研究生: |
黃郁宸 Huang, Yu-Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中生校園經驗與學校社群感之關係─以高雄市高中為例 The Relationship between Senior High School Students’ Campus Experiences and Sense of Community at School – Cases of Senior High Schools in Kaohsiung City |
指導教授: |
劉若蘭
Liu, Ruo-Lan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 186 |
中文關鍵詞: | 高中生 、校園經驗 、學校社群感 |
英文關鍵詞: | high school students, campus experience, sense of community at school |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DCEL.008.2018.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:196 下載:29 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討高雄市高中生校園經驗與學校社群感的關係,採用問卷調查法之量化設計,以「高中生校園經驗與學校社群感量表」為研究工具;量表分個人基本資料、校園環境知覺量表、校園整合經驗量表、學校社群感量表等四部分,其中個人背景變項包括性別、年級、身分、選讀類組、高中入學成績、家庭社經背景等;校園環境知覺包括物質環境、社會環境、制度環境三變項;校園整合經驗包括課業投入、課外活動參與、人際互動等;學校社群感則是涵蓋學校親和、學校認同、學校參與、學校關懷等四因素。
以高雄市12所公立普通高中為對象,分層叢集取樣進行問卷調查,共回收有效樣本488份,分別以描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析、多元迴歸分析之統計方法進行量化分析。研究結果歸納如下:
一、不同性別、年級、身分、選讀類組、入學成績的高中生在校園環境知覺上有顯著差異。
二、不同性別、年級、入學成績、家庭社經背景的高中生在校園整合經驗有顯著差異。
三、不同性別、年級、身分、選讀類組、入學成績、家庭社經背景的高中生之學校社群感有顯著差異。
四、高中生校園環境知覺、校園整合經驗與學校社群感間呈高度正相關,其中校園環境知覺方面,以制度環境與學校社群感的相關性最高、物質環境最低;校園整合經驗方面,則以人際互動與學校社群感的相關性最高、課業投入最低。
五、個人背景與環境知覺中,性別、物質環境、社會環境、制度環境等因素對於校園整合經驗,為顯著的預測因素,解釋力達36%。
六、個人背景、校園環境知覺與校園整合經驗中,性別、身分、年級、物質環境、制度環境、社會環境、人際互動、課外活動參與、課業投入等因素對於學校社群感,為顯著的預測因素,解釋力達70.1%。
最後本研究分別對高中學生事務工作與高中教師提出建議。對學生事務方面建議為:(一)針對不同年級學生之階段性需求,發展多元適切的輔導方案。(二)賦權予能,培養學生對校園環境的情懷與責任感。(三)規劃特色課程或方案,彰顯學校內的建築意義與歷史軌跡。(四)扶持學生自治組織的發展與成熟,暢通上下層溝通管道;對學校教師方面建議為:(一)注重學生的個別需求,實施文化回應教學。(二)加強班級經營,並且給予學生支持及關懷。(三)設計多元的課程活動,提昇教學品質。
This study aims to explore the relationship between campus experiences and the sense of community at school for Kaohsiung high school students. The questionnaire for this study is “Scale of High School Students’ Campus Experiences and the Sense of Community at School”, which include four parts: basic information, environmental perception scale, experience of campus integration scale, and sense of community at school scale. The personal background variables included gender, grade, identity, elective group, entry grade for high school, and the socioeconomic status of the family. In environmental perception, it included material environment, social environment, and system environment. In campus integration experience, it included study commitment, extracurricular activities, and interpersonal interactions. In sense of community at school, it included four factors: school affinity, school identity, school participation, and school care.
A total of 488 valid samples were collected from 12 public high schools in Kaohsiung City, and the results were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis for quantitative analysis. The results are summarized as follows:
1.There were significant differences in the environmental perception among high school students of different gender, grade, identity, elective group and school entry achievement.
2.There were significant differences in the experience of campus integration among high school students with different gender, grade, school entry achievement and family socioeconomic status .
3.There were significant differences in the sense of community at school among high school students of different gender, grade, identity, elective group, school entry achievement and family socioeconomic status .
