研究生: |
吳冠妮 Wu, Guan-Ni |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小資優學生樂觀解釋型態、情緒調節策略與學業表現感受之研究 The Study on Optimistic Explanatory Style, Emotion Regulation Strategies and Academic Performance Perception of Gifted Students in the Elementary Schools |
指導教授: |
于曉平
Yu, Hsiao-Ping |
口試委員: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Feng 李乙明 Li, Iming 于曉平 Yu, Hsiao-Ping |
口試日期: | 2022/06/08 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 120 |
中文關鍵詞: | 樂觀解釋型態 、情緒調節策略 、學業表現感受 |
英文關鍵詞: | optimistic explanatory style, emotion regulation strategies, academic performance perception |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200677 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:128 下載:25 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在了解國小資優學生樂觀解釋型態、情緒調節策略及學業表現感受之現況,並針對不同背景變項的國小資優生在樂觀解釋型態、情緒調節策略及學業表現感受等進行差異比較,進而探討三者間之相關性與預測情形。研究對象為國小三到六年級資優學生共755人,採用問卷調查法,問卷回收率為94%。問卷內容包含基本資料、學業表現感受、兒童解釋型態量表及情緒調節策略量表,問卷回收後整理出以下結論:
一、 國小資優學生面對正、負向事件傾向用樂觀的解釋型態來面對事情。較常使用「增加正向情緒」的情緒調節策略,「社會支持」、「發展新觀點」次之。且多數國小資優學生對自己的學業表現感受度高,僅有13位學生對自己的學業表現感受度低。
二、針對不同背景變項的差異情形,國小中年級的資優生較高年級資優學生來的樂觀;中、高年級資優學生在情緒調節與學業表現感受皆無顯著差異。而不同性別的國小資優學生,在解釋型態、情緒調節與學業表現感受上,皆無顯著差異。而在學業表現感受方面,高組學業表現感受之資優生較中組及低組資優生來的樂觀,也更常使用「發展新觀點」與「社會支持」,而「增加正向情緒」,僅高組學業表現感受之資優生較中組資優生更常使用。
三、最後,有關國小資優生樂觀解釋型態、情緒調節策略及學業表現感受之相關與預測效果,三者之間呈現低度正相關。且國小資優學生的樂觀解釋型態及其中之「正向事件解釋類化性」與情緒調節策略之「社會支持」對學業表現感受有預測效果。
根據研究結果,提出建議供未來研究者及資優教育參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the current situation of optimistic explanatory style, emotion regulation strategies and academic performance perception of gifted elementary school students. This study also compared the difference in optimistic explanatory style, emotion regulation strategies and academic performance perception among gifted elementary school students with a variety of background variables, and further investigated the correlation and predictability between these three. Gifted students who were between third and sixth grades in the elementary schools were administered a questionnaire. The questionnaire included basic information, academic performance perception, children's attributional style questionnaire and emotion regulation strategy scale. There were 755 valid questionnaires, with a validity rate of 94%. The results of this study were as follows:
1. Gifted students in the elementary schools tended to use an optimistic explanatory style when facing both positive and negative events. They most often used the emotion regulation strategy of "increasing positive emotion", followed by "social support" and "new perspective development". Moreover, most of them had a high academic performance perception, and only 13 students had a low academic performance perception.
2. In terms of the difference between background variables, the gifted middle graders were more optimistic than the gifted students in higher grades; there were no significant differences between middle and higher grades gifted students in emotional regulation strategies and academic performance perception. There were no significant differences between genders for elementary gifted students in optimistic explanatory style, emotion regulation strategies and academic performance perception. In terms of academic performance perception, high academic performance perception gifted students were more optimistic than middle and low academic performance perception gifted students. High academic performance perception gifted students were more likely to use "new perspective development" and "social support" than middle and low academic performance perception gifted students, while the high academic performance perception gifted students were more likely to use "increasing positive emotion" than middle academic performance perception gifted students only.
3. Finally, in terms of the correlation and predictability of optimistic explanatory style, emotion regulation strategies and academic performance perception among gifted students in the elementary schools, a low positive correlation was found. In addition, the explanatory style questionnaire of gifted students in the elementary schools, its "positive event explanation generalization" and "social support" of emotion regulation strategies could predict academic performance perception.
In the end, based on the research results, suggestions were put forward for future researchers in gifted education.
中文部分
文永沁(2007):低成就學生的情緒調節對學業情緒與偏差行為的影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
王文伶(2019):學術性向資優青少年之情緒智力、班級人際關係與學習投入的關係:一個雙中介因子模型之研究。特殊教育學報,49,1-34。
王淑棻(2009):資優是一種恩賜,還是困擾-談資優生情意特質的正反面與輔導策略。資優教育季刊,113,26-35。
王蕾雁、陳美芳、曾文志(2013):「中學生樂觀解釋型態量表」之編製。測驗學刊,60(1),43-65。
王麗香(2008):國小高年級學童樂觀解釋型態、教師期望與學業成就之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。銘傳大學。
江文慈(1999):情緒調整的發展軌跡與模式建構之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
余妙芬(2008):國小學童的樂觀解釋型態、情緒調整與學業表現之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
吳武典(2001):資優學生的適應類型與心理輔導,測驗與輔導,166,3481-3484。
呂孟真(2007):自我傷害動機、負向情緒、經驗迴避、情緒調節與青少年自我傷害行為之關係探索(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
李澄賢(2004):大學生的情緒調節、調節焦點、樂觀與創造力之關係(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
杜品儀(2007):樂觀學習課程方案對國小六年級學童樂觀解釋型態及正向情緒之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。
林佳瑩(2006):國小資優生利社會行為與情緒智力之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。
林雅絹(2012):兒童情緒調適量表編製之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。
林郁璇(2015):情緒信念對心理適應之影響:情緒調節之中介效果分析(未出版碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
邱雅沂(2006):母親後設情緒理念、教養態度對青少年憂鬱傾向的影響:青少年情緒調節能力的角色(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
邱維貞、賴翠媛(2012):資優學生情緒智力與輔導。桃竹區特殊教育,19,9-16。
邱馨節(2012):青少年情緒調節與問題行為之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。大葉大學。
侯雪香(2007):國中資優生學業自我效能、樂觀解釋型態與學業成就之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。
侯禎塘、張妤婷、曹傑如(2010):臺灣中區國小資優生情緒智力與其相關因素之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,24(1),195-219。
徐佩君(2000):父母管教方式、解釋風格、負向家庭生活經驗與兒童解釋風格之相關分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。
特殊教育法(2019):中華民國一百零八年四月二十四日總統華總(一)義字第10800039361號令發布。
翁雅綺、侯雅齡(2013):資優生的生活壓力與樂觀解釋型態之研究。特教論壇,15,103-118。
張妤婷(2006):影響國小資優生情緒智力之因素研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。
張妤婷(2014)。國小資優學生與普通學生情緒智力之多群組比較研究。特殊教育與輔助科技學報,7,51-73。
張馨仁(2011):過度激動特質對於資優生與普通生學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
教育部(2021):特殊教育通報網資料縣市設置特教班。取自
郭靜姿(2000):談資優學生的特殊適應與輔導。特殊教育季刊,75,1-6。
郭靜姿、林慶波、張馨仁、周坤賢、曾琦芬、張玉佩、林燁虹(2012):高中數理能力優異班學生與普通班學生大腦結構及性別差異之研究。教育科學研究期刊,57(2),25-64。
郭靜姿、張書豪、廖釗君、陳錦雪、林燁虹、于曉平、蔡明富(2020):臺灣中小學資優教育銜接與資優學生學習適應研究。教育心理學報,51(3),415-442。
陳李綢(2008):中學生情緒智慧測量與適應性指標研究。教育心理學報,39,61-81。
陳冠妃(2017):國中生樂觀解釋型態、自我效能、自我調節與學習行為關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
陳冠妃(2017):國中生樂觀解釋型態、自我效能、自我調節與學習行為關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
陳宥蓁(2015):臺中市國小高年級學童解釋風格與挫折容忍力之關係(未出版碩士論文)。東海大學。
曾雪芳(2007):樂觀創意教學對國小學童樂觀解釋型態影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
游馥瑋(2013):臺灣青少年日常情感調節經驗與憂鬱之初探:情感差距、情感調節策略的影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
湯詠婷(2006):階層式情緒焦點認知治療團體運用於憂鬱患者:療效評估與改變因子之初探(未出版碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
楊晴如(2009):大學生生活壓力、解釋風格與情緒幸福感之關係研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
楊蕙欣、游森期(2015):國小學童樂觀解釋風格量表之發展研究:結構方程模式取向。臺中教育大學學報:數理科技類,29(2),1-24。
葉在庭(2001):青少年情緒調適、焦慮、社會支持及生活事件與自殺意念的關係。中華輔導學報,10,151-178。
葉真秀(2004):高中生完美主義傾向、解釋風格與憂鬱程度之關係--以台中縣市六所高中為例(未出版碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。
董秀美(2002):情緒調節策略量表之發展:初探影響情緒調節歷程之因素(未出版碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
詹璿芳(2007):國小資賦優異學生與普通班學生樂觀解釋型態、自我效能與學業成就之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。
趙珮晴、張芳全(2013):情緒智力與高層次思考關係之後設分析。臺北市立教育大學學報,44(1),29-50。
趙榆茹(2009):國中生親子關係、情緒調整與友誼關係之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
潘裕豐(2015):資優學生的團體諮商。資優教育季刊,135,1-8。
蔡敏瑛(2015):國中資優學生情意特質分析及關懷介入方案之成效研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
蔡萱燁(2021):簡版情緒調節策略量表-模型發展及驗證(未出版碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
鄭芳怡(2004):國小學童樂觀解釋型態、領域知識、創意生活經驗與科技創造力之關係(未出版碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
鄭芳怡、葉玉珠(2006):兒童解釋形態、領域知識及創意生活經驗與科技創造力之關係。教育與心理研究,29(2),339-368。
謝幸娟(2016):情緒調節策略構面與其對心理適應影響之探討(未出版碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。
謝旻真(2009):國小學生知覺教師期望、樂觀解釋型態與學業表現之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
羅品欣(2012):國小高年級學童的情緒智力、親子互動關係、同儕互動關係之研究-以臺北地區為例。家庭教育與諮商學刊,13,25-55。
蘇琳(2012):探討性別、人格型態、情境脈絡對情緒調節及適應的影響(未出版碩士論文)。慈濟大學。
英文部分
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1979). Learned helplessness in human: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74.
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical psychology review, 30(2), 217–237.
Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl), 13-25.
Burns, M. O., & Seligman, M. E. (1989). Explanatory style across the life span: Evidence for stability over 52 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 471-477.
Catanzaro, S. J., & Mearns, J. (1990). Measuring generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation: Initial scale development and implications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54(3/4), 546-563.
Clark, B. (2007). Growing up gifted: Developing thepotential of children at home and at schoo. Prentice Hall : Person Education, Inc..
Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Laureen O’Donnell Teti. (1994). The Development of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: A Clinical Perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2/3), 73–100.
Dabroski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston : Little, Brown.
Downey, L. A., Mountstephen, J., Lloyd, J., Hansen, K., & Stough, C. (2008). Emotional intelligence and scholastic achievement in Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 10-17.
Downey, L. A., Mountstephen, J., Lloyd, J., Hansen, K., & Stough, C. (2008). Emotional intelligence and scholastic achievement in Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 10-17.
Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effectsof mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction,15, 415-431.
Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553.
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311-1327.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, Inc.
Goleman, D. (2001). An EI-Based Theory of Performance. In C. Cherniss, & D. Goleman (Eds.), The Emotionally Intelligent Workplace (pp. 27-44).
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54.
Greenberg, L. S. (2004). Emotion–focused therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 11(1), 3-16.
Greenberg, L. S., & Pascual‐Leone, A. (2006). Emotion in psychotherapy: A practice‐friendly research review. Journal of clinical psychology, 62(5), 611-630.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of general psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 551-573.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291.
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1-26.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Gross, J. J., & Muñoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 2(2), 151-164.
Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). The Guilford Press.
Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
Larsen, R. J. (2000). Toward a science of mood regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(3), 129-141.
MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 60-70.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2-21.
Pearlin, L.I. and Schooler, C. (1978) The Structure of Coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M, A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of educational Psychology, 98(3), 583.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun(Eds.), Emotion in education (pp.13-36). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Peterson, C., & Barrett, L. C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 603-607.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91, 347-374.
Peterson, C., Buchanan, G. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). Explanator style: History and evolution of the field. In Buchanan, G. M. & Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds.), Explanatory style (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27857503
Rottenberg, J., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion and emotion regulation: A map for psychotherapy researchers. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14(4), 323–328.
Rueger, S. Y., Haines, B. A., & Malecki, C. K. (2010). Children’s attributional style from middle childhood to early adolescence: Further validation of the paper-and-pencil versionsof the children’s attributional style interview. Assessment, 17(3), 294-307.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. (2002). The positive psychology of emotional intelligence. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 159–171). Oxford University Press.
Scott, E. (2015). What you should know about your explanatory style. Retrieved from https://www.verywell.com/about-explanatory-styles-3145110
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002):教孩子學習樂觀(洪蘭,譯)。遠流。(原著出版於1991)
Seligman, M. E. P., & Schulman, P. (1986). Explanatory Style as a Preductor of Productivity and Quitting Among Life Insurance Sales Agents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 832-838.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
Silverman, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love.
Smith, P., Caputi, P., & Crittenden, N. (2013). Measuring Optimism in Organizations: Development of a Workplace Explanatory Style Questionnaire. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 415-432.
Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2/3), 25-52.
Yeh, Y. C. (2008). Age, emotion regulation strategies, temperament, creative drama, and preschoolers’ creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 131-148.