簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃建榮
aaron
論文名稱: 探索劉力學的重要生命經驗與環境行動在環境教育上的意義
Exploring the significant life experience of Pierre Loisel and the magnificence of environmental action to environmental education
指導教授: 周儒
Chou, Ju
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 345
中文關鍵詞: 重要生命經驗環境行動環境教育
英文關鍵詞: significant life experience, environmental action, environmental education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:292下載:46
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    重要生命經驗﹙Significant Life Experience以下簡稱SLE﹚的研究,是Tanner在1980年所開啟的,歷經了二十年後,已然成為環境教育研究上的一個領域。這個領域的研究,致力於從解構一個人的生命經驗,去了解影響其環境行為的重要因素。SLE研究的重要性在於傳統以量化為主的環境教育研究中,它是一個質性研究,所探討的重點不只是在於知道人們做什麼?更要知道為什麼?因此它的重要性,在於從解構的過程中,重新建構環境教育的精神和內涵。此外,行動能力﹙Action Competence﹚是最近在丹麥環境教育學會上討論的主題,其影響力已經蔚為另一股環境教育的新典範,這個領域的特色是強調環境教育的焦點應該放在環境議題上,以及培養學生的行動能力上。
    國內有關這兩方面的研究,都尚處於起步的階段。研究者有幸,在幾位老師的指導之下,接觸到了這兩個研究領域,且研究的理論架構剛好可以適用,因此研究者就以質性研究的方式來進行個案的研究。一開始的研究動機,只是對於發生在本土的一位外籍人士—劉力學﹙Pierre Loisel﹚他個人的環境行為感到十分的好奇與興趣,想要瞭解他在台灣這三十幾年來所從事過的環境行動經驗,探索他是如何有效達成的?是什麼樣的因素,促使他去做這些事情?同樣的情況之下,為什麼台灣人辦不到?這些答案在環境教育上可以提供什麼意義?
    因此本研究的重點在於探索劉力學的重要生命經驗與其日後從事保護環境行動之間的關係,試圖探討他承諾保護環境的源動力,以及有效行動的構成要素,並進一步將研究的發現與結果轉移到環境教育的實施上。
    本研究的結果顯示:「承諾保護環境的源動力」與「有效行動構成要素」的各項因素之間具有交互作用的關係,透過本研究的分析可進一步將其架構成運作模式,且兩個運作模式之間具有密切的相關。這些模式有別於現存的許多環境行為模式,這樣的結果提供了環境教育工作者一個反思和批判的機會,重新檢視環境教育的真實內涵、相關實施方式,以及需要加強的地方。

    ABSTRACT
    Research in the field of Significant Life Experiences (SLE for short) was initiated by Thomas Tanner in 1980. It has become a serious research sector for environmental education 20 years down the road. Deconstructing a person's major underlying life experiences, to reveal the relevant factors that resulted in a person's environmental behavior, is the focus of this
    field of studies. SLE is a qualitative approach, different from, but supplement to the traditional quantitative approach to study environmental behavior. The approach is designed not only to study what people are doing, but also why they are doing. As a result, it is importance is to reconstruct the context and spirit of environmental education, which was based upon the
    deconstructing procedure previously accomplished. Meanwhile, action competence is the theme among Danish environmental education research and practices recently. Its impact gradually becomes a new research paradigm. The model of action competence emphasizes upon environmental issues along with their resolutions, and the potential of raising students' action competence.
    We just begin our effort in these two fields. Both of them are in the explorative stage. This researcher has the honor, under the careful supervision of some university faculty members, to touch these fields. More important, the research framework can apply to this research project. As a result, this researcher used the qualitative approach, the case study, to
    begin the investigation. When the researcher just began his investigation, he was interested in a foreigner's, Pierre Loisel, environmental behavior, and was very curious about Loisel's environmental action during the past thirty years in Taiwan. This researcher wanted to know how Loisel could have accomplished so much so effectively? What factors pushed him to do all of these? Why couldn't Taiwanese do that when the same situation applied? Could all of these answers provide some insights to environmental education?
