近來，環境教育、生態心理學學者提倡修復人與自然的關係，期盼為當前世代對於自然的疏離與冷漠找到出路，喚醒人本能中的「親生命性」 (Biophilia) ，並關切當代環境變遷與生物多樣性流失的挑戰。在愈趨都市化、工業化與虛擬化的時代，公園成為人們接觸自然重要的場域，國際間也拋出「健康的公園，健康的人民」，呼籲應重新發現公園對於公眾健康潛在的價值。
本研究著眼於上述兩點，期望透過調查研究在臺灣墾丁國家公園一群頻繁與自然接觸的解說志工、社區解說員們和自然互動與其心理健康之間的關係，摸索台灣的國家公園是否也有潛在健康促進的價值。研究目標包括調查解說員的自然連結感、心理幸福感與環境行動經驗；探索自然連結感分別與心理幸福感和環境行動經驗之間的關聯，並瞭解不同個人背景變項在自然連結感上的差異情形以及預測自然連結的潛在因子。
本研究採用問卷調查法，在110年7月至9月間採用網路與紙本問卷並行方式對墾丁國家公園解說員進行調查。測量自然連結採用加拿大學者Nisbet所發展的自然關聯性量表 (Nature Relatedness Scale) ，從情意、認知、與經驗面多維度來衡量解說員們的自然連結概況 (Nisbet et al., 2009) 。測量幸福感則以學者Ryff (1989) 所發展的心理幸福感量表 (Psychological Well-being) ，欲瞭解解說員們如何看待自己的生命意義與目前生活上心理運作的積極程度。回收的樣本資料使用社會科學統計軟體SPSS 28.0進行分析，採用方法包括描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、變異數分析、相關分析與迴歸分析。
研究結果顯示，墾丁國家公園解說員的心理幸福感與環境行動經驗皆屬中等偏上且皆與自然連結感具正向關聯，顯現人對自然的依戀與認同是促進人們心理健康的重要推動力之一。建議未來研究可以擴展研究對象至一般遊客或是小孩，了解更多不特定性大眾與自然連結的情形與相關效益；也可採用不同研究法包括質性研究了解個體在形成自然連結之差異，甚至實驗研究找尋自然連結到心理幸福感之間的路徑與機制，將可應用在國家公園長期規劃與環境教育活動設計上，改善國民與自然的互動的關係。

In a rapidly developing world, technological and economic advancements have resulted in increased urbanization and fewer opportunities for people to interact with nature. This separation from nature is driven by physical and psychological factors and impacts human health and well-being (Zylstra et al., 2014). In current society, parks have become an important place for people to contact nature. The international initiative "Healthy Parks, Healthy People," urged rediscovering the values of parks in the public health policy (Maller et al., 2009).
This study seeks to evaluate whether national parks in Taiwan might likewise have a health-promoting role for the people. Therefore, this study places environmental interpreters in Kenting National Park at a center stage to consider the benefits of nature and the potential enhancements to mental health, such as psychological well-being. The current study investigates interpreters' status of nature connection, well-being, and environmental action experiences and explores the association between three factors. In addition, the study also examines the differences in the nature connection under different personal backgrounds and initially searches for potential factors that can predict nature connection.
From July to September 2021, the survey was designed and completed with the online form and hard copies. The Nature Relatedness Scale (Nisbet et al., 2009) was translated and employed to measure interpreters' connectedness with nature from a multi-faceted viewpoints. To measure well-being, the researcher adopted the Psychological Well-being (PWB) Scale (Ryff, 1989) to understand how the interpreters' mental health functioned. Data were analyzed using SPSS 28.0 with descriptive statistics, independent sample test, one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis, and regression analysis.
The research results show that psychological well-being and environmental action experiences are positively associated with interpreters' connection to nature, thus, verifying previous studies in western regions. Moreover, interpreters’ backgrounds do not significantly affect the development of a deep bond with nature once they are willing to be close to nature and have the opportunity to immerse in nature for a longer time. Further studies are needed to explore this association from more diverse participants, including tourists and children, to accumulate more local research results for Connectedness with Nature in the field of environmental education. Qualitative and experimental approaches are also required to understand more details about the mechanism behind Nature Relatedness and Psychological Well-being.

一、中文文獻
內政部（1972年6月2日）。國家公園法。檢自：https://pse.is/4au267
內政部（2016年1月7日）。國家公園法。檢自：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070105
內政部（2019)。109年至112年國家公園中程計畫（核定本）。臺北市：內政部營建署。
方偉達（2018）。人文社科研究方法。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
王文科、王智弘（2017）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
王喜青（2002）。國家公園解說員環境教育及環境解說專業發展需求研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
王喜青、周儒（2018）。埋下幸福的種子：以東眼山自然教育中心過夜型環境教育課程為例。環境教育研究，14（1），76-116。
宋上仁（2018）。探討林務局解說志工自然連結與環境行動之關聯（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
里山生態股份有限公司（2018年5月21日）。2019墾丁社區生態旅遊。檢自：https://issuu.com/lishaneco/docs/kenting_ecotourism-ch-2016
李仁豪、余民寧（2016）。心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性：以大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題。中華輔導與諮商學報，46，127-154。
李靜瀅（譯）（2015）。沙郡年紀：像山一樣思考，荒野詩人寫給我們的自然之歌（原作者Aldo Leoplod）。果力文化漫遊者初版。（原著出版於1949年）
林志遠（2015）。104 年度「墾丁國家公園社區生態旅遊產業經營發展計畫」期末報告。屏東縣：墾丁國家公園管理處。
林志遠（2018）。墾丁國家公園社區生態旅遊產業維運管理及行銷拓展計畫（第一年）結案報告。屏東縣：墾丁國家公園管理處。
林瓊瑤（2017）。墾丁國家公園與鄰近社區永續發展教育因素重要性分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所，高雄市。
邱皓政（2008）。量化研究法（ㄧ）：研究設計與資料處理。臺北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。
邱皓政（2008）。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術。臺北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。
周儒、曾鈺琪、宋上仁、蔡佩勳（2018）。探究解說員自然連結、人格特質與心理幸福感之關聯。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：MOST105-2511-S003-035）。臺北市：科技部。
徐子惠（2014）。登山者自然關聯性之探究－以臺灣大專校院登山社團為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/abfrr9
徐國士、黃文卿、游登良（1997）。國家公園概論。臺北市：明文書局。
郝冰、王西敏（譯）（2009）。失去山林的孩子：拯救「大自然缺失症」兒童（原作者：Richard Louv）。臺北市：野人文化。
曹之鵬。2017。國家公園場域中的環境教育與社區文化型塑。中華民國環境教育學會編，2017中華民國環境教育學會第27屆環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會論文集，B144頁-B149頁。
陳美惠（2007）。墾丁國家公園生態旅遊路線整體規劃研究（第 3 年）。屏東縣：墾丁國家公園管理處。
許美惠（2007）。國家公園與鄰近學校合作實施戶外環境教育之研究——以陽明山國家公園與格致國中合作之「自然體驗課程」為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
許翠玲（2018）。探討轉換型領導對團隊知識分享與工作效能之影響-以墾丁國家公園解說志工為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/789pxp
張博鈞（2018）。臺北市社區大學自行車社團成員的自然連結與休閒涉入之初探（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
曾鈺琪（2014）。自然連結、美感體驗與環境敏感性發展：十位都市青少年的自然經驗之紮根理論研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
曾鈺琪（2019）。臺灣國中青少年自然連結量表編制與信效度分析。科學教育學刊，27（4），323-345。
曾鈺琪（2020）。探討重要生命經驗與國中青少年環境行為之關聯與自然連結之中介效果。科學教育學刊，28（3），223-254。
靳知勤（1994）。由科學教育的目標看科學博物館在教育上的定位。博物館學季刊，8（2），65-70。
游登良（2008）。國家公園與世界遺產。台北縣：華立圖書股份有限公司。
潘之甫（2021）。探究自然連結感與心理幸福感之關聯性—以公民科學團體「台灣兩棲類保育志工」為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。
潘淑蘭、周儒、吳景達（2017）。探究臺灣大學生環境素養與影響環境行動之因子。環
境教育研究，第十三卷第一期，35-65。
蔡佩勳（2018）。探究關渡自然公園志工自然連結感與心理幸福感之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q6h65f
墾丁國家公園管理處（2013）。墾丁國家公園管理處環境教育計畫提報子計畫。屏東縣：墾丁國家公園管理處。
顏志龍、鄭忠平（2016）。給論文寫作者的統計指南—傻瓜也會跑統計。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

二、外文文獻
Adiwena, B. Y., & Djuwita, R. (2019). Nature relatedness as a predictor of psychological well-being: A study of Indonesian urban society. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34 (4) , 175-187. doi:10.24123/aipj.v34i4.2578
Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31 (3) , 338-353. doi:10.1177/00139169921972137
Bragg, R., Atkins, G. (2016). A review of nature-based interventions for mental health care. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number204.
Capaldi, C., Passmore, H.-A., Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., & Dopko, R. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5 (4) , 1-16. doi:10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H.-A., Ishii, R., Chistopolskaya, K. A., Vowinckel, J., Nikolaev, E. L., & Semikin, G. I. (2017). Engaging with natural beauty may be related to well-being because it connects people to nature: Evidence from three cultures. Ecopsychology, 9 (4) , 199-211. doi:10.1089/eco.2017.0008
Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gound, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Luck, G. W., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J. & Turner, N. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (6) , 1462. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31 (1) , 15-26. doi:10.1080/00958969909598628
Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn, 2, 57-78. doi:10.5324/barn.v24i2.4401
Chawla, L., & Gould, R. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2 (3) , 619-642. doi:10.1002/pan3.10128
Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44 (1) , 31-49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082
Clark, C. R., Heimlich, J. E., Ardoin, N. M., & Braus, J. (2020). Using a Delphi study to clarify the landscape and core outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 26 (3) , 381-399. doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1727859
Clark, P. A. (2000). The ethics of alternative medicine therapies. Journal of Public Health Policy, 21 (4) , 447-470. doi:10.2307/3343283
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. (pp. 45-65) . Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
Cleary, A., Fielding, K. S., Bell, S. L., Murray, Z., & Roiko, A. (2017). Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic wellbeing and nature connection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 119-128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003
Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: L.Erlbaum.
