摘 要
本研究為達成「建構機電整合電路系統故障檢修行為分類表、分析先備知識與檢修成就的相關、探討機電整合電路系統故障檢修行為、分析影響故障檢修成就因素」等研究目的，首先從技術學院電機系學生中，實施機電整合電路系統先備知識測驗，依測驗成績分高低兩組，每組各選取6位學生，計有12位學生參與機電整合電路系統故障檢修測試。並以「有聲思考/臨床晤談」法蒐集學生檢修的行為與歷程，同時利用錄音錄影方式，配合原案分析轉錄成文字，經由資料分析結果，本研究提出的結論如下：
一、建構機電整合電路系統故障檢修行為分類表。
二、機電整合系統之先備知識與故障檢修成就具有相關存在。其中陳述性知識、程序性知識均與故障檢修成就具有相關存在。
三、機電整合電路系統故障檢修行為的次數依序為：搜尋故障點、瞭解徵候、執行修復行為。在瞭解徵候方面以目視的行為次數最多；在搜尋故障點方面的行為次數依序為：感官評估、電表測量、資料分析、策略運用。
四、先備知識高低分組在故障檢修成就上的差異：
(一)高分組較能運用檢修策略。
(二)低分組因先備知識的不足導致診斷與檢修上的瓶頸。
五、影響機電整合系統故障檢修成就的因素歸納如下：
(一)機電整合系統先備知識與技能的不足，是導致檢修失敗的主要因素。
(二)機電整合系統檢修經驗的不足，將導致檢修時間的增加，降低檢修成效。
(三)熟悉故障檢修策略與方法，是導致檢修成功的重要因素。
關鍵字︰機電整合、故障檢修、有聲思考

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to set up the classified table of Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting, explore behavior of troubleshooting, analyze the factors affecting the efficiency on troubleshooting achievement and the correlation between prior-knowledge and troubleshooting achievement. The experimental students, having the pre-test of Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting, were selected 12 students divided into high score group and low score group from electrical engineering department of Technology Institute. The research method was thinking aloud/clinical interview and utilizing protocol analysis by recording tape and video tape searching for the behavior of troubleshooting and processes of Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting.
According to the analysis of this case, the conclusions obtained were as follows:
1. Setting up the classified table of Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting.
2. Significant correlation exists between the students’ achievement of Mecha- tronics Circuit Troubleshooting and their prior-knowledge, both in declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge.
3. The ranking frequency of Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting was as follows: searching for troubleshooting, comprehension for symptoms, and executing troubleshooting behavior. The most frequency in comprehension for symptoms was visual behavior and the ranking frequency of searching for troubleshooting was as follows: sensory evaluation, electrical meter measuring, data analysis, and searching strategy.
4. The achievement comparison between high and low score group of prior- knowledge.
(1) High score group could efficiently implement troubleshooting strategies.
(2) Low score group had obstacles in troubleshooting resulted from insufficient prior-knowledge.
5. The influential factors in Mechatronics Circuit Troubleshooting achievement were as follows:
(1) The main factor resulted in fail troubleshooting was insufficient prior- knowledge and technique.
(2)Lack of experience in Mechatronics troubleshooting would increase troubleshooting time and decrease its efficiency.
(3)The main factor in successful troubleshooting was students’ knowing well about its strategies and methods.
Keywords: mechatronics, troubleshooting, thinking aloud.

