簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡書涵
Tsai, Shu-Han
論文名稱: 大專女子排球選手知覺教練領導信任對同儕關係與運動自信心之預測
The predictive utility of perceived coach leadership trust on peer relationships and sport confidence among collegiate women volleyball players
指導教授: 梁嘉音
Liang, Chia-Yin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 運動競技學系
Department of Athletic Performance
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 57
中文關鍵詞: 排球領導信任同儕關係運動自信心UVL
英文關鍵詞: volleyball, leadership trust, peer relationships, sport confidence, UVL
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204201
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:184下載:34
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討104學年度大專校院排球聯賽公開甲一級領導信任對同儕關係與運動自信心之預測。以有晉級104學年度大專校院公開女子組甲一級複賽12隊伍的排球選手為對象,徵得同意後,並以「領導信任量表」、「同儕關係量表」與「運動自信心量表」分別測量選手知覺的教練領導信任、同儕關係與運動自信心,共發放有139份,有效問卷為137份,回收率為98.5%。所得資料經描述性統計、皮爾遜積差相關、獨立樣本t-test、單因子變異數分析和簡單線性迴歸進行分析,結果顯示:(一) 104學年度UVL公開甲一級排球選手的教練領導信任中知覺到中高程度的教練領導信任;在同儕關係中的「信守諾言」最高,「社交技巧」最低;在運動自信心,以「社會支持」最高,「能力展現」為最低;(二) 104學年度UVL公開甲一級排球選手的教練領導信任在年齡、年級有顯著差異,而同儕關係中的年齡、年級、球齡及位置有顯著差異,運動自信心在球齡及位置上也有顯著差異存在;(三) 104學年度UVL公開甲一級排球選手的知覺教練領導信任與同儕關係中的「社交技巧」無相關,但與「信守承諾」、「情感依賴」兩個構面呈正相關,而與運動自信心的「技巧精熟」、「環境有利」無顯著相關,其他構面則呈現正相關;(四) 104學年度UVL公開一級排球選手知覺教練領導信任可正向預測同儕關係的「信守承諾」和「情感依賴」;(五) 104學年度UVL公開一級排球選手知覺教練領導信任能正向預測運動自信心中的「「生/心理準備」、「教練領導」、「能力展現」、「替代經驗」與「社會支持」。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the prediction of the division I collegiate Female volleyball players perceived coaches’ leadership trust on peer relationship and sport confidence. The participants were 137 female volleyball players recruited from 12 Division I universities competed in University Volleyball League 2015. After received informed consent, participants were requested to complete leadership trust, peer relationship and sport confidence Scale which assessed their player’s perception of leadership trust, peer relationship and sport confidence. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, independent sampling t-test, one-way ANOVA and simple linear regression were used to analyze data. The results showed that: (1) Collegiate volleyball players show high degree level in leadership trust. In the peer relation status, the keep promise shows the highest level. Social Skill shows the lowest level. (2) The leadership trust shows significant difference in different age and grade. In peer relationship were found significant difference on age, grade, years for playing and position. In Sport confidence were significant differences on years for playing and position. (3) The leadership trust was positively associated with “keeping promises” and “building affective attachment relationship” in peer relationship, but “social skill” was no significant correlation. (4) Leadership trust could be predicted “keeping promises” and “building affective attachment relationship” in peer relationship. (5) Leadership trust positively predicted “physical/mental preparation”, “coaches’ leadership”, “demonstration of ability”, “vicarious experience”, and “social support” in sport confidence.