4.There is a high degree of positive correlation between environmental perception, campus integration experience, and sense of community at school. Among them, in terms of environmental perception, the correlation between system environment and sense of community at school was the highest, while the material environment was the lowest; in terms of school integration experiences, the correlation with interpersonal interaction and sense of community at school were the highest, while study commitment was the lowest.
5.Personal background and environmental perception can significantly predict the experience of campus integration; among them, gender, material environment, social environment, and system environment are the significant predictive factors, with an explanatory power of 36%.
6.Personal background, environmental perception, and campus integration experiences can significantly predict the sense of community at school, among them, gender, grade, identity, material environment, system environment, social environment, extracurricular activities, interpersonal interaction, and study commitment are the significant predictive factors, with an explanatory power of 70.1%.
Finally, this study proposes suggestions for senior high school student affairs and senior high school teachers. the recommendations for senior high school student affairs include: (1)Develop dynamic appropriate targeted counseling programs targeting at the different needs of students in different stages; (2) Cultivate students’ feelings and responsibilities towards the campus environment, and to adequately give up certain space management and planning power; (3) Design relevant specialized courses or service learning so as to highlight the architectural meaning and historical traits of the campus; (4) Support the development and growth of students’ autonomous organization with a smooth top=to-bottom communication channel. the recommendations for senior high school teachers include: (1) Pay attention to the individual needs of the students and implement cultural responsive teaching; (2) Fortify the interaction with the students and provide them support and care; (3) Design dynamic courses and activities so as enhancing teaching quality.
一、中文部分
丁笑炯(2013)。提升底部、立足终身。上海教育,35,67-69。
王雅芳(2012)。國民小學校長專業領導行為、學校內部社區感與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
王錦雀(2000)。公民教育實施的障礙與契機─社群主義觀點之分析。公民訓育學報,9,219-239。
危芷芬(譯)(1995)。環境心理學(原作者: F. T. McAndrew )。臺北市:五南。
朱朝煌(2005)。大學生個人因素、個人經驗及校園環境知覺與能力感發展之關聯性研究:以成功大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
江宜樺(1998)。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。臺北市:揚智文化。
江明修(1996)。社區意識與公民參與。教育研究雙月刊,51,41-52 。
池旭臺(2005)。國民中學中輟學生返校復學成功案例之研究─以臺北縣某國中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
余秀文(2011)。教育大學學生組織變革知覺與學校認同關係之研究—以國立臺北教育大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS 與統計應用分析(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
吳武典(2004年3月)。臺灣教育改革的經驗與分析。第一屆香港校長研討會發表之演講,香港教育學院。
吳玥玲(2006)。大學僑生校園經驗與學習成就之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳叡人(譯)(1999)。想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布(原作者: B.Anderson)。臺北市:時報文化。
呂宜臻(2009)。第一代及非第一代大學生的校園經驗、學習成果與教育抱負之研究(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
宋千卉(2014)。大學生校園環境知覺、校園投入與學校認同之硏究─以臺北市三所公立大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李育齊(2014)。大學生校園經驗與批判思考能力關係之硏究─以北部某國立大學為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李萬吉(2015年11月24日)。鐵人夢語─校務評鑑要能務實解決問題。中時電子報。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151124000640
-260107
貝淡寧、林曉欽、胡全威(2007)。社群主義對自由主義的批判。政治與社會哲學評論,23,1-45。