    Therefore, the study focused upon Loisel's significant life experiences, his environmental action, and the potential relationship between them. It is the researcher's attempt to investigate the motivation of Loisel's commitment to take environmental action, and the important factors influencing effective environmental action, and finally, the potential implication of the research
    results to the implementation of environmental education.
    Research results indicated the followings: There is interacted relationship in between the motivation of a person's commitment to take environmental action, and the relevant factors of the effective action. Working models can be established through the analysis from this study, and the two models have close relationship to each other.
    These models are quite different from many models currently accepted by most
    environmental educators. The results of this study provide a chance for environmental educators to reflect, and criticize upon. It is time to seriously evaluate the true context, the proper approach to implement environmental education.

    內 容 目 次 致謝……………………………………………………………………………… i 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………… iii 內容目次………………………………………………………………………… iv 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………… vi 表目錄…………………………………………………………………………… vi 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究的重要性…………………………………………………… 4 第三節 研究的目的與目標……………………………………………… 5 第四節 研究的限制……………………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 「重要生命經驗」的研究……………………………………… 9 第二節 行動能力與環境教育的關係…………………………………… 35 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究的流程……………………………………………………… 45 第二節 資料的蒐集與分析……………………………………………… 47 第三節 效度和信度……………………………………………………… 55 第四章 個案簡介 57 第一節 童年生活………………………………………………………… 58 第二節 學校教育………………………………………………………… 62 第三節 定居臨海別墅…………………………………………………… 66 第四節 專業及社交上的成就…………………………………………… 71 第五節 臨海別墅自然與人文環境……………………………………… 79 第五章 劉力學的環境行動事件 第一節 劉力學早期的環境行動事件…………………………………… 83 第二節 劉力學近期的環境行動事件…………………………………… 120 第三節 劉力學對教育的看法與處世態度……………………………… 145 第六章 結果的分析與討論 第一節 劉力學承諾保護環境源動力的分析與討論…………………… 161 第二節 劉力學有效行動構成要素的分析與討論……………………… 179 第三節 綜合討論………………………………………………………… 205 第七章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………………… 209 第二節 建議……………………………………………………………… 213 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………… 227 附錄 附錄壹……………………………………………………………………… 231 附錄貳……………………………………………………………………… 255 圖 目 錄 圖2-1 不同年齡對環境承諾源動力的比較………………………………….. 25 圖2-2 「行動」的標準……………………………………………………….. 38 圖3-1 研究流程………………………………………………………………. 46 圖4-1 臨海別墅地理位置圖………………………………………………….. 80 圖7-1 劉力學「承諾保護環境源動力」的運作模式……………………….. 209 圖7-2 劉力學「有效行動構成要素」的運作模式………………………….. 211 圖7-3 議題探索教學模式…………………………………………………….. 222 表 目 錄 表2-1-1 影響一個人選擇保育工作的因素………………………………… 12 表2-1-2 影響一個人對環境實際的關心……………………………………. 13 表2-1-3 重要影響因素的分類項目及例子/Slovennia﹙斯洛維尼亞﹚…. 15 表2-1-4 重要影響因素的分類項目及例子/ Greece﹙希臘﹚…………… 16 表2-1-5 九個國家最重要的個別影響因素的等級分佈…………………… 17 表2-1-6 九個國家主要影響群組因素的等級分佈…………………………. 17 表2-1-7 影響一個人對環境的態度…………………………………………. 19 表2-1-8 影響一個人對環境的關心………………………………………… 20 表2-1-9 影響一個人選擇環境教育的因素………………………………… 20 表2-1-10 影響一個人對待環境的態度……………………………………… 21 表2-1-11 環境保護論者所提到承諾保護環境源動力的百分比…………… 23 表2-1-12 承諾保護環境的源動力…………………………………………… 24 表2-1-13 環境保護論者所提到有效行動構成要素的百分比………………. 