簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宣佑
Chen, Xuan-You
論文名稱: 中國家族企業接班與研發投資行為之探究
Exploring The Succession in Chinese Family Business and Research and Development Investment
指導教授: 陳慧玲
Chen, Huei-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 家族企業研發投資創辦人接班
英文關鍵詞: Family firms, R&D investment, founder, succession
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GGBS.004.2018.F08
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:174下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 相較於非家族企業,家族企業型II代理問題較為嚴重,因而影響家族企業的研發投資行為。本研究旨在檢視家族企業與非家族企業研究發展投資是否有所差異。此外,本研究檢視創始人是否擔任董事長與子女是否已接班對家族企業的研究發展投資之影響。本研究以2010-2015年中國上市企業為樣本,實證結果顯示,相較於家族企業,非家族企業具有較高的研發投資。相較於創始人未擔任董事長之家族企業,創始人擔任董事長之家族企業具有較高的研發投資。根據分年結果,子女有否接班對研發投資並無顯著影響。然合併年度結果顯示,相較於子女已接班之家族企業,子女未接班之家族企業具有較高的研發投資。

    Compared to non-family firms, family firms have more serious type II agent problem. Thus, agency problems may affect family firms’ R&D investment decisions. The objective of this study is to examine whether the R&D investment is different between family firms and non-family firms. In addition, this study investigates whether the founder serving as the chairman and the succession affect the magnitude of R&D investment.
    The sample firms are Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2015. The empirical results show that compared with the family firms, non-family firms have more R&D investment. Compared to family firms whose founders serve as the chairman, family firms whose do not serve as the chairman have more R&D investment. According to the annual results, the succession of second generation has no significant impact on family firms’ R&D investment. However, the pooled results show that compared to family firms which second generation has succeeded, the family firms which do not succeed have more R&D investment.

    目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、 研究動機 1 第二節、 研究目的 3 第三節、 研究架構 3 第四節、 研究貢獻 5 第二章、 文獻回顧 6 第一節、 家族企業相關文獻 6 第二節、 家族企業與研究發展費用 8 第三節、 中國家族企業之現況及其相關研究 9 第三章、 研究設計 12 第一節、 研究假說 12 第二節、 變數定義 14 第三節、 實證模型 16 第四節、 樣本選取及資料來源 18 第四章、 實證結果及分析 19 第一節 描述性統計 19 第二節 單變量統計結果 34 第三節 多變量統計結果 41 第四節 敏感性分析 47 第五章、 結論與建議 57 第一節、 研究結論 57 第二節 研究建議 58 參考文獻 59

    王明琳、王河森與徐萌娜(2014) 利他行為能夠降低代理成本嗎? - 基於家族企業中親緣利他行為的實證研究。經濟研究,2014年第3期:頁144-157
    宋麗紅(2012) 家族企業更具有長期導向嗎? - 基於家族控制與傳承意願的實際檢驗。杭州師範大學學報〔社會科學版〕,第二期:頁88-94
    辛金國與吳燕蝦(2012) 家族企業的績效評價指標體系實證研究。中國管理科學,第20卷專輯:頁726-732
    辛金國與吳燕蝦(2013) 家族企業績效評框架結構及指標篩選的實證研究。中國管理科學,第21卷專輯:頁527-534
    汪祥耀與金一禾(2015) 家族企業代際傳承及二代推動戰略轉型的績效研究。財經論叢,第11期:頁61-70
    林嬋娟與張哲嘉(2009) 董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性。會計評論,第48期:頁1-33
    周立新與黃潔(2012) 家族企業社會責任與企業績效:內部能力與外部關係的調節效應。商業經濟與管理,第5期總第247期:頁5-15
    張力(2015) 家族企業聘請職業經理人的影響因素研究 – 來自家族控股上市公司的經驗證據。山西大學學报(哲學社會科學版),第38卷第4期:頁124-130
    葉銀華(1999) 家族控股集團、核心金業與報酬互動之研究 – 台灣與香港證券市場比較。管理評論,第18卷第2期:59-86
    趙永杰與劉浩(2016) 基於動態能力視角的家族企業轉型升級研究。遼寧工程技術大學學報(社會科學版),第18卷第2期:頁149-157
    Adams, R., H. Almeida, and D. Ferreira. 2009. Understanding the relationship between founder-CEOs and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance 16(1): 136-150.
    Ali, A., T. Y. Chen, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2007. Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44(1-2): 238-286.
    Anderson, R. C. and D. Reeb. 2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58(3): 1301-1328.
    Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2003. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 68(2): 263-285.
    Anderson, R. C., A. Duru, and D. M. Reeb. 2012. Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking & Finance 36: 1744-1758
    Block, J. H. 2012. R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 27: 248-265
    Chen, H. L. and W. T. Hsu. 2009. Family Ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review 22(4): 347-362
    Chen, S., X. Chen, and Q. Cheng. 2008. Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research 46(3): 499-536.
    Chrisman, J. J., F. Frattini, J. Kotlar, A. D. Massis, and M. Nordqvist. 2016. Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Family Business Review 29(2): 189-213
    Chrisman, J. J. and P. C. Patel. 2014. Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal 35: 617-627
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112
    Frattini, F., U. Lichtenthaler, and A. D. Massis. 2012. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review 20(10):1–22.
    Gomez-Mejia, L.R., J. T. Campbell, G. Martin, R. E. Hoskisson, M. Makri , and D. G. Sirmon. 2013. Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family Firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Family Business 38:1351-1374
    Markarian, G., L. Pozza, and A. Prencipe. 2008. Earnings management in family firms: evidence from R&D cost capitalization in Italy. Family Business Review 21(1): 71-88
    Munari, F., R. Oriani, and M. Sobrero. 2010. The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of western European firms. Research Policy 39:1093-1104
    Muñoz-Bullón, F. and M. J. Sanchez-Bueno. 2011. The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review 24(1): 62-70
    Porta, R. L., F. Lopez-De-Silanes and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance 54: 471-517
    Patel, P. C. and J. J. Chrisman. 2013. Risk Abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal 35(4)617-627
    Villalonga, B. and R. Amit. 2006. How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2): 385-417.
    Wang, D. 2006. Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Research 44: 619-656.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE