簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林靜婷
Ching-ting Lin
論文名稱: 數位學習課程品質評估準則之發展與探討
The Development and Research on the Quality Evaluation Standards for e-Learning Courseware
指導教授: 陳明溥
Chen, Ming-Puu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞: 數位學習品質評估評估準則
英文關鍵詞: e-Learning, quality evaluation, quality standards
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:185下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究透過數位學習品質評估相關文獻之探討,發展數位學習品質評估工具,並藉由專家意見以確認評估架構的適切性,最後並透過評估架構及數位學習案例評估結果,提供此量表做為判斷數位學習品質優缺的參考,發展完成之量表內容務求淺顯易懂,也可提供一般學習者在評估數位學習優缺時使用。數位學習課程品質評估架構包含機構、教職員、學習者、教學、評鑑與評量五個構面、並細分為三十四項評估準則。
    專家針對評估準則重要性審查結果中得知準則構面的重要性排序依次為教學、機構、學習者、評鑑與評量、教職員。在學習者對品質評估準則的觀點調查中發現其對於評估構面的重要性看法依序為教學、評鑑與評量、機構、學習者、教職員。專家與使用者對於品質構面的重要性在重要性最高與最低的選擇上,具有相同的觀點。本研究所評估之數位學習案例共三件,依數位教材之用途與內涵分為國小補充教育、企業內訓、職能進修,此三件案例表現,以機構的品質構面平均表現為最佳,而在教職員的安排與協助上還有改善的空間。

    The purposes of this study were to develop and verify the feasibility of an quality evaluation standards for e-Learning courseware and to provide standards for the quality of e-Learning courseware with general learners. The study was developed based on literature review, and guidelines were adopted for the evaluation of e-Learning. The framework for the quality evaluation contained five components with thirty-four rules.
    The result showed that the e-Learning experts thought that the order for judging its quality should be teaching, institution, student, evaluation and assessment, and faculty. On the other hand, the e-Learning learners thought that the order should be teaching, evaluation and assessment, institution, student, and faculty. In sum, the orders of the important components identified by both experts and learners were similar. The three e-Learning cases in the study reveal that the quality of the institution was the best, but the quality of the faculties needs to be improved.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 重要名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 數位學習 8 第二節 數位學習品質 15 第三節 各國的數位學習品質與評估面向 19 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究案例 24 第二節 研究架構 30 第三節 研究工具 35 第四節 資料處理與分析 41 第四章 結果與討論 42 第一節 數位學習課程品質評估準則之題項發展 42 第二節 數位學習課程品質評估準則之評分者信度分析 49 第三節 數位學習課程品質評估準則專家審查結果分析 50 第四節 數位學習課程品質評估準則的使用者調查分析 50 第五節 數位學習課程品質案例評估之評分者信度分析 55 第六節 數位學習課程品質案例評估結果分析 55 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 結論 57 第二節 建議 60 參考文獻 62 附錄一 數位學習課程品質評估準則重要性評估表 66 附錄二 數位學習課程品質評估準則使用者意見調查表 77 附錄三 數位學習課程品質評估表 84

    吳台玲,(2001)。遠距教學之評量。生活科技教育,34(8),30-37。

    李永基,(2002)。以虛擬社群概念探討企業數位化學習之研究-以D公司為例。中原大學資管所碩士論文。

    陳年興,(2000)。網路教學與傳統教學之比較分析。遠距教育,15-16,153-163。

    陳明溥,(2005)。數位教材品質規範之規劃與考量。台大教與學期刊電子報,35,專家專欄。

    陳明溥,(2005)。數位學習服務品質認證之規劃與考量。台大教與學期刊電子報, 36,專家專欄。

    陳冠華,(2008)。數位學習。國家圖書館專題。Retrieved 28 May, 2008, from http://www.read.com.tw/web/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=subject/sub_e_learning.asp

    游光昭,(2003)。電子化學習與企業教育之關係探討。T&D飛訊,7,1-8。

    楊淑斐,(2002)。網路學習市場使用意向模式建構與比較分析之研究。南台科技大學資管所碩士論文。

    經濟部工業局,(2003)。2003數位內容產業白皮書。經濟部:作者。

    AFT. (2002). Distance education: Guidelines for good practice. Retrieved on 12 January, 2006 from http://www.aft.org/higher_ed/downloadable/distance.pdf

    Allen, M. W. (2003). Michael Allen’s guide to e-learning. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Press.

