研究生: |
涂嘉雯 Tu, Chia-Wen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
餐飲加盟商跑料十大線索研究 Examining Ten Clues to the Catering Franchisees Ordering Goods and Materials from Sources other than the Franchise Headquarters |
指導教授: |
王國欽
Wang, Kuo-Ching |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 122 |
中文關鍵詞: | 連鎖加盟 、監督成本 、投機主義 |
英文關鍵詞: | franchise, monitoring costs, opportunism |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GSLHM.044.2018.A05 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:96 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
加盟總部與加盟商間長期良好的互動關係為加盟體系發展的重要議題,雙方透過有型化契約簽訂,以互信承諾作為長期合作的發展基礎,以達成彼此共同利益。然而,立場不一致、環境的利誘、資訊不對稱下導致加盟商跑料行為於連鎖體系中行之有年,其本研究之「跑料」意指「加盟商未依加盟契約條款內容向加盟總部或其指定之供應廠商訂購營業所需貨品或原物料之行為」。加盟總部與加盟商關係嚴密則愈能達成共利互榮的目標,但因雙方所處立場相持、認知與目標有異,在面臨有關利益衝突時,可能會選擇對自身權益有利行為為採取之行動。當加盟者經營績效已維持穩定,轉以降低進貨成本以求提高獲利為常見方式。而跑料行為將使加盟總部產品在市場上品質不一,損及企業名聲,亦將造成加盟總部需花費更高的監督成本,相關防範成本皆會造成交易成本增加。在連鎖加盟企業中,企業難以判斷加盟商實際之所作所為是否符合連鎖加盟企業之期望 (Bercovitz,2004) ,當為了防範加盟商,對其資訊的蒐集過程勢必更加嚴謹小心,因為資訊若不充足,存在不確定性時,投機主義行為的發生機率將會大大的提高 (Kulkarni,2001) ,總部若要完全瞭解加盟商的行為,實有其困難性。故本研究透過學、業界專家效度驗證,針對其建議發展研究正式訪談題項,以5間餐飲加盟總部及12間餐飲加盟商進行探討,總計共17位受訪者為本研究深度訪談之研究對象,採內容分析法進行資料分析。其研究結果如下:一、加盟主的投機主義無法避免,並且會造成對總部企業的損失。二、總部可藉由嚴謹的加盟合約擬定,以降低加盟者投機行為。三、總部可透過不定時協助、監督加盟者的營運狀況,以避免加盟主的投機主義,破壞彼此的長期合作關係。
A positive relationship between franchise headquarters and franchisees is required to ensure the growth of franchise system. The headquarters and franchisees sign a standard form contract and subsequently develop their long-term cooperation based on mutual trust for their mutual benefits. Faced with different positions, environmental inducements and information asymmetry, however, many franchisees have ordered goods and materials from sources other than the franchise headquarters for many years.
As stated in this study, “ordering goods and materials from sources other than the franchise headquarters” means “according to the franchise agreement, franchisees are required to order the goods and materials needed by their business from the franchise headquarters or from the suppliers designated by the franchise headquarters, but they simply choose to order such goods and materials from sources other than the franchise headquarters.” The franchise headquarters and franchisees have to maintain a close relationship for their mutual benefits. Faced with different positions, cognition and goals, however, franchisees are likely to act for their own interest whenever they have a conflict of interest. Many franchisees start to decrease their purchase costs in order to improve their profit margin once their business has stabilized. Once franchisees order goods and materials from sources other than the franchise headquarters, the franchise headquarters has varied goods and materials with varied quality in the market, which not only affects the franchise headquarters’ reputation, but causes the franchise headquarters to incur excessive costs in order to supervise the franchisees. As a result, the transaction cost increases.
It is extremely difficult to judge whether the franchisees’ behaviors meet the franchise headquarters’ expectations. Franchise headquarters have to be careful about how the franchisees gather their information. If there is not enough information, there is an uncertainty and a higher probability of opportunism. It is extremely difficult for the headquarters to fully understand the franchisees’ behaviors. In this study, four catering franchise executives were interviewed intensively, using expert validation test to examine their recommendations in order to identify the topics required by the official interviews, while data was analyzed using content analysis method. Research results are summarized as follows: 1. There is no way to avoid the franchisees’ opportunism, which definitely results in the headquarters’ loss. 2. The headquarters may resort to the stricter standard form contract in order to minimize the franchisees’ opportunism. 3. The headquarters may assist the franchisees and monitor their daily operations in order to minimize the opportunism and at the same time maintain their long-term cooperation. Finally, according to the results of the study put forward practical recommendations, provide the competent authorities, academia for further improvement.
