現今課程的安排基於傳統教材進行教學活動，學習者學習新的概念時，透
過教學者引導其以有意義的方式學習，將課程所學內容進行有效整合以及結構化，運用擴增實境的定位特性與辨識標記概念搭配學習活動引導教材及適當的教學策略，協助學習者在學習過程中經由學習策略的安排，獲得學習引導及學習個人化之面向。

故本研究提出擴增實境學習導航系統（AR-based Learning Guide，ARLG），以擴增實境學習導航系統作為輔助學習工具，搭配國小高年級健康領域學習教材內容，讓學習者透過學習導航系統與教材及課程內容進行互動。

研究結果顯示，擴增實境學習導航系統的間接回饋組在學習成效比較時，進步幅度明顯優於直接回饋組，在兩組別皆使用擴增實境的情況下，提供學習者相同的外在環境條件進行學習活動時，在神馳經驗、領域學習動機與自我導向學習態度量表上，顯示學習策略的不同並未造成兩組別在學習活動專注度上的差異。在系統滿意度方面，除操作靈敏度教需要改進外，其餘學習者具有良好的使用以及接受態度，並對未來使用皆抱持著開放的心態。在間隔一個月的延宕測驗顯示，使用擴增實境學習導航系統的間接回饋組以及直接回饋組兩者並無學習保留上的差異。

The instructors and learners face during teaching and learning process is being constrained by traditional paper-based teaching activities are restricted by physical space. Therefore, one cannot integrate and collaborate with the design of the instructional materials effectively.

As a result, it is unlikely that instructors are able to successfully moderate learners’ focus on the content, as well as the order of their focus during their reading and learning processes, which forms a blind spot in teaching and learning. In order to organize knowledge structures to facilitate a meaningful learning experience and teach strategies, this study applied augmented reality (AR) and image positioning technologies to paper textbooks. By utilizing AR’s function of providing accurate guidance to learners, this study intends to establish an AR-based Learning Guide (ARLG) system for guiding learners through the logical pathways of the materials.

According to the analysis, the experimental groups make significant better progress than the control group, beside the progress of the test, included of the experience flow, learning motivation of the learning area and learning attitudes, there was no significant different among all groups. The results revealed that the learners demonstrated a good experience by using the system and a positive learning attitude. One month later both of the groups had delayed test, the test shows that the experimental group and the control group were not significantly different in the post-test scores and learning retention of the course after a month.

方德隆（2001）。課程理論與實務。高雄：麗文。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：教育部。
黃政傑（1993）。課程設計。台北：東華。
王郁文（2009）。數學史輔助教學法對國二學生數學學習動機影響之研究～以 「尺規作圖]」為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南市。
吳佳儒（2009）。不同自我導向學習能力國小學童在網路合作契約式學習活動中語文能力提升成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南市。
陳姿蓉（2013）。新北市汐止區四年級教師社會學習領域教學現況之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
單文經（2001）。解析 Beane 對課程統整理論與實際的主張，教育研究集刊。
黃炳煌（1999）。談「課程統整」－以國民教育九年一貫課程為例。迎向千禧年：新世紀中小學課程改革與教學創新學術研討會論文集（49-56頁）。高雄市：麗文文化。
黃譯瑩（1999）。從課程統整的意義與模式探究九年一貫新課程之結構。九年一貫課程研討會論文集（下）（252-274頁）。

