本研究旨在探討如何利用教材編製具體實踐高中英文課程綱要目標。研究主題是：民國99年教育部頒布《普通高中必修科目英文課程綱要》第二項目標：「培養以英語文進行邏輯思考、分析、判斷與整合創新的能力」。本研究透過五個形成性發展階段研發一課內補充教材範例，此五個階段為：編纂預備期(專家諮詢)、教材原型編製、教材試用及使用者意見回饋、原型修正(二度專家諮詢)、教材成品產出。
本研究探討教材中哪些特色元素有助於學生思考能力之訓練，並實際研發適合提供於每課的補充材料與活動。研究發現：特色元素包括具爭議探討性的內容、文本組織特色、問答活動設計、以及異質性分組活動。至於本研究所研發的補充教材，是經由參考Anderson及Krathwohl (2001)修正Bloom的認知階層分類、99課綱的能力指標、以及Fairclough (1989)的批判性語言覺識(critical language awareness approach)，發展出模組(model)，最後編寫而成。此補充教材考量了學生的需求與能力、融入聽說讀寫技能、並依據思考層次的高低訂出選用次序及難易度。
本研究以教材實例表現如何具體實踐課綱理念的作法，希能作為英語教師及教科書編輯者的參考。至於本研究所發展出的模組適用於英文教材文本的各種文體，亦可供教師在選擇教科書時，評估其是否有助於促進學生邏輯及創造性思考。

The study aims to explore some practical means to facilitate the realization of one of the goals in the 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English: students have to develop their abilities to think logically, judge, integrate and innovate. A sample set of supplementary in-class materials are developed through formative development of five phases: pre-compilation preparation (consultation with experts), prototype compilation, trial teaching and user feedback, further consultation with experts, and compilation of the final product.
The researcher probed into the features that contributed to the fostering of critical thinking abilities in the lesson design of senior high school English textbooks and investigated what could be provided as supplements to a textbook lesson to enhance the fostering of critical thinking abilities. The features that were found to play a role in the design of instructional materials are controversy in text content, text organization, question-and-answering implementation, and heterogeneous grouping in activity design. The sample materials compiled in the study were based on a model derived on the basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy updated and revised by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001), the competence descriptors mentioned in the 2010 Curriculum Guidelines, and Fairclough’s (1989) critical language awareness approach. Considerations in the design of the sample materials include the students’ needs and proficiency levels, integration of four skills, and the thinking process with a hierarchy scale of priorities and difficulties.
The present study has provided an example of how to explicate the ideas in the curriculum guidelines as a reference for English teachers and EFL teaching materials developers. The model mentioned earlier can be used with texts of different genres. It can also serve as a checklist for teachers to evaluate a textbook and examine whether it enhances critical thinking instruction.

Ainsworth, L. & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Albrecht, Karl. (1984). Brain building: Easy games to develop your problem solving skills. Prentice Hall.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Andrews, J. D. W. (1980). The verbal structure of teacher questions: Its impact on class discussion. POD Quarterly, 2, 129-163.
Angelie, C., Valanides, N. & Papastephanou, M. (2011). The role of the authority of the text on critical thinking. Interchange, 42(3), 307-328.
Apple, M. W. (2000). Official Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Barnett, R. (1997). High education: A critical business. (Buckingham, Open University Press).
Bradley, M. E., et al. (2008). Ask and you will receive: How question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 888-900.
Black, M. (1952). Critical Thinking. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Bloom, B. S., Engelahar, M. D., Frust, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objective, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David Mckay.
Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. E. (1971). Handbook on the formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Browne, M. N., & Keeley-Vasudeva, M. L. (1992). Classroom controversy as an antidote for the sponge model of learning. College Student Journal, 26, 368-373.
Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinking: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bucy, M. C. (2006). Encouraging critical thinking through expert panel discussions. College Teaching, 54(2), 222-224.
Case, R. E. Ndura, E., & Righettini, M. (2005). Balancing linguistic and social needs: Evaluating texts using a critical language awareness approach. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(5), 374-391.
