簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 萊素珠
Lai, Su-Chu
論文名稱: 從中間系統看兩歲兒從家庭進入幼兒園之銜接研究
Two-year-olds’ Transitions from Family to Preschool: A Mesosystem Study
指導教授: 廖鳳瑞
Liaw, Fong-Ruey
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 206
中文關鍵詞: 中間系統生態銜接水平銜接兩歲兒
英文關鍵詞: mesosystem, ecological transitions, horizontal transitions, two-year-old children
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:234下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的是透過生態系統理論,探討兩歲兒從家庭進入幼兒園的經驗歷程。目前有關從家庭進入幼兒園的研究,大都以三歲以上幼兒為對象,並且探究的場所侷限在幼兒園,對於家庭在整個過程中的角色鮮少探究。因此,本研究從家庭準備讓兩歲兒進入幼兒園之前、到剛入幼兒園之際,以及進入幼兒園一段時間之後等不同的階段,針對家庭和幼兒園兩場所間的連結及兩歲兒的經驗歷程進行探究。
    本研究主要以兩位兩歲兒及其家庭與進入的幼兒園為研究對象及場域,採取質性派典之個案研究取向,以家庭觀察與幼兒園觀察及訪談、文件蒐集等方式蒐集資料,透過主題分析法分析資料。研究發現不同階段中,兩歲兒和家庭與幼兒園交織出(1)未成曲調先有情;(2)迎向新生活界域;(3)再定位自己的存有等三個主題內涵。研究結論如下:

    壹、銜接不僅是策略而已,更是氣質、先前經驗與所有關係網的總和
    貳、重視垂直銜接之外,同時也要關注水平銜接
    參、「活動」是幼兒園適應良窳的重要機制
    肆、幼兒的發展是不同場所間交互作用的結果
    伍、鼓勵一對一、個人化溝通的幼兒園政策會有利兩歲兒的適應

    基於上述結論,本研究分別針對幼兒園、有兩歲兒要上幼兒園的家庭、師資培育機構及後續研究等,提出相關建議做為參考。

    The purpose of this research was to understand the preparations of two-year-old children to attend preschools from the perspectives of the ecological system theory. In previous research, most researchers focused on studying children’s preschool experiences after age at three, and how preschools assisted children to accommodate with their conflicts in preschools. Unfortunately, only a few research studied the family’s roles in the transitions of their children attending preschools. It was important to examine the relationships between the roles of families and schools when young children attended preschools. Therefore, this study discussed the connection between young children’s experience at home and their practices in preschools, and the transition when they attended preschool through three different time periods.
    This was a qualitative research conducted by a case study. Observations, interviews, and reviews of relevant documents were used for the data collection, and the thematic analysis was used for the data analysis. The participants were two young children at the age of two, their families, and preschools. The conclusions of this study were divided into three themes which were (a) preparations before attending preschools, (b) transitions of having a new life, (c) redefine the position in preschool. The following statements were the major results in this study:
    1. The transitions were support systems rather than strategies.
    2. Both vertical transitions and horizontal transitions were important.
    3. Curriculum activities were important elements during the transitions.
    4. Children’s developments resulted from the interaction with different environments.
    5. The individual communication between children and teachers, or teachers and parents helped children to familiar with the new environment.

    These findings can be suggestions for parents, teachers, and preschools to help young children to attend preschools. These also provided areas for further studies.