25 表2-1-14 SLE研究的優點……………………………………………………. 27 表2-1-15 SLE研究的缺點……………………………………………………. 28 表2-1-16 增進對SLE研究的建議…………………………………………… 32 表3-2-1 訪談歷程摘要……………………………………………………… 50 表3-2-2 重要環境行動事件編碼表…………………………………………. 51 表3-2-3 承諾保護環境源動力編碼表………………………………………. 51 表3-2-4 有效行動構成要素編碼表…………………………………………. 52 表3-2-5 參與觀察歷程表…………………………………………………… 53 表3-2-6 文件蒐集相關內容摘要表…………………………………………. 54 表4-1 劉力學年歷表……………………………………………………… 57 表4-2 白沙灣別墅門牌登記戶數………………………………………… 81 表4-3 臨海別墅門牌登記戶數…………………………………………… 81 表6-1 劉力學承諾保護環境源動力分析………………………………… 162 表6-2 劉力學有效行動構成要素分析…………………………………… 180

    參考文獻
    王 鑫﹙2000﹚:〈永續校園—學校環境教育政策的範例〉。《2000年環境教育學
    術研討會手冊》。國立高雄師範學院,183-185。
    王文科﹙1995﹚:《教育研究法》﹙第四版﹚。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    方潔玫譯 (Joseph Cornell著) (1994): 《共享自然的喜悅》 。台北:張老師
    出版社。
    尹萍、王碧譯 ( Feyman著) (1995) : 《你管別人怎麼想》。台北:天下文化。
    沈振中 (1999) : 《老鷹觀想錄》。基隆:基隆市野鳥學會。
    吳芝儀、李奉儒譯﹙Patton, M.Q.著﹚﹙1995﹚:《質的評鑑與研究》。台北,桂冠
    圖書公司。
    吳美真譯 (Aldo Leopold 著) (1997):《沙郡年記》。台北:天下文化。
    吳怡靜 (1999) : 〈腦力即國力三歲定一生〉 。 《天下雜誌》 。台北:特
    刊27,36-44。
    周 儒 (1998) :〈環境教育的神話與迷失〉 。 《現代教育論壇 (三) :環境教育
    國小階段之角色探討》,18-21頁,台北,國立台北師範學院,國立教育資料
    館。
    周 儒、呂建政譯 ( Donald R. H.;William M. H. & Elizabeth L. H.著) (1999)。 《戶
    外教學》 。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    周慧菁 (1999a) : 〈21世紀從0開始〉 。 《天下雜誌》 。台北:特刊27,
    30-31。
    周慧菁 (1999b) : 〈史代納:體驗自然 發展人生〉 。 《天下雜誌》 。台
    北:特刊27,237-238。
    孟祥森譯 ( Rachel Carson著) (1998):《永遠的春天》。台北:雙月書屋。
    孟祥森譯 (Jane Goodall;Phillip Berman著) (1999):《希望-珍.古德自傳》。台北:
    雙月書屋。
    許世璋﹙2000﹚:〈大學環境教育課程對於學生環境行動與其他環境素養變相之成效
    分析〉。《2000年環境教育學術研討會手冊》。國立高雄師範學院,301-313。
    黃建榮等譯 ( John Fien著 ) (1999) : 〈一個完全實施環境教育的學校〉 。 見
    國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所:《為永續環境而學習》。國立台灣師
    範大學環境教育研究所。
    劉克襄 (2000) : 《綠色童年》 。台北:玉山社。
    Breiting, S. & Mogensen, F. (1999). Action Competence and Environmental Education.
    Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), pp.349-353.
    Chawla, L. (1998a). Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on
    sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4(4),
    pp.369-382.
    Chawla, L. (1998b). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: review
    and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), pp. 383-297.
    Chawla, L. (1999). Life Paths Into Effective Environmental Action. Journal of
    Environmental Education, 31(1), pp. 15-26.
    Cromwell, M. (1988). The evolution of environmental values. Unpublished manuscript.
    Gough, A.(1999). Kids don't like wearing the same jeans as their Mums and Dads: So
    whose `life' should be in significant life experiences research? Environmental
    Education Research, 99(5), pp.383-394.
    Gough, N.(1999). Surpassing our own histories: Autobiographical methods for
    environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 99(5),
    pp.407-418.
    Gough, S. (1999). Significant Life Experiences (SLE) Research: A view from
    somewhere. Environmental Education Research, 99(5), pp.353-363.
