本研究目的為探討職前教師有關潮汐現象之迷思概念，以及不同學科背景與學系的職前教師對潮汐現象的理解情形。共有三所國立大學241位職前教師參與研究。研究採問卷調查法，並施以訪談。研究工具為自行開發之「國中職前教師潮汐概念問卷」，經三位專家審查修正工具，而重測信度為.77。資料除做描述性統計外，還有變異數分析，並針對問卷特定選項訪談職前教師。研究發現職前教師的潮汐迷思概念可分為以下三類：（1）引潮力：背對月球之地表海水凸出是因為月球萬有引力或地球自轉向心力的影響；（2）乾潮與滿潮：背對月球與太陽的地表海水會發生乾潮現象及太陽與月球需在地球的同一端才會發生滿潮；（3）影響潮汐大小與時間之因素：海水面降到最低者稱小潮及大潮的發生原因是地球位於近日點且月球位於近地點上。在潮汐現象的瞭解上，修習過海洋學、海洋學概論或物理海洋學任一科目的職前教師顯著優於未修習過這些科目的職前教師（p＜.04）。地球科學系的職前教師顯著優於其他各學系的職前教師（p＜.04）。

Investigated were the misconceptions of tide of perservice teachers with different science background and science majors. There were 241 perservice teachers from three national universities involved. Survey and interview methods were adopted. 「The Test of Tide for Perservice Teachers of Jounior High School」 was developed by the author. The tool had been evaluated by three experts. The test-retest reliability was .77. Data was analized through descriptive statistic and ANOVA. Some preservice teachers were interviewed for specified items. The results showed there were three type of misconceptions about tide held by preservice teachers as follows：（1）tide-generating force：the gravitation from the moon or centripetal force from the earth rotation makes the sea level higher on the surface of the earth which is not facing the moon；（2）low tide and high tide：the sea level on the surface of the earth which is not facing the moon and the Sun was low tide and when the moon and the Sun were the same direction, the sea level on the surface of the earth was high tide；（3）the factors affected the size and the time of tide：the sea level on the surface of the earth was the lowest called neap tide and when the earth was at perihelion and the moon was at perigee, the sea level on the surface of the earth called spring tide. Preservice teachers who had studyed one of oceanography、the introduction of oceanography or physical oceanography understood tide sigificantly better than those who did not have the above courses（p＜.04）. Preservice teachers majored in earth science understood tide significantly better than other majors（p＜.04）。

<中文部分>
九年一貫課程綱要（2003）。
中小學教師登記及檢定辦法（1987）。
牛頓出版社（2002）。自然與生活科技一上。台北：牛頓。
毛松霖（1998）。地球科學迷思概念與概念改變之教學研究。國立台灣師
範大學主辦之「國民中學學生概念學習」研討會論文集（頁117-
126），台北。
王美芬（1992）。我國五、六年級學生有關月亮錯誤概念的診斷及補救教
學策略的應用。台北市立師院學報，23，357-380。
王保進（2002）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北：心理。
王貴春、黃萬居（1999）。師院學生對氧化還圓之迷思概念研究。科學教
育研究與發展，15，19-38。
李田英（2000）。由設計科學課程的理論談本次課程改革的一些問題。科
學教育，231，28-34。
吳慧珍（2000）。探討學生透過網際網路進行合作學習對其科學過程技能
的影響。國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台
北。
周俊謀（譯）（1976）。David, A. R.著。普通海洋學。台北：徐氏基金
會。
林陳涌（2000）。九年一貫課程發展模式與內容。科學教育，231，35-
42。
紀恭謙（主編）（2002）。自然與生活科技一上。台北：仁林文化。
唐山（譯）（1978）。Peter, K. W.著。海洋學。台北：台灣開明。
高級中等以下及幼稚園師資資格檢定及教育實習辦法第七條修正條文
（2001）
師資培育法（1994）。
教育部（1985）。國民中學課程標準修訂版。台北：作者。
教育部（1994）。國民中學課程標準。台北：作者。
陳文典（2001）。課程變革對教學及學習模式的衝擊及其可能的回應。科
學教育，244，48-51。
國立編譯館（1994）：國民中學地球科學教科書上冊。台北：作者。
國民中小學九年一貫課程各領域教科圖書審查規範及編輯指引（1999）。
國民教育九年一貫課程總綱（民87）
郭重吉（1990）。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學
報，1，頁279-319。
郭重吉（2000）。從數理課程改革的趨勢談師資培育的因應之道。科學教
育，231，83-88。
許健將、郭重吉、李成康（1992）。利用二段式測驗探查高三學生有關共
價鍵及分子結構之迷思概念。彰師大科學教育，3，175-197。
張平（譯）（1974）。也滿隆治著。海洋。台北：台灣商務。
張良誠（2002）。國小中高年級地心引力迷思概念之探討。國立嘉義大學
國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台灣嘉義。
張德銳（1999）。從九年一貫課程改革談師資培育機構因應策略。教育研
究資訊，7（1），33-38。
張德銳（2000）。師資培育與教師評鑑。台北：師大書苑。
曾憲政（1999）。九年一貫課程需要完善的配套措施。教育研究資訊，7
（1），39-45。
曾麗英（1997）。台北都會區本科系與非本科系畢業的國中地球科學教師
之學科知識及解題能力的比較。國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩
士論文，未出版，台北。
董正玲、郭重吉（1992）。利用晤談方式探究國小兒童運動與力概念的另
有架構。彰師科學教育，3，93-121。
楊深坑（1997）。當代師資培育理論的發展。載於黃政傑（主編），當代
師資培育的發展與趨勢。台北：漢文。
劉文俊（1997）。認識台灣的潮汐—從高中地理課本抬起。科學月刊，28
（6），514-518。
劉文俊（1999）。台灣的潮汐。台北：萬森興業。
劉廣定（2000）。國中自然科課程改革之另向思考。科學教育，231，12-
16。
廖榮文（1972）。海洋學概論。台北：徐氏基金會。
鄭明長（1998）。教師知識與教師談話。國教學報，10，217-248。
歐用生（1999）。從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資
訊，7（1），22-32。
歐用生（2000）。課程統整實施的檢討。國民教育，40（5），2-10。
蕭速農（1995）。國小專家教師與初任教師的數學學科知識之分析與比