Chang, L. Y. (張麗滎) (2005) Evaluation .of Grammar Activities in Junior High School English Textbooks for Nine-year Integrated Curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Chen, C. T. (陳貞廷) (2002). Textbook Selection for Senior High School Students in Greater Taipei Area. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen, H. W. (陳虹雯) (2002). Investigating senior high school literature teaching by analyzing the literary texts in different new versions of English textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen, Y. H. (陳育萱) (2005). A Study of Compiling Process and Post-Use Evaluation of Senior High School English Textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen, C. M. (陳超明) (2011). Senior high school English curriculum guidelines: From language skills to general education. General Education Online, 37, 9-11.
Cheng, Y. S. (程玉秀), Yeh, H, N. (葉錫南), Su, S. F. (蘇順發) (2011). The planning, implementation, and expected effects of the 2010 Curriculum Guidelines: Teachers’ perspectives. [九十九年「普通高級中學英文科課程綱要」之規劃、實施與預期效果：教師觀點]. English Teaching and Learning(英語教學)，35(2)，91-137.
Chin, C. (2004). Questioning students in ways that encourage thinking. Teaching Science, 50(4), 16-21.
Chorzempa, B. F. & Lapidus, L. (2009). “To find yourself, think for yourself.” Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 51-59.
Colley, B. M., Bilics, A. R., & Lerch, C. M. (2012). Reflection: A key component to critical thinking. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-19.
Crismore, A. (2000). Helping ESL and EFL university students read critically: A 2000’s challenge. Opinion Papers..
Cummins, J. (1989). The sanitized curriculum: Educational disempowerment in a nation at risk. In D. M. Johnson and D.H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing:
Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.
Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Revised ed.), Boston: D. C. Heath.
Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course Design: Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, N. (1987). Making the Most of Your Textbook. New York: Longman.
Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81-111.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical approach to measuring critical thinking skills in the fourth grade. Paper presented at the American Educational Association. Chicago.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43, 44-48.
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching for thinking (pp. 9-26). New York: Freeman.
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Teaching for higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 181.
Ennis R. H. (2002). “A Super-Streamlined Conception of Critical Thinking. Robert H. Ennis’ Academic Web Site (2002). http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/SSConcCTApr3.html (accessed April 10, 2013).
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman: London.
Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED315423
Fisher, C., Bol, L., Pribesh, S. (2011). An investigation of higher-order thinking skills in smaller learning community social studies classrooms. American Secondary Education, 39(2), 5-26.
Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised. In M. Orey (Ed.). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2011, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/bloom.htm
Ghajar, S. G., & Kafshgarsouteh, M. (2011). Recovering the power inside: A qualitative study of critical reading in an Iranian University. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3), 26-39.
Gilbert, P. K. & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 1, 5-18.
Glaser, E. M. (1942). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. Teachers College Record, 43(5), 409-410. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
Goodwin, B. & Miller, K. (2013). Creativity requires a mix of skills. Educational Leadership, Feb.
Gruenfeld, E. (2010). Thinking creatively is thinking critically. New Directions for Youth Development, 125, 71-83.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Halpern, D. (1998). Teaching CT for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 253-256.
Han, W. Y. (韓文瑤) (2007). A Study of the Vocabulary Size and Recycling Frequency in Elementary School and Junior High School English Textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hashemi, S. A. (2011). The use of critical thinking in social science textbooks of high school: A field study of Fars Province in Iran. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 63-78.
Hashemi M. R. & Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System 40, 37-47.
Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431-
473.
Howe, R. W. & Disinger, J. F. (1990). Environmental Activities for Teaching Critical Thinking. Environmental Education Information Report. Published by Eric Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus, Ohio.
Hrehovcik, T. (2002). Foreign language textbook evaluation-methodological considerations. Retrieved from: www.univ.rzeszow.pl/file/1246/sar_v1_18.pdf
Hsu, P. C. (許珮甄) (2000). A Comparison of Language Learning Activities in Two Sets of Junior High School English Textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huang, C, Y. (黃鉦貽) (2011). Analysis of Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Types of Questions and Activities in Senior High School English Textbooks in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung, L. C. (洪儷倩) (2008). Grammatical Structure Recycling in Junior High School English Textbooks for Nine-year Integrated Curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ironside, P. M. (2006). Using narrative pedagogy: Learning and practicing interpretive thinking. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55, 478-486.
