簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王振雄
Wang, Chen-Hsiung
論文名稱: 基於專利地圖與能力集合擴展之開放性創新策略
Open innovation strategy based on the patent map and competence set expansion
指導教授: 洪翊軒
Hung, Yi-Hsuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 141
中文關鍵詞: 開放性創新策略專利地圖能力集合擴展決策實驗室分析法決策實驗室網路流程法
英文關鍵詞: Open Innovation Strategy, Patent Map, Competence Set Expansion, Decision Makin Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), DEMATEL based network process (DNP)
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204231
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:157下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 專利地圖(Patent Map)乃透過專利的檢索技巧,檢索出與研究主題相關之專利資料,並以統計分析之方法,加以整理製成可分析、解讀、或以圖表格式呈現之加值化專利資訊,即可獲取包含在其內的豐富專利資訊內涵。能力集合擴展(Competence Set Expansion)為在一個產品開發專案中,決定所需技術的開發優先順序與其中扮演著重要的角色。若以能力集合擴展而言,則可視為一產品開發專案為達成某一決策問題之期望目標所需之能力集合。借由透過此能力集合擴展分析,得到產品開發創新之策略,來加快創新流程及提升創新績效鞏固並維持其競爭優勢。因此,本研究首先針對擬分析的技術進行專利檢索,並依據檢索結果建構專利地圖後,盤點組織之技術現況以及與主要競爭者與未來發展趨勢之落差後,選擇未來計畫擴充的能力,進行能力集合擴展,並針對擬擴充之能力,訂定適合之開放式創新策略。(1)基於專利搜索結果繪製專利地圖 (2)能力的選擇於標準和評估和選擇的能力選擇; (3)優先考慮的能力:DEMATEL的標準和DNP權重與定義之間的關係;(4)建議開放式創新戰略; (5)優先的開放式創新戰略。
    運用專利地圖分析加上能力集合擴展概念的方法,找出產品在開發時的優先順序,從而解決專案在產品開發中所需面臨的決策問題,來說明所提出方法的可行性及有用性。

    The patent mapping is a patent analysis method which derives patent functionality and technology related statistical information and demonstrate such information in a matrix. Competence set expansion technique can serve a very dominant role in new product development. Technology or resource can be developed and further, Therefore, this study aims to define an analytic framework to derive the technology trend or competitive information at first based on a patent map being derived based on patent search results. Then, the gaps between the state of the art of the technology versus the aspired level as well as the factors for evaluation the technologies, In general, the research process can be summarized as follows: (1) patent map construction based on patent search results, (2) derivation of the current level of the patent versus the aspired level, (3) criteria definitions for competence prioritization, (4) derivations of influence relationships between criteria by using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), (5) derivations of weights versus each criteria by using the DEMATEL based network process (DN)), The well-verified analytic framework can use for competence set expansions and corresponding open innovation strategy definitions.

    摘要 ...................................................................................................................... i Abstract ............................................................................................................... ii Table of Content ................................................................................................. iii List of Table ........................................................................................................ v List of Figure ..................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Research Background ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Research Motivations ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Purposes ..................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research Method and Framework ............................................................. 5 1.5 Research Limitations ................................................................................. 9 1.6 Thesis Structure ......................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Literature Review ............................................................................. 11 2.1 Open Innovation ...................................................................................... 11 2-2 Open Innovation Strategies ..................................................................... 14 2.3 Patent Map ............................................................................................... 20 2.4 New technology product development strategies ................................... 23 2.5 Competence Set Expansion ..................................................................... 25 Chapter 3 Research Method .............................................................................. 29 3.1 Research Process ..................................................................................... 29 3.2 Patent Analysis and Mapping .................................................................. 32 3.3 Modified DELPHI Method ..................................................................... 35 3.4 Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) .......... 36 3.5 DEMATEL based Network Process (DNP) ............................................ 41 iv 3.6 VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) ..... 46 Chapter 4 Empirical Study ................................................................................ 51 4.1 Patent Analysis ...................................................................................... 53 4.2. Patent characteristics .............................................................................. 61 4.3 Criteria Definition by Modified DELPHI Method for Selecting Technology based on Open Innovation ................................................... 68 4.4 Decision Problems Structuring on Experts Based DNP .......................... 75 4.5 Rank the R&D Technical Options by VIKOR ........................................ 95 Chapter 5 Discussion ...................................................................................... 103 5.1 R&D technology and Open Innovation Strategies ................................ 103 5.2 Research Limitations ............................................................................. 105 Chapter 6 Conclusions .................................................................................... 107 References ....................................................................................................... 109

    Afuah, A. (1998). Models of innovation. Innovation Management New York: Oxford University Press.
