本文致力於呈現學習者視角中的學習；「工廠、部落與大海」暗喻本文三名個案學習觀構築的樣貌。基於研究者參與民族誌研究團隊在國小現場的觀察經驗，欲理解學習者的學習觀，需奠基於學習者生活整體的概念。「構築」概念闡述著人與世界建立連結的歷程，其包含著時空取向的社會討論，與學習歷程兼顧個體與社會的特性相互輝映；所以「構築」概念為本文社會理論與討論的基礎，而「學習觀構築」為呈現學習者視角中學習的主要內容。
　　研究採用民族誌方法，進行了為期一年半的資料蒐集。根據「構築」與民族誌的理論基礎對話：統合兩者對整體觀的重視，以及相互主體性的認識基礎，欲以「學」視角捕捉學習歷程，研究者遂有了建構學習民族誌的發想。學習民族誌的描繪將著重於個人與社會的互動歷程，由此勾勒個人的學習歷程；猶如針線畫，透過學習者作為針引，生活經歷為線，勾勒出學習觀構築的圖像。因此，研究發現以「點、線與面」的架構呈現個案學習觀的構築：點的描繪為現場學習者在各式場域中所遇的學習據點與其地景意涵；而線與面的描繪為個案學習觀的呈現。研究中呈現三名個案的學習觀，並基於個案學習觀的構築，進行社會層次的分析與討論，勾勒出現場學習的社會網絡。
　　本文的研究成果可由三個層面作為說明。首先，由現場個案的學習觀構築勾勒的現場學習網絡，提供教育現場省視學校教育中學業表現分化的文化結構，以及網路延伸空間鑲嵌於生活中的學習處境。再者，基於生活整體觀與「人」主體性的關懷，學習觀構築與學習民族誌概念的提出，提供教育討論一種自「學」出發的研究視角，同時也提供當今「學習」探究一個文化取向的認識途徑。最後，研究由個人看見社會歷程的理論視角，回應當代教育學習化現象與後現代知識處境下的教育議題，宜以多層次的系統性思維作為思考與討論基礎。

This study aims for describing learners’ learning perspectives. Factory, tribe and ocean are the metaphors which represent learners’ learning perspectives. Based on the experience of participant observation, the study starts from the concept of holistic life in order to understand learners’ learning perspectives. The concept of “Tectonics” illustrates the process how a human builds the connection with the world through the spatiotemporal approach. “Tectonics”can be considered as an echo of learning process because the concepts are concerned about not only individuals themselves but their sociability. As a result, the concept of “Tectonics” is the foundation of sociological discussion in the study, and “the tectonics of learning perspectives” will be the main content which shows the learning from the horizon of leaners.
According to the methodology of ethnography, researcher had worked on data collection for one and a half year. On the basis of the theoretical dialog between tectonics and ethnography, the study emphasizes the holism of framework and the epistemology of intersubjectivity. For the horizon of learners, researcher worked out an ethnography of learning. The ethnography of learning starts from the description of individuals, then sketches the learning process through the social interaction. Just like stitch work, the self-description of an individual learner as a needle and one’s life experience as suture, they complete the picture of the learning perspectives.
With the metaphor of stitch work, the cases in the study will present the tectonics of learning perspectives with the frame of point, line and plane. The description of point represents the learning spots in various fields and its representation. And the description of line and plane show three eleven-years-old learners’ perspectives as cases. According to the cases, the article analyzes the process of tectonics to do some sociological discussion.
Result from this study can be illustrated in three points. First, the cases reveal that school members in the field lived in the culture with the academic performative division, and they also display the learning situation that learners are encountering an information society because of using internet. Second, based on the value of holism and subjectivity, the tectonics of learning perspectives and the ethnography of learning provide educational discussion with a learners’ horizon and a cultural approach to explore learning. Third, through the theoretical view from an individual’s social discussion, to respond the issues of the phenomenon of “learnification of education” and the postmodern condition, we need to discuss these issues with multilevel systematic thinking.

一、中文部分
王志弘（1998）。流動、空間與社會。台北市：田園城市。
王志弘（2016）。傅柯Heterotopia翻譯考。地理研究，2016(65)，75-106。
李信漢、杜綺文（2007）。Web 2.0，麥克魯漢知多少？新聞學研究，92，183- 192。
教育部教育研究委員會（2011）。中華民國教育報告書－黃金十年、百年樹人。 台北市：教育部。
黃瑞琴（1991）。質的教育研究方法。台北市：心理。
黃鴻文、鄭英傑、王俐蘋（2016）。為何不傾聽學生的聲音？學生課程觀及其對
課程研究的啟示。臺灣教育社會學研究，16(1)，127-152。

二、外文部分
Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in
medical school. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to
reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educ Asse Eval Acc, 21, 33- 46.
Biesta, G. (2012). Philosophy of education for the public good: Five challenges and an agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 581-593.
Candela, A., Rockwell, E., & Coll, C. (2004). What in the world happens in
classroom? Qualitative classroom research. European Educational Research
Journal, 3(3), 692-713.
Castells, M. (1989). The reconstruction of social meaning in the space of flow. In R. T. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (pp. 493-498). New York : Routledge.
DfEE (1998). The learning age. A renaissancefor a new Britain. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.
DfEE (1999). Learning to succeed. A new framework for post-16 learning. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.
Edwards, R. ,& Usher, R. (2000). Globalization and pedagogy: Space, place and identity. New York : Routledge.
Erickson, F. (1984). What makes school ethnography” ethnography”? Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 15(1), 51-66.
Frampton, K. (1995). Studies in tectonic culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. J. Cava (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of ‘acting white. Urban Review, 18 (3), 176-206.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
May, K.T. (2013). A school in the cloud: Sugata Mitra accepts the TED Prize at TED2013. Retrieved date August 21, 2017, from https://blog.ted.com/a-school- in-the-cloud-sugata-mitra-accepts-the-ted-prize-at-ted2013/
Price-Chalita, P. (1994). Spatial metaphor and the politics of empowerment: mapping a place for feminism and postmodernism in geography? Antipode, 26(3), 236- 254.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
UNESCO (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? (Open
Access)
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.