阮孝齊(2015)。國中學生學校歸屬感影響模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊,23,81-123。
周素足(2007)。技職校院新生入學期望與校園經驗之研究─以北區一所技術學院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
林永基(2006)。國民中小學校長願景領導與學校內部社區感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
林明地(2002a)。助長學校內部社區感塑造學校內部社區。教育研究月刊,95,70-78。
林明地(2002b)。學校與社區關係。臺北市:五南。
林振春(2014)。社區意識與教育改革。臺北市:高等教育。
林淑敏(2008)。師生關係、認同學校學習價值、學習投入與學校歸屬感表現
之比較研究─以澳門及香港兩地作為比較(未出版之碩士論文)。澳門大
學,澳門。
林淑華、張芬芬(2015)。評析芬蘭教育制度的觀念取向:以共好取代競爭。臺灣教育評論月刊,4,112-131。
林瑞欽 (1994)。社區意識的概念、測量與提振策略。社區發展研究學刊,11-21。
林瑞欽(2000)。社會意識的概念、測量與提振策略。載於林瑞欽、林美珠、顏世一(主編),新臺灣社會發展學術叢書 (1) 社區篇(13-41頁)。臺北市:中華民國公益活動促進會。
俞可平(1999)。社群主義。臺北市:風雲論壇。
姜怡君(2012)。校園經驗、學校認同與續讀意願之關係─以臺北地區私立大學大一學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
柯珮婷(2006)。科技大學不同校區學生校園投入與學校滿意度之研究─以北部某科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
臺灣PISA國家研究中心(無日期)。關於PISA。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/
pisa_tw.htm
徐恆鑑(2012)。大學新生個人因素、校園經驗與能力發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
徐震(1980)。社區與社區發展。臺北市:正中。
翁芳怡(2016)。國中學生的校園經驗形塑學校內部社區感之探究─以某偏鄉小校為例。南台灣社區發展學術研討會發表之文章,國立屏東大學。
高雄市政府教育局(2017)。106學年度高雄區高級中等學校免試入學簡章(含部分五專名額)。取自 http://12basic.kh.edu.tw/?act=news
高雄市政府教育局(無日期)。學校資料查詢。取自http://www. kh.edu.tw/schools
張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
張家宜、高熏芳(1999)。大學教育品質管理與學生滿意度之實證研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC88-2413-H032-007)。臺北市:淡江大學教育發展中心教育學程組。
張國祥(2010)。澳門在PISA 2003 數學素養測試計劃中學校歸屬感相關議題之詳盡分析。課程與教學,13,95-115。
張雪梅(1996)。學生發展:學生事務工作的理論與實踐。臺北市:張老師文化。
張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊:我國大學生校園經驗與學校成果之實証研究。台北市:張老師文化。
張凱婷(2011)。大學生家庭背景、入學特質、校園經驗與學習成果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
許水德(1995)。學校社區化:教育改革的方向。載於中華民國社區教育學會(主編),學校社區化(1-8頁)。臺北市:師大書苑。
郭秀芳(2012)。嘉義縣國民中小學校園文化核心價值之實踐與學校內部社區
感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
郭靜晃(2001)。中途輟學靑少年之現況分析及輔導。臺北市:洪葉文化。
陳秀玲(2008)。國小校長經營學校內部社區感之研究。花蓮教育大學學報,27,251-272。
陳佳萍(2008)。國民小學教師知覺校長多元領導策略與學校內部社區感關係之研究─以苗栗、台中、彰化地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳金貴(2001)。學生涉入理論運用在學生事務的探討。載於陳金貴(主編),學生事務與社團輔導(81-98)。臺北市:東吳大學課外活動組。
陳威宇(2010)。學習投入、心理特質對學校認同及科學成就之影響─以TIMSS 2007台灣地區資料為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東市。
陳舜芬(2004)。松竹楊梅四校大學生校園投入經驗與學習成果之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告(NSC91-2413-H-007-003)。新竹市:國立清華大學教育學程中心。
陶韻然(2010)。大學應屆畢業生個人背景因素、校園經驗與生涯成熟態度研究─以北部地區大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
彭如婉(1998)。從社群主義的公民觀探究公民教育。公民訓育學報,7,435-450。
曾慈慧(2011)。兒童的校園環境涉入、地方感與學校認同關係之研究。教育與心理研究,34,109-139。
黃玉(2000)。大學學生事務的理論基礎─台灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報,9,161-200。
黃玉(2003)。從環境中增進學生事務功能-論學校環境與學生發展。載於林至善(主編),學生事務與社團輔導,第三輯。臺北市:東吳大學課外活動組。
黃毅志(2008)。如何精確測量職業地位?「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。臺東大學教育學報,19,151-159。
楊淑娥(1996)。大學生社團參與及其心理社會發展之分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
葉昌智(2014)。大學生課外學習經驗與其畢業後生活適應關係之研究─以某大學校友為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
葉紹國(2006)。大學生的校園生活及其對學生發展的意義。高等教育,2010,1-17。
葉紹國、何英奇、陳舜芬(2007)。大一學生的校園參與經驗與收穫自評。師大學報:教育類,52,91-114。
賓靜蓀(2012)。PISA到底是什麼?。親子天下,35。取自
https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5033385-PISA%E5%88%B0%E5%BA
%95%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%EF%BC%9F/?page=1
齊若蘭(譯)(1995)。第五項修練II 實踐篇(下)(原作者: P. M. Senge、A. Kleiner、C. Roberts、R. Ross、B. J. Smith)。臺北市:天下文化。
劉力瑋(2013)。國民中學學校文化類型與學校內部社區感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
劉若蘭(2005)。大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之建構與驗證─以北部某多元族群技術學院為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
劉若蘭(2008)。大學生個人因素、校園經驗與多元能力之關係研究─以臺灣高等教育資料庫大三學生為例。長庚科技學刊,9,119-134。
劉若蘭、楊昌裕(2009)。不同身分背景大學生校園經驗與學習成果滿意度之關係模式研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,26(2),1-21。
劉寶銀(2003)。高職校長營造學校內部社區感之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
潘慧玲、周麗玉、陳佩英、周祝瑛、張碧娟、陳偉泓(2011)。「高中教育政策白皮書」工作計畫(教育部中等教育司委託研究計畫)。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學教育學系暨教育政策與行政研究所。
蔡玉慧(1996)。高雄市國小學生學校環境知覺與學生行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
蔡宏進(1985)。社區原理。臺北市:三民。
蔡瑞榮(1995)。「學校社區化、社區學校化」的理念與作法。載於中華民國社區教育學會(主編),學校社區化(83-107頁)。臺北市:師大書苑。
鄭博仁、岳修平、陳姿伶(2011)。農學類科大一新生學系投入、生涯態度與科系認同感之初探研究。臺灣農學會報,12,582-610。
盧冠樺(2010)。影響中輟復學生持續就學之學校經驗探究(未出版之碩士論文)。明道大學,彰化縣。
賴玉卿(2007)。國中經常缺課學生生活經驗之分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。
國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
應奇(1999)。社群主義。臺北市:揚智文化。
謝其政(2015年7月26)。日漸崩壞的高中教育。天下雜誌。取自
http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/3129
鍾旭晏(2010)。國民小學校長團隊領導與學校內部社區感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
譚子文、張楓明(2013)。依附關係、低自我控制及接觸偏差同儕與青少年偏差行為關係之研究。當代教育研究季刊,21,81-120。
二、西文部分
Astin, A. W. (1968). The college environment. Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.
Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The relationship between students' sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American journal of public health, 87(12), 1997-2001.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American educational research journal, 32(3), 627-658.
Beck, L., & Foster, W. (1999a). Administration and community: Considering challenges, exploring possibilities. Handbook of research on educational
administration, 2, 337-358.
Beck, L. & Foster, W. (1999b). Administration and community: Considering challenges, exploring possibilities. In J. M. a. K. S. Louis (Ed.), Handbook of
research on educational administration (Vol. 2, pp. 337-358). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bell, D. (1993). Communitarianism and its Critics. Oxford, England: Oxford
University Press.
Bellah, R. N. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. San Francisco, CA: University of California Press.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Campus life: In search of community. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Calderwood, P. E. (2000). Learning Community: Finding Common Ground in Difference. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Chickering, A. W. , & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Chiu, M. M., Pong, S.-l., Mori, I., & Chow, B. W.-Y. (2012). Immigrant students’
emotional and cognitive engagement at school: A multilevel analysis of students in 41 countries. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(11), 1409-1425.
Chun, H., & Dickson, G. (2011). A psychoecological model of academic performance among Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1581-1594.
Clark, B., & Trow, M. (1966). The organizational context. In T. N. E. Wilson (Ed.), College peer groups: problems and prospects for research (pp. 17-70). Chicago: Aldine.
Conyne, R. K., & Clack, R. J. (1981). Environmental assessment and design: A new tool for the applied behavioral scientist. New York, NY: Praeger publishers.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process (Vol. 35). New York: D. C. Heath.
Dorsch, N. G. (1998). Community, collaboration, and collegiality in school reform: An odyssey toward connections. New York, NY: State University of New York
Press.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of educational research, 59(2), 117-142.