參 考 書 目
【中文部分】
王仁家(民88) ：問題解決教學策略對高工學生低壓工業配線學習成效影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
王春展(民86) ：專家與生手間問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊，5(2)，80-92頁。
王昭明(民84) ：波利亞在工程圖學教學上之應用，技術及職業教育，25期，54-58頁。
王昭明(民85) ：圖學解題策略之分析研究。台北市：全華圖書公司。
王繼正(民87) ：專科學校機械類科創造性問題解決式專題製作教學之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文，54頁。
方吉正、張新仁(民89) ：認知學徒制在國小數學解題教學成效之研究,課程與教學，3卷4期，49-72頁。
朱湘吉(民83) ：原案分析法簡介，教學科技與媒體，14期，49-53頁。
李忠成(民85) ：SIEMENS S5 PLC程式設計與故障診斷，技術與訓練，21(1)，41-54頁。
李隆盛(民83) ：工藝教材教法新趨勢：模組化的課程設計與解決問題的教學策略。菁莪，6卷4期，3-9頁 。
李隆盛、黃政傑（民85）技職教育概論。台北市：師大書苑。
李靜瑤(民83) ：高雄市國二學生數學解題歷程之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所碩士論文。
吳天方(民86) ：我國師範大學工業教育學生問題解決和學習風格之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學學報。
林宏一(民79) ：國中學生數學解題行為之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
林明哲(民79) ：大一與高三學生化學平衡解題過程與行為之分析。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
林清山、張景媛(民82) ：國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，26期，53-74頁。
林碧珍(民78) ：國小學生數學解題的表現及其相關因素的研究。國立臺灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文。
林頌恩(民86) ：專家與生手的解題後設認知研究，科學與教育,1期, 2-8頁。
邱清城(民86) ：PLC原理技模組化應用。台北市：全華圖書公司。
邵瑞珍、皮連生(民86) ：教育心理學。台北市：五南出版社。
施純協(民79) ：科技教育之歸根與常道。台北市：知行出版社。
施純協(民88) ：資訊教育。台北市：五南出版社。
施良方(民85) ：學習理論。台北市：麗文出版社。
洪榮昭(民86) ：問題解決的思考模式。技術問題解決能力發展研究研習會報告資料，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系。
涂金堂(民88) ：國小學生數學解題歷程之分析研究，初等教育學刊，7期，295-332頁。
郭生玉(民76) ：心理與教育研究法。台北市：精華圖書出版社。
郭重吉(民89) ：學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。國立彰化師大學報，1期，280頁。
郭興家、邱弘興(民86) ：機電整合。臺北市:高立圖書公司。
張春興(民80)：教育心理學。台北市：東華圖書公司。
張憶壽譯(民75) ：怎樣解題。台北市：眾文圖書公司。
許書務(民88) ：問題導向學習之教學策略研究：以專科微電腦應用系統設計專題製作為例。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
陳東營、張惠博(民88) ：國中學生理化解題過程差異與其影響因素之研究，科學教育， 9期， 54-87頁。
陳曉開(民86) ：新聞編輯的解題表現---專家與生手的比較，新聞學研究， 58期， 237-268頁。
康自立（民83） ：技職教育課程基礎之理論研究－以工業教育為例。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告，NSC 83 - 0111 - S - 018 - 010。
莊謙本 (民86) ：電子電路故障檢修評量模式研究。國立臺灣師範大學學報，數理與科技類，42期，7-24頁。
莊謙本 (民87) ：技能評量的內再與外在因素。教學科技與媒體，42期，38-42頁。
莊謙本、徐椿樑(民89) ：專科學校專業技術科目採用問題解決式教學法實驗研究。第十五屆全國技術及職業教育研討會。一般技職及人文教育類，403-412頁。
黃耀寬(民88) ：問題解決教學策略對高職電機科學生低壓工業配線學習成效之研究。國立彰化師大工業教育碩士論文。
黃幸美(民82) ：問題解決的思考歷程。教育研究雙月刊，34期，50-56頁。
楊朝祥(民83) ：技術職業教育理論與實務。臺北市:三民書局。
楊家興(民89) ：自學式教材設計手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。124-127頁。
楊坤原(民88) ：問題解決在科學學習成就評量上的應用。科學教育月刊，216期，3-16頁。
葉明恭（民85）：電腦輔助教學系統在數位調變與解調變技術教學成效及學後保留之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究碩士論文。
鄒治華(民88) ：機電整合應用與實習。臺北市:文京圖書公司。
廖文清(民88) ：影響高職學生技能學習成效的因素。輔導園地，5(1)，53-57頁。
廖焜熙(民88) ：有機立體化學成就影響因素及解題模式之研究。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育博士論文。
蔡錫濤(民84) ：系統維修原理，工業自動化維護技術人力訓練教材，系統組。職訓局。
劉錫麒(民78) ：國小高年級學生數學解題歷程及其相關因素的研究，花蓮師範學院學報，3期，23-90頁。
鄭麗玉(民82) ：認知心理學理論與應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。
鄭毓信(民87) ：數學教育哲學。臺北市:九章出版社。
謝澄漢(民88) ：高工控制科機電整合控制實習教材發展與設備製作之研究。國科會研究報告NSC-88-2516-S-003-002，6-7頁。
謝淡宜(民87) ：小學五年級數學資優生與普通生數學解題時思考歷程之比較，臺南師院學報， 31期，225-268 頁。
蕭錫錡（民79）：專科學校教師教學評量手冊。教育部技職司。
蕭錫錡（民83）：技職教育課程基礎之理論研究－以工業教育為例。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告。
鍾瑞國、康鳳梅(民86) ：提昇五專學生解決工程製圖中正投影試圖問題能力之研究，國科會研究報告NSC-85-2516-S-003-002-TG。
鍾聖校(民79) ：認知心理學。臺北市:心理出版社。
顏晴榮(民89) ：培養專科學生機電整合故障檢測之問題解決能力研究。國科會研究報告。NSC-89-2516-S-161-002。
羅素貞(民85) ：問題表徵與問題解決。屏東師院學報，9期，149-176頁。
羅煥茂(民87) ：FX系列可程式控制器基礎與實務。台北市：華興書局。
【英文部分】