較。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集，1，183-204。
簡紅珠（1994）。師範生學科與學科教學的知識基礎。載於中華民國師範
教育學會，師範教育多元化與師資素質（1-15）。。台北：師大書
苑。
饒見維（1996）。教師的專業發展內涵。載於饒見維，教師專業發展—理
論與實務（149-208）。台北：師大書苑。
蘇育任（1999）。職前及在職國民小學教師的天氣概念及其相關迷思概念
之探究。科學教育學刊，7（2），157-176。
蘇育任（2000）。自然科教師因應九年一貫課程所需之基本能力。國教輔
導，40（1），2-9。
<英文部分>
Abimbola, I. O.（1988）.The problem of terminology in the study
of student conceptions in science. Science Education, 72
（2）, 175-184.
Abimbola, I. O., & Baba, S.（1996）.Misconceptions and
alternative conceptions in science textbook：The role of
teachers as filters. American Biology Teacher, 58（1）, 14-19.
Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. （1997）.Beginning science
teacher cognition and its origins in preservice secondary
science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 34（6）, 471-481.
Aron, R. H.、Francek, M. A.、Nelson, B. D., & Bisard, W. J.
（1994）.Atmospheric misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 61
（1）, 30-33.
Barrass, R（1984）.Some misconceptions and misunderstandings
perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of
Biological Education, 18（3）, 201-206.
Borko, H.、Livingston, C.、McCaleb, J., & Mauro, L.
（1988）.Student teachers’ planning and post-lesson
reflection：Patterns and implications for teacher
preparation. In J. Calderhead（Ed.）, Teachers’ Professional
Learning. New York：The Falmer Press.
Brown, D. E.（1994）.Facilitating conceptual change using
analogies and explanatory models. International Journal of
Science Education, 16（2）, 201-214.
Carlsen, W. S.（1988）. The effects of science teacher subject-
matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom
discourse. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Stanford
University , Stanford, CA.
Carlsen, W. S.（1991）. Effects of new biology teachers’
subject—matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science
Education, 75（6）, 631-647.
Carlsen, W. S.（1993）. Teacher knowledge and discourse
control：Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’
classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30（5）,
471-481.
Carlsen, W. S.（1999）.Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-
Newsome, & N. G. Lederman, Examining Pedagogical Content
Knowledge（pp.133-144）. Netherland：Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Dai, Meme（1991）.Research on science misconceptions. Journal
of Taipei Municipal Teachers College, 22, 367-400.
Dai, Meme（1994）.Misconceptions about the moon held by
preservice teacher in taiwan. Journal of Taipei Municipal
Teachers College, 25, 465-482.
Driel, J. H. 、Verloop, N., & Vos, W. D. （1998）. Developing
science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Journal
Research in Science Teaching, 35（6）, 673-695.
Driver, R., & Easely, J.（1978）.Pupils and paradigms：Areview
of literature related to concept development in adolescent
science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Duxbury, A. C., & Duxbury, A. B.（1984）.The tides. In A. C. Duxbury, & A. B. Duxbury, An introduction to the world’s Oceans
（pp.260-283）. Dubuque：Wm.C.Brown.
Gentner, D.（1989）.The mechanisms of analogical learning. In
S.Vosniadou and A.Ortony, Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
（pp.199-241）. New York：Cambridge University Press.
Gess-Newsome, J.（1999）.Pedagogical content knowledge：An
introduction and orientation. In J . Gess-Newsome, & N. G..
Lederman, Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge（pp.3-
17）.Netherland：Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gess-Newsome, J.（1999）.Secondary teachers’ knowledge and
beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction.
In J . Gess-Newsome, & N. G.. Lederman, Examining Pedagogical
Content Knowledge（pp.51-94）.Netherland：Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Gilbert, J. K.、Watts, M., & Osborne, R. J.（1985）.Eliciting
student views ssing an interview-about-instances technique.
In L. T . West, & A. L. Pines, Cognitive Structure And
Conceptual Change（pp.11-27）. New York：Academic Press.
Grossman, P. L.、Wilson, S. M.,＆ Shulman, L. S.
（1989）.Teachers of substance：Subject matter knowledge for
teaching. In M. C. Reynolds, Knowledge Base for the Beginning
Teacher（pp.23-36）. New York：Pergamon Press.
Hashweh, M. Z.（1987）.Effects of subject-matter knowledge in
the teaching of biology and physics. ERIC No ED275502.
Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D.（1996）.Statisical methods in
education and psychology. New York：Allyn and Bacom.
Howell, D.C.（2001）.Simple analysis of variance. In C. D.
Howell, Statistical Methods for Psychology（pp.319-368）. CA：
Buxbury,
Jiang, M.（1993）.Children’s understanding of the earth
science. Tainan Teacher College Academic Report, 26, 193-219.
Kennedy, M. M.（1998）.Education reform and subject matter
knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35（3）,
249-263.
King, C（2000）.The earth’s mantle is solid：Teachers’
misconceptions about the earth and plate tectonics. School
Science Review, 82（298）, 57-64.
Kruger, C.、Summers, M.,& Palacio, D.（1990）.A survey of
primary school teachers’ conceptions of force and motion.
Educational Research, 32（2）, 83-93.
Lawrenz, F（1986）.Misconceptions of physical science concepts
among elementary school teachers. School Science and
Mathematics, 86（8）, 654-660.
Lederman, N. G.., & Chang, H. P.（1997）.An international
investigation of preservice science teachers’ pedagogical
and subject matter knowledge structures. Proceedings of
National Science Council, 7（2）, 110-122.
Lee, O.（1995）.Subject matter knowledge, classroom management,
and instructional practices in middle school science
classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32（4）,
423-440.
Leinhart, G.., & Smith, D.（1985）.Expertise in mathematics
instruction：Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 77, 247-271.
Lewis, E. L.,& Linn, M. C.（1994）.Heat energy and temperature
concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts：Implications
for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 31（6）, 657-677.
McClure, J. R.、Sonak, B.,& Suen, H. K.（1999）.Concept map
assessment of classroom learning：Reliability, validity, and
logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 36（4）, 475-492.
Mikolaj Sawicki（1999）. Myths about gravity and tides. Physics
Teacher, 37（7）. 438-441.
Novak, J. D.、Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T.（1983）.The use
of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high
school science students. Science Education, 67（5）, 625-645.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B.（1984）.The interview as an
evaluation tool. In J. D. Novak, & D. B. Gowin, Learning how
to learn （pp.119-148）. New York：Cambridge University
Press,.
Novak, J. D.（1988）.Learning science and the science of
learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101.
Novak, J. D.（1990）.Concept mapping：A useful tool for science
education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27（10）,
923-949.
Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. D.（1976）.An assessment of children’
s concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews.
Science Education, 60（4）, 535-550.
Nussbaum, J.（1979）.Children’s conceptions of the earth as a
cosmic body：A cross age study. Science Education, 63（1）,
83-93.
Osborne, R.J., & Gilbert, J. K.（1980）.A method for
investigating concept understanding in science. European
Journal of Science Education, 2（3）, 311-321.
Sanders, L. R.、Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D.（1993）.Secondary
science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science
courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 30（7）, 723-736.
Schibeci, R.A., & Hickey, R.（2000）.Is it natural or
processed？elementary school teachers and conceptions about
materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37（10）,
1154-1170.
Shulman, L. S.（1986a）.Paradigms and research programs in the
study of teaching：A contemporary perspective. In M. C.
Wittrock, Third Handbook of Research on Teaching（pp.3-36）.
New York：Macmillan.
Shulman, L. S.（1986b）.Those who understand：Knowledge growth
in teaching. Educational Research, 15（2）, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S.（1987）.Knowledge and teaching：Foundations of
the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57（1）, 1-22.
Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C.（1989）.The construction of
subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 5（1）, 1-20.
Southerland, S. A.、Smith, M. U., & Cummins, C. L.（2000）.”
What do you mean by that？” using structured interviews to
assess science understanding. In J. J. Mintzes,、J. H.
Wandersee, & J. D. Novak , Assessing Science Understanding,
（pp.71-93）. New York：Academic Press.
Thurman, H. V.（1994）.Tides. In H. V. Thurman, Introductory
oceanography（pp.251-278）. New York：Macmillan.
Thurman, H. V., & Burton E. A.（2001）.Introductory Oceanography
（pp.231-260）. Upper Saddle River：Prentice Hall.
Tuan, H. L.（1996）. Investigation the nature and development
of pre-service chemistry teachers’ content knowledge,
pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge.
Proceedings of National Science Council, 6（2）, 101-112.
Wilson, S. M.（1988）. Understanding historical understanding：
Subject matter knowledge and the teaching of U.S. history.
Unpublished doctoral disseration, Stanford University ,
Stanford, CA.