研究生: |
翁凱昕 Wong, Kai-hsin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
線上遊戲式學習對創造力之影響 The influence of On-Line game based Learning to Creativity |
指導教授: |
蕭顯勝
Hsiao, Hsien-Sheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 147 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創造力 、遊戲式學習 、線上遊戲 |
英文關鍵詞: | Creativity, Game based Learning, On-line game |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:50 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究是以自行開發的線上遊戲學習系統來輔助學生學習,並激發其創造力,此線上遊戲是根據威廉斯知情互動教學模式與創造性問題解決模式進行開發,以增強學生的創造力。
研究對象以台北縣某國民小學六年級學生為研究對象,採不等組
控制組準實驗研究法,以威廉斯創造力測驗為前後測,以分析學習的成效及差異,課程結束後填寫線上遊戲滿意度調查問卷,分析學生對於線上遊戲式學習之態度。所應用的統計方法有描述統計、單因子共變數、相關係數…等統計方法加以處理資料,所得重要結果如下:
1.實驗組經威廉斯創造力前後測分析發現,除了流暢力外,開放性、
變通力、獨創力、精密性、標題、冒險性、好奇性、想像力、挑戰
性、總分均有提升的情形。
2.實驗組經威廉斯創造力測驗分析發現,除了流暢力、挑戰性外,在開放性、變通性、獨創力、精密力、標題等、冒險性、好奇性、想像力、總分的表現上有顯著差異。
3.從研究中發現線上遊戲機制設計中的創意思考遊戲、即時通訊、知識隱喻設計與創造力有顯著正相關。
The purpose of the study constructed an online game for Creativity to assist students in learning. The development of the game is based on the Cognitive Affective Interaction Model and Creative Problem-Solving teaching strategy that was designed to enhances creativity of students.
Samples were certain of two classes students at 2nd grade of Elementary School in Taipei, dividing into experimental and control groups. Study method applies the pretest-posttest nonequivalent-groups design. The study used Williams Creativity Assessment as pretest and posttest, and fill in the questionnaire for On-line game. The data is processed by statistics methods such as covariance(ANCOVA)and Correlation Coefficient etc. After analysis, the study finds out the following results:
1. After the teaching experiment, experimental group discovered the Scores in Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration, Imagination, Title, challenge, Risk-taking, Curiosity and total were promoted outside Fluency.
2. After the teaching experiment, experimental group discovered the significant differences in Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration, Imagination, Title, Challenge, Risk-taking, Curiosity and total were
promoted outside Fluency and challenge.
3. The study also proved the mechanism of the online game had a significantly positive relation with creativity, such as creative thinking games, instant messenger and the metaphor design of knowledge.
毛連塭(1989)。實施創造思考教育的參考架構。創造思考教育創刊號,2-9。
史萊姆工作室(譯)(2003)。Rollings, A.,& Adams, E.著。大師談遊戲設計。台北市:上奇科技。
吳鐵雄(1988)。電腦軟體遊戲帶來的影響。第三波,66,64-71。
伍建學(2004)。網路遊戲教學策略對國小學生科技創造力影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所。
李基常、王繼正(1998)。創造性問題解決式的專題製作教學。技術職
業教育雙月刊,45,39-44。
李乙明、李淑真 (譯)(2005)。Robert J. Sternberg主編。創造力。
台北:五南。
吳培安(1995)。「問題解決」式的科技教育教學模式。教師之友,
36(2),12-19。
吳齊殷(1998)。真實社區與虛擬社區:交融、對立或互蝕。第二屆
資訊科技與社會轉型研討會,中央研究院社會學研究所。
林美娟、莊志洋(1993)。輔助學習電玩之可行性探討。中等教育,44
(6),46-51。
林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。台北市:心理出版社。
林幸台 (1998)。創造智能。資優教育教師專業知能研討會。台北。
林幸台(1998),創造思考能力之評量與教學。台北:台灣師大特教系。
李佳蓉(1996)。電腦益智遊戲對國小高年級學童的推理能力、問題解決能力及電腦態度之影響。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
杜明城(譯)(1999)。Csikszentmihalyi著。創造力。台北:時報。
洪榮昭,劉明洲(1997)。影響多媒體電腦輔助學習認知因素之探討。
教育研究資訊,5(4)﹐119-125。
洪榮昭 (1999)。試析科技創作力。國際科技教育整合思考研討會專題研討論文集,台北。
洪文東(2000)。從問題解決的過程培養學生的科學創造力。屏師科學教育,11,52-62。
洪國勳(2003)。線上遊戲式學習系統之建置─以科技學習為主。台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
孫聖和(2000)。遊戲理論及幽默感應用於設計教育之可行性初探。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