    Ashton, W. B., & Sen, R. K. (1988). Using patent information in technology business planning-I. Research technology management, 31(6), 42.
    Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Market orientation and the new product paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 483-502.
    Bastic, M. (2004). Success factors in transition countries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 65-79.
    Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117.
    Breitzman, A. F., & Mogee, M. E. (2002). The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 187-205.
    Calantone, R. J., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Meloche, M. S. (1988). Strategies of product and process innovation: A loglinear analysis. R&d Management, 18(1), 13-21.
    Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of knowledge management, 4(2), 87-98.
    Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33-58.
    Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
    Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm: Oxford University Press on Demand.
    Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology: Harvard Business Press.
    Chiu, W.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Improving the e-store business model for satisfying customers‟ needs using a hybrid MCDM combined DANP with grey relational model Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies (pp. 113-121): Springer.
    110
    Chiu, Y.-J., & Ying, T.-M. (2012). A Novel Method for Technology Forecasting and Developing R&D Strategy of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Technology Industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012.
    Chyu, C.-C., & Fang, Y.-C. (2014). A hybrid fuzzy analytic network process approach to the new product development selection problem. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.
    Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and competitiveness: a review: Practitioners' forum. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 363-395.
    Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458-467.
    Elham, F., Shamsuddin, A., & Sorooshian, S. (2014). A Multi-Criteria Framework to Evaluate Supplier's Greenness, 23(4), 154-163.
    Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World patent information, 25(3), 233-242.
    Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914-925.
    Ford, D. (1988). Develop your technology strategy. Long range planning, 21(5), 85-95.
    Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&d Management, 40(3), 213-221.
    Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.-M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of marketing research, 77-90.
    Hammer, M. (2004). Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company. Harvard Business Review, 82(9), 133.
    Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1999). Building an innovation factory. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 157-166, 217.
    Herzog, P., & Leker, J. (2010). Open and closed innovation–different innovation cultures for different strategies. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 322-343.
    Hsu, C.-F., Li, R.-K., Kang, H.-Y., & Lee, A. H. (2014). A systematic evaluation model for solar cell technologies. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,
    111
    2014.
    Huang, J.-J., Tzeng, G.-H., & Ong, C.-S. (2006). Optimal fuzzy multi-criteria expansion of competence sets using multi-objectives evolutionary algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 30(4), 739-745.
    Im, S., & Workman Jr, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of marketing, 68(2), 114-132.
    Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of marketing, 53-70.
    Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7001), 376.
    Keeney, S., Wein, H., & Linn, S. (1992). Biochemical heterogeneity in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E. Mutation Research/DNA Repair, 273(1), 49-56.
    Kesten, S., Plautz, M., Piquette, C. A., Habib, M. P., & Niewoehner, D. E. (2007). Premature discontinuation of patients: a potential bias in COPD clinical trials. European Respiratory Journal, 30(5), 898-906.
    Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. Paper presented at the 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).
    Lee, J., Bae, Z. t., & Choi, D. k. (1988). Technology development processes: a model for a developing country with a global perspective. R&d Management, 18(3), 235-250.
    Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. The Journal of marketing, 13-29.
    Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (Vol. 29): Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
    Liou, J. J., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chang, H.-C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 243-249.