Conn, S. A. (1998). Living in the Earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 26 (1-3) , 179-198. doi:10.1080/08873267.1998.9976972
Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J. F., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011) . Happiness as Correlate of Sustainable Behavior: A Study of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Equitable and Altruistic Actions That Promote Subjective Wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18 (2) , 95-104. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707465
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 29 (2) , 173-180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001
Dean, J. H., Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Barber, E., Franco, L., Fuller, R. A. (2018). Is nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (7) , 1371. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071371
Department of Interior. (2018). Healthy parks healthy people 2018-2023 strategic plan. Department of Interior. National Park Service. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/subjects/healthandsafety/upload/HP2-Strat-Plan-Release-June_2018.pdf
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2) , 276-302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39 (4) , 474-493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18 (2) , 1-8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
Healthy parks Healthy People Global. (2011). Protecting Earth’s two most important assets. Introducing healthy parks healthy people. Retrieved from http://www.hphpcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/HPHP_prospectus_July_2011.pdf
Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H.-A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (2) , 166-171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21 (3) , 8-21. doi:10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178 - 202.
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home:Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior 33 (4) , 507-542. doi:10.1177/00139160121973115
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 15 (3) , 169-182.
Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, D.C.: MD: Island Press.
Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The Biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6) , 1007-1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
Klassen, J. M. (2010). Connectedness to nature: Comparing rural and urban youths' relationships with nature. (Master of arts) . Brandon University, unpublished.
Li, R.-H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73 (4) , 446-452. doi:10.1177/0017896913485743
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin.
Mackay, C. M. L., & Schmitt, M. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 65, 101323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323
Maller, C., Townsend, M., St Leger, L., Henderson-Wilson, C., Pryor, A., Prosser, L., & Moore, M. (2009). Healthy parks, healthy people: The health benefits of contact with nature in a park context. The George Wright Forum, 26 (2) , 51-83. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43598108
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 24 (4) , 503-515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
McConnell, A. R., & Jacobs, T. P. (2020). Self-nature representations: On the unique consequences of nature-self size on pro-environmental action. Journal of environmental psychology, 71, 101471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101471
Naess, A. (1995). Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world. G. Sessions (Ed.) , Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Boston and London (Shambhala) 1995, pp. 225-239. Retrieved from https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fromm/frontdoor/index/index/docId/25986
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41 (5) , 715-740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2010). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2) , 303-322. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
Perkins, H. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 30, 455-463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2019). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21 (3) , 1145-1167. doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
Pyle, R. M. (2003). Nature matrix: Reconnecting people and nature. Oryx, 37, 206-214.
Richardson, M., Cormack, A., McRobert, L., & Underhill, R. (2016) . 30 Days Wild: Development and evaluation of a large-scale nature engagement campaign to improve well-being. PLOS ONE, 11 (2) , e0149777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149777
Richardson, M., Hunt, A., Hinds, J., Bragg, R., Fido, D., Petronzi, D., Barbett, L., Clitherow, T., White, M. (2019). A measure of nature connectedness for children and adults: validation, performance, and insights. Sustainability, 11 (12) . doi:10.3390/su11123250
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (3) , 529-565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 30 (2) , 159-168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.009
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6) , 1069-1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (4) , 719-727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9 (1) , 13-39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp. 61-78) . Boston, MA: Springer.
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21 (5) , 944-963. doi:10.1080/02699930600923668
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human —nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14 (2) , 94-101. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44000969
Tam, K.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of environmental psychology, 34, 64-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with add: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior, 33 (1) , 54-77. doi:10.1177/00139160121972864
Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner city children. Journal of environmental psychology, 22 (1) , 49-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11 (3) , 201-230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944 (05) 80184-7
United Nation. (2018). World urbanization prospects the 2018 revision. Retrieved from New York: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/
Weinstein, N., Balmford, A., DeHaan, C. R., Gladwell, V., Bradbury, R. B., & Amano, T. (2015). Seeing community for the trees: The links among contact with natural environments, community cohesion, and crime. BioScience, 65 (12) , 1141-1153. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv151 %J BioScience
Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (10) , 1315-1329. doi:10.1177/0146167209341649
World Resource Institute (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and Human Eell-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46 (1) , 3-23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901
Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2 (1) , 119-143. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3