陳照雄(1975)。台北市國小學生創造力與智力相關之分析研究。台北:文景出版社。
陳英豪、吳鐵雄、簡真真編著(1980)。創造思考與情意的教學。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
陳龍安(1984)。「問、想、做、評」創造思考教學模式的建立與驗證。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳龍安(1998)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理出版社
陳怡靜、計惠卿(1998)。育樂式課程軟體之遊戲式學習情境。視聽教育雙月刊,39(1),24-33。
陳慶峰(2001)。從心流(flow)理論探討線上遊戲參與者之網路使用行為。南華大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
陳怡安(2003)。線上遊戲的魅力–以重度玩家為例。南華大學社會
學研究所碩士論文。
董奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。台北:五南。
董家豪(2001)。網路使用者參與網路遊戲行為之研究。南華大學資訊管理研究所。
黃瑞琴(1994)。幼稚園的遊戲課程。台北:心理出版社。
黃立文(1998)。網路使用的快感與神迷—遊戲理論與網路瀏覽行之
初探,台灣學術網路研討會論文,台北。
黃瓊慧(1998)。從沉浸(flow)理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。交通大學傳播所碩士論文。
黃國洲(2002)。我國電腦遊戲產業之新產品開發策略考量。元智大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。
郭有遹(1989)。創造性的問題解決法。台北:心理出版社。
郭有遹(2001)。創造心裡學。台北:正中。
陶明潔(譯)(1992)。Friedrich Frobel著。人的教育。台北市:揚智。
張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。台北市:心理出版社。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實際。台北:東華書局。
張德儀(1998)。WWW使用者之瀏覽行為與心理探究。中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
張智超、虞孝成著(2001)。網咖‧連線遊戲e軍突起,台北:聯經出
版社。
張意佩(2002)。線上遊戲使用者轉換因素之研究。元智大學資訊管
理學系碩士論文。
詹秀美(1989)。國小學童創造力與問題解決能力的相關變項研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
詹棟樑(1994)。兒童人類學-兒童發展。台北:五南。
詹焜能(2001)。兒童創造性問題解決歷程之個案研究--「永動機」的製作。科學教育研究與發展,25,17-28。
鄭凱育(2000)。電腦遊戲對國小四年級學童二維空間概念發展影響之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文。
鄭文賓(2001)。遊戲式電腦輔助學習中的競爭因素對學習成效的影響。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
賴阿福(1996)。電腦益智遊戲軟體之設計研究。台北市立師範學院學報,27,183-225。
劉旨峰、周倩、林珊如(2001)。以網路心流理論為基礎探討台灣大學生網. 路沉迷之相關 因素。台灣區學術網路研討會暨網路學習與繼續專業教育國際會議,嘉義。
薛念祖(1998)。電子娛樂風潮下的線上遊戲市場,2004年12月17日,取自 http://mouse.oit.edu.tw/Hope/199803/text4.html。
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (1985). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. CO: Westview Press.
Bullinger, H.J., Müller-Spahn,F.M. & Rößler,A. (1996). Encouraging
Creativity -Support of Mental Processes by Virtual Experience. IDG
conferences & seminars, Australia.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Curtis, P. (1992). Mudding: Social Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Realities: Proceedings of Directions and Implications of Advanced Compuing Symposium. Berkeley: Calif.
Davis ,G.A.(1986). Creativity is Forever. Iowa: Kendall Hunt.
Dempsey, J. V., Lucassen, B., Haynes, L., & Casey M. (1996). Instructional applications of computer games.( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394500)
Dempsey, J. V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen. B. (1994). Instructional gaming: implication for technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ368345).
DeVries, D. L. & Edwards, K.J.(1972). Learning games and student teams: Their effects on classroom processes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED070019).
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
De Bono, E. 1970).Lateral thinking:creativity step by step. New York:Harper and Row.
Eby D.(2006). creativity and flow. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Douglas_Eby
Ellington, H., Adinall, E., & Percival, F.(1982). A Handbook of Game Design. London, UK: Kogan.
Fileni, F.(1988). Educational and cognitive aspects of videogames. Simulaion-game in education and training. Oxford: Pergamon.
Fitch, C. (2000). Cyberspace in the 21st Century: Mapping the Future of
Massive Multiplayer Games. Retrieved October 15, 2001, from
http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20000120/fitch_01.htm
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J.(1980). Creativity thinking and
problem solving in gifted education. Texas: Kendall/Hunt Publishing
Company
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books
Gruber, H. E. (1989). The Evolving Systems Approach to Creative Work in Creative People at Wor. New York:Oxford University Press.
Guilford, J.P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 267-293.
Guilford, J.P.,& Hoepfner. (1971). The Analysis of Intelligence. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J.P.(1983). Transformation: Abilities or functions. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 17, 75-86.
Hocevar, D.(1981). Measurement of creativity review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(5), 450-464.
Hoover, S. M. (1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students. Roeper Review, 16(3),156-159.
Isaksen, S. G., & Parnes, S. J. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative
thinking and problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(1). 1-29.
Jarett, A. & Estanislao, J. (2002). IGDA Online Games White Paper Full Version. Retrieved April 2, 2002, from http://www.igda.org/Endeavors/Research/Online/online.htm.
Jenkins, H. (2002). Game theory. Technology Review, 29, 1–3.
Jones, B. F., & Idol, L. (1990). Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Joyce, B.& Weil, M.(1972). Models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs New
Jersy : Prentice-Hall Inc.
Lepper, M.R., & Malone, T., W. (1983).Intrinsic motivation and
instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow
& M. J Aptitude, learning, and instruction:III. Cognitive and affective
process analysis. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to
creativity.In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke, (Eds.) , Creative
cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malone, T W (1980). What makes things fun to learn? A study of
intrinsically motivating computer games. Technical Report CIS-7. Palo
Alto: Xerox PARC.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R.(1983), Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: III. Cognition and affective process analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum, 1983.
May, R.(1959). The nature of creativity.In H.H. Anderson(Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper and Row.
McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A. & Heald, Y.(2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM of the contribution which games can make to the education process. Retrieved May 6, 2006, Available: from http://reservoir.cent.uji.es/canals/octeto/es/440.
Meadow, A., & Parnes, S. J. (1959). Evaluation of training in creative problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 189-194.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H.A. (1962)., Gruber H.E., G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds)., Contemporary approaches to creative thinking. New York:Atherton.
Parnes, S.J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles
Scribner’s Sons.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Rogers, V.M. (1972). Modifying questioning strategies of teachers.
Journal of Teacher Education, 23, 231-235.
Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V.,& Correa, M.
(2003). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40, 71-94.
Sewell, A. M., Fuller, S., Murphy, R. C., & Funnell, B.H.(2002). Creative
problem solving: A means to authentic and purposeful social studies.
Social Studies, 93(4), 176-179.
Simon, H. A., Newell, A. & Shaw, J. C. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. (p. 145). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Snow, R.E.(1989). Cognitive-conative aptitude interactions in learning. In R. Kanfer, P.L.,Ackerman & R. Cudeck(Eds.), Abilities, motivation, methodology(pp.435-473). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
Stein, M.I. (1968). Creativity. In E.F.Borgatta&W.W.Lambert(Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research, Chicago: Rand Mcnally.
Stein, M.I. (1974). Stimulating creativity(Vol. 1). New York: Academic.
Stein, M.I. (1975). Stimulating creativity(Vol. 2). New York: Academic.
Sternberg, R.J. & Lubart, T.I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Sweetser, P. & Wyeth, P.(2005). GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating
Player Enjoyment in Games, ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), P4.
Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J.(1988). The Nature of creativity:
contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge; NewYork :
Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E.P. et al., (Eds)(1969).Creativity:Its educational implications. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.
Torrance, E.P. (1975). Creativity research in education:still alive. In I. A.
Tayor & J. W. Getzels, Perspectives in creativity Chicago:Aldine.
Torrance, E. P. (1970). Influence of dyadic interaction on creative functioning. Psychological Reports, 26,391-394.
Triffinger, D. J., Isaken, S. G. & Dorval, K. B (1994). Creative problem
solving: An overview. In M.A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem
solving, creativity. New Jersey: Ablex.
Wallas, G. (1926). The Arts of Thought. NY: Harcourt Brace Janonovica.
Webster, J.,Trevino,K.L.,&Ryan,L.(1993).The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human, Behavior, 9(4),411-426.
Williams, F.E. (1972). Identifying and measuring creative potential. NY:
Educational Technology Publications.