研究生: |
蔣龍杰 Lung-chieh CHIANG |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
網路教學平台功能評鑑指標之發展與應用:以資策會龍門課站為例 Development and Application of the Indicators for Assessing Learning Management system of Web-based Instruction-A Case Study of the Institute for Information Industry‘s Good2U |
指導教授: |
李隆盛
Lee, Lung-Sheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 90 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 120 |
中文關鍵詞: | 網路教學 、平台功能 、評鑑指標 |
英文關鍵詞: | web-based instruction, learning management system, assessment indicators |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:182 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
網路教學日益普及,不僅擴展自我學習的管道,同時觸角也深及公私
部門、各行各業中。然而,許多教學網站重視課程內容的發展與設計,
但卻忽略了平台功能的重要性,以致太簡陋或難用,影響網路教學效
果。有鑑於此,本研究的目的在:(1)發展評鑑網路教學平台功能之
指標與項目;(2)應用評鑑指標於資策會「龍門課站」的平台功能評
鑑;(3)歸納研究結果,提出結論與建議,作為網路教學平台功能評
鑑及進行後續研究之參考。本研究共寄發750份網路問卷,有效問卷
回收率為58.6﹪。本研究之結論為:(1)網路教學平台功能之評鑑
指標,可分為精確性、效用性、互動性、支援性、豐富性等五大層面;
(2)前述五大層面可細分為52項目;(3)資策會龍門課站已有之
42項平台功能重要程度高;但其中五項品質偏低;(4)資策會龍門
課站宜多增加10項平台功能;(5)平台功能之重要性因使用者性別
不同以致有差異者共有11項、平台功能之重要性因使用者工作地點不
同以致有差異者共有七項、平台功能之重要性因使用者學歷不同以致
有差異者共有15項。
Armed with the space and time feasibility, web-based instrucation is a easy way for adult learners. The purposes of this study were to develop and applicate the indicators for assessing learning management system on the case study of institute for industry information’s good2u. A planed assessment indicators were firstly drafted from literature analysis and expert interview, and then a questopmmaire was mailed by E-mail to 517 members of good2U. Finally, 303 valid questionnaires were obtained and led to the return rate 58.6 ﹪. The following conclusions were made:(1) Five learning management system assessment indicators were:Accuracy indicator、utility indicator、abundance indicator、interaction indicator、assisstance indicator. (2) 52 items of learning management system of web-based instruction were developed in 5 assessment indicators. (3) There are 43 items of learning management system in Good2U. 42 of them, the importance are above average;5 of them, the quality are below average. (4) Good2U had better equip 10 more items of learning management system . (5) The difference of importance of learning management system , 11 items of learning management system were affected by gender、15 affected by education、7 affected by work locatoion.
壹、中文部分
丁惠民(2001)。線上訓練的執行步驟與管理方針。電子化企業-經理人
報告,19,頁24-30。
王保進(2002)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究-第三版。台北:心理出版
社。
林瓊如(2000)。網路學習環境中的學習助理之設計與應用研究。台
南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
林姿妙(2001)。兒童學習網站品質評鑑準則之發展研究。台南師範學
院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
何祖鳳、陳俊榮和陳銘欽(1998)。網路教學系統評估準則之研究。遠距
教學,7,頁20-29。
李隆盛(1993)。國中工藝/科技教育評鑑模式之研究。中華民國工藝教
育學會。
林奇賢(1998)。網路學習環境的設計與應用。資訊與教育雜誌,67,頁
34-50。
吳俞民(1999)。網路教學技術應用分析。國立屏東科技大學資訊管理所
碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
林奇賢和陳滄鉉(2000)。網路主題探索式課程與應用環境的設計。亞太
成人教育,1(1),頁1-23。
洪明洲(1999)。網路教學課程設計對學習成效的影響研究。2001年10月
1日,取自http://140.112.110.130/education/f9.asp。
洪明洲(2000)。網路教學。華彩軟體。
莊智明和張基成(1998),科技化企業訓練新趨勢下的網路化訓練
(WBT)-網際網路與全球資訊網在企業教育訓練上的應用。遠距教育,
8,頁12-18。
唐宣蔚和張基成(2001)。一個架構於全球資訊網上的知識分散式網
路學習社群。遠距教學,13-14,頁18-36。
曹汝民(2001)。非同步網路教學網站評鑑指標發展之研究。國立台
北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,,未出版,台北。
教育部電子計算中心(民88)。專科以上學校開辦遠距教學作業要點附件
(一非同步(網路)遠距教學需求規格。台北:教育部。
張鈿富(1999)。教育政策與行政-指標發展與應用。台北市:師大書
苑。
郭生玉(1999)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華書局。
陳年興(1999)。網路教學之教材與教學設計。教育部學術研究資訊服
務-網路應用暨套裝軟體研討會。台北:教育部電子計算中心。
辜輝趁(2001)。企業e化-知識管理策略。台北縣:知行文化事業股
份有限公司。
黃貝玲(2001)。從線上學習的發展看企業線上訓練。電子化企業-經理
人報告,19,頁12-23。
黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑,頁13。
趙美聲和陳姚真(1999)。遠距教育:系統觀。台北市:松崗。
壽大衛(2001)。資訊網路教學。師大書苑。
廖肇弘(2001)。建置有效的線上學習系統。管理雜誌,321,頁112-
115。
劉毓民(2001)。IBM---以兼顧虛擬與實體的電子化學習提供經理人一個
持續學習的環境。電子化企業-經理人報告,19,頁58-62。
羅英豪(2000)。國民中學校長辦學績效評鑑指標之研究。國立台灣師範
大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
毆陽誾(2000)。網站品質評鑑之初探。初等教育學報,13,頁219-
238。
貳、英文部分
Aronen, R., & Dierssen, G. (2001). Improving equipment
reliability through e-learning. Hydrocarbon Processing, 80
(9), 47.
