研究生: |
劉佳蕙 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
打造音樂家的夢—提琴學習者的特質與學習生涯之探討 Building the Dreams of Musician:Exploring the Characteristics and Learning Experiences of Gifted Young String Players |
指導教授: | 吳武典 |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 257 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:237 下載:76 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
本研究的目的在探討音樂資優者的音樂特質與學習生涯的發展。九位年齡四十歲以下的提琴學習者者接受訪談,他們皆在國內接受過音樂資優教育,目前都從事音樂工作或在音樂研究所攻讀碩士。本研究透過深度訪談,根據紮根理論進行資料分析。本論文包括五大部分:音樂資優者的音樂才能與氣質、學習生涯的過程與特色及國內社會脈絡對古典音樂家的影響。
本研究主要發現如下:
典型的音樂資優者的發展必須從小接受音樂的啟蒙教育,並且大多出生在喜愛音樂的家庭。他們必須學習許多音樂專業課程,從幼稚園到研究所可分為四個階段。提琴學習者者通常具有比他人更具有音樂天份,尤其在視唱聽寫部分。此外,他們在演奏方面,台風穩健,音樂表達力強,能吸引觀眾。國內音樂資優班所提供的音樂專業課程對他們的樂器演奏技巧、音樂素養等有很大的幫助。提琴學習者認為樂器指導教師的教學重點為:國小著重基礎奠定,國中著重鞏固基礎,高中加強音樂表達力,大學與研究所重視樂曲的詮釋與音樂家生涯體驗。他們知覺的教師教學風格有十種:(1)傳統以基礎練習為重,(2)重視期末大曲子的練習,(3)善用舉例方式,(4)非主流型,(5)以比賽為重的積極型,(6)強調樂曲表現,(7)鼓勵學生參加國際音樂營,(8)尊重學生意願,(9)鼓勵用腦思考樂曲的表現,(10)身教與精神感召。他們與樂器指導教師的關係方面,仍以下對上的服從關係居多;有些教師擅長激發他們的學習動機,也會關心他們未來的發展。學校求學階段是他們養成練琴習慣的階段,也是決定音樂生涯的關鍵時期。
在國內,因為音樂班設班有限,在升學壓力下產生下列現象:(1)補習音樂專業技巧與知識,(2)同時兩個老師教相同的樂器,(3)以長時間練一首大曲子的應考技巧。提琴學習者者在大學階段,普遍透過接案演出(接case )來累積他們的演奏經驗與賺錢。他們的家庭也形成獨特文化:正面的影響是營造家庭支持學音樂的氣氛,包括金錢、時間的挹注;負面的影響,則包括干涉學校行政、過度尋求名師及看重競賽成績。他們在學習音樂的歷程中,所遇到關鍵事件包括愉快與不愉快的經驗,不過他們仍以自己的努力是否足夠來詮釋關鍵事件對他們的影響。目前國內的大環境欠缺對古典音樂的支持,主要是因為學校音樂教育與音樂資優教育脫節,導致古典音樂會觀眾來源有限。此外,音樂資優者要開演奏會,需考慮曲目是否大眾化,演出者的外貌與魅力也是重要因素。
最後,根據本研究的發現,研究者提出若干建議,企盼對音樂資優教育的目標和努力的方向有所澄清與導正。
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to explore the development of the characteristics and the learning experiences of gifted young string players in Taiwan. Nine musicians, under the age of forty who had been accepted into music program for the gifted, were invited to discuss the development of their careers. In-depth interviews were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. The findings of this study indicated that the training of the string players depends on five elements: their music abilities, music temperament, learning processes, features of their learning experiences and the influence of the social context of Taiwan on the classical musicians.
The main findings were as follows:
The string players were musically more talented than their peers especially in sight-reading when singing and auditory skills. They were also found to appeal to audience with distinct music interpretation and solid performing style. These individuals typically began music training at a very early age, came from a music-loving families, and took a great deal of music lessons. The special program was perceived to help them acquire performing skills and music literacy. The learning processes can be divided into four stages from kindergarten to graduated school. The instruction foci at different levels were also identified as basic skills acquired at elementary school, skill perfecting in junior high school, expressiveness in senior high school and interpretation and performing careers in university and graduate school. Furthermore, ten teaching styles were found: (1) focusing on basic skills, (2) performing big musical pieces for final examination, (3) explaining effectively with examples, (4) exhibiting alternative styles, (5) encouraging students to enter contests, (6) stressing music expression, (7) encouraging participation in international music camps, (8)respecting the interests and decisions of students, (9) encouraging students to interpret music on their own, as well as (10) serving as role models and inspiring students to dedicate themselves to music.
In order to pass competitive entrance examination so as to be admitted into one of the limited number of music departments, students adopted some special strategies, including (1) taking intensive music courses, (2) learning a musical instrument from two teachers at the same time, (3) practicing an important piece for one year so as to master it. After entering university, music majors commonly accept outside work to accumulate performing experiences and make money. Parents tended to invest a great deal time and money to facilitate learning on the part of their children, while interfering with school administration, seeking well- known instructors and overemphasizing contest results. Behavior of this kind has tended to create “skewed music cultures” in some families. Consequently, the string players accumulated both happy and unhappy experiences throughout their studies. However, the impact of these experiences depends on how much efforts they put in. Because general music education and the music program for the gifted were not well integrated, Taiwan society fails to provide sufficient support to classical music. As a result, the lack of classical music aficionados in Taiwan forces performers to reconsider the popularity of their repertoire as well as the impact of their appearance and personal charisma over the audiences.
Suggestions are forwarded concerning the goals of music program for the musically talented based on the findings of this study.
參考文獻
一、 中文部分
于曉平(1998):雙親在資優生生涯發展的角色之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
王文科(1999):教育研究法(再版)。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
王欣(1995):音樂班教育的展望。載於台灣地區國民小學音樂資優教育研討會紀要(67-91頁)。台北:國立台北師範學院。。
吳靜吉(1984):青年的四個大夢(第二版)。台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
李玉玲(2001):但昭義、陳郁秀探討兩岸音樂教育。聯合報,2001年2月17日,19版。
李光真(1999a):打造音樂家的夢工廠。光華雜誌,六月號,94-103頁。
李光真(1999b):林薏蕙的音樂人生。光華雜誌,六月號,104頁。
李宜蓉(1989):孩子學音樂是必須的嗎?婦女雜誌,四月號,74-77頁。
李翠玲(2000):菁英教育模式與通才模式對音樂資優學生之社會成就生活適應及相關因素之比較研究—以台灣及英國為例(第一年)。載於李翠玲:我國音樂班之探討(1-205頁)。國立新竹師範學院。
洪莉竹(2000):台灣諮商輔導人員在學習諮商過程中文化議題的衝擊與統整。國立台灣師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所博士論文。(未出版)
胡幼慧(1996):多元方法:三角交叉檢視法。載於胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土化女性研究實例(271-285頁)。台北:巨流圖書公司。
施美惠(2001):但昭義為學子解說彈琴竅門。聯合報,2001年2月19日,19版。
姚世澤(1998):變調的音樂特殊才能教育「音樂班」與「音樂才能班」定位的思考。藝術才能學生的生涯發展研究以音樂資優生為例。中華民國音樂教育學會1998年會訊,第4頁。
查修傑、施璧玉、陳效真譯(N. Lebrecht原著),(2001) : 誰殺了古典音樂。台北:新新聞文化事業股份有限公司。(原著出版年:1996)
徐宗國(1996):紮根理論研究法:淵源、原則、技術與涵義。載於胡幼慧(主編):質性研究:理論、方法及本土化女性研究實例(47-73頁)。台北:巨流圖書公司。
徐宗國譯,A. Strauss & J. Corbin 原著(1997):質性研究概念。台北:巨流圖書公司。(原著出版年:1990)
孫曄譯,B.M Tenrob,.原著(1990):音樂能力心理學。北京:人民教育出版社。(原著出版年:1985)
崔家蓉(1980):天才夢的覺醒。婦女雜誌,四月號,16-21頁。
張己任(1999):談樂錄。台北:高談文化事業有限公司。
張春興(1991):現代心理學。台北:台灣東華書局股份有限公司。
教育部(1998):八十七學年度國民小學音樂班評鑑報告。教育部委託國立台灣師範大學藝術學院編印。
教育部(1998):八十七學年度國民中學音樂班評鑑報告。教育部編印。
程緯華(1999):台灣國小兒童之和聲聽音能力-合唱合奏教學之音樂心理學研究。載於國立台灣師範大學藝術學院主編:「藝術教育研究」成果發表會論文集。79~108頁。
彭廣林( 2000):弦歌不輟化當年-台灣樂壇四十年點滴與省思。聯合報,2000年12月25日,37版。
彭蕙仙( 2002,9月15日):學會接受孤獨這件事。中國時報。2002年9月15日,33版。
黃麗卿(民85):創造性音樂遊戲與傳統音樂教學活動中幼兒創造行為表現之差異研究比較。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)。
雷驤(1977):學琴的孩子變不壞的嗎?婦女雜誌,十一月號,24-27頁。
楊韻玲(1993):國民中小學音樂班畢業學生學習成效之追蹤研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心。
劉志明(1998):西洋音樂史與風格。台北:全音樂譜出版社有限公司。
劉佳蕙(1998):藝術才能學生的生涯發展研究以音樂資優生為例。中華民國音樂教育學會1998年會訊,6-7頁。
劉佳蕙(2001):音樂資優者生涯發展之個案探討。資優教育研究,1(1),151-171頁。
劉蘊芳(1997):飄揚的音符-「愛樂在台北」。光華雜誌,一月號,101-109頁
潘罡(1999,5月11日):國中國小音樂班定位不清,嚴重資源浪費。中國時報,1999年5月11日,11版。
陳郁秀(1995, 三月):參與音樂資優教育之感言。報告發表於台灣地區國民小學音樂資優教育研討會紀要(102-105頁),台北:國立台北師範學院。
盧欽銘、陳淑美、陳李綢(民70):我國國小及國中學生音樂性向之研究。教育心理學報,14期,149-160頁
盧欽銘、陳茂萱、陳淑美(民80):高中音樂成就測驗編製。測驗年刊,38輯, 97~106頁。
陳曉君(1979):父母怎樣幫助孩子學音樂。婦女雜誌一月號,22-27頁。
蕭富元譯,H. Gardner原著(2000):超凡心智:大師如何成為大師。台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。(原著出版年:1997)
二、英文部分
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor- analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University press. (pp. 364-393).
Davidson, L., & Scripp, L. (1994). Condition of giftedness: Musical development in the preschool and early elementary years. In R. F. Subotnik and K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of talent (pp.155-185). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Demorest, S. M., & Serlin, R.C. (1997). The integration of pitch and rhythm in musical judgment: Testing age-related trends in novice listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45 (1), 67-79.
Feldman, D. H. (1991). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
Feldman, D. H. (2000). Was Mozart at risk? A develop- mentalist looks at extreme talent. In R. C. Friedman and B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding (pp.251-263). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Glaser, B.C., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gordon, E. E. (1989). Audiation, music learning theory,music aptitude, and creativity. In Suncoast music education forum on creativity (pp.75-88).ED380941
Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Children prodigies growing up. In R. C. Friedman and B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding (pp.89-117). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Hargeaves, D. J., & North, A. C. (1997). The social psychology of music. In D. J. Hargeaves and A. C. North (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp.3-24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, A.E. (1996). The musical temperament- psychology and personality of musicians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, A.E. (1997). Individual difference in musical behavior. In D. J. Hargreaves and A. C. North (Eds.), The Social psychology of music (pp.25-45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, A. C., & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). Historical developments of expert performance: Public performance of music. In A. Steptone (Ed.), Genius and the Mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp.67-94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, D., & Handy, B. (1998). The suite life. Time, Mar.16, 46-48.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Slobda, J.A. (1997 reprinted with corrections). The musical mind, the cognitive psychology of music. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. (first published 1985).
Sosniak, L.A. (1985a). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B.S.Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people. (pp. 19-67). New York: Ballantine books.
Sosniak, L.A. (1985b).One concert pianist. In B.S. Bloom, (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 68-89). New York: Ballantine books.
Sosniak, L.A. (1997). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In N. Colanelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handsbooks of gifted education(2 ed.)(pp. 207-217). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998):Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grouped theory. (2ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Steptoe, A. (1998). Mozart: Resilience under stress. In A. Steptone (Ed.), Genius and the Mind: Studies of creativity and temperament. (pp.141-164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Veccia, E. M., & Schroeder, D. H. (1990). Development and internal-structure analysis of a new pitch discrimination test, worksample 740 A. Technical report 1990-1 Chicago: Johnson O’Connor Research Foundation.
Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2000). Giftedness in non-academic domains: The case of the visual and music. In K.A. Heller, F. J. Monks R. J. Sternberg and R. F. Subonik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(2ed.)(pp.95-110).Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.