    March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
    112
    Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1996). Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic management journal, 169-195.
    Mogee, M. E. (1991). Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Research technology management, 34(4), 43.
    Mohannak, K., & Samtani, L. A. (2014). A criteria based approach for evaluating innovation commercialisation.
    Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1999). The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 45-60.
    Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new‐product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334-347.
    Niewoehner, D. E., Lokhnygina, Y., Rice, K., Kuschner, W. G., Sharafkhaneh, A., Sarosi, G. A., . . . Kesten, S. (2007). Risk indexes for exacerbations and hospitalizations due to COPD. CHEST Journal, 131(1), 20-28.
    Nooteboom, B. (2000). Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems. Organization studies, 21(5), 915-939.
    Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2(1), 5-21.
    Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455.
    Page, A. L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 273-290.
    Rangus, K., & Drnovšek, M. (2013). Open innovation in Slovenia: A comparative analysis of different firm sizes. Economic and Business Review, 15(3), 175-196.
    Rogers, T. L., Nelsen, A. C., Sarkari, M., Young, T. J., Johnston, K. P., & Williams Iii, R. O. (2003). Enhanced aqueous dissolution of a poorly water soluble drug by novel particle engineering technology: spray-freezing into liquid with atmospheric freeze-drying. Pharmaceutical research, 20(3), 485-493.
    113
    Ruekert, R. W. (1992). Developing a market orientation: an organizational strategy perspective. International journal of research in marketing, 9(3), 225-245.
    Saeki, T., Minami, K., Yoshida, H., & Suzuki, H. (1999). A direct-skew-detect synchronous mirror delay for application-specific integrated circuits. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, 34(3), 372-379.
    Sanders, M. C., legal representative Vivian, M.-S., Nguyen, J. D., & Pascarella, R. (2006). Redundant data and power infrastructure for modular server components in a rack: Google Patents.
    Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257-2262.
    Shin, S., Sung, B.-J., Cho, Y.-S., Kim, H.-J., Ha, N.-C., Hwang, J.-I., . . . Oh, B.-H. (2001). An anti-apoptotic protein human survivin is a direct inhibitor of caspase-3 and-7. Biochemistry, 40(4), 1117-1123.
    Stankovic, L., & Djukic, S. (2004). Problems of measuring success of a new product. Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, 2(2), 101-110.
    Sundbo, J. (2003). Innovation and strategic reflexivity: an evolutionary approach applied to services. The International Handbook on Innovation, 97-114.
    Sundbo, J. (2003). The International Handbook of Innovation: Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Tamura, H., Okanishi, H., & Akazawa, K. (2006). Decision support for extracting and dissolving consumers' uneasiness over foods using stochastic DEMATEL. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 91-95.
    Tushman, M., & Nadler, D. (1996). Organising Innovation–California Management Review.
    Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
    Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2012). Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems. Annals of Operations Research, 197(1),
    114
    159-190.
    Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423-437.
    Van Kleef, J., & Roome, N. (2007). Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation: a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 38-51.
    Vanhaverbeke, W., & Peeters, N. (2005). Embracing innovation as strategy: corporate venturing, competence building and corporate strategy making. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 246-257.
    Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of management review, 24(1), 132-142.
    Von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34(10), 1591-1607.
    Wenzlaff, J., & Singh, A. (2015). Leadership in Open Innovation: An exploratory study on the nature of R& D projects and predominant leadership characteristics in industry-academia collaborations.
    West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&d Management, 36(3), 319-331.
    Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 26(7), 641-658.
    Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wu, X., Fu, Y., Wu, H., & Guo, S. (2014). Materials Chemistry A.
    Yoon, J., Choi, S., & Kim, K. (2010). Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells. Scientometrics, 86(3), 687-703.
    Yu, P.-L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management science, 19(8), 936-946.
    Yu, P., & Zhang, D. (1993). Marginal analysis for competence set expansion. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 76(1), 87-109.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE