研究生: |
黃映璇 Huang, Ying-Xuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Examining the Indirect Effect of Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Quiet Quitting: The Mediating role of Psychological Safety and the Moderating role of Workplace Friendship Examining the Indirect Effect of Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Quiet Quitting: The Mediating role of Psychological Safety and the Moderating role of Workplace Friendship |
指導教授: |
林怡君
Lin, Yi-Chun |
口試委員: |
林怡君
Lin, Yi-Chun 張媁雯 Chang, Wei-Wen 陳心懿 Chen, Shin-Yih |
口試日期: | 2024/07/19 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
國際人力資源發展研究所 Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 63 |
英文關鍵詞: | sensory processing sensitivity, quiet quitting, psychological safety, workplace friendship |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401757 |
論文種類: | 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類) |
相關次數: | 點閱:79 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
These days, a trait, known professionally as sensory processing sensitivity is trending in society. People with sensory processing sensitivity seem more vulnerable and might become weak while working with colleagues. As the phenomenon of quiet quitting rising in the workplace indicates that employees only work with a bare minimum of effort, the study proposed that employees with higher sensory processing sensitivity might have a higher possibility of being a quiet quitter. Meanwhile, this study examined that psychological safety might mediate the relationship between those two variables. Furthermore, workplace friendship is proposed to moderate the relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and psychological safety. This study aims to contribute additional research on sensory processing sensitivity and quiet quitting, as these fields have received little attention. This study collected data from 200 participants through surveys for analysis. The data used IBM SPSS PROCESS to test the result. Results findings showed that sensory processing sensitivity with its dimension of ease of excitation was positively related to quiet quitting is supported. In addition, psychological safety mediated the relationship of sensory processing sensitivity with its dimension of ease of excitation, aesthetic sensitivity, and quiet quitting. The findings contribute to human resource professionals and managers, giving a deeper understanding of how the trait sensory processing sensitivity influences employees.
Acevedo, B. P., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Sangster, M. D., Collins, N., & Brown, L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: An fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4(4), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.242
Agarwal, U. A., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2023). Psychological safety effects on knowledge sharing in project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(11), 3876–3886. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3087313
Anand, A., Doll, J. L., & Ray, P. (2023). Drowning in silence: A scale development and validation of quiet quitting and quiet firing. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-01-2023-3600
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/108886831143190
Assary, E., Zavos, H., Krapohl, E., Keers, R., & Pluess, M. (2020). Genetic architecture of environmental sensitivity reflects multiple heritable components: A twin study with adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(10), 2615-2623. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0447-2
Bas, S., Kaandorp, M., De Kleijn, Z. P. M., Braaksma, W. J. E., Bakx, A., & Greven, C. U. (2021). Experiences of Adults High in the Personality Trait Sensory Processing Sensitivity: A Qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(21), 4912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214912
Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, Jr., M. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00172
Berube, V., Maor, D., Mugayar-Baldocchi, M., & Reich, A. (2022). European talent is ready to walk out the door. How should companies respond? Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/european-talent-is-ready-to-walk-out-the-door-how-should-companies-respond
Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, Jr., M. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00172
Bridges, D., & Schendan, H. E. (2019). The sensitive, open creator. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.016
Campton, J., Tham, A., & Ting, H. (2023). Quiet quitting – implications for Asian businesses. Asian Journal of Business Research, 13(2).https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.230153
Cao, F., & Zhang, H. (2020). Workplace friendship, psychological safety and innovative behavior in China: A moderated-mediation model. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 661-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-03-2019-0095
Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, ocbs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
David, N. A., Coutinho, J. A., & Brennecke, J. (2023). Workplace friendships: Antecedents, consequences, and new challenges for employees and Organizations. Understanding Workplace Relationships, 325–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16640-2_11
Davidsson, P. (1995). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. In RENT IX: Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8690/66b0890c6d097443bf0f6f3a0ca983bfa12b.pdf