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Araujo, I. S., Veit, E. A., & Moreira, M. A. (2008). Physics students’ performance using computational modelling activities to improve kinematics graphs interpretation. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1128-1140.
Ausubel, D. P. (2012). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21(6), 34-47.
Baber, C., Bristow, H., Cheng, S. L., Hedley, A., Kuriyama, Y., Lien, M., ... & Sorrell, P. (2001). Augmenting museums and art galleries. In 13rd Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Interact (pp. 439-447)
Bauman, R. P. (1976). Applicability of Piagetian Theory to College Teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching, 6(2), 94-96.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Bergqvist, U. O., & Knave, B. G. (1994). Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 27-33.
Berryman, D. R. (2012). Augmented reality: a review. Medical reference services quarterly, 31(2), 212-218.
Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The magicbook-moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21(3), 6-8.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
Blum, L., Wetzel, R., McCall, R., Oppermann, L., & Broll, W. (2012, June). The final TimeWarp: using form and content to support player experience and presence when designing location-aware mobile augmented reality games. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 711-720). ACM.
Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World‐Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193-200.
Cardellini, L. (2004). Conceiving of concept maps to foster meaningful learning: An interview with Joseph D. Novak. J. Chem. Educ, 81(9), 1303.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and Behavioral Pattern Analysis of a Mobile Guide System with Augmented Reality for Painting Appreciation Instruction in an Art Museum. Computers & Education, 71, 185-197.
Chang, Y. L., Hou, H. T., Pan, C. Y., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Apply an Augmented Reality in a Mobile Guidance to Increase Sense of Place for Heritage Places. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 166-178.
Chen, C. M. (2008). Intelligent web-based learning system with personalized learning path guidance. Computers & Education, 51(2), 787-814.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449-462.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Children and parents' reading of an augmented reality picture book: Analyses of behavioral patterns and cognitive attainment. Computers & Education, 72, 302-312.
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students’ Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Roher Murphy, L. C. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 5-22.
Coffey, J. W., Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Reichherzer, T., & Suri, N. (2003). Knowledge modeling and the creation of El-Tech: a performance support and training system for electronic technicians. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(4), 483-492.
Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2009). Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 455-465.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
Deepwell, F., & Malik, S. (2008). On campus, but out of class: an investigation into students' experiences of learning technologies in their self-directed study. ALT-J, 16(1), 5-14.
Dempsey, J.V., & Sales, G.C. (Eds.), (1993). Interactive Instruction and Feedback.　Educational Technology Publications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Dickson, K. L., Miller, M. D., & Devoley, M. S. (2005). Effect of textbook study guides on student performance in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 34-39.
Dressel, P. L. (1958). The meaning and significance of integration. The integration of educational experiences, 57, 3-25.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). ARBOOK: Development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119-124.
Gorissen, C. J., Kester, L., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Martens, R. (2015). Autonomy supported, learner-controlled or system-controlled learning in hypermedia environments and the influence of academic self-regulation style. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 655-669.
Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1999). Integrating the Internet for meaningful learning. Houghton Mifflin Co..
Guglielmino, L. M. (1978). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
Hamid, M. A. (2016). The effect of learning guidance to students’ achievement in English lesson on the class VIII at MTs Ribatul Muta'alimin Pekalongan in academic year of 2015/2016 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Walisongo).
Hammond, N., & Allinson, L. (1989). Extending hypertext for learning: an investigation of access and guidance tools. People and computers V, 293-304.
HARDEN, JM LAIDLAW, EA HESKETH, R. M. (1999). AMEE Medical Education Guide No 16: Study guides-their use and preparation. Medical teacher, 21(3), 248-265.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hendry, G. D., Bromberger, N., & Armstrong, S. (2011). Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 1-11.
Henly, D. C. (2003). Use of Web‐based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit. European Journal of Dental Education, 7(3), 116-122
Hollier, L. M., Cox, S. M., McIntire, D. D., Lo, J. Y., & Wendel Jr, G. D. (2002). Effect of a Resident‐Created Study Guide on Examination Scores. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99(1), 95-100.
Höök, P. L. K., Karlgren, P. L. J., Wærn, T. L. A., Dahlbäck, N., Jansson, C. G., Karlgren, K., & Lemaire, B. (1998). A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia. In Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 143-170). Springer Netherlands.
Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55-67.
Hübscher, R. (2000, August). Logically optimal curriculum sequences for adaptive hypermedia systems. In International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (pp. 121-132). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Yin, P. Y., & Chuang, K. H. (2010). A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 404-415.
Iiyoshi, T. (1999). Cognitive processing using cognitive tools in open-ended hypermedia learning environments: A case study (pp. 1-261).
J. HOLSGROVE JOEL H. LANPHEAR IAIN MCA. LEDINGHAM, G. A. R. E. T. H. (1998). Study guides: an essential student learning tool in an integrated curriculum. Medical Teacher, 20(2), 99-103.
Jaehnig, W., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Feedback types in programmed instruction: A systematic review. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 219.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. New Media Consortium. 6101 West Courtyard Drive Building One Suite 100, Austin, TX 78730.
