研究生: |
黃馨瑩 Huang, Hsin-Ying |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
巴拿馬文件揭露的宣告效果之分析-以台灣企業集團為例 Information Content of the Panama Papers Disclosure-Perceptive from Taiwan Business Conglomerate |
指導教授: |
周德瑋
Chou, De-Wai |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 31 |
中文關鍵詞: | 巴拿馬文件 、事件研究法 、避稅 |
英文關鍵詞: | Panama paper, Event study, Tax avoidance |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GIM.008.2018.F08 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:151 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
避稅是企業為了節省公司租稅支出,進而增加公司淨利,使股東享有更多營業成果,然而後續可能會有追稅或觀感不佳的情況產生。因此本研究之研究目的在利用事件研究法,檢視特定臺灣集團企業,在巴拿馬文件於2016年4月被正式揭露後,新聞發布日之宣告效果,本研究估計期採用事件日前320日到前66日,共255天,而事件期則採事件日發生前三天到後一天,共5天,樣本集團企業則共計389家。另外還透過t檢定與多元線性迴歸模型,探討影響累積異常報酬的因素有那些,實證結果如下:研發費用率、股價報酬率、巴拿馬文件曝險及長期有效稅率等變數較能解釋樣本公司在巴拿馬文件事件期間產生的累積異常報酬,且皆呈正相關。
Tax avoidance is an attempt to save the company’s tax expenses, thereby increasing the company’s net profit and allowing shareholders to enjoy more business results. However, there may be tax recovery or poor perception. The purpose of this study was to use event study to examine Taiwan Business Conglomerate’s information content of the Panama Papers disclosure. The event date was April 6, 2016. The estimated period was 255 days and the event period was 5 days. There is a total sample of 389 group companies. Through the methodologies of event study, t tests and multiple linear regressions, the empirical results are as follows. The factors which affect the cumulated of abnormal returns are discussed. The rate of R&D expenses, the stock price rate of return, Panama Paper exposure and long-term effective tax rate are positively correlated to the samples’ cumulated of abnormal returns and also have significant impact on them.
李存修、胡星陽、王瑪如(2007),「從公司治理角度探討海外可轉債發行對公司價值之影響」,財務金融學刊,15(3),頁1-42。
沈中華、李建然(2000),事件研究法-財務與會計實證研究必備,華泰文化。
林光仁(2011),「公司法第二十七條法人董監事制度存廢之研究」,台大法學論叢,40(1),頁253-350。
林其玄(2016),「稅捐規避行為可罰性之探討」,中正大學法學集刊, (50),頁1-52。
海角難再7億全球今起大追稅(2017),[available at https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5085331-%E5%AF%8C%E4%BA%BA%E6%B3%A8%E6%84%8F%EF%BC%81%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E4%BB%8A%E8%B5%B7%E5%A4%A7%E8%BF%BD%E7%A8%85]
高儷華、單騰笙(2016),「企業避稅與盈餘管理探索性研究-以臺灣為證」,中原企管評論,14(2),頁79-101。
莊豐銘(2006),「台灣上市公司到租稅天堂設立公司之決定因素」,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
許杏宜(2015),「境外公司的使用與操作-從頂新出售臺北101股權案談起」,會計研究月刊,352期,頁74-78。
陳明進(2002),「營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究」,會計評論,34 卷,頁57-75。
曾淑華(2006),「台商透過境外公司轉投資之動機與誘因」,東吳大學會計系碩士論文。
黃美祝、陳緯(2017),「代理觀點下避稅行為與公司價值之關聯性-來自中國的實證研究」,當代會計,18(2),頁155-185。
黃美祝、楊佩璇(2011),「集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較」,會計學報,4(1),頁1-22。
瞭解集團-組織圖-Eric Chi-Medium(2017),[available at https://medium.com/@ericchi_83330/%E7%9E%AD%E8%A7%A3%E9%9B%86%E5%9C%98-%E7%B5%84%E7%B9%94%E5%9C%96-c5d6f762f6fe]
薛敏正、林于璿、邱彥毅(2017),「避稅行為與資訊透明度之關聯性研究」,管理學報,34(2),頁167-187。
魏妤珊、邱敬貿、黃淑惠(2015),「法人董事與企業避稅:台灣股票市場之實證研究」,證券市場發展季刊 ,27(4),頁1-42。
證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統網頁,[available at http://www.selaw.com.tw/LetterContent.aspx?Soid=7788]
證券櫃檯買賣中心及臺灣證券交易所,[available at http://www.tpex.org.tw/web/regular_emerging/governance/corporate_governance_09.php?l=zh-tw]。
Chen, M. Y., Gao, P., & Hsieh, Y. C. (2011). “ETRs of electronic & non-electronic firms listed on Taiwan stock market: Panel models with two-sided censoring.” Thail &Econometrics Society, 3(3), 51-60.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). “Long-run corporate tax avoidance: the accounting review.” The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
Hadlock, C. J., Ryngaert, M., & Thomas, S. (2001). “Corporate structure and equity offerings: are there benefits to diversification?” The journal of business, 74(4), 613-635.
Hanlon, M. and J. Slemrod (2009). “What does Tax Aggressiveness Signal? Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to News about Tax Aggressiveness.” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 93, No.1-2, 126-141.
Khurana, Inder K. and Moser, William J. (2009). “Institutional Ownership and Tax Aggressiveness.” AAA 2010 Financial Accounting and Reporting Section (FARS) Paper [Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1464106]
Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-Level Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). “The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). “Corporate social responsibility & tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis.” Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 31(1), 86-108.
Lim, Y. (2010). “Tax Avoidance, Cost of Debt and Shareholder Activism: Evidence from Korea.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(2), 456-470.
Lisowsky, P. (2010). “Seeking Shelter: Empirically Modeling Tax Shelters Using Financial Statement Information.” Accounting Review, 85(5),1693-1720.
O'Donovan, James and Wagner, Hannes F. and Zeume, Stefan, (2017), “The Value of Offshore Secrets – Evidence from the Panama Papers.” HKUST Finance Symposium 2017 [Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2771095]
Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). “The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68-88.
Thomas, S. (2002). “Firm diversification and asymmetric information: evidence from analysts’ forecasts and earnings announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 64(3), 373-396.
Wilson, R. J. (2009). “An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants.” Accounting Review, 84(3): 969-1000