簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊博涵
Po-han Yang
論文名稱: 「君子動口也動手」:《哈姆雷特》與《羅密歐與茱麗葉》中的武器與打鬥
“Make It a Word and a Blow”: Weaponry and Fighting in Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet
指導教授: 林璄南
Lin, Ying-Nan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 武器打鬥語言版本學場域交叉法
英文關鍵詞: weaponry, fighting, language, Textual Criticism, field, chiasmus
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:160下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文旨在探討《哈姆雷特》與《羅密歐與茱麗葉》中武器與打鬥的功能與意義。武器與打鬥在兩劇中占有重要地位。劇中的君子,諸如哈姆雷特與羅密歐,不僅能言善道,更運用武器與打鬥做為解決爭端的手段。本論文分為五章:「緒論」首先說明武器與語言在兩劇中的交互遊戲。劇本中關於武器與打鬥的舞台指示雖然有限,學者與導演們對於打鬥場景的詮釋解讀卻因而呈現諸多風貌;另一方面,語言亦可視為一種虛擬武器。角色間一來一往的對話宛如鬥劍,其殺傷力訴諸於耳,直指人心。本章亦解釋將「版本學」做為研究立足點的必要性及「文本不穩定性」可能拓展的討論空間。論文第一章探索不同版本《哈姆雷特》中的打鬥如何影響並決定角色型塑。第二章討論在《羅密歐與茱麗葉》中語言如何再現或扭曲打鬥,並指出爭鬥僅能以武力解決,希冀以武力維持和平的宣稱本身即是暴力。第三章則將劇本與舞台視為戰場,不只劇中角色彼此競爭,莎劇亦成為學者們爭論的場域。「結論」概述全文重點所在,並以「交叉法」美學閱讀供讀者酌參。

    This study seeks to explore some possible functions and meanings of weaponry and fighting in Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet. Weaponry and fighting play important roles in these two plays. The gentlemen in Shakespeare’s plays, such as Hamlet and Romeo, not only use language to argue, but also adopt weaponry and fighting to solve their quarrels. There are five chapters in the thesis. I begin my introductory chapter by first outlining the interplay of weaponry and language in the plays. Even though the information provided by Shakespeare’s stage directions for fighting is somewhat limitted, scholars and directors still have various interpretations and productions of the fight scenes. On the other hand, language can also be regarded as a virtual weapon. The fierce dialogues between characters are like swordplays, which thrust through the ear, into the innermost. I also explain the necessity of “Textual Criticism” and how “the instability of texts” may open up more room for discussion. Then I investigate how fight scenes in different texts of Hamlet influences and decides the characterization of the characters. The next chapter discusses how language represents or distorts fight scenes in Romeo and Juliet. The chapter also observes that quarrels can only be ended by fighting and any force claimed to keep the peace connotes violence in itself. The third chapter reads the plays and the stage as battlefields: not only do the characters compete with each other in the plays, but also Shakespeare’s plays have become fields for scholars to struggle within. The concluding chapter pinpoints the main ideas of this study and provides aesthetics of “chiasmus” for reference.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHINESE ABSTRACT.......................................i ENGLISH ABSTRACT......................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.....................................iii TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................iv ILLUSTRATION...........................................v INTRODUCTION...........................................1 1. Two of His Weapons..................................1 2. More Talk of These Sad Things.......................6 3. The Play’s the Thing ...............................9 4. Argument of the Play...............................16 CHAPTER ONE In My Heart There Was a Kind of Fighting.19 1. Textual Variation..................................20 2. Fight Within the Play..............................23 3. Language Fight.....................................30 4. Words like Daggers.................................33 5. Imaginary Audition.................................37 CHAPTER TWO Drawn and Talk of Peace..................40 1. Textual Revolver...................................41 2. Rapier and Sword...................................42 3. Affection Makes Him False..........................49 4. Fight with Language................................54 5. Drawn and Talk of Peace............................57 CHAPTER THREE A Sight as This Becomes the Field......66 1. The Pass and Fell of Incensèd Points...............67 2. Look to the Queen..................................70 3. Such a Fight Becomes the Field.....................73 4. Thinking Makes It So...............................80 5. All the Stage Is a Field...........................83 CONCLUSION............................................88 WORKS CITED...........................................93

    Works Cited
    Alexander, Nigel. Poison, Play, and Duel: A Study in Hamlet. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1971.
