簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林宜臻
Lin, I-Chen
論文名稱: 混合辦公傾向對於員工工作滿意度之影響研究-以職家衝突為中介變項
The Impact of the Tendency Towards Hybrid Work on Employee Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Work-Family Conflict
指導教授: 蕭顯勝
Hsiao, Hsien-Sheng
康雅菁
Kang, Ya-Chin
口試委員: 蕭顯勝
Hsiao, Hsien-Sheng
孫弘岳
Suen, Hung-Yue
丁玉成
Ting, Yu-Chen
康雅菁
Kang, Ya-Chin
口試日期: 2024/07/10
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系人力資源發展碩士在職專班
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development_Continuing Education Master's Program of Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 112
中文關鍵詞: 混合辦公傾向職家衝突工作滿意度
英文關鍵詞: Tendency Towards Hybrid Work, Employee Job Satisfaction, Work-Family Conflict
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401127
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:130下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 2021 年疫情逐漸緩和後,許多科技大廠仍採行混合辦公的選項,或將其視為員工的福利方案,或作為招攬海外人才的措施。因此,本研究旨在探討企業實施混合辦公對工作滿意度之影響,以及職家衝突對混合辦公與工作滿意度關係的中介效果。研究對象為在台灣實施遠距工作之企業員工,採用問卷調查法,以便利抽樣回收有效網路問卷 294 份,以 SPSS 統計軟體及結構方程模型(SEM)進行分析驗證研究假設。研究結果如下:(1)員工對混合辦公傾向與工作滿意度具有正向關係;(2)員工對混合辦公傾向與職家衝突具有負向關係;(3)職家衝突與工作滿意度具有負向關係;(4)職家衝突在混合辦公傾向與工作滿意度間具有中介效果;(5)混合辦公傾向是影響工作滿意度的重要因素,而職家衝突次之。期望藉由本研究之研究結果,提出相關的結論和建議,為企業提供管理實務參考。

    After the gradual easing of the pandemic in 2021, many tech giants continued to adopt hybrid working options, either as a welfare plan for employees or as a strategy to attract overseas talent. Therefore, this study aims to explore the impact of implementing hybrid work on job satisfaction and the mediating effect of work-family conflict on the relationship between hybrid work and job satisfaction. The subjects of this study are employees of enterprises in Taiwan who practice remote work. The study employs a questionnaire survey method, collecting 294 valid online questionnaires through convenience sampling. SPSS statistical software and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) tools were used to conduct related analyses to verify the research hypotheses.The findings are as follows: (1) There is a positive relationship between employees' tendency towards hybrid work and job satisfaction; (2) There is a negative relationship between employees' tendency towards hybrid work and work-family conflict; (3) Work-family conflict has a negative relationship with job satisfaction; (4) Work-family conflict mediates the relationship between the tendency towards hybrid work and job satisfaction; and (5) The tendency towards hybrid work is an important factor affecting job satisfaction, with work-family conflict being secondary. It is hoped that the findings and suggestions from this study can provide practical references for enterprise management.

    中文摘要 i ABSTRACT iii 目 錄 v 表 次 vii 圖 次 ix 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4 第三節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 混合辦公傾向(Tendency Towards Hybrid Work) 7 第二節 工作滿意度(Job Satisfaction) 10 第三節 職家衝突(Work-Family Conflict) 12 第四節 各變項之相關研究 16 第三章 研究設計與實施 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究假設 20 第三節 研究對象 20 第四節 研究方法 20 第五節 研究工具 21 第六節 資料處理與分析 31 第七節 研究程序 35 第四章 研究結果 39 第一節 描述性統計分析 39 第二節 個人背景變項差異性分析 46 第三節 結構方程模型分析 65 第四節 中介效果分析 70 第五節 重要性績效矩陣分析 73 第五章 結論與建議 77 第一節 研究結論 77 第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 81 第三節 研究限制 87 參考文獻 89 附錄 97