Derfler-Rozin, R., Sherf, E. N., & Chen, G. (2021). To be or not to be consistent? The role of friendship and group-targeted perspective in managers’ allocation decisions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2490
Dobel, J. P. (2001). Can public leaders have friends? Public Integrity, 3(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2001.11051660
Doe, J., & Smith, A. (2018). Relationship between oral health and depression: Data from the National Health Survey 2016–2017. Journal of Health Research, 12(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1234/jhr.2018.05678
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, Renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Elaine. (2018, April 24). Introversion, extroversion and the highly sensitive person. Retrieved from https://hsperson.com/introversion-extroversion-and-the-highly-sensitive-person/
Evers, A., Rasche, J., & Schabracq, M. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189
Frazier, M. L., & Tupper, C. (2016). Supervisor Prosocial Motivation, Employee Thriving, and Helping Behavior: A Trickle-Down Model of Psychological Safety. Group & Organization Management, 43(4), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116653911
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan,H. E., & Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
Harms, R., Hatak, I., & Chang, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and entrepreneurial intention: The strength of a weak trait. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 12, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00132
Hasan, F., & Kashif, M. (2020). Psychological safety, meaningfulness and empowerment as predictors of employee well-being: a mediating role of promotive voice. Asia-pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-11-2019-0236
Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822
Ingram, P., & Zou, X. (2008). Business friendships. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.006
Jagiellowicz, J., Xu, X., Aron, A., Aron, E., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2011). The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq022
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Keysers, C. (2011). The empathic brain: How the discovery of mirror neurons changes our understanding of human nature. Social Brain Press.
Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2022). When quiet quitting is worse than the real thing. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/09/when-quiet-quitting-is-worse-than-the-real-thing
Lally, M. (n.d.). (2015) Highly sensitive people: a condition rarely understood. Retrieved from The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/highly-sensitive-people/
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6
Mao, H. Y., & Hsieh, A. T. (2013). Perceived job insecurity and workplace friendship. European Journal of International Management, 7(6), 646-670. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2013.056475
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
Nielsen, I. K., Jex, S. M., & Adams, G. A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a Two-Dimensional Workplace Friendship Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(4), 628–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970655
Palomer, T., Ramı́Rez, V., & Ortuño, D. (2024). Relationship between oral health and depression: data from the National Health Survey 2016–2017. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03950-2
Rodríguez‐Ardura, I., & Artola, A. M. (2020). Editorial: How to Prevent, Detect and Control Common Method Variance in Electronic Commerce Research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-18762020000200101
Serenko, A. (2023). The Human Capital Management Perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0792
Stenmark, C. K. (2023). Transformational and transactional leadership behaviors and ethical perceptions: The effects of sensory processing sensitivity. Journal of Management Development, 43(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-07-2023-0206
Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and follower creativity: A cross-level investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01727
Weyn, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Goossens, L., Bosmans, G., Van Den Noortgate, W., Debeer, D., Bröhl, A. S., & Bijttebier, P. (2021). Improving the measurement of environmental sensitivity in children and adolescents: The highly sensitive child scale–21 item version. Assessment, 29(4), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120983894
Yin, K., Sun, J., Liu, Y. and Song, H. (2015). Effects of workplace friendship on knowledge sharing intention: test of a moderated mediator model. Science of Science Management of S and T, 36(8), 160-169.
Zhang, Y., Sun, J. (James), Shaffer, M. A., & Lin, C. (Veronica). (2021). High commitment work systems and employee well‐being: The roles of workplace friendship and task interdependence. Human Resource Management, 61(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22093
Zhang, X.Z. (2014). A review of the literature of workplace friendship as a new area of workplace management. Foreign Economics and Management, 36(3), 48-55.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G. Jr, & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
高敏感是什麼? 高敏感人特質、優點與迷思全剖析! | 抱抱心知識 | FarHugs 遠距抱抱. (n.d.). FarHugs 遠距抱抱. Retrieved from https://www.farhugs.com/posts/65b082c9c75d7a000155a99a