Iseri, K. (2010). Determining the comprehensibility of texts in sixth grade Turkish course books. Education, 131(2), 381-392.
Kafshgarsouteh, M. (2006). A naturalistic study of critical understanding : Forms of language ownership in webbing words/worlds. Unpublished MA dissertation, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Kahveci, A. (2010). Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495-1519.
Karakas, S. L. (2010). Creative and critical thinking in the arts and sciences: Some examples of congruence. Published by Forum on Public Policy.
Karamoozian, F. M. & Riazi, A. (2008). Development of a new checklist for evaluating reading comprehension textbooks. ESP World, 3(19), 3-21.
Kennedy, M. R. T. & Deruyter, F. (1991). Cognitive and language bases for communication disorders. In D.R.Beukelman & K. M. Yorkston (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: management of cognitive, language, and motor impairments (pp. 123-190). Pro-ed.
Kim, H. K. (2003). Critical thinking, learning and Confucius: A positive assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(1), 71-87.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 4, 212-218.
Ku, K. Y. L. & Ho. K. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition Learning 5, 251-267.
Lai, C. F. (2011). Cultivating Critical Thinking through Integrating Literature Circles into EFL Freshman English Classes. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Leu, M. H. (呂敏慧) (2004). The Use and Evaluation of Teaching Materials for Vocational High Schools in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li, H. C. (2003). (李筱晴) Predictive Evaluation, Use, and Retrospective Evaluation of an EFL Textbook by Junior High School Teachers: A Case Study in a Taipei Junior High School. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lipman, M. (1985). Thinking skills fostered by philosophy for children. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman and R. Glazer (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 1, (pp. 83-108) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mathews, S. R. & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom environments that foster a disposition for critical thinking. Learning Environ Res, 14, 59-73.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
McLaughlin, M. & DeVoogd, G. L. (2004). Critical Literacy: Enhancing Students’ Comprehension of Text. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Molden, K. (2007). Critical literacy, the right answer for the reading classroom: Strategies to move beyond comprehension for reading improvement, 44(1), 50-56.
Morgan, H. & York, K. C. (2009). Examining multiple perspectives with creative think-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 307-311.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2003). NCTE position statement : Resolution on composing with nonprint media. Urbana, IL: Author. www.ncte.org/positions/statements/composewithnonprint
Newmann, F. (1991). Promoting higher order thinking in social studies: Overview of a study of 16 high school departments. Theory and Research in Social Education, XIX (4), 324-340.
Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1985). The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Notar, C. E., Wilson, J. D. & Montgomery, M. K. (2005). A distance learning model for teaching higher order thinking. College student Journal, 39, 17-25.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Oleg, t. & Kozhushko, S. (2002). Playing business in the classroom: Designing a new type of Business English coursebook. A paper presented at the 23rd Annual TESOL Greece Convention March 10, 2002.
Onosko, J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher-order thinking in social studies. Journal of curriculum Studies, 19(4), 341-366.
Orig, Princess. Problem-based learning and the Socratic Elenchus in the teaching of literature. http://www.tp.edu.sg/pbl_princessorig.pdf (accessed May 8th, 2013)
Osborne, R. E., et al. (1996) May. The Costs of Benefits of Critical Thinking
Page, D., Mukherjee, A. (2007). Promoting critical-thinking skills by using negotiation exercises. Journal of Education for Business, May/June, 251-257).
Pan, P. H. (潘姵璇) (2003). Evaluation of Learning Activities in Junior High School English Textbooks for Nine-year Integrated Curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Paulson, E. (2011). Group communication and critical thinking competence development using a reality-based project. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 399-411.