丁學勤、陳正男、吳萬益 (2004)。總部特質、溝通、投機行為、資產專屬性對加盟關係的影響。行銷評論,1 (2) ,1-30。
文崇一、楊國樞 (2000)。訪問調查法、社會及行為科學研究法下冊。臺北市:東華。
方世杰、方式榮 (2002)。從交易成本與代理理論探討醫藥行銷通路-以行為規範與控制機制為調節變數。管理評論,21 (3) ,1-24。
方世杰、廖誠昌 (1997)。流通業連鎖加盟體系合作關係之研究-連鎖便利商店之實證。 輔仁管理評論,5 (2) ,47-74。
王文宇(1999)。論「共生交易」對公平交易法的挑戰-以加盟事業為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,29 (1),91-120。
王居卿 (2005)。以搭便車觀點整合加盟者競合因素之探討 (未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
庄貴軍 (2004)。營銷渠道控制:理論與模型。管理學報,1 (1),82。
甘珏瑋 (2010)。加盟契約下的通路協調效益之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
何雍慶、盧龍泉、李曄淳、呂佳茹 (2006)。加盟者對加盟主價值認知之探討。致遠管理論叢,1 (1),23-35。
吳立偉、林維峰 (2015)。探討專屬性資產、鑲嵌、非功能性衝突與投機行為對連鎖加盟業者續約意願之影響:以信任、依賴為中介變數。 International Journal, 7 (1), 1-18.
吳光明 (2010)。論加盟契約。月旦法學雜誌,187,5-20。
李孟穎 (2016)。加盟契約競業禁止條款之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。.
李建昌 (2006)。連鎖便利商店加盟總部之攻擊式與防衛式行銷策略對加盟主關係品質之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。實踐大學,臺北市。
李琮偉 (2010)。加盟連鎖飲料店總部績效評估 (未出版碩士論文)。國立虎尾科技大學,雲林縣。
李嘉芸 (2015)。連鎖加盟總部成功條件與手冊建立之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。虎尾科技大學,雲林縣。
沈芷萍 (2015)。論加盟契約 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
周世偉 (2006)。加盟體系關係品質與組織公民行為之研究-結構化觀點。國立高雄第一科技大學,高雄市。
周世偉、黃慧玲、李冠穎、許英傑 (2007)。加盟連鎖系統忠誠導向之研究-溝通觀點。人文暨社會科學期刊,3 (2),19-26。
林隆儀 (2004)。消費價值與消費者涉入對仿冒品購買行為影響之研究-以名牌服飾為例。真理大學,臺北市。
林良田 (2016)。加盟者評選加盟總部準則之研究-萬佳鄉連鎖早餐店為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,臺北市。
林佳蓁 (2003)。連鎖事業體系之機制、組織學習與績效之關係研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學,高雄市。
林岡輝 (2016)。加盟禁忌:為什麼不該隨便向契約約定以外的廠商叫貨?取自:http://windleo1.pixnet.net/blog/post/213876898-%E5%8A%A0%E7%9B%9F%E7%A6%81%E5%BF%8C1%EF%BC%9A%E7%82%BA%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%E4%B8%8D%E8%A9%B2%E9%9A%A8%E4%BE%BF%E5%90%91%E5%A5%91%E7%B4%84%E7%B4%84%E5%AE%9A%E4%BB%A5%E5%A4%96
林鴻偉 (2001)。從交易成本分析與關係交換理論之觀點探討投機主義之管理機制 (未出版碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
阿甘創業網 (2012)。加盟連鎖經營最常見十大加盟糾紛排行。取自:http://blog.xuite.net/ican168blog/ican168blog/60554880-%E5%8A%A0%E7%9B%9F%E9%80%A3%E9%8E%96%E7%B6%93%E7%87%9F%E6%9C%80%E5%B8%B8%E8%A6%8B%E5%8D%81%E5%A4%A7%E5%8A%A0%E7%9B%9F%E7%B3%BE%E7%B4%9B%E6%8E%92%E8%A1%8C+
徐曉慧 (2010)。臺灣中國小數學教科書代數教材內容分析之比較研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
徐曉慧 (2010)。臺灣與中國小學數學教科書代數教材內容分析之比較研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
張元晨、魏品揚 (2015)。影響加盟主遞延開放加盟時點及加盟店比例之因素。管理學報,32 (3),223-246。
張婉晴 (2015)。加盟總部不道德行為對加盟者加盟意願之研究-以便利商店為例 (未出版碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
張瑞龍 (2016)。影響連鎖加盟產業加盟者續約意向之研究-以早餐產業為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。