    Alley, L. (2000). Ten keys to quality assurance and assessment in online learning. Retrieved 7 June, 2008, from http://www.worldclassstrategies.com/

    American Federation of Teachers, Higher Education Program and Policy Council (2000). Distance education: Guideline for good practice (AFT Publication No. 36-0693). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.

    ASTD. (2003). Retrieved 5 November, 2005, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary

    Barker, K., & FutureEd (2002). Canadian recommended e-learning guidelines. Retrieved 12 January, 2006, from http://www.col.org/newsrelease/CanREGs%20Eng.pdf

    Cisco (2003). E-learning. Retrieved 28 May, 2008, from http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/elearn/overview.html

    E-Learning Advisory Group. (2002). Highways and pathways: Exploring New Zealand’s e-Learning opportunities. Retrieved 28 May, 2008, from http://www.steo.govt.nz/download/e-learning.pdf

    E-Learning Guidelines for New Zealand, (2005). Guidelines for the support of e-learning in New Zealand tertiary institutions. Retrieved on 12 January, 2006 from http://elg.massey.ac.nz/index.php?title=E-Learning_Guidelines-no-cube

    Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S. & Willis, J. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2001, 263-270.

    ITP New Zealand, (2004). Academic quality standards (2004 Revision). Retrieved on 17 January, 2006 from http://www.itpnz.ac.nz/standards/Academic%20Qual%20Standards%202004.pdf

    JISC. (2004). Effective practice with e-Learning: A good practice guide in designing for learning. Retrieved 28 May, 2008, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticeelearning.pdf

    LIfIA, & EIfEL. (2004). Open eQuality learning standards. Retrieved on 9 January 2006, from http://www.lifia.ca/en/learn_equal_proj_oeqls.htm

    Meyer, K. A. (2003). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. San Francisco: ASHE-ERIC Press.

    Rudenstine, N. L. (1997). The internet and education: A close fit. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 37-38.

    Open and Distance Learning Quality Council, (2005). Standards in open & distance learning. Retrieved on 17 January, 2006 from http://www.odlqc.org.uk/standard.htm

    Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Rosenberg, M. J. (2006). What lies beyond e-learning? Retrieved on 4 June, 2008 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2006/March/rosenberg.htm

    Ruttenbar, B.W. & Spickler, G. C. (2000). E-Learning- The engine of the knowledge economy. Morgan Keegan & Co., eLearning Industry Report.

    SEEQUEL (2004). SEEQUEL core quality framework. Retrieved on 9 January, 2006 from http://www.education-observatories.net/seequel/SEEQUEL_core_quality_Framework.pdf

    The British Association for Open Learning (2002). The development, implementation and use of the BAOL quality mark. Retrieved on 9 January 2006, from http://www.british-learning.org.uk/PDF/qmrepdfes.pdf

    The Institute for Higher Education Policy, (2000). Quality on the line- benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Retrieved on January 12, 2006 from http://www2.nea.org/he/abouthe/Quality.pdf

    Thorn K. E. (2000). Web based training producer 2000 conference recap. Retrieved on 4 June, 2008 from http://aaaprod.gsfc.nasa.gov/TEAS/KT_AppNet/KarenThorn/sld007.htm

    Twigg, C. A., (2001). Quality assurance for whom? Providers and consumers in today’s distributed learning environment. Center for Academic transformation at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved on January 17, 2006 from http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewSym/Mono3.pdf

    WR Hambrecht +Co. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://www.astd.org/NR/rdonlyres/E2CF5659-B67B-4D96-9D85-BFAC308D0E28/0/hambrecht.pdf

    Vaile K. (1999). Nine keys to quality K-12 online learning experiences. Retrieved 6 June, 2008 from http://www.classroom.com/edsoasis/TGuild/FETC99/Vaile1.html

    Yeung, D. (2002). Toward an effective quality assurance model of web-based learning: the perspective of academic staff. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(2). Retrieved February 24, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer52/yeung52.htm

    下載圖示
    QR CODE