Alastair S. (1997). Criteria for Evaluation of Internet
Information Resources. Retrieved October 10, 2002, from
http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/index.htm
Branch, R. & Kim, D. & Koenecke, L. (2000). Online Educational
Materials for Use in Instruction. Teacher Librarian, 28(1),
21.
Boisvert, L. (2000). Web-Based Learning. Information Systems
Management, 17(1), 35.
Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S., & Hurd, S. (1999). Web-Based
Learning Environments Guided by Principles of Good Teaching Practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30 (3), 248.
Chapnick, S. (2000). E-learning Readiness Assessment Tool. Research Dog . Retrieved September 30,2001, from
www.deakinprime.com/dp/intelligence/pdf/elearning.pdf
Cisco System(2001). Model of an e-learning solution
architecture for the enterprise. Retrieved October 10, 2001,
from
www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/elearning/implement
/solu tion_architecture_wp.pdf .
2001 e-learning user survey. E-Learning Magazine. Retrieved
September 30, 2001, from http://www.elearningmag.com.
Criteria and Standards Used in Evaluationi Web-based
Instrucation and Delivery Guidelines. Electronic Learning
Institute. Retrived September 30, 2001 from
http://www.electroniclearning.edu/about.html
Criteria for Evaluating School-Based Distance Education
Programs.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved Sep.
30, 2001, from http://www.ncrel.org/tandl/disted.htm.
Everhart N.(1996).Web Page Evaluation Worksheet. Retrieved
September. 30, 2001, from
http://www.duke.edu/~del/evaluate.html
Khan, B. H. (2001). web-based instruction. New Jersey:
Educational Technology Publications.
Gregory, M. S.(2000). Identification and Evaluation of Elements
needed for a County Extension Website. Published doctoral
dissertation, Collage of Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma.
Howell, D. (2001). Elements of effective e-learning. College
Teaching, 49(3) , p87.
Harold, H. (1997). Evaluating Web-based Instruction Design.
Retrieved September. 30, 2001, from
http://www.scis.nova.edu/~henkeh/story1.htm
Jay, A. (1998). A Trainer’s Guide to Web-Based Instruction .
American Society for Training & Development (ASTD).
Janet E. A., & Marsha A. T. (1999). Web Wisdom-How to Evaluate
and Create Information Quality on the Web. Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Kearsley, G. (1997). A Web Site for Theories of Learning and
Instruction. In Khan, B. H., (Ed.). Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey. p271.
Loh, C. S. (2001). Learning Tools for Knowledge Nomads : Using
Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) in Web-based learning
Environments. Educational Technology, 41(6), p5-14.
Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., & Lahav, O., & Oren, A. (2001). Web-
Based Learning Environments: Current Pedagogical and
Technological State. Journal of Research on Computing in
Education, 33 (1), p55.
Maurer, M. M., & Davidson, G. (1998). Leadership in
instructional Technology. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Nuttall, D. L. (1989). The functions and limitations of
international educational indicators. Paper prepared for the
OECD/CERI INES Project, Paris.
Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning : making connections
across virtual space and time. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning .Strategies for delivering
knowledge in the digital age。U.S.:A Division of McGraw
Hill Company。
Ritchie, D. C., & Hoffman B. (1996). Instruction and the
Internet. San Diego State University. Retrieved September 30,
2001, from
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/clrit/learningtree/DCD/WWWInstrdesign/
Teh, G. P. L.(1999). Assessing student perceptions of Internet-
based online learning environments. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 26 (4), p397.
William ,H., (2000). Designing Web-Based Training . New York:
John Wiley & Sons.
Equity Research. WRHAMBERCHT+CO(2000).Retrieved September 20,
2001, from
http://www.adsl.com/PressRoom/Q1newsletter_2001.pdf