Furman, G. (Ed.) (2002). School as community: From promise to practice. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Garrett, S. A. (1992). Building a Sense of Community in the School Setting. (Master), Nova University, Florida. Retrieved from http://0search.ebscohost.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/login.aspx?direct=true&db=
eric&AN=ED353198&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-live Available from EBSCOhost eric database.
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the
Schools, 30(1), 79-90.
Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. New York, NY: Random House .
Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice: A Theory of Personality Types and Model Environments. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing Company.
Huebner, L. A. (1989). Interaction of student and campus. In U. D. G. R. Hanson (Ed.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (2nd ed., pp. 165-208). San Francisco, CA: Jessey-Bass.
Huebner, L. A., & Lawson, J. M. (1990). Understanding and assessing college environment. In D. G. C. Associates (Ed.), College student development: Theory and practice for the 1990s (pp. 127-151). Lanham, MA: ACPA.
Keiser, K. A., & Schulte, L. E. (2009). Seeking the sense of community: A comparison of two elementary schools' ethical climates. School Community
Journal, 19(2), 45-58.
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. C. a. Associates (Ed.), The modern American college: Responding to the new
realities of diverse students and a changing society (pp. 232-255). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D. (1991). Involving colleges : successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom: San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
Liu, Y., & Lu, Z. (2011). Trajectories of Chinese students' sense of school belonging and academic achievement over the high school transition period. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 187-190.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Merz, C., & Furman, G. C. (1997). Community and schools : promise and paradox. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Moos, R. (1976). The human context: Environmental determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
Moos, R. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: procedures, measures, findings, policy recommendations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Myers, I. B. (1980). introduction to type. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Neel, C. G.-O., & Fuligni, A. (2013). A Longitudinal Study of School Belonging and Academic Motivation Across High School. Child Development, 84(2), 678-692.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01862.x
Pascarella, E. T. (1985a). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. Higher education:
Handbook of theory and research, 1(1), 1-61.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985b). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1-61). New York, NY: Agathon.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Roberts, W., Hom, A., & Battistich, V. (1995). Assessing Students' and Teachers' Sense of the School as a Caring Community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Reasearch Association, San Francisco,
CA.
Rodgers, R. F. (1990). Recent theories and research underlying student development. In D. G. C. Associates (Ed.), College student development: Theory and practice
for the 1990s (pp. 27-35). Alexandria,VA: ACPA.
Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1996). Individual‐level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of community psychology, 24(4), 395-416.
Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1997). Schools as Communities. ERIC Digest, Number 111 (Eric document Reproduction Service ED 405641). Eugene, OR: ERIC
Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
Sandel, M. J. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schroeder, C. C. (Ed.) (1993). Creating residence life programs with student development goals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship : a reflective practice perspective (3rd ed .). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sheers, K. L. (2010). Administrator, teacher, and parent perceptions of syudent's sence of community in one elementary school. (doctor), Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University Falls Church, VA.
Shouse, R. C. (1995). Academic Press and School Sense of Community: Sources of Friction, Prospects for Synthesis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Reasearch Association, San Francisco, CA.
Strange, C. (1983). Human development theory and administrative practice in student affairs: Ships passing in the daylight? NASPA Journal, 21(1), 2-8.
Strange, C. C. (1993). Developmental impacts of campus living environments. In J. R. B. Winston, S. Anchors & Associates (Ed.), Student housing and residential
life (pp. 134-166). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Strange, C. C. (1996). Dynamics of campus environments. In D. B. W. J. S.R. Komives, & Associates (Ed.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (Vol. 3, pp. 244-268).
Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by design : creating campus learning environments that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Talcott, P. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of educational research, 45(1), 89-125.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college : rethinking the causes and cures of student
attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tonnies, F., & Loomis, C. P. (1957). Community and society. Translated and edited by C.P. Loomis. East Lansing, MI: Michigen State University Press.
Walker, C. O. (2012). Student perceptions of classroom achievement goals as predictors of belonging and content instrumentality. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 97-107.
Wells, R. L. (1996). Leadership for community: a case study of individuals perceived as creators and maintainers of a psychological sense of community in a university. (doctor), Temple University
Whitt, E. (1996). Assessing student cultures. In M. L. U. J. H. Schuh (Ed.), Assessment in student affairs: A guide for practitioners (pp. 189-216). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.