    Hicks, D. (1998). Stories of hope:A response to the ‘psychology of despair’.
    Environment Education Research, 4(2):165-176.
    Hines, J. M. (1985). An Analysis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior.
    Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Southern University at Carbondale.
    Hungerford, H. R., Peyton, R. B., & Wilke, R. J. (1980). Goals for curriculum
    development in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education,
    11(3):42-47.
    Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. (1985). Science Methods for the Elementary School.
    Champaign, Ⅲ.:Stipes Publishing Co. Columbus, Ohio:ERIC/SMEAC
    Information Reference Center. ED 260921.
    James, K. (1993). A qualitative study of factors influencing racial diversity in
    environmental education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
    Minnesota.
    Jensen, B. & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental
    education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), pp. 163-178.
    Lewis, B. (1999). In safe hands. Inform--Public Education in New South Wales, 2(1),
    pp. 14-16.
    Mcknight, M. (1990). Socialization into environmentalism, in: D. Simmons, C. Knapp &
    C. Young (Eds) Setting the Environmental Education Agenda for the '90s, pp. 135-
    140, (Troy, OH, North American Association for Environmental Education).
    Musser, L. M. & Diamond, K. E.(1999). The children's attitudes toward the environment
    scale for preschool children. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), pp. 23-
    30.
    Myers, G. (1997). Significant life experiences and choice of major among undergraduate
    minorities and nonminority students majoring in environmental studies and other
    disciplines. paper presented at the Annual Conference of the North American
    Association of Environmental Education, University of British Columbia,
    Vancouver.
    Palmer, J.A. (1993). Development of concern for the environment and formative
    experiences of educators. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), pp. 26-30.
    Palmer, J.A. & Suggate, J. (1996). Influences and experiences affecting the pro-
    environmental behaviour of educators. Environmental Education Research, 2(1),
    pp. 109-121.
    Palmer, J.A., Suggate, J., Bajd, B. & Tsaliki, E. (1998a). Significant influences on the
    development of adults' environmental awareness in the UK, Slovenia and Greece.
    Environmental Education Research, 4(4), pp. 429-444.
    Palmer, J.A., Suggate, J. with others (1998b). An overview of significant influences and
    formative experiences on the development of adults' environmental awareness in
    nine countries. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), pp. 445-464.
    Payne, Phillip (1999). The significance of experience in SLE research. Environmental
    Education Research, Nov99, 5(4), pp.365-382 .
    Peters Grant, V.P. (1996). The influence of life experiences on the vocational interests of
    volunteer environmental workers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
    of Maine at Orono.
    Peterson, N. (1982). Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in
    professional environmental educators. Unpublished master's thesis, Southern
    Illinois University at Carbondale.
    Roth C.E. (1992). Environmental Literacy:Its Roots, Evolution, and Directions in the
    1990s. Columbus, Ohio:ERIC/CSMEE.
    Scholl Wilder, M. (1983). Significant childhood environmental learning experiences of
    suburban/urban environmentalists, in: J.H. BALDWIN (Ed.) Crossroads: Society
    and Technology (Troy, OH, National [now North American] Association for
    Environmental Education), pp. 125-129.
    Sia, A. (1984). An investigation of selected predictors of overt responsible environmental
    behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at
    Carbondale.
    Sivek, D.J. & Hungerford, H.R. (1989/90). Predictors of responsible environmental
    behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organizations. Journal of
    Environmental Education, 21(2), pp. 35-40.
    Sward, L. (1998). Significant life experiences affecting the environmental sensitivity of
    El Salvadoran environmental professionals. Environmental Education Research,
    5(2).
    Tanner, T. (1974). Ecology, Environment, and Education (Lincoln, NE, Professional
    Educators Publications).
    Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences: a new research area in environmental
    education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), pp. 20-24.
    Tanner, T. (1998a). Choosing the right subjects in significant life experiences research.
    Environmental Education Research, 4(4), pp. 399-418.
    Tanner, T. (1998b). On the origins of SLE research, questions outstanding, and other
    research traditions. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), pp. 419--424.

    QR CODE