研究生: |
洪曙天 Hung, Shu-Tian |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
一位金門縣國小資優班初任教師專業實踐歷程之敘事研究 The Narrative Research of Professional Practice of Primary Gifted Class Teacher in Kinmen County |
指導教授: |
于曉平
Yu, Hsiao-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 154 |
中文關鍵詞: | 敘事研究 、資優班初任教師 、金門資優教育 、教師專業實踐 |
英文關鍵詞: | narrative research, new teacher of gifted classes, Kinmen gifted education, teachers’ professional practice |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000115 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:207 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以敘事研究的方式,敘說我-一位國小資優班初任教師,進入金門縣一間新設立的一般智能資優資源班,如何在一個與自身求學和生活背景相異甚大的環境下,實踐教師專業的歷程,以及我在實踐教師專業中的所見所感。
此敘事研究以教師專業實踐為主軸,透過修改自Labov的敘事架構,並以「四個書寫方向」和「心理位移法」,將我的教師專業實踐的每日工作日常記錄下來,形成文本。並從中梳理出敘事的軸線、構面和主題,形成七個篇章。
在「對著金門和未來好奇」中,闡述我敘事的動機跟我想找尋的問題;在「對著現況和過去好奇」裡,搜尋金門在地的教育現狀,以及教師專業實踐等內涵;「在好奇與敘說的路上,怎麼走才好」當中,幫助我自己更多理解敘事研究的意義和功能,以及如何進行「好的敘事」。
之後的篇章,可分為四大命題,分別是「理想、現況、反思、回顧」,依序描述著在金門這個環境中我與親、師、生互動的過程與想法;學生、老師、家長們提出的問題跟需求以及我的因應方式;而在我和這些群體互動後,我如何轉化過去的經驗及當下的挑戰,陸續在這個資優班實踐我的理想;最後回顧這一年的初任生涯,自己改變了什麼?誰也被我改變了?透過此研究過程的反思與建議與更多初任資優班教師分享。
This narrative details how the author taught, for the first time, a newly established class of gifted students in an environment completely different from the author’s own educational experience and background, and provides the author’s observations and reflections during this professional practice.
This narrative research focuses on professional teacher practice on the basis of a principle adapted from Labov’s narrative structure. The author recorded his professional daily experiences, analyzed the records by using approaches such as the four narrative directions and psychological displacement, and further categorized the records into seven articles according to their narrative axis, dimension, and theme.
Curiosity about Kinmen and Its Future described the author’s motivation and doubts, whereas Curiosity about the Present and Past explored the current education situation in Kinmen and the connotations of teachers’ professional practice. In How to Proceed on the Combined Path of Curiosity and Narrative, the author gained deeper comprehension of the meaning and function of narrative research and the concept of what makes an exceptional narrative.
The remaining articles consisted of four propositions, namely ideals, the current situation, reflections, and reviews, which depicted the following four ideas respectively: the process and thoughts on the parent–teacher–student interaction in Kinmen; the questions and demands raised by students, teachers, and parents and the author’s coping methods; how the author transformed his experiences and current challenges to practice his ideals in the gifted class after interacting with the students, parents, and teachers; and reflection on the first year as a teacher: what changed, and who changed? The author anticipates sharing the reflections and suggestions presented in this paper with more teachers starting to teach gifted classes.
壹、 中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2000):質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
余德慧(2001):詮釋現象心理學。臺北市:心靈工坊文化。
吳武典、張芝萱(2009):資優教育師資專業標準之建構。資優教育研究,9(2),103-143。
呂金燮、侯貞伊、陳偉仁(2016):資優教育的在地轉化: 一個課外方案的實踐與省思。資優教育論壇,14,1-26。
李家兆(2013):生命之流的湧現-一個「社經地位不利資優生」社群之敘事探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
林杏足(2013):敘事諮商東當事人自我認同轉化歷程之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,37,209-242。
林香君(2015):立於實踐-我對自我敘說研究方法的辨識與選擇。應用心理研究,63,189-238。
洪瑞斌、陳筱婷、莊騏嘉(2012):自我敘說研究中的真實與真理:兼論自我敘說研究之品質參照標準。應用心理研究,56,19-53。
徐珮華(2017):自我敘說研究反思。家庭教育雙月刊,70,6-13。
張純子(2009):教師專業認同之敘說探究:一位男性幼兒教師「找尋」與「轉化」的故事。國民教育研究學報,23,81-111。
張德銳(2012):教師專業發展評鑑的檢討與展望-實踐本位教師學習的觀點。教育資料與研究,108,1-30。
章五奇(2013):以教師自傳探究進行身份認同的課程理解。臺北市立教育大學學報,44(1),1-28。
郭靜姿(2013):如何實施資優學生的區分性教學?。資優教育季刊,127,1-11。
陳昭儀(2000):優秀國小資優教育教師教學生涯之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,19,327-346。
陳昭儀(2012):資優教育教師之專業能力與專業成長之探析。資優教育季刊,122,1-8。
陳偉仁(2012):人才培育的空間美學:在地化資優教育的探討。資優教育季刊,124,19-30。
陳偉仁、陳明聰、胡心慈(2014):特殊教育教師專業標準建構之研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,75-94。
陳國泰(2006):學習教學:一位國小初任教師教學知識成長的歷程。彰師大教育學報,10,33-66。
陳慧蓉(2016):大學質性評鑑的挑戰:系所與外部專家評鑑觀點的一致性分析。當代教育研究季刊,24(2),75-109。
鈕文英(2013):研究方法與論文寫作二版。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
鈕文英(2018):質性研究方法與論文寫作二版。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
黃素菲(2018):敘事諮商歷程與敘事結構特徵中生活目標改變之詮釋分析。中華輔導與諮商學報,51,143-180。
黃馥珍、卓紋君(2009):敘說研究的探索從三本敘說研究的比較說起。輔導季刊,45(3),49-63。
萬文隆(2004):深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),17-23。
潘慧玲(2003):社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。
蔡素琴、洪雅鳳、劉淑慧(2014):敘事分析方法:由Labov敘事結構與隱喻故事取徑。臺灣諮商心理學報,2(1),77-96。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯(譯)(2003):敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(原作者:Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版年:2000)
賴念華(2005):從自我敘說到助人工作者的反思。應用心理研究,26,24-25。
戴心翊(2016):離去、留下與相遇-一位資優教育教師的敘說旅程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
簡春安、趙善如(2008):社會工作哲學與倫理。高雄市:巨流圖書公司。
貳、 外文部分
Azano, P. A., Callahan, M. C., Brodersen, V. A., & Caughey, M. (2017). Responding to the Challenges of Gifted Education in Rural Communities. Global Education Review, 4(1). 62-77.
Barkhuizen, G. (2016). Narrative Approaches to Exploring Language, Identity and Power in Language Teacher Education. ERIC Journal, 47(1), 25-42.
Bruce, A., Beuthin ,R., Sheilds, L., Molzahn, A., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2016). Narrative Research Evolving: Evolving Through Narrative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1-6.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Clandinin, D. J., & Murphy, M. S. (2009). Relational Ontological Commitments in Narrative Research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 598-602.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., Baldus, C. M., Ihrig, D.,& New, J. (2006). Gifted in Rural America: Faces of Diversity. University of Iowa, The Connie Beline & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
Coulter, C. A., & Smith, M. L. (2009). Discourse on Narrative Research The Construction Zone: Literary Elements in Narrative Research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 577-590.
Goodcase, T, E., & Love, A, H. (2017). From Despair to Integrity: Using Narrative Therapy for Older Individuals in Erikson’s Last Stage of Identity Development. Clinical Social Work Jounral, 45(4), 354-363.
Helkkula, A., & Pihlström, M. (2010). Narratives and metaphors in service development. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 13(4), 354-371.
Kanevsky, L., & Kieghley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce ? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.
Kirk, S., & Gallagher, J. (1972). Educating exceptional children (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kleres, J. (2010). Emotions and Narrative Analysis: A Methodological Approach. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2), 182-202.
Norum, D. (2000). Mindful Solutions: A Journey of Awareness. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 19(1), 16-19.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 471-486.
Pulvermacher, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2006). Narrative representations of practice: What and how can student teachers learn from them? Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 255-266.
Puryear, S. B., & Kettler, T. (2017). Rural Gifted Education and the Effect of Proximity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(2). 143–152.
Seward, K., & Gaesser, H. A. (2018). Career Decision-Making With Gifted Rural Students Considerations for School Counselors and Teachers. Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 217-225.
Wolgemuth, J. R., & Donohue, R. (2006). Toward an Inquiry of Discomfort- Guiding Transformation in “Emancipatory” Narrative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5), 1022-1039.
Ysseldyke. J. E., Algozzine, B. & Thurlow, M. L. (2000). Critical issues in special education (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.