understand the range of writing performances characteristic of Taiwanese junior high school students; (2) analyze the factors influencing their writing performances; and (3) analyze the factors influencing their performance after controlling for writing ability as measured by the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students (BCTEST). Writing samples of Taiwanese junior high school students from the 2007 administration of BCTEST were collected, and analyzed with regression analysis and multinomial modeling. It was found that, after controlling for writing ability, performances differed primarily in terms of writing style. Implications for instruction and suggestions for future research are offered.

(一)中文文獻
仇小屏(2001)。非傳統命題探析。人文及社會學科教學通訊。12(4)，91-130。
仇小屏(2005)。歷屆升大學考試「新型作文」考題之分析與檢討。國文教學，9月號，70-74。
王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯與張淑慧(1999)。教育測驗與評量──教室學習觀點。台北：五南。
吳鐵雄、洪碧霞(1998)。實作評量問與答。測驗與輔導，149，3102-3103。
李名揚(2004)。國中基測 96年起加考作文。台北：聯合報A7版。
李坤崇 (1999)。多元化教學評量。台北：心理出版社。
林志忠(2000)。實作評量與真實評量的運用與反思。國教輔導，40(2)，30-35。
林奕宏、林世華(2004)。國小高年級數學科成就測驗中與性別有關的DIF現象。台東大學教育學報。15(1)，67-96。
林瑞娟(1988)。高中及專科聯考作文應如何命題。國文天地，4(2)，19-21。
邱麗綺(2003)。從傳統到變通：談評量的變遷。教育趨勢報導，3，1-5。
國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會(2007)。96年國民中學學生寫作測驗問與答。2008年4月8日，取自http://www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/documents/97qa.pdf
國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會(2007)。九十五至九十七年國中基本學力測驗性別DIF分析。2009年6月5日，取自http://www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/flying/flying51-60/flying55-5.html
國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會(2007)。九十六年第二次國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗計分結果說明會新聞稿。飛揚， 47。
張麗麗(1999)。檔案評量模式之建構及其實施成效與信、效度之探討：以國小寫作檔案為例(報告編號：NSC 88-2413-H-153-016)。行政院國家科學委員會。
張麗麗(2002)。評量改革的應許之地，虛幻或真實─談實作評量之作業與表現規準。教育研究月刊，93，76-86。
郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。台北：精華。
余民寧(2000)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。台北：心理。
陳文典(1998)。實作評量在學力測驗之應用。測驗與輔導，150，3108-3111。
鄒慧英譯(2003)。測驗與評量─在教學上的應用。台北：洪葉。
陳恆光(2006)。全教會籲暫緩基測作文計分。台北：中央日報。
陳滿銘(1998)。國文教學論叢‧續編。台北：萬卷樓。
陳滿銘(2003)。談命題作文的分項指引。國文教學, 9月號，92-97。
傅秋英(2006)。學生、家長、國中教育人員對國中基本學力測驗 態度及改進意見之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
彭森明(1996)。實作評量理論與實際。教育資料與研究，9，44-48。
曾忠華（1992）。作文命題與批改。台北：國立台灣師範大學中等教育輔導委員會。
歐滄和(1992)。教育測驗與評量。台北：心理。
盧雪梅 (1998) ：實作評量的應許、難題與挑戰。教育資料與研究，20，1-5 。
盧雪梅、毛國楠(2008)。國中基本學力測驗數學科之性別差異與差別試題功能(DIF)分析。教育實踐與研究，21(2)，95-126。
謝奇懿(2007)。論國中基本學力測驗寫作測驗之評分方式。國文天地，22(12)，21-27。
蘇義翔(1998)。實作評量的理論與啟示。測驗與輔導，149，3099-3102。
(二)英文文獻
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and its implication (2nd). NY: Freeman and Company.
Archbald, D. A. (1991). Authentic assessment: Principles, practices, and I ssues. School Psychology Quarterly, 6(4),279-293.
Breland, H., Lee, Y.-W., Najarian, M., & Muraki, E. (2004). An Analysis of TOEFL CBT Writing Prompt Difficulty and Comparability for Different Gender Groups. Research Reports. Report 76. RR-04-05: Educational Testing Service. Rosedale Road Mailstop 19R, Princeton.
Chapman, C. (1990). Authentic writing assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(7).
Chen, E., Niemi, D., Wang, J., Wang, H., & Mirocha, J. (2007). Examining the Generalizability of Direct Writing Assessment Tasks. CSE Report 718.
Donald E. Powers and Mary E. Fowles. (1999). Test-Takers' Judgments of Essay Prompts: Perceptions and Performance. Educational Assessment, 6(1), 3-22.
Ebel, Robert L. & Frisbie, David A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Elbow, p. (1973). Writing without teachers. NY: Oxford University Press.
Flower, l., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
Giselle, O. M. (2002). Becoming a better teacher: Eight innovations that work. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goldberg, Gail Lynne; Roswell, Barbara Sherr.(2001) Are Multiple Measures Meaningful?: Lessons From a Statewide Performance Assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(2), 125-150
Graves, D. H. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth. NH: Heinemann.
Gredler, M. (1999). Classroom assessment and learning. New York: Addison Wesley
Hee-Kyung Lee(2008). The relationship between writer’s perceptions and their performance on a field-specific writing test. Assessing Writing, 13, 93-110.
Heidi Goodrich Andrade (1997). Understanding Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4).
Shepard, L. A. 1982. Definition of bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (9-29). Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dorans, N. J., and P. W. Holland. 1993. DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization. In P. W. Holland and H. Wainer (Eds.).Differential Item Functioning (35-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Herman, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L.(1990). Issues in developing alternative assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Hudson; Lane& Mercer (2005) . Writing prompts: the role of various priming conditions on the compositional fluency of developing writers. Reading and Writing. 18, 473–495.
Jucks, R. S.-L., Petra; Bromme, Rainer. (2007). Supporting experts' written knowledge communication through reflective prompts on the use of specialist concepts. Journal of Psychology, 215(4), 237-247.
Keith Oatley & Maja Djikic (2008). Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12, 9-27.
Keith Oatley & Maja Djikic(2008)Writing as Thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12, 9-27.
Klein, S. P., Stecher, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., McCaffrey, D., Ormseth, T., Bell, R. M., Comfort, K., Othman, A. R. (1998). Analytic versus holistic scoring performance task. Applied Measurement in Education, 11(2), 121-137.
Larsen, S. C. (1987). Assessing the writing abilities and instructional needs of students. Texas: Iudustrial Oaks Boulevard.
Legum, S. E. & Krashen, S. D. (1972). Conceptual framework for design of a composition program. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 108239.
Longman.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Mayo& Goodrich (2002). Staffing for Results: A Guide to Working Smarter. American Library Association.
Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25)
Miller, M. D., & Crocker, L. (1990). Validation methods for direct writing assessment. Applied Measurementin Education, 3, 12.
Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Allyn and Bacon.
Powers, D. E., & Fowles, M. E. (1999). Test-takers’ judgments of essay prompts: Perceptions and performance. Educational Assessment, 6(1), 3–22.
Richard Menary (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29, 621–632.
Robert J. Mislevy & Russell G. Almond & Janice F. Lukas(2004). A Brief Introduction to Evidence-Centered Design. National Center for Research on Evaluation,Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE)Graduate School of Education & Information Studies niversity of California, Los Angeles.
Rohman, D. G. (1965). Prewriting, the stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16, 106-112.
Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1992). Imoroving written communication through minimal feedback. Language and Cognitive Processes 7, 1-22.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitcomb. R. (1999). Writing Rubrics for the Music Classroom. Music Educators Journal, 85(6), 26-32.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, , Research & Evaluation, 2(2).