    Berger, Harry, Jr. Imaginary Audition: Shakespeare on Stage and Page. Berkeley: U of Callifornia P, 1989.
    Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity, 1992.
    Branagh, Kenneth, dir. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet: A Kenneth Branagh Film. Perf. Kenneth Branagh, Julie Christie, Billy Crystal, Derek Jacobi, Robin Williams, and Kate Winslet. Castle Rock Entertainment, 1996. Warner Bros, 2007. DVD.
    Derrida, Jacques. “Aphorism Countertime.” Acts of Literature. Ed. Derek Attridge. New York: Routledge, 1992. 414-33.
    ---. Dissemination. Trans and intro. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.
    ---. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” Writing and Difference. Trans. and intro. Alan Bass. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1978. 278-93.
    Edwards, Philip, ed. Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. 1985. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. The New Cambridge Shakespeare.
    Engel, William E. Chiastic Designs in English Literature from Sidney to Shakespeare. Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.
    Foakes, R. A., ed. Henslowe’s Diary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
    Furness, Horace Howard, ed. Hamlet: A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare. 1877. 2 vols. New York: Dover, 1963.
    Greenblatt, Stephen, ed. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition. New York: Norton, 1997.
    “Hamlet (Folio 1, 1623).” Internet Shakespeare Editions. U of Victoria, 2005. Web. 1 July. 2010.
    “Hamlet (Quarto 1, 1603).” Internet Shakespeare Editions. U of Victoria, 2005. Web. 1 July. 2010.
    “Hamlet (Quarto 2, 1604).” Internet Shakespeare Editions. U of Victoria, 2005. Web. 1 July. 2010.
    Hapgood, Robert. “Popularizing Shakespeare: The Artistry of Franco Zeffirelli.” Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video. Ed. Lynda E. Boose and Richard Burt. London: Routledge, 1997. 80-94.
    Irace, Kathleen O., ed. The First Quarto of Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
    Jackson, Russell. “From Play-Script to Screenplay.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Ed. Russell Jackson. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
    Jowett, John. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2007. Oxford Shakespeare Topics.
    Lennox, John. “The Relationship Between Personal Combat and Stage Combat from the Late Sixteenth Century to the Early Twentieth Century.” Diss. Wayne State U, 2008. PDF file.
    Maguire, Laurie E. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The “Bad” Quartos and Their Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
    Murphy, Andrew. “Introduction: What Happens in Hamlet?.” A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Ed. Andrew Murphy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007. 1-14.
    Norrman, Ralf. Samuel Butler and the Meaning of Chiasmus. Londin: Macmillan, 1986.
    “Romeo and Juliet (Quarto 1, 1597).” Internet Shakespeare Editions. U of Victoria, 2005. Web. 1 July. 2010.
    “Romeo and Juliet (Quarto 2, 1599).” Internet Shakespeare Editions. U of Victoria, 2005. Web. 1 July. 2010.
    Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet.” The First Folio of Shakespeare: Based on Folios in the Folger Shakespeare Library Collection. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1996. 760-90. The Norton Facsimile.
    ---. “Romeo and Juliet.” The First Folio of Shakespeare: Based on Folios in the Folger Shakespeare Library Collection. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1996. 669-93. The Norton Facsimile.
    Taylor, Gary. “General Introduction.” Wells, Taylor, Jowett, and Montgomery 1-68.
    Turner, Craig, and Tony Soper. Methods and Practice of Elizabethan Swordplay. Carbondale: South Illinois UP, 1990.
    Wells, Stanley. Shakespeare, Sex, and Love. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.
    Wells, Stanley, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, and William Montgomery. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. 1987. Reprinted with corrections. New York: Norton, 1997.
    Williams, George Walton, ed. The Most Excellent and Lamentable Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet: A Critical Edition. Durham, N.C.: Duke UP, 1964.
    Wise, Arthur. Weapons in the Theatre. London: Longmans, 1968.
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. The German text, with a revised English translation. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
    Zeffirelli, Franco, dir. Hamlet. Perf. Mel Gibson, Glenn Close, Alan Bates, and Ian Holm. 1990. Warner Bros, 2004. DVD.
    ---. Romeo & Juliet. Perf. Olivia Hussey and Leonard Whiting. 1968. Paramount, 2000. DVD.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE