研究生: |
李承玫 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
宜蘭縣大同鄉土地利用與邊坡崩塌之災害潛勢分析 Disaster susceptibility analysis of land use and landslide in Tatong town, Taiwan. |
指導教授: |
林雪美
Lin, Hsueh-Mei |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 116 |
中文關鍵詞: | 災害潛勢 、土地利用類型 、邊坡崩塌 、潛勢值 |
英文關鍵詞: | Hazard Susceptibility, Landuse type, Landslide, Susceptibility value |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:223 下載:12 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
邊坡崩塌為臺灣常見的塊體運動現象,若影響到人類的生命或財產,則為坡地災害。在特定時空下所產生的災害,其潛勢值可被計算,本研究以國土測繪中心的全國土地利用類型資料做為人類成災的條件,而自然條件為一地環境的背景要素,兩者交互作用下便可能產生災害,而其中的潛勢值便可計算出來,此為災害潛勢的概念。研究方法主要以現今在邊坡災害研究上普遍使用的羅吉斯迴歸,而研究區選定為土地利用類型多元和自然環境脆弱的宜蘭縣大同鄉。
本研究以地理學中的人地互動觀點去做串聯,先以大同鄉土地利用對邊坡崩塌的影響,是為「人」對「地」的影響,進行因子的篩選,得出土地利用類型、農作距離、道路距離此三項具影響力的因子;接著為「地」對「地」的作用,即自然條件對邊坡崩塌的影響,篩選出以下七項因子,為高程、坡度、坡向、地質、河道距離、一日最大降雨分級和年總雨量。前兩個步驟皆著重於「因子」對於「地」的影響評估,目的在於找出可以解釋造成邊坡崩塌的影響因子,然而若要評估其影響力的大小以得出災害潛勢值,需將篩選得出的土地利用因子與自然條件因子結合,最後將此十項因子合併進行單因子檢驗和羅吉斯迴歸的統計分析,刪除坡向和年總雨量此兩者不具解釋力的因子後,得出一解釋力68.3%的模型。本研究藉由統計方法來計算大同鄉土地利用與邊坡崩塌的潛勢值後,繪製出大同鄉的災害潛勢地圖,但此潛勢值與潛勢地圖需與實際現況配合,才能有效達到防災應用,因此最後以野外考察和居民訪談做一防災管理的探討,並希冀未來能持續投入研究以實際達到減災效果。
Landslide is a common phenomenon in Taiwan. If it affected people’s life or properties, that has become slope hazard. According to the hazard in specific time and space, its susceptibility could be calculated. This study defines landuse type data which is from National Land Surveying and Mapping Center as one of the condition of hazard. When landuse types interact with the physical factors of any environment backgroungs could yield hazard, and the susceptibility value could be generated. This is the concept of susceptibility. As for study method, this study applied Logistic regression which is commonly used in recent landslide studies. The study area must be provide with plentiful landuse types and vulnerable physical environment, so Tatong town was choosed.
Human-land relationship is the structure in this study. To begin with, the impact of “human to land” was evaluated by the landuse types to landslide in Tatong town. In this procedure, this study selected factors by collinearity diagnosis which help to discover and eliminate multicollinearities. 3 influential factors was obtained, that were landuse types, crop distance and road distance. Sencondly, the impact of “land to land” was assessed by physical factors to landslides, and this study acquired 7 influential factors, that were DTM, slope, aspect, geology, river distance, 24 hours maximum precipitation and annual rainfall by collinearity diagnosis as the same. This two steps focused on the evaluation of “factors to land”, and the aim was to find the causal factors which could precisely explain the reason why makes landslide. Moreover, this study have to combine the landuse factors and physical factors so that could generate hazard susceptibility. And then put this 10 factors into univariate tests of association and Logistic regression, after deleted the aspect and annual rainfall factors which were uninterpretable, the 68.3% explanation model was obtained. This study use statistics methods to demostrate the susceptibility of landuse type and landslide, by this we could create hazard suceptibility maps in Tatong town. In order to utilize the susceptibility value and susceptibility maps practically, we carried out field works and interview with residents to revise the study to achieve hazard prevention.
中文部分
1. 丁志堅(2002):屏東平原土地利用變遷分析與模式建立,臺北:國立台灣大學地理學研究所碩士論文。
2. 大同鄉公所製(1994):大同鄉公所簡報資料,宜蘭:大同鄉公所。
3. 大同鄉公所製(1999):大同鄉簡介,宜蘭:大同鄉公所。
4. 王秀蘭、包玉海(1999):土地利用動態變化研究方法探討,地理科學進展,18(1):81-87。
5. 山坡地土地可利用限度分類標準(1999):中華民國88年5月31日行政院農業委員會,農林字第88118880號令修正
6. 牛志仁(1990):關於災害系統的若干問題,災害學,3:1-5。
7. 申曙光(1995):災害系統論,災害辯證學學報,3(1):102-106。
8. 史培軍(1996):再論災害研究的理論與實踐,自然災害學報,5(4):6-17。
9. 史培軍(2009):五論災害系統研究的理論與實踐,自然災害學報,18(5):1-9。
10. 宇佐美衛(1936):宜蘭圖幅及說明書,臺灣總督府殖產局出版,第774號。
11. 吳聰賢(1964):農業消息之傳播,臺北:國立臺灣大學農業推廣學系。
12. 吳明淏(2011):生活防災-災害風險管理,高雄:高雄市立空中大學土木與環境工程學系數位教材。
13. 何春蓀(1975):臺灣地質概論,臺北:中華民國經濟部。
14. 何春蓀(1980):普通地質學,臺北:五南。
15. 李秀彬(1996):全球環境變化研究的核心領域:土地利用/土地覆蓋變化的國際研究動向,地理學報,51(5):553-558。
16. 李曉兵(1999):國際土地利用─土地覆蓋變化的環境影響研究,地球科學進展,14(4):395-400。
17. 李瑞陽(2006):運用影像分塊方法於高解析衛星影像土地利用判釋精度之研究,航測及遙測學刊,11(4):403-415。
18. 李錫堤(2008):事件型山崩潛感分析流程─以大甲溪流域為例,2008流域地質與坡地災害研討會,1-21。
19. 李仕利、唐國滔、董先勝、王斯杰(2008):國內外土地利用/土地覆蓋變化研究綜述,廣西農學報,23(3):42-44。
20. 林啟文、林偉雄(1995):臺灣地質圖說明書─三星,臺北:經濟部中央地質調查所。
21. 林彥妤(2012):山區道路邊坡崩塌危害度分析之研究—以太平山宜專一線道路為例,宜蘭:國立宜蘭大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
22. 林雪美(2004):台灣地區近三十年自然災害的時空特性,師大地理研究報告,41:99-128。
23. 林雪美、洪政耀(2008):坡地災害系統與災害識覺關聯之探討,2008台灣災害管理研討會論文集,47-48。
24. 洪政耀(2009):新竹縣五峰鄉、尖石鄉坡地災害特性與災害識覺關聯之研究,臺北:國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所碩士論文。
25. 洪政耀(2013):區域災害系統評估不同空間尺度之災害風險研究─以臺灣臺東縣坡地環境為例,臺北:國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所博士論文。
26. 洪如江(2009):坡地災害防治,水利土木科技資訊季刊,46:7-16。
27. 馬士彬、安裕倫(2008):喀斯特地區土地利用與坡度因子關係分析─以貴州省都勻市為例。貴州師範大學學報,26(1):18-21。
28. 孫麗、陳煥偉、潘家文(2004):運用DEM剖面土利用類型的分布及時間變化─以北京延慶縣為例。山地學報,22(6):762-766。
29. 陳佑啟、楊鵬(2001):國際上土地利用/土地覆蓋變化研究的新進展,經濟地理,21(1):95-100。
30. 陳建新(2008):應用不安定指數法於集水區崩塌地特性比較之研究─以仁愛鄉部落集水區為例,臺中:國立中興大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
31. 陳禹銘、蘇昭郎、黃詩倩(2009):災害風險評估研究之探討,災害防救電子報,48:1-10。
32. 許炳進(2006):大同鄉志經濟篇,宜蘭:宜蘭縣大同鄉公所。
33. 黃誌川、徐美玲、朱子豪(2001):區別分析於衛星影像土地利用分類之應用─以宜蘭沿海鄉鎮為例,地理學報,29:107-120。
34. 黃國楨、鍾玉龍、林美雲、李久先(2004):航空照片應用於大鵬灣土地利用變遷之研究,航測及遙測學刊,9(4):35-46。
35. 張明(1999):區域土地利用結構及其驅動因子的統計分析,自然資源學報,14(4):381-384。
36. 楊貴三(2010):臺灣地形土地志地形篇,南投:國史館台灣文獻館,1-2。
37. 溫振宇(2005):結合地震與颱風因子之山崩模式分析,臺南:國立成功大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。
38. 廖啟岳(2008):大漢溪流域崩塌地發生特性分析,臺南:國立成功大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。
39. 蔡運龍(2001):土地利用/土地覆被變化研究:尋求新的综合途徑,地理研究,20(6):645-652。
40. 蔡博文、范義軍(1999):台灣北部海岸地區土地利用歷史資料庫建立之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,計畫編號:NSC88-2621-Z-002-016。
41. 蔡博文(2003):台灣山地地區土地利用時序資料庫建立之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,計畫編號:NSC91-2621-Z-002-014。
42. 蔡博文(2005):土地變遷研究之回顧與展望,全球變遷通訊雜誌,48:21-24。
43. 劉守恆(2002):衛星影像於崩塌地自動分類組合之研究,臺南:國立成功大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。
44. 賴進貴、葉高華、王韋力(2004):土地利用變遷與空間相依性之探討─以臺北盆地聚落變遷為例,臺灣地理資訊學刊,1:29-40。
45. 錢樂祥(1994):災害系統分類初探,自然災害學報,3(3):98-102。
46. 謝啟賢、蔡博文、張康聰(2007):養殖土地利用變遷預測模式之建立─個體施為取徑,地理學報,47:1-18。
47. 擺萬奇、趙士洞(2001):土地利用變化趨動力系統分析。資源科學,23(3):39-41。
48. 羅煒婷(2011):宜蘭冬山河流域洪患特性變遷與居民洪患識覺之研究,臺北:國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所碩士論文。
外文部分
1. Atkinson, P.M., Massari, R. (1998) Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines. Computers & Geosciences, 24:373-385.
2. Ayalew, L., & Yamagishi, H. (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorpholoy, 65:15-31.
3. Begueria, S., Lorente, A. (1999) Landslide hazard mapping by multivariate statistics: comparison of methods and case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. The Damocles Project Work, Contract No EVG1-CT 1999-00007. Technical Report, 20.
4. Brabb, E.E. (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping. Proceeding of the 4th International Symposium on Landslides. Toronto, 1:307-324.
5. Brookfield, H.C. (1972) Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture. Pacific Viewpoint, 13:30-48.
6. Bunza, G. (1984) Oberflächenabfluß und Bodenabtrag in alpinen Graslandökosystemen. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 12:101-109.
7. Bortz, J. (1993) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin.
8. Bell, R., & Glade T. (2004) Quantitative risk analysis for landslides─Examples from Bildudalur, NW-Iceland, 4:117-131.
9. Carrare, A., Cardinali, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V. & Reichenbach, P. (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslides hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16:427-445.
10. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F. & Reichenbach, P. (1995) GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht, 135-176.
11. Collinson, A.J.C., Anderson, M.G. & Lloyd, D.M. (1995) Impact of vegetation on slopestability in a humid tropical environment: a modelling approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Water, Maritime and Energy, 112:168–175.
12. Dai, F.C.,& Lee C.F. (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorpholoy, 42:213-228.
13. Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., Nhai, Y.Y. (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering Geology, 64:65-87.
14. Fannin, R.J., Wise, M.P., Wilkinson, J.M.T. & Rollerson, T.P. (1996) Landslide initiation and runout on clearcut hillslopes. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Landslides, Trondheim, Norway, 195-199.
15. Fell, R., Ho, K.K.S., Lacasse, S., Leroi, E. (2005) A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In: Hungr, O., Fell, R., Couture, R., Eberhardt, E. (Eds.), Landslide Risk Management. Taylor and Francis, London, 3-26.
16. Fell, B., Corominas, J., Bonnard, C., Cascini, L., Leroi, E., Savage, W. Z. (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Engineering Geology, 102:85-98.
17. Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M. & Reichenbach P. (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study. Central Italy, Geomorphology, 31:181-216.
18. Glade, T. (2003) Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: a review of evidence from New Zealand. Catena, 51:297-314.
19. Glade, T.,Anderson, M.and Crozier, M. (2006) Landslide hazard and risk. Hoboken: John Wiley.
20. Garcia-Ruiz, J.M., Begueria, S., Alatorre, L.C.& Puigdefabregas, J. (2010) Land cover changes and shallow landsliding in the flysch sector of the Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology, 124:250-259.
21. Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989) Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York,307.
22. Imaizumi, F., Sidle, R.C.,Kamei,R. (2008) Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33:827-840.
23. IUGS (1997) Quantitative risk assessment for slopes and landslides — the state of the art. In: Cruden, D., Fell, R. (Eds.), Landslide Risk Assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, 3-12.
24. Jacks, G.V. (1954) Soil. Nelson, London.
25. Koukis, G. & Ziourkas, C. (1991) Slope instability phenomena in Greece: A statistical analysis. Bullentin of International Association of Engineering Geology, 43:47-60.
26. Mark, R.K. & Ellen, S.D. (1995) Statistical and simulation models for mapping debris flow hazard. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishing, The Netherlands, 93-106.
27. Meusburger, K. & Alewell, C. (2008) Impacts of anthropogenic and environmental factors on the occurrence of shallow landslides in an alpine catchment (Urseren Valley, Switzerland). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8:509-520.
28. Ohsaka, O., Tsuchiya, S. & Yoshida, M. (2002) Quantitative decrease in the area of slope failures in mountainous area with vegetation cover. International congress interpraevent 2002 in the Pacific Rim, 2:893-900.
29. Panizza, M. (1999) Relationships between environment and man in terms of landslide induced risk. In R. Casale & Y.C. Margottini (eds), Floods and landslides, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 191-195
30. Popescu, M.E. (2002) Landslide causal factors and landslide remedial options. Keynote Lecture, Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Landslide, Slope Stability and Safety of Infra-Structures, Singapore, 61-81.
31. Rowbotham, D.N. & Dudycha, D. (1998) GIS modelling of slope stability in Phewa Tal watershed, Nepal. Geomorphology, 26:151-170.
32. Rindfuss, R. R., Walsh, S. J., Turner II., B. L., Fox, J. & Mishra, V. (2004) Developing a Science of Land Change: Challenges and methodological issues. PNAS, 101(39):13976-13981.
33. Schauer, T. (1975) Die Blaikenbildung in den Alpen. Schriftenreihe Bayerisches Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft 1. München.
34. Shucksmith, M. (1993) Farm household behaviour and the transition to post-productivism. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44:466-479.
35. Tasser, E., Mader M. & Tappeiner, U. (2003) Effects of land use in alpine grasslands on the probability of landslides. Basic Appl. Ecol.,4:271-280.
36. Tarantino, C., Blonda, P. & Pasquariello, G. (2007) Remote sensed data for automatic detection of land-use changes due to human activity in support to landslide studies. Nat Hazards, 41:245-267.
37. Terlien, M.T.J., Van Asch, T.W.J., Van Westen, C.J. (1995) Deterministic modelling in GIS-based landslide hazard assessment. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishing, The Netherlands, 57-77.
38. Tsukamoto, Y. & Kobashi, S. (1991) New SABO Engineerings. Asakura Shoten Co., 193.
39. Turner, B.L. & Doolittle, W.E. (1978) The concept and measure of agricultural intensity. Professional Geographer, 30(3):297-301.
40. Turner II, B.B., & Meyer, W.B. (1991) Land Use and Land Cover in Global Environmental Change, International Social Science Journal, 130:669-679.
41. Turner II, B.L. (1995) Land Use and Land Cover Chang(LUCC):Scince/Research Plan. IGBP Reports, 35:6-9.
42. UN/ISDR (2002) Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiative-preliminary version. UN Publications, Geneva.
43. Vanacker, V., Vanderschaeghea, M., Goversb, G., Willemsc, E., Poesenb, J., Deckersc, J. & De Bievre, B. (2003) Linking hydrological, infinite slope stability and land-use change models through GIS for assessing the impact of deforestation on slope stability in high Andean watersheds. Geomorphology, 52:299-315.
44. Van Beek, L. P. H. & Van Asch, TH. W. J. (2004) Regional Assessment of the Effects of Land-Use Change on Landslide Hazard by Means of Physically Based Modelling. Natural Hazards, 31:289-304.
45. Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Vanwalleghem, T., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Verstraeten, G., &Vandekerckhove, L. (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorpholoy, 76:392-410.
46. Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Poesen, J. & Van Rompaey, A. (2009) How do humans interact with their environment in residential areas prone to landsliding? A case-study from the Flemish Ardennes. Landslide processes: From geomorphologic mapping to dynamic modelling. Proceedings of the conference,19-24.
47. Wasowski, J. (1998) Understanding rainfall-landslide relationships in man-modified environments: a case-history from Caramanico Terme, Italy. Environ Geol, 35(2-3):197-209.
48. Wieczorek, G.F., Mandrone, G. & DeCola, L. (1997) The influence of hillslope shape on debris-flow initiation. In: Chen, C.L. (Ed.), Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 21-31.
49. Wisner, B., Blaikie P., Cannon T., & Davis I. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. (Second edition.) Routledge, London.
50. Wu, W., Sidle, R.C. (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resources Research, 31:2097-2110.
51. Zêzere, J.L. (2002) Landslide susceptibility assessment considering landslide typology, a case study in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2:73-82.
52. Zhou, C. H., Lee C. F., Li J. & Xu Z.W. (2002) On the spatial relationship between landslides and causative factors on Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Geomorphology, 43:197.
網路資料
1. CIA-The World Factbook,https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tw.html,2014/3下載。
2. USGS National Landslide Information Center FAQ’s,http://www.usgs.gov/faq/index.php?action=show&cat=17, 2011/10下載。
3. 內政部國土測繪中心,http://www.nlsc.gov.tw/websites/i_ext/default.aspx, 2012/2下載。
4. 行政院農業委員會水土保持局臺中分局網站,http://eng2.swcb.gov.tw/content.asp?Aid=170,2014/3下載。
5. 宜蘭縣政府主計處,http://bgacst.e-land.gov.tw/releaseRedirect.do?unitID=115&pageID=3375,2014/3下載。
6. 國土利用調查成果資訊網,http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/LUWeb/Home/LoginAdv.aspx,2012/4下載。
7. 國土利用調查業務介紹,http://www.nlsc.gov.tw/websites/make_page.aspx?la=1&le=2&li=5&sno=132&le2=3&li2=132,2012/6下載。
8. 歐洲環境局,glossary.eea.europa.eu,2011/10下載。
9. 聯合知識庫,http://udndata.com/,2014/4下載。