簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 余紫瑛
Yu Tzu-Ying
論文名稱: 探索教育活動影響國中學生自我概念與人際關係之 實驗研究
The Effects of Adventure Education Activities on the Self-Concept and Interpersonal Relationship of Junior High School Students
指導教授: 李義男
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 公民教育與活動領導學系
Department of Civic Education and Leadership
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 200
中文關鍵詞: 探索教育自我概念人際關係
英文關鍵詞: Adventure Education, Self-concept, Interpersonal Relationship
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:306下載:269
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 論文摘要
    本研究旨在探討探索教育活動(Adventure Education)對增進國中學生自我概念與人際關係之影響效果,並根據研究結果提出具體建議,以供實施探索教育活動和未來相關研究之參考。
    本研究採實驗組控制組前後測之準實驗設計,以報名參與「宜蘭縣立八十九年度童子軍全能考驗營暨探索教育活動」之國中學生為研究對象,其中二十九位「探索組」成員參與三天兩夜戶外露營活動方式的「探索教育活動」,三十一位「童軍組」成員同時參與「童子軍全能考驗活動」;而至宜蘭縣各國中隨機抽取三十五位控制組成員,則不予以任何實驗活動處理。本研究使用之研究工具為「田納西自我概念量表」、「人際關係量表」以及研究者自編之「整體活動回饋表」和「探索教育活動追蹤回饋表」,以此進行前測、後測與延宕測驗。實驗所得資料以單因子共變數分析、單因子變異數分析、相依樣本t考驗和描述性統計等統計方法,進行各項檢定。除了以標準測驗進行量的考驗外,並對探索組成員的回饋資料加以整理分析,以為實驗效果之補充與參考,並印證探索教育的相關理論基礎。
    本研究所獲致之發現,臚陳如下:
    一、探索教育活動對增進國中學生之「整體自我概念」無顯著立即效果與延宕效果。
    二、探索教育活動對增進國中學生之「生理自我概念」有顯著立即效果,但未具延宕效果。
    三、探索教育活動對增進國中學生之「人際關係」無顯著立即效果,但具延宕效果。
    四、探索教育活動與童軍活動對增進國中學生『整體自我概念』之立即效果與延宕效果無顯著差異。
    五、探索教育活動對增進「生理自我概念」的立即效果顯著優於童軍活動;延宕效果則無顯著差異。
    六、探索教育活動與童軍活動對增進國中學生『人際關係』之立即效果與延宕效果無顯著差異。
    探索組成員的活動回饋分析:
    一、成員對整體活動具有相當高的滿意程度,多數成員印象最深刻也最喜歡的活動是屬於高空繩索和個人責任活動的「高空垂降」。而具探索教育精神和隱喻意義的探索活動比單純的體能活動更令成員印象深刻,而更具學習轉移的價值。
    二、成員覺得整體團隊氣氛是合作愉快的;團隊最具凝聚力的時間,則分別是屬於社會責任活動的「突破迷網」和「營火晚會」活動中。
    三、成員對個人方面具有相當高的滿意程度,認為自己更加認識了解自己、對自己的體能更加有信心;認為活動對自己最大的幫助與改變乃涵蓋了團體成長、個人成長,以及技能應用三個面向。
    四、在經驗分享方面,多數成員將高空垂降時的恐懼、勇氣和成就感與家人朋友分享;在經驗應用方面多數將認識朋友與團結互助的經驗應用在待人處事與分工合作上,成員經驗應用的方式共涵蓋「學習轉移理論」的三種模式,即特定性與非特定性學習轉移,以及隱喻性轉移。因此,本探索教育活動對成員之學習轉移具有正面之影響效果。
    五、在活動改進方面,活動地點的安排因受到童軍活動進行的影響而需有所改進;而外在天候因素等的變化亦影響成員的活動情形。
    茲根據上述研究結果,提出下列建議:
    一、對增進研究效果之建議
    1、加強分享回饋時的諮商經驗與技巧,以增進參與者的自我成長與經驗的學習轉移:如具備諮商專業或經驗豐富的領導者,各單元活動設計基本而必要之「提問問題檢核表」。
    2、增強探索教育的活動領導技巧以營造團體氣氛,進而增進人際技能之成長。
    3、從學校與家庭整體生活面實施追蹤輔導活動,以鑑定個人經驗行為的成長過程。
    4、根據成員能力與活動目標適當地設計安排活動,以增進探索活動的整體效益。
    5、選擇良好安全之活動場地,以確保活動的安全進行與分享回饋時的團體進程效果。
    二、對未來相關研究之建議
    1、研究設計方面:採「等組隨機控制實驗設計」以提高外在效度。
    2、研究對象方面:探討特殊樣本、不同年齡層與性別的實驗效果。
    3、研究工具方面:編制更符合研究需求與精確的量表;採用更客觀全面性的行為評量表。
    4、研究變項方面:探討特定依變項的實驗效果;探討影響活動效益的重要因素,或採「以過程為導向」的研究。
    5、實驗活動方面:實施長期性或持續性的探索教育活動。
    三、對實施探索教育活動的建議
    1、「學校環境」的融入:融入「綜合活動學習領域」,成為一具結構式的學習活動;運用探索教育的精神與方式,以統整學業科目的教學;發展學校特色,成為實施探索活動的重點學校。
    2、「社會環境」的推廣:探索教育活動的實施可廣泛推廣於各種參與對象,如家庭親子情感的重建、公司團體員工的合作與凝聚,甚至以特殊團體為參與對象,例如以探索活動促進身體障礙者之生理自我概念,而突破自我限制、發揮潛能。
    3、「專業組織」的成立:成立專門組織以培養領導人才、研究設計課程以及推廣探索教育活動的理念和方式,甚至建立具公信力的活動與領導證照制度,以促使探索教育活動的發展與推廣。
    4、「活動場地」的設置:配合活動實施場地的自然情境設計適當的活動以增加隱喻性轉移效果;設立固定安全的活動場地與活動設施,以確保探索教育活動實施的流程順利以及安全性的保障。

    The purpose of this thesis was to investigate the effects of Adventure Education activities upon the self-concept and interpersonal relationship of the junior high school students.
    The pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with treatment and comparison groups was utilized. The subjects for the study were drawn from the junior high school in ILan county and divided into three groups: the adventure group(the experimental group, 29 subjects) , the scouting group( 31 subjects) , and the control group (35 subjects) . Both of the adventure group and the scouting group attended voluntarily a three-day outdoor camping program in ILan county at the same time. The adventure group received the Adventure Education activities, and the scouting group received the Scout skill-testing activities. Whereas the control group, selected randomly from junior high school in ILan county, received no treatment at all.
    The study employed ‘Tennessee Self-Concept Scale’ and ‘Interper-sonal Relationship Inventory’ to conduct pretest, posttest, and long-term measures. And hypotheses were tested by one-way analysis of covariance and paired t test(within-subjects design t test).
    The results of this study were summarized as followed:
    1.The Adventure Education activities showed no significant instant and long-term effects on the students’ 「total self-concept」.
    2.The Adventure Education activities showed significant positive instant effect on the students’ 「physical self-concept」, and had no significant long-term effect on it.
    3.The Adventure Education activities showed no significant instant effect on the students’ 「interpersonal relationship」, but had significant positive long-term effect on it.
    4.There were no significant instant and long-term effects on the students’ 「total self-concept」 between the Adventure Education activities and the Scouting activities.
    5.The instant effect of the Adventure Education activities on the students’ 「physical self-concept」 was significant higher than that of the Scouting activities, and the long-term effect between these two activities was no significantly different on it .
    6.There were no significant instant and long-term effects on the students’ 「interpersonal relationship 」 between the Adventure Education activities and the Scouting activities.
    As the conclusions mentioned above, some of the suggestions for the practicing of the Adventure Education activities and the future researches were discussed.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究緣起與背景................................1 第二節 研究動機與目的................................4 第三節 研究問題與假設................................6 第四節 名詞釋義......................................8 第五節 研究範圍與限制................................9 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 探索教育的意義與發展.........................12 第一項 意義與相關名詞...........................12 第二項 教育思想緣起.............................15 第三項 活動組織發展.............................19 第二節 探索教育的理論基礎...........................25 第一項 共同原則要素.............................25 第二項 社會學習理論.............................37 第三項 經驗學習理論.............................41 第四項 學習轉移理論.............................50 第三節 探索教育的相關實證研究.......................54 第一項 自我概念.................................54 第二項 人際關係.................................61 第三項 相關實證研究.............................67 第四節 探索教育的團體活動進程........................78 第一項 團體發展理論.............................78 第二項 探索活動進程.............................83 第三項 探索活動與童軍活動之異同比較.............93 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究架構......................................95 第二節 實驗對象......................................96 第三節 實驗設計......................................97 第四節 研究工具......................................98 第五節 實施程序.....................................104 第六節 資料處理.....................................106 第四章 研究結果之分析與討論 第一節 基本背景特質.................................108 第二節 立即效果.....................................116 第三節 延宕效果.....................................128 第四節 探索組成員的活動回饋.........................137 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論.........................................157 第五節 建議.........................................162 參考書目 壹、中文部份..........................................174 貳、英文部份..........................................175 附錄 附錄一 自我概念與人際關係量表.......................180 附錄二 整體活動回饋表...............................184 附錄三 探索教育活動追蹤回饋表.......................186 附錄四 探索教育活動日程表...........................187 附錄五 探索教育活動實驗方案.........................189 附錄六 分享回饋之問題集錦...........................194 附錄七 童子軍全能考驗活動日程表.....................198

    參考文獻
    一、 中文部份
    尹萍、韓敦瑋(民86)。堤河邑冒險學校。台北:天下文化。
    李義男(民77)。國中童軍在露營活動中友誼發展之研究。中國童軍教育年刊,第45期,頁25-50。台北:中國童子軍教育學會。
    李義男(民85)。童軍自然教育思想之探討。台北:公民訓育學報第五輯。
    何英奇(民75)。自我觀念評量的探討。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,75-79。
    呂建政(民83)。國民中學童軍教育課程研究。台北:水牛。
    金盛華、楊志芳、趙凱(民83)。溝通人生:心理交往學。台北:新雨。
    林邦傑(民71)。田納西自我概念量表。台北:正昇。
    林邦傑(民75)。田納西自我概念量表指導手冊。台北:正昇。
    林振春、王秋絨(民84)。團體輔導工作。台北:師大書苑。
    吳武典、洪有義等著(民73)。如何進行團體諮商。台北:張老師。
    黃月霞(民80)。團體諮商。台北:五南。
    陳皎眉(民84)。美好的人際關係。學生輔導,36,18-23。
    郭為藩(民68)。自我心理學。台北:開山。
    郭為藩著、伍振鶩主編(民81)。教育哲學。台北:師大書苑。
    郭為藩(民85)。自我心理學。台北:師大書苑。
    陳添丁(民79)。童軍教育與國民教育。台北:水牛。
    張春興、林清山(民70)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
    張春興、林清山(民77)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
    張美紅(民85)。國小國語科教科書中人際關係之內容分析研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園編(民77)。社會及行為科學研究法上冊。台北:東華。
    蔡居澤(民84)。探索教育與心療活動之探討。台北:公民訓育學報第四輯。
    劉彥俊(民84)。童軍概說及其史略。台北:水牛。
    顏裕峰(民81)。國中生的社會興趣與同儕人際關係之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    Bandura,A.著,周曉虹譯(民84)。社會學習理論。台北:桂冠。
    Bandura, A. 著,周曉虹譯(民84)。社會學習理論。台北:桂冠。
    Csikszentmihalyi,M. 著,張定綺譯(民82)。快樂,從心開始(Flow—The Psychology of Optimal Experience)。台北:天下文化。
    Csikszentmihalyi,M. 著,陳秀娟譯(民86)。生命的心流。台北:天下文化。
    二、 英文部份
    Adair, J. E.(1988). Effective Leadership: a modern guide to developing leadership skills.London:Pan. 2nd ed.
    Bachert, D. W.(1990). Historical Evolution of NOLS: The National Outdoor Leadership School. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.). Adventure Education(pp.83-88).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.
    Bukowski, W. M. & Hoza, B.(1989). Popularity and friendship: Issue in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd(Eds). Peer relationships in child development.pp15-45. New York: John Wiely & Sons.
    Burrington,B. & PA (1995).Youth Leadership In Action: A Guide to Cooperative Games and Group Activities Written by and for Youth Leaders. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Bunting, C. J. (1990).Venture Dynamics. Texas:A & M V.
    Byrne,D. (1974).An introduction to personality, research, theory and application. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Coleman, J. C. (1980). Friendship and the peer group in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of adolescent psychology.(pp.408-431) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Dewey, J.(1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
    Diller, C.(1954). Conscious and unconscious self-attitude after success and failure. Journal of Personality.23,p.1-13.
    Donaldson, G. W. & Vinson, R. (1979). William James, Philosophical Father of Experience-based Education-‘The Knower is an Actor’. The Journal of Experiential Education. 6-8
    Ellmo, W., & Graser, J.(1995).Adapted Adventure Activities: A Rehabilitation Model for Adventure Programming and Group Initiatives. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Erickson, E. H.(1959). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E.(1968). Identity, outh and crisis. NY: W. W. Norton.
    Fitts, W. H.(1965). Manual of Tennessee department of mental health self concept scale. Nashville, Tennessee Counselor Recordings an tests.
    Garvey, D. (1990). A History of the AEE. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.). Adventure Education (pp.75-82). State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Gass, M. A. (1990). Transfer of Learning in Adventure Education. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.).Adventure Education (pp.199-207). State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Gass, M. A. (1993). Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic Applications of Adventure Programming. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Hartup,W. W.(1989).Behavioral Manifestations of Children's Friendships. In Berndt, T. J. & Ladd, G. W.(Eds.) Peer Relationships in Child Development.(pp.46-70) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Henton, M.(1996).Adventure in the classroom: Using Adventure to Strengthen Learning and Build a Community of Life-Long Learners. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Hunt J. S. (1990). Philosophy of Adventure Education. In Miles, J. & Priest, S. (Eds.).Adventure Education (pp.119-128). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
    Lair, J. (1984). Change induction groups, group psychotherapy, integrity groups, peer counseling. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.). Encyclopedia of psychology,1(2),493-494.
    Lupton, F.(1990). WEA History. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.). Adventure Education(pp.89-96).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Kaplan, R.(1974). Some psychological benefits of an outdoor challenge program. Environment and Behavior, 6, 101-116.
    Kaplan, L.(1979). Outward Bound: A treatment modality unexplored by the social work profession. Child Welfare, 58(1), n. P.
    Kaplan, H. B.(1991a). A guide for explaining social interest to laypersons. Individual Psychology, 47(1), 82-85.
    Kaplan, H. B.(1991b). Sex differences in social interest. Individual Psychology, 47(1), 120-123.
    Kifer, E.(1975). Relationship between academic and personality characteristics: A quasi-longitudinal study. American Education Research Journal, 12,p.191-210.
    Kimball, R. O. (1980). Wilderness/adventure programs for juvenile offenders. Chicago: University of Chicago, School of Social Services Administration, National Center for the Assessment of Alternative to Juvenile Justice Processing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196586).
    Kimball, R. O. & Bacon, S. B. (1993). The Wilderness Challenge Model. In Gass, M. A. Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic Applications of Adventure Programming. (pp.11-41). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Knapp, C. E.(1996). Just Beyond the Classroom: community adventure for interdisciplinary learning. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
    Kraft, R. J. & Sakofs, M. (1985). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.
    Kraft, R. J.(1990). Experiential Learning. In Miles, J. & Priest, S. (Eds.).Adventure Education (pp.175-183). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
    McGough, D. J. & Roth, M. (1990). Foundations of Experiential Methodology: an introductory workshop in experiential theory and practice for professional education. Minnetonka : Voyageur Outward Bound School. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353109).
    McGough, D. J. (1992). Exploring the foundations of philosophy of natural education. In G. Hanna (Ed.). Celebrating our tradition, charting our future: proceeding of the international conference of the Association for Experiential Education. Boulder, CO: AEE.
    Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Miner, J. L. (1990).The Creation of Outward Bound. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.).Adventure Education(pp.55).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Moote, G. T. & Wodarski, J. S. (1997).The acquisition of Life Skills through Adventure-Based Activities and Programs: a review of the literature. Adolescence. Vol.32, No.125,143-167.
    Nassar-McMillan , S. C. & Cashwell, C. S.(1997). Building Self-Esteem of Children and Adolescents Through Adventure-Based Counseling. Journal of humanistic education and development. V.36.
    Prouty, D.(1990). Project Adventure: A Brief History. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.).Adventure Education(pp.97).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Priest, S.(1990a).The Semantics of Adventure Education. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.).Adventure Education.(pp.113-114).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Priest, S.(1990b).The Adventure Experience Paradigm. In Miles, J. & Priest, S.(Eds.).Adventure Education(pp.157-161).State College, PA: Venture Publishing,Inc.
    Sale, P. L.(1992). Ego and self-concept development among juvenile delinquent participants in adventure-based programming, Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University.
    Schleien, S. J., McAvoy, L. H., Lais, G. J.,Rynders, J. E.(1993). Intergrated Outdoor Education and Adventure Programs. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
    Schiamberg, L. B.(1988). Child and adolescent development. New York: Macillan.
    Schoel, J., Prouty, D., & Radcliffe, P. (1988). Islands of Healing: A Guide to Adventure Based Counseling. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
    Schutz, A. & Luckmam, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Northwestern University Press.
    Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.
    Smith, P. K. (1988). Children's play and its role in early development: A re-evaluation of the ''play ethos'', In Pellegrinni, A. D. (Eds.) Psychological bases for early education (pp.207-226) Chichester, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Stich, T. F., & Gaylor, M.S. (1983). Outward Bound: An Innovative Patient Education Program. Dartmouth Medical School.
    Selye, Dr. Hans, March 1978, “On the Real Benefits of Eustress,” Psychology Today, pp.60-70.
    Widra, J. M. & Amidon, E.(1987). Improving self-concept through intimacy group training. Small Group Behavior.18(2). P.269-279.
    WWW.aee.org.(2000)
    Wylie, R. C.(1961). The self-concept: A critical survey of pertinent research literature (3rd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    Zook, L. R.(1986). Outdoor adventure programs build character five ways. Parks and Recreation. pp.54-57.
    Zwart, T. J.(1988).The Effects Of A Wildness /Adventure Program On The Self-Concept, Locus Of Control Orientation, And Interpersonal Behavior Of

    QR CODE