    目 次 中文摘要...................................................I 英文摘要........................................................II 第一章 緒論........................................................1 第一節 研究背景與目的.......................................1 第二節 研究方法............................................4 第三節 研究範圍與限制......................................4 第二章 文獻探討............................................7 第一節 兩歲兒的發展........................................7 第二節 生態系統理論........................................12 第三節 幼兒從家庭進入幼兒園................................25 第三章 研究方法..........................................39 第一節 研究派典的選擇.....................................39 第二節 研究議題聚焦.......................................40 第三節 進入研究現場......................................42 第四節 資料的蒐集與分析...................................54 第五節 研究的嚴謹性......................................72 第六節 研究者背景與角色....................................75 第七節 研究倫理................................... .......77 第四章 研究發現與討論.....................................81 第一節 前奏—未成曲調先有情..............................81 第二節 主曲—迎向新生活界域..............................116 第三節 轉調—再定位自己的存有............................149 第五章 結論與建議..................................... .181 第一節 結論............................................181 第二節 建議與反思.......................................185 參考文獻................................................191 附錄一 研究計畫說明(機構)..............................199 附錄二 研究計畫說明(家庭)..............................200 附錄三 家庭及幼兒園觀察編碼及日期.........................201 附錄四 家長及教師訪談日期及編碼...........................203 附錄五 相關文件及編碼....................................204 附錄六 主題改版過程......................................205 附錄七 主題分析表........................................206 表 次 表2-1 幼兒家庭與幼兒園相異之處一覽表........................25 表2-2 0-3歲幼兒進入幼兒園相關研究的變項或焦點................28 表2-3 3-6歲幼兒進入幼兒園相關研究的變項或焦點................28 表3-1 觀察筆記範例........................................57 表3-2 訪談記錄範例........................................59 表3-3 文本代號說明表......................................63 表3-4 小殷入園前整體文本閱讀的理解與省思....................63 表3-5 編碼/摘要/省思範例..................................65 表3-6 編碼分類範例.......................................66 表3-7 初步意義單元命名....................................67 表3-8 再次閱讀編碼/摘要/省思範例...........................67 表3-9 小殷入園前整體文本再次閱讀的理解與省思................68 表3-10 意義單元初步歸類命名形成次主題......................70 圖 次 圖3-1 主題分析流程圖....................................62 圖3-2 主題分析螺旋圖....................................64 圖3-3 小殷、晴晴從家庭進入幼兒園重要事件...................69 圖3-4 主題分析圖........................................71

    行政院(2007,5月16日)。行政院第3040次院會決議。2007年6月24日,取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=29833&ctNode=90&mp=1
    王美方(2004)。家庭—幼兒園中間系統量表建構之研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    王美方、廖鳳瑞(2006)。家庭—幼兒園中間系統量表建構之研究。教育與心理研究,29(4),745-769。
    王淑清、蔡育琦(2004)。幼兒氣質與園所生活適應之研究。載於第三屆托教論壇研討會,164-184。台北市:國立台北護理學院。
    呂淑芳(2006)。家長參與幼兒入園準備及幼兒在幼兒園適應之相關研究。天主教輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    邢清清(2005)。實習教師面對幼稚園新生學校適應之歷程研究。國立嘉義大學師範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
    余思靜(1999)。幼稚園大班的畢業生真的準備好上一年級了嗎?國小新生的同儕關係與學校適應。台東師院學報,10,123-154。
    林秀錦、王天苗(2004)。幼兒入學準備能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,26,89-108。
    林明地(2000)。質的研究實例舉隅:校長領導的參與觀察。載於中正大學教育學研究主編,質的研究方法(頁51-91)。高雄市,麗文文化。
    林雅婷(2005)。外籍配偶子女幼兒園生活適應之個案研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    洪婉萍(2005)。幼稚園新生入學情緒適應之研究。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育學系碩士班碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
    胡幼慧(1996)。多元方法:三角交叉檢視法。載於胡幼慧主編,質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁271-285)。台北市,巨流。
    胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析?載於胡幼慧主編,質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁141-58)。台北市,巨流。
    高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅。高雄市,麗文文化。
    高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學太太的生活世界—詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,16,225-285。
    孫扶志(2005)。幼小銜接中課程與教學的問題與因應策略成效之研究。朝陽人文社會學刊,3(1),59-130。
    黃美瑛(1995)。意象:幼兒教師實際知識運作之研究。屏東縣,睿煜。
    黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。台北市,心理。
    陳怡君(2006)。從經驗連續性探討台灣台北縣市幼稚園大班家長與幼小教師之幼小銜接教育觀與策略。香港幼兒學報,5(1),11-21。
    齊 力(2005)。質性研究方法概論。載於齊力、林本炫主編,質性研究分析方法與資料分析(頁1-18)。嘉義縣,南華大學教社所。
    蔡育琦(2005)。初次入學幼兒之園所生活適應及其相關因素之研究。屏東科技大學幼兒保育系研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
    蔡春美(1993)。幼稚園與小學銜接問題調查研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,6,665-730。
    簡茂發(1986)。大學生適應問題及其相關因素之研究。教育研究所集刊,28,1-89。
    蘇建文(1996)。社會依附行為的發展。載於蘇建文等著,發展心理學(頁111-146)。台北市,心理。
    Ames, L. B. & Ilg, F. L. (1976/ 1990). 你的兩歲孩子—又好氣又惹人愛憐年齡(陳竹華譯)。台北市,信誼。
    Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E. & Hilgard, E. R. (1987/ 1990). 心理學(第九版)(楊國樞校閱,鄭伯壎、洪光遠、張東峰等編譯)。台北市,桂冠。
    Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.
    Bailey, B. (1992). “Mommy, don’t leave me!” Helping toddlers and parents deal with separation. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 20(3), 25-39.
    Blatchford, P. (1983). Children’s entry into nursery class. Educational Research, 25(1), 41-51. EJ277 621.
    Blatchford, P., Battle, S., & Mays, J. (1984). The first transition. Guildford: NFER- Nelson.
    Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998/ 2001). 質性教育研究—理論與方法(第三版)(黃光雄等譯)。嘉義市,濤石文化。
    Brazelton, T. B. (1992/ 1995). 嬰幼兒發展與保育(楊婷舒譯)。台北市,桂冠。
    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Researcher in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta(Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 6, 187-249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Combridge, M.A. :Harvard University Press.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
    Bronfenbrenner, U.& Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (vol.1): Theoretical models of human development (993-1028). NY: Wiley.
    Cairney, T. H. (1992). Parents, Our silent partners. Paper presented at the Joint National Conference of the Australian Reading Association and the Australian Association for the Teaching of English (2nd, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, September 24-27, 1992).
    Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. California: Sage.
    Dalli, C. (2002). From home to childcare centre: Challenges for mothers, teachers and children. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transition in the early years-debating continuity and progression for young children in education (pp.38-51). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Dalli, C. (1999). Starting childcare before three: Narrative of experience from a tri-partite focus. Unpublished PhD thesis. Victoria University of Wellington.
    Daniel, J. (1993). Infants to toddlers: Qualities of effective transitions. Young Children, 48(6), 16-21.
    Daniel, J. & Shapiro, J. (1996). Infant transitions: Home to center-based child care. Child & Youth Care Forum, 25(2), 111-123.
    De Schipper, J. C., Tavecchio, L. W. C., Van IJzendoorn, M. H. & Van Zeijl, J. (2004). Goodness-of-fit in center day care: Relations of temperament, stability, and quality of care with the child’s adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 257-272.
    Diamond, K., Spiegel-McGill, P. & Hanrahan, P. (1988). Planning for school transition: An ecological-developmental approach. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12(3), 245-252.
    Fein, G. F., Gariboldi, A. & Boni, R. (1993). The adjustment of infants and toddlers to group care: The first 6 months. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 1-14.
    Feldbaum, C. L., Christenson, T. E. & O’Neal, E. (1980). An observational study of the assimilation of newcomer to the preschool. Child Development, 51, 497-507.
    Fernie, D. E., Kantor, R., Klein, E. L., Meyer, C. & Elgas, P. M. (1988). Becoming students and becoming ethnographers in a preschool. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 3(2), 132-41.
    Ferri, E. (1981). The two-year-old in the nursery. Early Child Development and Care, 7, 303-16.
    Goldschmied, E. & Jackson, S. (1994). People under three: Young Children in day care. London: Routledge.
    Harrison, L. & Ungerer, J. (1996). Child care experience and attachment security as predictors of children’s social adjustment at aage two-and-a-half. Paper presented at the ⅩⅠⅤth Biennial ISSBD Conference, (August 1996, Quebec City, Canada).
    Hartman, J. A. (1989).Separation distress of a Chinese-American toddler at preschool. A case study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED346 946).
    Herr, J. (1998/ 2004). 幼兒教保概論(尹亭雲等譯)。台北市,心理。
    Jewsuwan, R., Luster, T. & Kostelnik, M. (1993). The relation between parents’ perceptions of temperament and children’s adjustment to preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 33-51.
    Jorde, P. (1984). Transitions: The influence of parent’s attitudes and behaviors on the adjustment of 2-year-olds to a new school experience. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED252 307).
    Kagan, S. L. (1995). Meeting family and community needs: The three C’s of early childhood education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED413 978).
    Kagan, S. L. (1991). Moving from here to there: Rethinking continuity and transitions in early care and education. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Issues in early childhood curriculum (pp.132-151). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Kagan, S. L. & Neuman, M. J. (1998). Lessons from three decades of transition research. The Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 365-379.
    Kellaghan, T., Sloane, K., Alvarez, B. & Bloom, B. S. (1993/ 1996). 家庭環境與學校學習(吳國淳譯)。台北市,五南。
    Kienig, A. (2002). The importance of social adjustment for future success. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transition in the early years-debating continuity and progression for young children in education (pp.23-37). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Klein, H. A. (1991). Temperament and childhood group care adjustment: A cross-cultural comparison. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 211-24.
    Klein, H. A. (1982). The relationship between children’s temperament and adjustment to kindergarten and Head Start settings. Journal of Psychology, 112, 259-268.
    Kontos, S. (1992). The role of continuity and context in children’s relationships with nonparental adults. New Directions for Child Development, 57, 109-19..
    Kraft-Sayre, M. E. & Pianta, R. C. (2000a). Enhancing the transition to kindergarten: Connecting families and elementary schools. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 29(1), 25-29.
    Kraft-Sayre, M. E. & Pianta, R. C. (2000b). Enhancing the transition to kindergarten: Linking children, families, & schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED479 280).
    La Paro, Kraft-Sayre, M. E. & Pianta, R. C. (2003). Preschool to kindergarten transition activities: Involvement and satisfaction of families and teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 17(2), 147-158.
    Lazarus, R. S. (1976). Patterns of adjustment (3nd ed.). N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Inc.
    Long, F. (1983). Discontinuity between home and family day care. Ph. D. thesis, Pennsylvania State.
    Long, F., & Garduque, L. (1987). Continuity between home and family day care: Caregivers’ and mothers’ perceptions and children’s social experiences. In D. L. Peters & S. Kontos (Eds.), Continuity and discontinuity of experience in child care (pp.69-90). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Margetts, K. (2002). Planning transitions programmes. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transition in the early years-debating continuity and progression for young children in education (pp.111-122). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Meltzer, D. (1984). A one-year-old goes to nursery: A parable of confusing times. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 10, 89-104.
    Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.
    Mobley, C. & Pullis, M. (1991). Temperament and behavioral adjustment in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 577-86.
    Nelson, F., & Garduque, L. (1991). The experience and perception of continuity between home and day care from the perspectives of child, mother, and caregiver. Early Child Development and Care, 68, 99-111.
    Neuman, M. J. (2002). The wider context: An international overview of transition issues. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transition in the early years-debating continuity and progression for young children in education (pp.8-22). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
    Newman, P. & Newman, B. (?/ 1993). 兒童發展—心理社會理論與實務(郭靜晃、吳幸玲譯)。台北市,揚智。
    Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W. & Feldman, R. D. (2001/ 2001).人類發展—兒童心理學(張慧芝譯)。台北市,桂冠。
    Patton, M. Q. (1990/ 1995). 質的評鑑與研究(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北市,桂冠。
    Peak, L. (1991). Learning to go to school in Japan: The transition from home to preschool life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Pence, A. & Goelman, H. (1987). Silent partners: Parents of children in three types of day care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 103-18.
    Peters, D. L., & Kontos, S. (1987). Continuity and discontinuity of experience: An intervention perspective. In D. L. Peters & S. Kontos (Eds.), Continuity and discontinuity of experience in child care (pp.1-16). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Petrie, A. J. & Davidson, I. (1995). Toward a grounded theory of parent preschool involvement. Early Child Development and Care, 111, 5-17.
    Pramling, I. & Lindahl, M. (1994). Learning from the toddler's perspective in the context of day-care. Paper presented at the European Conference on the Quality of Early Childhood Education. Göteborg, 1 - 3 September.
    Pramling, I. & Lindahl, M. (1991). Awareness and the life-world. Infants' first experiences of preschool. Paper presented at "The Tenth Conference of the International Human Science Research Association". Göteborg, 18-22 August.
    Robbins, J. (1997). Separation anxiety: A study on commencement at preschool. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(1), 12-17.
    Sanchez, S. & Thorp, E. K. (1998). Discovering meanings of continuity: Implications for the infant/ family field. Zero to Three, 18(6), 1-6.
    Segal, M. & Adcock, D. (1985/ 1998). 在遊戲中成長2—二到三歲的孩子(朱孟勳譯)。台北市,及幼文化。
    Silvern, S. B (1988). Continuity/ discontinuity between home and early childhood education environments. The Elementary School Journal, 89(2), 147- 59.
    Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86-109). California: Sage.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990/ 2002). 質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。台北市,巨流。
    Thyssen, S. (2000). The child’s start in daycare. Early Child Development and Care, 161, 33-46.
    Van Manen, M. (1997/ 2004). 探究生活經驗—建立敏思行動教育學的人文科學(第二版)(高淑清、連雅慧、林月琴譯)。嘉義市,濤石文化。
    Walsh, D. J. (1993).詮釋的聲音:質的研究在幼兒教育上的應用(陳正乾、李慕華譯)。幼教天地,9,17-37。
    Wilson, L. C., Douville-Watson, L. & Watson, M. A. (1995/ 2000). 嬰幼兒課程與教學(賴慧玲譯)。台北市,五南。
    Yin, R. K. (1994/ 2001). 個案研究(尚榮安譯)。台北市,弘智。
    Zajdeman, H. S., & Minnes, P. M. (1991). Predictors of children’s adjustment to daycare. Early Child Development and Care, 74, 11-28.
    Zigler, E., & Kagan, S. L. (1982). Child development knowledge and educational practice: Usig what we know. In A. Lieberman & M. McLaughlin(Eds.), Policy making in education. Eighty-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education(pp. 80-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE