研究生: |
高瑪麗 Ma-Li Kao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
經理與員工對於影響網路化訓練受訓者滿意度因素之觀點比較 Comparison on Managers and Employees' Viewpoints to Factors Affecting Trainee Satisfaction on WBT |
指導教授: |
賴志樫
Lai, Chin-Chien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
國際人力資源發展研究所 Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 101 |
中文關鍵詞: | 影響因素 、受訓者滿意度 、網路化訓練 |
英文關鍵詞: | influential factors, trainee satisfaction, WBT |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:145 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
科技進步與全球化影響促進了網路化訓練的興起,然而僅有少數研究著重於網路化訓練受訓者滿意度,大多數研究著重於數位學習的重要性,並且聚焦於學生們的經驗與滿意度。然而,如果公司可以事先將會影響網路化訓練受訓者滿意度的因素納入考量,那麼,它將可比事後對網路化訓練系統進行修正來得節省成本,此外,本研究著重於比較經理與員工對於影響網路化訓練受訓者滿意度因素之觀點,經理往往在行銷、設計、執行網路化訓練扮演著重要的角色,並且激勵員工參與,而員工則是整套系統的最終使用者,因此,若此二者之觀點間有著落差,勢必會引起許多的問題。基於收集他們意見想法的需要,本研究使用了質化與量化研究方法,在第一階段,問卷調查被用於找出影響網路化訓練受訓者滿意度之重要因素,在第二階段,主要採用訪談的方式,希望藉由此法了解這些重要因素如何影響網路化訓練受訓者滿意度、公司如何解決困難以滿足這些因素及他們對於網路化訓練的建議。在分析及討論獲得的資料之後,本研究發現,經理與員工對於網路化訓練受訓者滿意度因素之觀點的落差表現在使用網路的頻率、回應問題的速度及授課者的教學方式三大因素上。
The advancement of technology and the impacts of globalization push the rise of WBT. It becomes a trend of training. However, there are few studies emphasize on trainee satisfaction of WBT. Most researchers attach importance on E-learning and aim at experiences or satisfaction of students. If companies can take factors which affect trainee satisfaction of WBT into consideration in advance, it would save more costs than improve after evaluating. Besides, this study focuses on comparing managers and employees’ viewpoints of factors which affect trainee satisfaction on WBT. Managers are important roles to market, design, and implement WBT or motivate employees to participate it and employees are the ultimate users. So, if there is a fall between their viewpoints, it would cause many problems. Owing to the need of colleting their opinions, this study will use both of qualitative and quantitative research methods. At the first stage, survey will be used to find out important factors of trainee satisfaction on WBT. And in the second stage, interview which is the main method will be used to understand how these important factors affect satisfaction of WBT, how samples solve obstacles to fulfill these important factors and what their suggestions are. After analyzing and discussing data, the study finds that differences between managers and employees’ viewpoints on influential factors on WBT are showed in three factors which are the frequency for using internet, the speed to reply questions which are posted, and the teaching style of instructors.
Barakzai, M.D. & Fraser, D. (2005). The effect of
demographic variables on achievement in and
satisfaction with online coursework. Journal of Nursing
Education, 44(8), 373-380.
Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the
science of instruction. CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Desimone, R.L., Werner, J.M., & Harris, D.M. (2002). Human
resource development (3rd ed.). NY: Harcourt College
Publisher.
Driscoll, M. (1999). Web-based training in the workplace.
Adult Learning, 10(4), 21-25.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based training: creating e-
learning experiences (2nd ed.). CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Dubinsky, A. J., Mehta, R., & Anderson, R. E. (2001).
Satisfaction with sales manager training- Design and
implementation issues. European Journal of Marketing,
35 (1), 27-39.
Faul, A.C., Frey, A. J., & Barber, R. (2004). The effects
of web-assisted instruction in a social work research
methods course. Social Work Education, 23(1), 105-118.
Glesne, C. & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative
researchers, NY: Longman.
Hong, K.S. (2002). Relationships between students’ and
instructional variables with satisfaction and learning
form a web-based course. Internet and Higher Education,
5, 267-281.
Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training: how to
teach anyone, anything, anywhere, anytime. CA: John
Wiley & Sons.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of
different types of interaction on learning achievement,
satisfaction and participation in web-based
instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching
International, 39(2), 153-162.
Kaye, T. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online
& traditional learning. London: Kogan Page.
Kevin, D. (2001). What the online world needs now: quality.
Training, 37(9), 84-94.
Lin, C. C. (2004). A study of key influential factors on
satisfaction of e-learning. Unpublished masters’
thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University,
Kaohsiung, R.O.C.
Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative
research a philosophic and practical guide, Washington,
DC: Falmer.
Mcfarland, D. & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting
student performance and satisfaction: online versus
traditional course delivery. The Journal of Computer
Information Systems, 46(2), 25-32.
Newman, S. & Milne, D. (1992). Measuring Management
Training: two new instrument. The Journal of Management
Development, 11(3), 18-23.
Potter, M. A., Ley, C. E., Fertman, C. I., Eggleston, M.
M., & Duman, S. (2003). Evaluating workforce
development: perspectives, processes, and lessons
learned. Public Health Management Practice, 9(6), 489-
495.
Rpdriguez. M.C., Ooms, A., Montanez, M., & Yan, Y.L.
(2005). Perception of online learning quality given
comfort with technology, motivation to learn technology
skills, satisfaction, & online learning experience.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the America
Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Sadik, A. & Reisman, S. (2004). Design and implementation
of a web-based learning environment. The Quarterly
Review of Distance Education, 5(3), 157-171.
Simonson, M. (2002). Introduction to the issue: Online
training in an online world. The Quarterly Review of
Distance Education, 3(1), 5-6.
Tello, F.P., Moscoso, S.C., Garcia, I.B., & Chaves, S.S.
(2006). Training satisfaction rating scale: Development
of a measurement using Polychoric correlations.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(4),
268-279.
Thomas, W. K. (1988). Making trainees want to learn.
Training and Development Journal, 42(6), 43-47.
Thurmond, V.A. & Connors, H.R. (2002). Evaluation of
student satisfaction: Determining the impacts of a web-
based environment by controlling for student
characteristics. The American Journal of Distance
Education, 16(3), 169-189.
Tzeng, G. W. (2001). The Effects of Personal Factors to the
Satisfaction Level of Web-Based Training in Business
Environment. Unpublished master’s thesis. National
Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, R.O.C.
Wang, Q. H. (2001). A Study of the Learning Behavior,
Satisfaction and Performance on Internet Learning. Da-
yen University, Chang-hua, R.O.C.
William, H. (2001). Evaluating e-learning. U.S.A: ASTD.
Yu, K. C. & Lee, T. W. (2003). Introduction of web-based
education and training. Taipei: Shta book.
張保隆、謝寶煖 (2006)。學術論文寫作:APA規範。台北市:華泰文化。
經濟部數位內容產業推動辦公室。Retrieved April 28, 2007 from URL:
http://www.dcipo.csd.org.tw
數位學習網路科學園區。Retrieved February 7, 2007 from URL:
http://www.epark.org.tw/