Jonassen, D. H. 2000. Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational psychology review, 19(2), 141-184.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning?. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247-254.
Laidlaw, J. M., & Harden, R. M. (1990). What is… a study guide?. Medical Teacher, 12(1), 7-12.
Lawson, A. E., & Wollman, W. T. (1975). Physics problems and the process of self‐regulation. The Physics Teacher, 13(8), 470-470.
Maas, J. D., & Leauby, B. A. (2005). Concept mapping-exploring its value as a meaningful learning tool in accounting education. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 75.
Macías, J., & Castells, P. (2001). An authoring tool for building adaptive learning guidance systems on the web. Active Media Technology, 268-278.
Mafinejad, M. K., Aghili, R., Emami, Z., Malek, M., Baradaran, H., Taghavinia, M., & Khamseh, M. E. (2014). Study guides: effective tools to improve self-directed learning skills of medical students. Acta Medica Iranica, 52(10), 781.
Margueratt, D. O. (2007). Improving Learner Motivation Through Enchanced Intructional Design.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., & Braun, A.-K. (2010). Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 25-35.
Micarelli, A., & Sciarrone, F. (1996). An intelligent agent for supporting user navigation in a hyperspace. In Advanced IT Tools (pp. 479-486). Springer US.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional science, 32(1), 99-113.
Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: a study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83-97.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge.
O’regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 7(3), 78-92.
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2005). Engagement as process in computer-mediated environments. In Poster presented at the Annual Conference of American Society for Information Science and Technology, Charlotte, NC.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum--foundations, principles, and issues. Allyn & Bacon.
Quinney, K. L., Smith, S. D., & Galbraith, Q. (2010). Bridging the gap: Self-directed staff technology training. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(4), 205.
Raven, R. J. (1974). Programming Piaget's logical operations for science inquiry and concept attainment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(3), 251-261.
Rose, S., Potter, D., & Newcombe, M. (2010). Augmented Reality: A Review of available Augmented Reality packages and.
Sadler, D.R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18: 119–144.
Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing Self-directed and Self-regulated Learning and Measuring them in the E-learning Context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190-198.
Schittek, M., Mattheos, N., Lyon, H. C., & Attström, R. (2001). Computer assisted learning. A review. European Journal of Dental Education, 5(3), 93-100.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (1988). Motor control and learning. Human kinetics.
Seo, D. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2013). Direct hand touchable interactions in augmented reality environments for natural and intuitive user experiences.Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3784-3793.
Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 51(2), 955-967.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer Self‐Efficacy and Motivation to Learn in a Self‐Directed Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 99-121.
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68.
Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114-122.
Spinath, B., & Spinath, F. M. (2005). Longitudinal analysis of the link between learning motivation and competence beliefs among elementary school children. Learning and instruction, 15(2), 87-102.
Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The journal of the learning sciences, 16(3), 371-413.
Timmers, C., & Veldkamp, B. (2011). Attention paid to feedback provided by a computer-based assessment for learning on information literacy. Computers & Education, 56(3), 923-930.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 541-566.
Vallino, J. R. (1998). Interactive augmented reality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester).
Van der Kleij, F. M., Eggen, T. J., Timmers, C. F., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2012). Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 263-272.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 85(4), 475-511.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Timmers, C. F., & Eggen, T. J. (2011). The effectiveness of methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning: A systematic review. Cadmo.
Van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1.
Van Nuland, H. J., Taris, T. W., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2012). Testing the hierarchical SDT model: The case of performance-oriented classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 467-482.
Vichitvejpaisal, P., Sitthikongsak, S., Preechakoon, B., Kraiprasit, K., Parakkamodom, S., Manon, C., & Petcharatana, S. (2001). Does computer‐assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process?. Medical education, 35(10), 983-989.
Walker, R. A., Hendrix, J. R., & Mertens, T. R. (1980). Sequenced instruction in genetics and Piagetian cognitive development. The American Biology Teacher, 42(2), 104-108.
Wang, K.-H., Chen, L.-C., Chu, P.-Y., & Cheng, Y.-M. (2009). A Study on the Design of Augmented Reality User Interfaces for Mobile Learning Systems in Heritage Temples. In International Conference on Virtual and Mixed Reality (pp. 282-290). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Wang, X., & Chen, R. (2009). An experimental study on collaborative effectiveness of augmented reality potentials in urban design. CoDesign, 5(4), 229-244
Weinberg, R., Grove, R., & Jackson, A. (1992). Strategies for building self-efficacy in tennis players: A comparative analysis of Australian and American coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 6(1), 3-13.
Winne, P. H., & Butler, D. L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. International encyclopedia of education, 2, 5738-5775.
Wojciechowski, R., Walczak, K., White, M., & Cellary, W. (2004, April). Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technology (pp. 135-144). ACM.
Zhang, J., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014, August). UARE: Using reality-virtually-reality (RVR) models to construct Ubiquitous AR environment for e-Learning context. In Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2014 (pp. 1007-1010). IEEE.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2011). Using a Mobile Digital Armillary Sphere (MDAS) in astronomical observation for primary school students. In Proc. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2632-2641)