Alexander, P. A., Kukiowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1992). How subject- matter knowledge affects recall and interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Anderson, J.R.(1983). The Arcbitecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, R.D.,Anderson,B.L., Varanka-Martin,M. A., et al.(1994). Issues of curricula reforms in science, mathematics and higher order thinking across the disciplines. Washington DC:The U.S. Government Printing.
Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An experimental study. New York: Basic Books.
Bedard, D., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1992). Comprehension and use of knowledge by students in learning complex technical skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Best, J. B. (1989). Cognitive psychology. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristic and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bodner, G. M. (1987). The role of algorithm in teach. Prob. Solv. J. of chem.. Edu., 64(6), 513.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1987). Reactive leaning environments for teaching electronic troubleshooting. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research, (pp. 65-98). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
Camacho,M., (1986). Analysis of the Performance of Experts and Navice While Solving Chemical Equilibrium Problems,Dissertation Abstracts International 44,2979A.
Cash, J.R.(1997). Effectiveness of cognitive apprenticeship-based instructional methods in college automotive technology , Order No: AAC 9708744 ProQuest - Dissertation Abstracts. Source: DAI-A 57/10, p. 4342.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Human ability. An information-processing approach. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Chung, S.P.(1999). The effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) on the Troubleshooting Ability of Aviation Technician Students, Order No: AAC 9904415 ProQuest - Dissertation Abstracts. DAI-A 59/08, p. 2937.
Davies, I. K.(1981). Instructional technique. New York: McGraw-Hall.
DeKleer, J.,& Brown, J. S. (1981). Mental models of physical mechanisms and their acquisition In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, (pp. 285-309). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Driscoll, M. P.(1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. London: Allym and Bacon.
Dochy, F. J. (1996). Assessmetnt of domain-specific and domain-transceding prior knowledge: Entry assessment and the use of profile analysis.
Downey, T.E.(1997).An analysis of the application of formal models of knowledge representation for troubleshooting by students in three Dimensional functional aviation maintenance training simulators. Order No:AAC 9637929.ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts. Source: DAI-B 57/07, p. 4628.
Ericcson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Re-view,87,215-252.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1990). Cognitive psychology. Hove: LEA Pub-lishers.
Finch,R.(1992). An organizational simulation for vocational education professionals. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 948).
Flavell,J.H.(1981). Cognitive Monitoring, In Dickson W.P.,(Ed.), Children’s Oral Communication Skills, N.Y.:Academic Press, Inc,pp.35-60.
Flesher, J. W. (1993). An exploration of technical troubleshooting expertise in design, manufacturing, and repair contexts. Journal of Industrial Teacher Edu-cation, 31(1), 34-56.
Foshay, W. R. (1989). What we know (and what we don’t know) about training of cognitive strategies for technical problem-solving. Journal of Structural Learning, 10, 111-125.
Frederiksen, N (1984). Implications of cognitive theory or instruction in problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 54, 363-407.
Gagn’e, E.D.(1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
Ginsburg,H.P.et al., (1983). Protocol Methods in Research on Mathematical Think-ing, in H.P. Ginsburg,(Ed.), The Development of Mathematical thinking,riando, Florida:Academic Press, Inc.,pp7-47.
Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986a). Cognition. NY: Random House.
Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986b). Cognition(2nd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-hill.
Glass, A. R. (1996). The effects of thinking aloud pair problem solving on technology education students’ thinking processes, procedures, and problem solving. University of Minnesota.(UMI:AAC 9220258).
Hamilton, R. ,& Ghatala, E.(1994). Learning and instruction. New York:Mcgraw-Hill, INC.
Hayes, J.R., & Flower, L. (1981). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Hayes, J.R. (1989). The complete problem solver. Hillsdale, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Helgeson, S. L. (1992). Problem solving research in middle/junior high school. Columbus, OH:ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Enviromental Education.
Hereb, J. (1996). The technical problem and its didactic function. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391 699).
Johnson,S.D.(1999). The effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) on the Troubleshooting Ability of Aviation Technician Students,Journal of Industrial Teacher Education,37(1), 7-25.
Johnson, S. D. (1987). Knowledge and skill differences between expert and novice service technicians on technical troubleshooting tasks (Technical Report #20): St. Paul: University of Minnesota, training and Development Research Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 284-054).
Johnson, S. D. (1991). Training technical troubleshooters. Technical and Skills Training, 27(7), 9-16.
Johnson, S. D., Flesher, J. W., Jehng, J. C., & Ferej, A. (1993). Enhancing electrical troubleshooting skills in a computer-coached practice environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(3), 199-214.
Johnson, S. D., Flesher, J. W., & Chung, S. P. (1995), Understanding Trouble-shooting Styles To Improve Training Methods. Paper presented at the American Vocational Association Convention. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 948).
Johnson, S. D.,& Satchwell, R.E. (1993). The effect of functional flow diagrams on apprentice aircraft mechanics’ technical system understanding. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4). 73-91.
Johnson, S. D., & Others.(1992). Application of Cognitive Theory to the Design, Development, and Implementation of a Computer-Based Troubleshooting Tutor. National Center for Research in Vocational Education. Berkeley, CA.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 351 602).
Jones, R.E.,& Wilson, K.A.(1991).Problem-solving activities for technology edu-cation . Austin, Texas:The University of Texas at Austin , Extension Instruction and Materials Center , Division of Continuing Education.
Judith M.,& Chartes C. W.(1992). Testing and Troubleshooting. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED325677).
Kahney, H. (1986). Problem solving : A Cognitive approach. Bristol, PA:Open Uni-versity Press.
Kilpatrick, J. (1967). Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics: An exploratory study.(Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.) University Micro-films International.
Klausmeier, H. J.,Ghatala, E. S. ,& Frayer, D. A. (1974).Conceptual Learning and Development, A Cognitive View; Acaemic Press Inc., New York and London.
Kulatunga, N. A.(1996). The effect of Visual Analyaia Skills on Conceptual Under-standing and Problem-Solving in Electrical Circuits(Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International,-A 57/03.
Laudon, K.C.,& Laudon , J.P.(1993). Business information system: A problem-solving approach (2nd ed). Orlando,FL :The Dryden Press .293-333.
Lawson, A. E.,&Wollman, W. T. (1977). Cognitive level, Cognitive style, and value judgement. Science Education,61(3),397-407.
Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Eastman, R., Eggan, G., Gitomer, D., Glaser, R., Greenberg, L., Logan, D., Magone, M., Weiner, A., Wolf, R., & Yengo, L. (1986). Cognitive task analysis to enhance technical skills training and assessment: Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
Lodahl, D.(1989). Electronics Troubleshooting. High-Technology Training Module. Office of Vocational and Adult Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 347 372).3-12.
Lux & Ray (1966). A Rationale and Structure for industrial arts subject matter. The Ohis State University.
Macpherson,R.T. (1989). Factors affecting technological troubleshooting skills. Journal of Industrial Teachers Education,35(4),5-28.
Maloney, D. P. (1991). Research on problem solving:Physics. In Dorothy L. Gabel (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition(2nd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive of psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In A. Silver (Ed.). Teaching and learning mathe-matical problem solving: Mutliple research perspectives (pp. 123- 138). Hallsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaun Associates.
Means, B., & Roth, C.(1988). Some outcomes of a cognitive analysis of trouble-shooting. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Atlanta, GA.
Morris, N. M., &Rouse, W. B. (1985). Review and evaluation of empirical research in troubleshooting (Interim Report NPRDC TR 86-20): San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
Newell, A. J., & simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-hall.
Nisbett,R.E., & Wilson,T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review,84,231-259.
Niskanen, V. A. (1987). Some principal results of the studies carried out in the research project on instructional material(ERIC No. ED288825). Finland : Helsinki Univ. Dept. of Education.
Perez, R. S. (1991). A view from troubleshooting In M. U. Smith(Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving, pp.115-153. Hillsdale, New Jersey :Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Rasmussen, J., & Jensen, A. (1974). Mental procedures in real-life task: A case study of electronic troubleshooting. Ergonomics, 17(3), 293-307.
Reynolds, A. G., & Flagg, P. W. (1983). Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Little, Brown and company.
Riley, M. S.,Greeno,J.G., & Heller,J.I. (1981). Development of word problem solving ability. In H.P. Ginsberg(Ed.), Development of mathematical thinking, New York: Academic Press.
Rouse, W. B. (1991). Design for success : A human-centered approach to successful products and systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rowe,H.A.(1985). Problem solving and intelligence. Hillsdale, N.Y.: Academic.
Rowntree, D.(1994). Preparing materials for open, distance and flexible learning. London:Kogan Page.
Rumelhart,D.E., & Norman,D.A.(1988). Representation in memory. In R.C. Atkin-son, R.J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, and R.D. Ruth(Eds.),Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology(pp.511-587). New York:Willey.
Schlager, M., Means, B., & Roth, C. (1988, April). Cognitive analysis of expert knowledge: Input into design of training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Schoenfeld,A.H.(1985).Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
Simmons,P.E.(1985). Problem Solving Behavior and Concepts of Novices and Ex-perts during Interaction With a Genetics Computer Simulation, Ann Arbor Mich. University Microfilms International.
Simon, H. A.(1980). Problem solving and education. In D. T. Tuma, & F. Reif(Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, M.U. (1991). A view from biology(Ed.). In Toward a Unified Theory of Problem Solving, 1-19. Hillsdale, New Jersey :Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Soden, R.(1994). Teaching Problem Solving in Vocational Education. London and New York.
Sternberg, R. J.(1996). Cognitive Psychology. Orlando, Floride: Harcourt Brace College.
Sutcliffe, A.G., Benyon, D. & Assche, F. V. (1996). Domain knowledge for inter-active system design. London：SAGE.
Tennyson, R.D. (1992). An educational learning theory for instructional design. Educational Technology, 11(1),38-40.
Todd, R. D.(1990). The teaching and learning environment. The Technology Teacher, 50(3) , 3-7.
Umelhart, D. E.,& Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Ruth (Eds.), Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 511-587). New York: Willey.
Webb, N.L. (1975). An exploration of mathematical problem-solving processes. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.) University Microfilms International.
Wellman, H. M.(1983). Metamemory revisited. In M. Chi(Ed.), What is memory development the development of ? A look after a decade (pp. 31-51). Basel:Karger.
Yackel, E., & Wheatley, G. H. (1985). Characteristics of problem representation indicative of understanding in mathematics problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.