研究生: |
孔令如 Kung, Ling-Ju |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
杜邦分析三因子與股票報酬之關聯性及公司治理對其之影響 Corporate governance and the relationship between the three components of DuPont analysis and stock returns |
指導教授: |
蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 53 |
中文關鍵詞: | 杜邦分析 、代理關係 、代理衝突 、公司治理 |
英文關鍵詞: | DuPont analysis, Agency relations, Agency conflict, Corporate governance |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.EMBA.030.2018.F08 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:198 下載:42 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
公司的理財目標是將股東財富最大化,亦即股票市值最大化,而反映股東財富增值幅度的內部財務指標中,最為敏感者即為股東權益報酬率,因此杜邦公司設計和運用此分析方法時,以股東權益報酬率作為分析的核心指標。上市公司所揭露的資訊為投資人重要的參考指標之一,投資人藉由公開資訊評估該公司股票的投資風險與報酬。運用杜邦分析可提高財務報表分析的效率,不僅能簡潔地分析企業所揭露的財務資訊、系統操作性強,並能直觀而有系統地反映出企業的財務狀況。
通常當公司發生財務困難時,經營者傾向減少揭露或規避性地揭露資訊,避免對公司股價及投資者信心產生不利影響。因此投資人若僅以財報分析作為投資決策依據,極有可能矇蔽於過度處理的財務報表,在委託及代理關係中,委託人和代理人之間經常發生代理衝突,而為了緩解上述衝突,委託人和代理人之間應當建立有效的激勵與約束機制;若經營者的收入與股東利益產生正向關聯,則實現股東利益最大化時亦可實現經營者的利益最大化,引導經營者關注股東權益報酬率及與其相關的財務指標。鑑於大型公司財報不實等弊端,推行有效的公司治理,則可大幅降低財務報表被操弄的可能性;而公開揭露的財報資訊也較能取信於投資者。
本研究結果有二項發現,首先杜邦分析雖已行之有年,仍可作為選擇股票價值投資之依據,尤其是(一)資產周轉率高對股價報酬有正向影響。(二)槓桿比率高對股價報酬有正向影響。其次,提高有效的公司治理,可以提高前述的正向影響:(一)大股東持股比率低,可以提高資產周轉率對股價報酬的正向影響。(二)經理人佔董監事席次比高,可以提高資產周轉率對股價報酬的正向影響。(三)席次控制百分比低,可以提高資產周轉率對股價報酬的正向影響。
The mainstream view is maximizing shareholder’s wealth, regarding the financial objectives of a company. That is to maximize the stock market value. Among the internal financial indicators, Return on Equity (ROE) is the most sensitive indicator for reflecting the increment of shareholders’ wealth. Consequently, DuPont Analysis adopts ROE as the core of its analysis. The information disclosed by listed companies is an important reference for investors to predict the risk and return of investing in stock. With concisely analyzing disclosed information, DuPont Analysis not only improves the efficiency of financial statement analysis, but also straightly and systematically reflects the financial status of enterprise.
If a company encounters financial difficulties, it would tend to reduce or evade disclosing information for avoiding the negative impact on its share price or investors’ confidence. Investors are more likely to be covered by the manipulated financial statements if they simply rely on these public information. The principal-agent conflict is inevitable in the relationship between the principal and the agent. In order to mitigate this agency problem, effectively establishing the incentive and restraining mechanisms is necessary. When the top manager's income positively correlates with shareholders’ interests, maximizing the interests of shareholders is associated with realizing the maximization of top managers’ interest. Therefore, top managers are guided to concern the rate of ROE and its related financial indicators. Stemming from the dishonesty of large companies, the implementation of corporate governance decreases the likelihood of manipulating financial statements and increase the reliability of publicly disclosing information.
This study contributes to the literature as followings. DuPont analysis, an ancient analysis method, remains a useful reference for investment. First, high asset turnover has a positive effect on stock price return. Second, high leverage ratio has a positive effect on stock price returns. Improving the effective corporate governance can increase the aforementioned positive impact: First, major stockholders have a low shareholding ratio which can increase the positive impact of the asset turnover rate on stock price gains. Second, managers have a higher ratio of supervisors which can increase the positive impact of asset turnover on stock returns. Third, the percentage of seat control is low which can increase the positive impact of the asset turnover rate on the return on share price reward.
1.李宗鶯Tsung-Ying Li利用杜邦分析檢驗盈餘管理─以台灣資料為例2013國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文
2.柯武剛(Wolfgang Kasper)、史漫飛(Manfred E. Streit),《制度經濟學》(北京:商務印書 館,2001),頁77-78。
3.袁雁鳴.淺談杜邦分析法.會計之友,2006,頁29
4.陳敦源(1999),「誰掌控官僚體系?:從代理理論談官僚體系的政治性問題」,世新大學「民主行政與政府再造」學術研討會論文集,頁5-12。
5.彭雅惠,(1996),《台灣上市公司財務決策代理理論的驗證》(台北:國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文)。
6.葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩、李冠德,2004年,「公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響」,台灣證券交易所委託研究計劃結案報告。
7.葉銀華.公司治理全球觀點、臺灣體驗二版.滄海圖書,2017,頁8-27,341-345
8.葉銀華.公司治理個案與分析模式二版.滄海圖書,2017,頁22,416
9.榮泰生.SPSS與研究方法第三版.五南圖書.2013.頁406-421,431-434
10.劉宴辰(1993),《從代理理論觀點探究股權結構、董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究— 上市公司之實證分析》(台北:淡江大學管理科學研究所管理科學組碩士論文)。
11.櫃檯買賣中心(民91),「上市上櫃公司治理實務守則」, ,取自: http://www.otc.org.tw/storage/governance/上市上櫃公司治理實務守則.doc
12.鐘輝龍HUI-LUNG CHUNG杜邦分析與股票報酬率及信用評等關聯性之研究2009國立成功大學碩士論文
13.Abarbanell, J., and V. Bernard. 1992. Test of analysts’ overreaction /underreaction to earnings informationas an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. Journal of Finance 47 (July): 1181–1207.
14.Abarbanell, J., and B. Bushee. 1997. Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 1–24.
15.Abarbanell, J., and B. Bushee. 1998. Abnormal returns to a fundamental analysis strategy. The Accounting Review (January): 19–45.
16.Adams, R. B., and Ferreira, D., 2007,”A theory of friendly boards,”Journal of Financial Economics 121(2), 368-391
17.Anderson, R.C., A. Duru, and D.M.Reeb,2009,”Founders,heirs, and corporate opacity in te United States,”Journal of Financial Economics 92(2),205-222
18.Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting numbers. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 159–177.
19.Barniv, R., and J. Cao. (2009). Does information uncertainty affect investors´ responses to analysts´ forecast revisions? An investigation of accounting restatements. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,28(4),328-348.
20.Beaver, W. 1968. The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 67–92.
21.Beaver, W. 1998. Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.Beaver, W.H. (2002). Perspectives on recent capital market research. Accounting Review,77(2),53-474
23.Berle A., and G. Means (1932), “Modern Coporate and Private Property”New York:Harwurt, Brace and Word, Inc.Rev.Ed.,1968 , pp66-84.
24.Bonner, S.E., B.R.Walther, and S.M. Young, (2003). Sophistication-related differences in investors´ models of the relative accuracy of analysts´ forecast revisions. The Acounting Review,78(3),679-706.
25.Claessens,S., S. Djanknov, J.P.H. Fan, and L.H.P. Lang, 2002,”Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings,”Jounrnal of Finance 57(6), 2741-2771
26.Claessens, S., and J.P.H. Fan, 2002,”Corporate governance in Asia:A surver,”International Review of Finance 3(2), 71-103.
27.Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J.P.H. Fan, and L.H.P. Lang, 2002,“Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings,”Journal of Finance (6),2741-2771.
28.Clement, M., S. Tse, (2003). Do investors respond to analysts´ forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters? The Accounting Review,78(1),227-249.
29.Duchin, R., J. G. Matsusaka, and O. Ozbas, 2010,”When are outside directors effective?”Journal of Financial Economics 96(2),195-214
30.Fairfield, P., R. Sweeney, and T. Yohn. 1996. Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. The Accounting Review (July): 337–355.
31.Fama, E, 1980,”Agency problems and theory of the firm,”The Journal of Political Economy 88,288-307
32.Fan, J.P.H., and T.J. Wong, 2002,”Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia,”Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 401-425.
33.Feltham, G., and J. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 689–731.
34.Holthausen, R., and D. Larcker. 1992. The prediction of stock returns using financial statement analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15: 373–411.
35.Jensen M.C. and W.H. Meckling (1976),”Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure ”, Journal of Financial Economics, No 3, pp.306-310.
36.Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman, 2000,” Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis,”Journal of Financial Economics 58, 141-186.
37.Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 2000,”Tunneling,”American Economic Review 90(2),22-27.
38.Kothari, S.P., Xu Li, and James E. Short. (2009). The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and business press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: A study using content analysis. The Accounting Review,84(5),1639-1670.
39.Kross, W., Ro, B. and Schroeder D. (1990). Earnings expectation: the analysts´ information advantage. The Accounting Review,65(2),461-476.
40.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silane, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1998, “Law and finance,”Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155
41.La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 1999”Corporate ownership around the world,” Journal of Finance 54(2),471-517
42.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 2002,”Investo protection and corporate valuation,” Journal of Finance 57,1147-1170.
43.Lee, C. 1999. Accounting-based valuation: Impact on business practices and research. Accounting Horizons 13: 413–425.
44.Lee, T.S., and Y.H. Yeh, 2004,”Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan,”Corporaate Governance: An International Review 12(3),378-388
45.Lev, B., and S. Thiagarajan. 1993. Fundamental information analysis. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 190–215.
46.Lins, K.V., P.Volpin, and H.F.Wagner,2013,”Does family control matter? International evidence from the 2008-2009 financial crisis,”Review of Financial Studies 26(10),2583-2619
47.Lipe, R. 1986. The information contained in the components of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 37–64.
48.Mnuchin, C. 2017. DuPont formula bites profit, p.14-18
49.Modigliani, F., and M. Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review (June): 261–297.
50.Modigliani, F., and M. Miller. Source: The American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Jun., 1963), pp. 433-443
51.Nissim, D., and S. Penman. 2001. Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies (March): 109–154.
52.Ohlson, J. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 661–687.
53.Ou, J., and S. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11: 295–329.
54.Penman, S. 1992. Return to fundamentals. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Autumn):465–482.
55.Perrow, C. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd ed.(New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986), p.224.
56.Prowse, S., 1998. ”Angel investors and the market for angel investments,”Journal of Banking and Finance 22(6),785-792
57.Rajan, R., and L. Zingales, 1998,”Financial dependence and growth,” American Economic Review 88,559-586
58.Richardson, S., R. Sloan, M. Soliman, and I. Tuna. 2005. Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 437–485.
59.Schipper, K. (1989),”Commentary on earnings management,” Accounting Horizons 3(4), 91-102
60.Schipper, K. (1991). Analysts' forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5(1), 105-131.
61.Schroeder, Doug. and William Kross. “An Investigation of Seasonality in Stock Price Responses to Quarterly Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 17.5 (1990): 649–675
62.Sloan, R. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review (July): 289–315.
63.Soliman, M. T. 2008. The Use of DuPont Analysis by Market Participants. Accounting Riview, 8:823-853.
64.Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu, and Y. H. Su, 2012,”Related party transaction and corporate governance: The evidence from the Twiwan stock market,”Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 20,755-776.
65.Yeh,Y.H., and T. Woidtke,2005,”Commitment or entrenchment? Controlling shareholders and board composition,”Journal f Banking and Finance 29,1857-1885.
66.Yeh,Y.H., T.S.Lee, and T.Woidtke,2001,”Family control and corporate governance:Evidence for Taiwan,”International Review of Finance 2,21-48