本研究以心智圖（Mind－Map）繪製應用在國小中年級科普閱讀文本理解，探討心智圖對於孩童閱讀理解能力的影響。依據已有的研究，教師以教授學童繪製心智圖來進行閱讀理解輔助，有助於學童對文章結構、段落大意、心得發表、個人知識整合有所幫助，並且可將所閱讀訊息、關鍵字等整合。本研究以行動研究課程設計方式，指導學童繪製心智圖輔助於科普文本閱讀理解，並假設學童在學習繪製心智圖後，對於文章理解，有正面影響。本研究閱讀理解課程以國小四年級學生為實施對象，進行為期八個星期心智圖繪製課程，並施以閱讀理解評量前後測與回饋問卷瞭解學生學習情形的改變。研究結果發現：一、心智圖學習課程能增進學生對科普文章閱讀理解能力。二、學生在課程實施後，低分組學生在提取訊息能力，高分組在推論訊息能力有獲得提升。三、行動研究教學回饋問卷分析顯示「課程滿意程度」和「提問教學方法」、「課程滿意程度」與「知識學習理解」以及「提問教學方法」和「知識學習理解」有顯著的相關性。四、女生在閱讀理解前後測進步的情形優於男生。五、經濟弱勢學生與原住民學生閱讀理解能力在課程實施後有獲得提升。

This study uses Mind-Map drawing in the comprehension of science texts in elementary and middle grades to explore the impact on children's reading comprehension ability. According to existing research, teachers teach students to draw mind maps to assist reading comprehension, which can help students understand the structure of articles, the main ideas, different opinions, and integration of personal knowledge, and can also integrate the information, keywords, etc. they read. This study uses an action research course design method to guide school children to draw mind maps to assist in reading comprehension of popular science texts.
This study's reading comprehension course targets fourth-year elementary school students and conducts an eight-week mind mapping course. Reading comprehension assessment pre- and post-tests and feedback questionnaires are administered to understand changes in students' learning situations. The research results show that: 1. Mind map learning courses can improve students’ reading comprehension of popular science articles. 2. Students in the low group have improved their ability to extract information, while students in the high group have improved their ability to infer information. 3. Analysis of the action research teaching feedback questionnaire shows that there is a significant correlation between "course satisfaction" and "questioning teaching method", "course satisfaction" and "knowledge learning and understanding", and "questioning teaching method" and "knowledge learning and understanding". 4. Girls improved better than boys in pre- and post-tests of reading comprehension 5. The reading comprehension ability of economically disadvantaged students and aboriginal students has been improved after the implementation of the course.

丹尼爾.T威林厄姆、梁海燕譯 (2020)。心智與閱讀 (初版)。浙江: 浙江教育出版社。
王梅玲、 曾湘怡 (2013)。 兒童閱讀教學活動成效評估。 國家圖書館館刊,2, 83–110。
王開府、 潘麗珠、鄭圓鈴、 吳惠花、黃惠美、 陳俐伶、 施政麟等 (2008)。 國語文心智圖教學指引。(教育部九年一貫語文學習領域國語文輔導群, Ed.)。 台北市: 教育部。
王聰 (2019)。 基於PIRLS 2016的香港小學生閱讀素養分析與啟示。教育理論與實踐學刊, 39, 1–20。
王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、 張郁雯、陳秀芬 (2008)。 一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報, 39(4), 555–568.Nagy。
丘引 (2014)。美國如何推動閱讀。全國新書資訊月刊,184, 9–15。
史麗珠、鍾佳玘、趙國玉、林雪蓉、侯嘉玲、林慧芬 (2015)。注意力不足過動症知識量表之發展及信效度評估。台灣公共衛生雜誌, 34(3), 319–334。
吳清基 (2010)。推動臺灣的閱讀教育－全民來閱讀。 研考雙月刊, 34(1), 62–66。 國家發展委員會. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.6978/YKSYK.201002.0062
林佳蓉 (2012)。心智圖法在學習障礙學生閱讀理解教學之應用。桃竹區特殊教育, 19, 24–29。
林奇伯 (2007, August)。日本閱讀新運動 晨讀10分鐘，造就教育大奇蹟。 遠見出版社。台北. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/11891
林朝鳳 (1986)。皮亞傑的認知發展理論及其在幼兒教育上的意義。 師大學報, 31, 89–102.
金明美、張琪惠譯(2011)。小學時期的閱讀能力決定一生的成績 (初版)。台北市: 李茲文化.
侯一欣 (2021)。 國內閱讀教育的推廣概況。 教育學誌, (45), 151–184。 國立臺南大學教育學系。Retrieved from https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/20713126-202105-202106030010-202106030010-151-184
柯華葳、張郁雯、詹益綾、 邱嘉慧 (2017)。 PIRLS 2016台灣四年級學生閱讀素養-國家報告。桃園市。
胡雅茹(2022)。心智圖閱讀術 (二版)。 臺中市: 晨星。
徐于婷(2015)。心智繪圖在閱讀教學上的應用。 台灣教育, 691, 34–36。
國家圖書館圖書館事業發展組(2020)。 108年臺灣閱讀風貌：全民閱讀力大幅成長 民眾閱讀興趣多元發展。 臺灣出版與閱讀, 10, 132–141。
教育部 (2008)。 提升國民中小學學生閱讀素養實施計畫. 教育部.
教育部 (2011)。十二年國教課程綱要總綱。 台北市. Retrieved March 31, 2023。 from https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/(111學年度實施)十二年國教課程綱要總綱.pdf
教育部 (2021, November 25)。 班班有網路 生生用平板-全面推動中小學數位學習精進方案。資訊及科技教育司。
教育部 (2023)。 雙閱讀素養教學. 教育部國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺。 Retrieved from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=1194&mid=13143
教育部國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺 (2023, November 10)。 閱讀策略成分表（國小）。教育部。 Retrieved November 10, 2023, from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/Website/1198/WebContent/38701/RFile/38701/106322.pdf
陳欣希 (2017, March 26) 。 理解閱讀 4-0 閱讀課室—培養閱讀理解力。 Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://reurl.cc/OVeO5v
陳雅慧、 蘇逸涵 (2019) 。圖解8張圖看懂108課綱。 親子天下。 台北市。 Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5085593
黃國珍 (2023, November 7)。閱讀理解的24個練習。 趨勢教育基金會
楊裕貿 (2023, November 13)。國語 : 新課綱中年級閱讀理解教學指導。 康軒教師網。 台北市。 Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://e108in.knsh.com.tw/article01.asp?ID=50
潘世尊 (2016)。以PIRLS閱讀理解歷程為基礎之「提問」策略教學。弘光學報, 78, 147–58。
鄭永熏, & 王嘉慧. (2015). 心智圖法運用在國語文領域對提昇國小五年級閱讀理解能力和創造力成效之研究。人文與社會學報, 3(34), 89–124。
謝小韞 (2006, April)。 縣市閱讀－桃園縣如何推動閱讀。 全國新書資訊月刊, 22–26。
簡俐珊、吳麗媛 (2011)。 增進幼兒繪本故事閱讀理解之探究-心智繪圖教學之應用。教育理論與實踐學刊, 23, 53–87。 Retrieved from http://doi.airiti.comhttp//doi.airiti.comFormoreinformation
Aleksić, V., Stanković, N., & Papic, M. (2011). The evaluation of using mind maps in teaching. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272792319
Amin, A., Lubis, M., Alimni, A., Saepudin, S., Jaenullah, J., Kurniawan, D. A., & Lestari, M. (2020). A study of mind mapping in elementary islamic school: Effect of motivation and conceptual understanding. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5127–5136. Horizon Research Publishing.
Biber, D., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1986). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Language, 62(3), 664. New York: Academic Press.
Bradley, S., Draca, M., Green, C., & Leeves, G. (2007). The magnitude of educational disadvantage of indigenous minority groups in Australia. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 547–569.
Bulut, A. (2017). Improving 4th Grade Primary School Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 23–30. Horizon Research Publishing Co., Ltd.
Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind Mapping Technique in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215–218. Elsevier BV.
Cathie Norris, & Elliot Soloway. (2015, October 13). Modeled Sustained Silent Reading’ Is Spreading Like Wildfire Internationally. THE JOURNAL.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (n.d.). The Reading Crisis: Why Poor Children Fall Behind.
Chen, H. H. (2013). How to use readability formulas to access and select english reading materials. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 50(2), 229–254. Tamkang University.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. Cognition in learning and memory.
Donna M. Ogle. (1986). K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text . The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.
Dr Rafiq Elmansy. (2015). How to Use Mind Mapping for Better Thinking. Retrieved March 16, 2023, from https://www.designorate.com/how-to-use-mind-mapping/
Edwards, S., & Cooper, N. (2010). Mind mapping as a teaching resource. Clinical Teacher, 7(4), 236–239. Retrieved from www.thinkbuzan.com
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Gee, J. (1991). Socio-Cultural Approaches to Literacy (Literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 31–48.