Paul, R. C. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, R. C. & Elder L. (1997). Critical thinking: Implications of instruction of the stage theory. Journal of Developmental Education, 20(3), 340-350.
---. (1999). Critical thinking: Teaching students to seek the logic of things, part II. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(2), 34-35. Retrieved Oct. 21, 2012, from http://educationmonitor.net/Four-Cognitive-Skills-for-Successful-Learning-197.html?&page=2
Perkins, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models (pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.
Rapp, D. N. (2011). Comic books’ latest plot twist: Enhancing literacy instruction. R & D, 93(4), 64-67.
Resnick, L. (1987). Education and Learning to Think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Resnick, L, & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.) (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, New York: CUP.
Shaaban, K. (2005). A proposed framework for incorporating moral education into the ESL/EFL classroom. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 18(2), 201-217.
Savignon, S. J. (2000). Communicative language teaching. In Byram, Michael. Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 125–129). London: Routledge.
Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education, 46, 49-70.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation . In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation: Vol. 1 AREA monograph series on curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Shepard, L. (1999). Psychometricians’ beliefs about learning. Educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 2-9.
Shiau, J. C. (2010). Using Reciprocal Teaching to Develop Thinking in a senior High EFL Classroom in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Simpson, E. & Courtney, M. (2007). A framework guiding critical thinking through reflective journal documentation: A Middle Eastern experience. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 13, 203-208.
Siegel, H. (1997). Rationality redeemed? Further dialogues on an educational ideal. New York: Routledge.
Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
Smith, G. F. (2003). Beyond critical thinking and decision-making: Teaching business students how to think. Journal of Management Education, 27(1), 24-51.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Handbook of Intelligence. New York: CUP.
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324-328.
Taylor, L. (1992). Mathematics attitude development from a Vygotskian perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4, 8-23.
Tseng, T, L. (曾子玲) (2006). A Study on the Selective Use of High School English Textbook Materials. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tucker, M. A. A. (2007). Leadership by the Socratic method. Air and Space Power Journal, summer, 80-87.
Wallas, Grham (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Wang. H. G. (2011). Predictability of English Proficiency, Creativity, and Creativity Motivation in Taiwanese Freshmen’s Recognition and Production of Creative Metaphors in English Predictability of English Proficiency, Creativity, and Creativity Motivation in Taiwanese Freshmen's Recognition and Production of Creative Metaphors in English. Unpublished dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
White, D. A. (2010). Gifted education: Thinking (with help from Aristotle) about critical thinking. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 14-20.
Yasar, O. (2009). A comparative analysis of assessment and evaluation exercises included in Geography textbooks written according to the 2005 Secondary Education Geography Curriculum and textbooks of the former curriculum in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5(1), 45-68.
Yeh, H. N. (2008). The ideals for revision and features in the new curriculum guidelines for senior high school English. [高中英文科新課程綱要之修訂理念與特色]. Journal of Education Research (教育研究月刊)，166，25-32。
Yeh, H. N. (葉錫南), Yu, H. Y. (尤雪瑛), Chen, J. H. (陳中漢), Chern, C. L. (陳秋蘭), Chern, Cheng, Y. S. (程玉秀), Lin, H. H. (林秀慧), & Yu. C. C. (游春琪) (2010). A Final Report on the Versions A & B Test Items in the Subject of English Based on the Newly-Revised 2010 Curriculum Guidelines. [「新修訂課綱 (99年) AB版測驗內容與試題探究工作計畫—英文科：AB分版與思考能力評量」結案報告]. Taipei: CEEC.
Yeh, H. N. (葉錫南) (2011). Assessment of thinking skills and creativity in CEEC English tests. [邏輯思考與創造能力在大學入學考試英文考科中之評量] Bulletin of Testing and Assessment (考試學刊)，9，25-47。
Young, J. G. (1985). What is creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior (the 2nd Quarter), 77-87.
Zohar, A., Weinberger, Y., & Tamir, P. (1994). The effect of the Biology CT Project on the development of CT. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 183-196.
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teachers’ Education, 17, 469-485.
Zohar, A. & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181.