    中文部分
    何姵嬑(2023)。員工混合辦公態度、工作滿意度與留任意願關係研究。(碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學科技與工程學院科技應用與人力資源發展學系。
    吳統雄(1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、反應、反省。民意學術專刊,夏,29-53。
    林信亨(2022)。「混合辦公」來臨! 企業面對「疫常」的遠距工作模式。CEO Vision,95,16-19。https://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/ReportS?docid=CDOC20220103005
    邱琮皓(2022)。職場友善與工作生活平衡之經驗分享。臺灣勞工季刊,(71),52-61。
    張妤玥、陸洛(2011)。工作家庭雙介面之要求、資源與職家衝突關聯之性別差異。商略學報,3(1),25-38。
    張婷婷、陸洛(2009)。資源損失與資源獲得對職家衝突之影響:資源保存理論的觀點。台大管理論叢,20(1),69-98。https://doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2009.20.1.69
    張婷婷、陸洛、林惠彥、高旭繁、陳塋珊(2015)。職家衝突因應策略與適應後果之關聯。組織與管理,8(1),77-111。https://doi.org/10.3966/199687602015020801003
    張婷婷、陸洛、郭靜宜(2012)。工作資源對工作-家庭衝突及工作表現之影響。組織與管理,5(2),101-135。https://doi.org/10.6792/OM.201208.0101
    陳士航(2016)。消防人員工作家庭衝突與工作滿意度之關係-團隊凝聚力之中介效果與組織承諾之調節效果。(碩士論文)。中臺科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8axjjd
    陸洛、張婷婷、張妤玥(2012)。工作與家庭的意義對因應職家衝突的影響-華人雙文化自我觀之展現。本土心理學研究,(37),141-189。https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.37.141
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質,影響,測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
    趙必孝、陳以亨、張健豪、林虹君(2004)。企業組織支援系統對大陸台商幹部之工作-家庭衝突之研究。中山管理評論,12,63-91。
    趙達瑜(2016)。工作與生活平衡的制度: 美國聯邦政府實施遠距工作制度之初探。中國地方自治,69(9),20-53。
    蔡佩蓉(2015)。教保服務人員職家衝突與心理福祉之相關研究。(碩士論文)。台灣首府大學。
    蕭怡欣(2021)。遠距工作文獻回顧。科技與人力教育季刊,7(3),82-96。https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.202103_7(3).0004
    賴偉文(2020)。後疫情時代臺灣勞動市場工作型態的轉變與困難。台灣勞工季刊,Fall(63),52-58。
    外文部分
    Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
    Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278
    Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). An examination of work-family conflict, positive spillover, and gender role variables: Implications for managing work and family. Journal of Management, 26(2), 337-356.
    Choi, S. (2020). Flexible work arrangements and employee retention: A longitudinal analysis of the federal workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470-495.
    Choi, S. (2020). Flexible Work Arrangements and Employee Retention: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Federal Workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470-495.
    Choudhury, P., Khanna, T., Makridis, C. A., & Schirmann, K. (2022, March). Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Working Paper No. 22-063. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4068741
    Chung, H., & Van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381.
    Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
    Conference Board. (2023). Survey: US job satisfaction hits all-time high. Retrieved from https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com
    Deloitte. (2023). Hybrid work challenges. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com
    Di Martino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129(5), 529-554.
    Flowscape Solutions. (2022). How adopting the hybrid workplace model reduces costs. Retrieved from https://flowscapesolutions.com
    Flydesk. (2023). Unlocking financial advantages with a hybrid work model. Retrieved from https://flydesk.com
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
    Glass, J. L., & Finley, A. (2002). Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00063-1
    Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
    Guest, D. E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 41(2), 255-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041002005
    Gutek, B., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.560
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and reliability of the customer-oriented behaviour scale in the health tourism hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771-775.
    Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
    Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
    Hu, L., Shafi, M., & Malik, A. S. (2015). Role conflict and work-family balance among female nurses: A comparative study of government and private sector hospitals in Pakistan. Gender in Management, 30(5), 365-382.
    Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
    Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
    Karatepe, O. M., & Baddlar, L. (2006). An empirical study of the selected consequences of frontline employees’ work-family conflict and family-work conflict. Tourism Management, 27, 1017-1029.
    Karatepe, O. M., & Kilic, H. (2007). Relationships of supervisor support and conflicts in the work-family interface with the selected job outcomes of frontline employees. Tourism Management, 28, 238-252.
    Karatepe, O. M., & Sokmen, A. (2006). The effects of work role and family role variables on psychological and behavioral outcomes of frontline employees. Tourism Management, 27, 255-268.
    Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2018). Work-life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work-life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0059
    Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Journal of Management, 37(3), 769-791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394861
    Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 220-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
    Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309-336.
    Lu, L., Hwang, M. T., & Kao, S. F. (2005). The bi-directional conflict of work and family: Antecedents, consequences and moderators. Research in Applied Psychology, 27, 133-166.
    Lu, L., Kao, S. F., Chang, T. T., Wu, H. P., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). Work/family demands, work flexibility, work/family conflict, and their consequences at work: A national probability sample in Taiwan. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(1), 1-21.
    Microsoft. (2021). The next disruption is hybrid work—are we ready? 2021 Work Trend Index: Annual Report.
    Parasuraman, S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Granrose, C. S. (1992). Role stressors, social support, and well-being among two-career couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(4), 339-356.
    Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
    Rice, R. W., Frone, M. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1992). Work-nonwork conflict and the perceived quality of life. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 155-168.
    Suomi, R., & Pekkola, S. (1998). Characteristics of telework: The state of the art and an annotated bibliography. In Telework: New international perspectives from telecommuting to the virtual organization (pp. 81-100). Taylor & Francis.
    Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15.
    Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120-120.
    Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

    下載圖示
    QR CODE