George, T. (2023). What Is Action Research? Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/action-research/
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 6–10.
Grii, P., & Care, E. (2015). Educational Assessment in an Information Age Assessment and Teaching of 21 st Century Skills. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York Londo. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/13475
Heffernan, V. (2011, August 7). Education Needs a Digital-Age Upgrade. The New York Times. New York. Retrieved from https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/education-needs-a-digital-age-upgrade/
Holland, B., Holland, L., & Davies, J. (2004). An investigation into the concept of mind mapping and the use of mind mapping software to support and improve student academic performance. Background and rationale. LEARNING AND TEACHING PROJECTS 2003/2004, 89–94. Retrieved from www.wlv.ac.uk/celt
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.
Janine Toole. (2018). VISUALIZATION SKILLS FOR READING COMPREHENSION SIX-MINUTE THINKING SKILLS (1st ed.). Happy Frog Press.
Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., Snyder, J., Petrich, B., & Koonce, C. (2012). The Effects of Mind Mapping Activities on Students’ Motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Georgia Southern University.
Kintsch, W. (1991). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Advances in Psychology, 79(C), 107–153.
Kommers, P. (2022). Sources for a Better Education Springer Texts in Education. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/13812
Koshy, V. (2010). Action research for improving educational practice: A step-by-step guide. Sage.
Kotcherlakota S, Zimmerman L, & Berger AM. (2013). Developing scholarly thinking using mind maps in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educ, 38(6), 252.
Malekzadeh, B., & Bayat, A. (2015). The effect of mind mapping strategy on comprehending implicit information in EFL reading texts. International Journal of Educational Investigations Available, 2(3), 81–90. Retrieved from www.ijeionline.com
Martin, M. O., Von Davier, M., Foy, P., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2021). PIRLS 2021 Assessment Design.
McCormick, S. (1999). Instructing students who have literacy problems (3rd ed.). Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Merchie, E., Catrysse, L., & Van Keer, H. (2021). Mind maps as primers when reading-for-learning in elementary grades? An eye tracking study. Instructional Science, 49(1), 23–65. Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Spontaneous Mind Map Use and Learning from Texts: The Role of Instruction and Student Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1387–1394. Elsevier BV.
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2021). PIRLS 2021 Reading Assessment Framework.
Pacey, A. (2020). Visual Thinking. Meaning in Technology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309548164
Pang, E. S., Muaka, A., Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL BUREAU OF EDUCATION Teaching reading. Retrieved from http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept/smec/iae
Pollitt, D. (2003). Mind mapping your way to a better career. Career Development International, 8(5), 253–256. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister
Rahmadiah, S. (2007). Reading Comprehension Strategies Theories, Interventions, an. Los Angeles.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Roehling, J. V., Hebert, M., Nelson, J. R., & Bohaty, J. J. (2017). Text Structure Strategies for Improving Expository Reading Comprehension. Reading Teacher, 71(1), 71–82. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Scott G. Paris, Ellen E., Hamilton Scott, G. Paris, & Ellen E. Hamilton. (2009). The Development of Children’s Reading Comprehension. Handbook of Research on Reading (pp. 32–54).
Shea, M., & Ceprano, M. (n.d.). Reading with Understanding: A Global Expectation. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education (Vol. 9).
Street, B. (2001). Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Suto, I., & Eccles, H. (2014). The Cambridge approach to 21st century skills: Definitions, development and dilemmas for assessment. IAEA Conference, 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/461811-the-cambridge-approach-to-21st-century-skills-definitions-development-and-dilemmas-for-assessment-.pdf
Toffler, A. (2022). The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. Bantam.
Trochim, W. M. R. (1989). AN INTRODUCTION TO CONCEPT MAPPING FOR PLANNING AND EVALUATION. Evaluation and Program Planning (Vol. 12).
UNESCO. (2023, June). What you need to know about literacy. UNESCO.
Westby, C. (2014). Reading comprehension problems as language impairment. Word of Mouth, 26(2), 5–8.
Westwood, P. (2012). Reading comprehension: assisting children with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17(1), 59–61. Heidelberg London New York: Springer.
Wigfield, A. (2005). Concept Oriented Reading Instruction - CORI. Ein Programm zur Förderung der Lesemotivation im Unterricht. Unterrichtswissenschaft. Retrieved March 20, 2023, from http://www.juventa.de