郭亮延 (2008)。連鎖加盟業之合作關係研究-以市售連鎖飲料店為例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳正男、林素吟、丁學勤 (2005)。信任、承諾與其相關因素的關係:加盟體系的實證研究。臺灣管理學刊,5 (2),209-229。
陳信儒 (2010)。連鎖傳統冰品業加盟總部關係資本策略與加盟主續約意願關係之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄旅學院,高雄市。
陳國雄、黃建榮 (2010) 。連鎖便利商店內部行銷、關係連鐑與加盟承諾之關聯性研究。高應科大人文社會科學學報,7 (2),203-222。
陳逸竹 (2003) 。以代理理論、交易成本觀點與資源依賴觀點探討加盟體系行為績效之影響因素 (未出版碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
許欣萍 (2010)。從公平交易法之觀點論加盟制度-以資訊揭露及垂直交易限制行為為核心 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。
陶思妤 (2015)。被授權人違反連鎖加盟契約之進貨渠道限制條款是否構成商標侵權? -從鮮芋仙案看連鎖加盟契約之商標授權風險。科技法律透析,27 (10),9-15。
游美惠 (2000)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究,8,5-24。
黃瑋如 (2004)。連鎖加盟業之關係連結、信任與承諾之關係-以關係階段為干擾效果 (未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
黃慧玲、許英傑、李昀真 (2006)。加盟連鎖店續約意向之研究。中華管理評論,9 (4),1-22。
黃識銘、余泰魁 (200) 。關係連結與未來關係互動之研究—關係品質之中介效果。管理與系統,13 (3),265-292。
楊文欽 (2009) 。餐飲服類連鎖加盟成功關鍵因素之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。崑山科技大學,臺南縣。
楊孝文 (2016)。加盟連鎖契約競業禁止條款之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。
楊宏暉 (2016)。加盟業主先契約資訊揭露義務之建構。政大法學評論,144,227-312。
溫貫良 (2015)。加盟主的主動行為研究:前置因素及中介機制之探討 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,臺北市。
萬文隆 (2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37 (4),17-24。
趙正敏、鄭博文 (2012)。從交易成本與社會交換觀點探討醫療供應商夥伴間未來關係互動之影響因素。商管科技季刊,13 (2),131-164。
劉冠宏 (2004)。連鎖事業體系知識分享與通路績之實證研究-從交易成本、社會交換觀點探討 (未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學,高雄市。
歐用生 (1995)。質的研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
蔡顯童、呂姿瑩、鍾君宇 (2015)。連鎖加盟者主動貢獻行為之研究。管理評論,34 (3) ,1-21。
鄭世弘 (2001) 。投機主義的管理機制與事後交易成本-以連鎖便利商店為例 (未出版碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化市。
蕭富庭(2017)。2016年公平會加盟處分分析-從中南部案例談公平會加盟處理原則。 取自:http://csia-st.cdri.org.tw/Article/Content/71
簡震宇 (2011)。連鎖加盟事業以內部加盟或外部加盟展店考量因素之初探 (未出版碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
顏廷棟 (2011)。從濫用相對優勢地位之觀點論競爭法對於加盟關係之規範。公平交易季刊,19 (2),105-149。
羅璽、賓幕容 (2008)。交易成本理論與農產品連鎖超市經營。現代商業,11,8。
蘇一貴 (2008) 。臺灣咖啡連鎖業國際進入策略之研究-以85度c為例 (未出版碩士論文)。元智大學,桃園市。
蘇明德 (2015)。連鎖餐廳在中國發展之策略研究-以 T 品牌為案例 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。
Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of marketing research, 36-50.
Anderson, E. & Weitz, B. A. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 18-34.
Anderson, E., Lodish, L. M., & Weitz, B. A. (1987). Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 85-97.
Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A., (1990). A Model of Distribution Firm and Manufacturer Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1),, pp. 42-58.
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of consumer research, 16 (1), 1-38.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2004). Academic entrepreneurs: Social learning and participation in university technology transfer. Twin, MN: University of Minnesota.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2004). Academic entrepreneurs: Social learning and participation in university technology transfer. Twin, MN: University of Minnesota.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free Press.
Berelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 313-330.
Bianchi, C. and Saleh, A., (2010). On Importer Trust and Commitment: A Comparative Study of Two Developing Countries, International Marketing Review , 27(1), 55-86.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Bonoma, T. V. (1985). Case research in marketing: Opportunities, problems, and a process, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 199-208.
Bracker, J. Y., & Pearson, J. N. (1986). Planning and financial performance of small, mature firms. Strategic management journal, 7(6), 503-522.
Caves, R. E., & Murphy, W. F. (1976). Franchising: Firms, markets, and intangible assets. Southern Economic Journal, 572-586.
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H. and On, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
Gassenheimer, J. B., Baucus, D. B. and Baucus, M. S., (1996). Cooperative Arrangements among Entrepreneurs: An Analysis of Opportunism and Communication in Franchise Structures. Journal of Business Research , 36 (1), 67-79.
Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 13-47.
Hamid, A. B. A., Othman, M. H. M., Selamat, R., & Mastor, N. (2003, September). An encouraging factors for entrepreneur in franchising: A Malaysia Experience. Proceeding of 16 th Annual Conference of Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand, Ballarat, Australia.
Harmon, T. R., & Griffiths, M. A. (2008). Franchisee perceived relationship value. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23 (4), 256-263.
Hendrikse, G. and Jiang, T.,(2011). An Incomplete Contracting Model of Dual Distribution in Franchising, Journal of Retailing, 87 (3), 332-344.
Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. The handbook of social psychology, 2, 596-692.
Hunt, S. D., & Nevin, J. R. (1974). Power in a channel of distribution: sources and consequences. Journal of marketing Research, 186-193.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3 (4), 305-360.
John, G. (1984). “An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel”, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 278-289.
Joshi, A. W. and Stump, R. L.,(1999). Determinants of Commitment and Opportunism: Integrating and Extending Insights from Transaction Cost Analysis and Relational Exchange Theory. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16 (4), 334-352.
Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 4(1), 8-18.
KASSARJIAN, J. (1997). The Paradox of leading change. International Institute for Management Development, 40(12).
Klein, S., Frazier, G. L. and Roth, V. J.,(1990). A Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel Integration in International Markets, Journal of Marketing Research , 27(2), 196-208.
Knemeyer, A. M. and Murphy, P. R., (2004). Evaluating the Performance of Third-party Logistics Arrangements: A Relationship Marketing Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management , 40 (4), 35-51.
Kopman, A. F., Yee, P. S., & Neuman, G. G. (1997). Relationship of the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 86 (4), 765-771.
Kulkarni, S. P. (2001). The influence of the type of uncertainty on the mode of international entry. American Business Review, 19 (1), 94.
Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial setting: A study of the governance exchange processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (1), 76-104.
Larson, A., & Starr, J. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 17 (2), 5-15.
Lee, J. and Kim, Y. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15 (4), 29-61.
Mohr, J. J. and Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnerships attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994a). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The journal of marketing, 58, 20-38.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994b). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.
Mukherjee, A. and Nath, P., (2003). A Model of Trust in Online Relationship Banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21 (1), 5-15.
Mummalaneni, V. (1987). The influence of a close personal relationship between the buyer and the seller on the continued stability of theory role relationships. Philadelphia ,PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Prigozy, T. I., Naidenko, O., Qasba, P., Elewaut, D., Brossay, L., Khurana, A., ... & Kronenberg, M. (2001). Science, 291 (5504), 664-667.
Rasmusen, E. B., & Hirshleifer, D. (1989). Cooperation in a repeated prisoner's dilemma with ostracism. Journal of economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 87-106.
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. The Annals of statistics, 34-58.
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 21 (3), 491-503.
Tamura, K., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (30), 11030-11035.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelly, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NJ: Wiley.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NJ: Routledge.
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction - cost Economics: the governances of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
Williamson, O. E., (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly , 36 (2), 269-296.
Wilson, D. T.,(1995). An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 335-345.
Zineldin, M. & Jonsson, P., (2000). An Examination of the Main Factors Affecting Trust/Commitment in Supplier-dealer Relationships: An Empirical Study of the Swedish Wood Industry. The TQM Magazine, 12 (4), 245-266.