    口試委員與系主任簽字之論文通過簽名表……………………………... i 論文授權書………………………………………………………………... ii 中文摘要………………….……….……………..……………… ………..iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………iv 謝誌…………………………………………………………………………v 目次…………………………………………………………………………vi 圖次…………………………………………………………………………viii 表次…………………………………………………………………………viii 第壹章 緒論....................................................................................... 1 第一節 問題背景………….…………….……….……………..…..……. 1 第二節 研究目的..…………….…………………………..….……..…… 4 第三節 研究問題與假設…..…………………………..….………..……. 4 第四節 名詞解釋……..……….…………….….…………………..……. 5 第五節 研究的重要性…………..……..…………………….….…..…… 6 第貳章 文獻探討............................................................................... 7 第一節 知覺教練領導信任的理論基礎與相關研究.………………..…. 7 第二節 同儕關係的理論基礎與相關研究………………….…………. 10 第三節 運動自信心的理論基礎與相關研究..…………..……….......... 15 第參章 研究方法............................................................................. 19 第一節 研究架構………… .…….……..……………….……….………19 第二節 研究對象………………...………..…………….…….…………20 第三節 研究工具………………...…………..………….…….…………20 第四節 研究流程………………….....……….…….……………………22 第五節 資料分析……………..……...….…….…………………………22 第肆章 研究結果............................................................................. 24 第一節 領導信任、同儕關係與運動自信心之現況..………………… 24 第二節 研究對象各變項在背景變項之差異情形…………………….. 25 第三節 領導信任、同儕關係與運動自信心之關係……..….…………27 第四節 領導信任對同儕關係之預測情形…….………..………………33 第五節 領導信任對運動自信心之預測情形….……………………..…34 第伍章 討論..................................................................................... 38 第一節 領導信任、同儕關係與運動自信心在背景變項之差異情形.. 38 第二節 領導信任、同儕關係與運動自信心之關係………………...…39 第三節 領導信任對同儕關係之預測情形…..………….…….…...……40 第四節 領導信任對運動自信心之預測情形….……..…………………40 第陸章 結論與建議......................................................................... 42 第一節 結論……………… .…….……..……………….……….………42 第二節 建議……………………...………..…………….…….…………42 參考文獻 中文文獻………………...………..…………….…….……………………44 英文文獻…………………………………………………………………...47 附錄……………………………………………………………….. 52 附錄一 參加者須知及同意書……………………….…………………52 附錄二 基本資料…………………………………….…………………53 附錄三 領導信任量表……………………………….…………………54 附錄四 同儕關係量表……………………………….…………………55 附錄五 運動自信心量表…………………………………………….....56 圖 次 圖1 運動信心概念模式圖……………………………………………………...16 圖2 運動自信心來源概念圖…………………………………………………...18 圖3 研究架構圖………………………………………………………………...19 圖4 研究流程圖………………………………………………………………...23 表 次 表1 同儕關係之意義………………………... ………………………………...13 表2 晉級隊伍與人數一覽……………………………………………………...20 表3 各變項之描速統計表…………………………………………………….. 25 表4 各變項之間的簡單相關矩陣…………………………………………..… 28 表5 領導信任在背景變項的t考驗與單因子變異數分析摘要表...………… 29 表6 同儕關係在背景變項的t考驗與單因子變異數分析摘要表……..….. .. 30 表7 運動自信心在背景變項的t考驗與單因子變異數分析摘要表…..…..... 31 表8 運動自信心在背景變項的t考驗與單因子變異數分析摘要表….....….. 32 表9 領導信任對信守諾言之迴歸分析摘要表…….……………………..…... 33 表10 領導信任對情感依賴之迴歸分析摘要表………………………..…….. 33 表11 領導信任對社交技巧之迴歸分析摘要表………………………..…….. 34 表12 領導信任對技巧精熟之迴歸分析摘要表………………………..…….. 34 表13 領導信任對生/心理準備之逐步迴歸分析摘要表……………..……..... 35 表14 領導信任對教練領導之迴歸分析摘要表……………………..……….. 35 表15 領導信任對能力展現之迴歸分析摘要表…………………..………….. 35 表16 教練領導信任對環境有利之迴歸分析摘要表…………………...……. 36 表17 領導信任對替代經驗之迴歸分析摘要表………………………...……. 36 表18 領導信任對社會支持之迴歸分析摘要表………………………...……. 37

    參考文獻
    一、中文文獻
    王俊明 (2011)。教練和選手的人際溝通能力對教練—選手之間知覺教練領導行為差異和團隊凝聚力的影響。運動與健康研究,1(1),98-117。

    王慶福、林幸台、張德榮 (1997)。人際依附風格、性別角色取向與人際親密能力之評量。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,44(2),63-78。

    石培欣 (2000)。唯實主義的評析及其在教育上的應用。教育研究,7,369-382。

    吳素卿 (2001)。足球選手目標取向、知覺運動動機氣候與運動自信心來源之相關研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。

    呂素幸 (1992)。尊重、支持、啟發的幼兒教育--以康乃狄克大學附設兒童發展實驗中心為例。國教之聲,26(1),29-33。

    卓國雄 (2003)。特質性運動自信心量表之修訂研究。南師體育,10期,106- 112。

    卓國雄 (2004)。運動自信心來源問卷之修訂。國立體育學院論叢,15(1),217-231。

    周愫嫻 (2001)。蛻變的青春-青少年自我概念形成原因之兩性差異。台北市師範學院學報,32,375-396。

    林天德 (1998)。中學生人關技能問卷之編制與其屬性之探討。教育資料與研究。22,52-61。

    邱招婷 (2002)。 國民中學青少年次級文化、同儕關係與生活適應相關之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。屏東縣。

    洪雅雯 (2001)。學童之人格特質、同儕接納程度與班級氣氛知覺關係之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。屏東。

    韋式字典 (2011)。2011年12月1日,取自: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer.

    馬藹屏 (1987)。家庭社經地位、父母教養方式與國中學生自我概念友伴關係之調查研究 (未出版碩士論文) 。中國文化大學。台北市。
    高三福 (2001)。團隊文化與教練領導:質化與量化兩種研究途徑 (未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。

    高三福 (2005)。華人運動團隊信任:教練與運動員互動之探究。大專體育學刊,7 (3),115-126。

    高三福、陳鈺芳 (2006)。要求與實際領導行為一致性、領導信任與效能關係之研究。大專體育學刊,8(4),63-77。

    張忠秋 (1996)。運動團隊凝聚力主要表現特徵與培養方式探討。中國體育科學,16(3),68-72。

    張芝鳳 (1999)。青少年與父母以及與同儕間的依附關係對其自我價值之影響研究 (未出版碩士論文) 。國立花蓮師範學院。花蓮縣。

    張春興 (1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。

    張春興 (1998) 。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華。

    張美麗 (2004)。國中學生性別角色、同儕關係與性別教育需求之相關研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。彰化縣。

    張惟亮 (2003)。人際關係之班級輔導活動實施效果研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。新竹縣。

    許雅嵐 (2002)。國中班級同儕團體互動之研究 (未出版碩士倫文)。國立高雄師範大學。高雄縣。

    陳秀卿 (2008)。青少年刺激尋求動機、同儕關係、休閒阻礙與偏差行為相關之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。中國文化大學。臺北市。

    陳怡君 (2003)。國中生網路使用行為、同儕關係與自我概念之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。中國文化大學。台北市。

    陳奎熹 (1994)。教育社會學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。

    陳彩鳳、曾信超 (2006)。信任危機。護理雜誌,53(1),10-16。

    陳皎眉 (1997)。人際關係。臺北:空大。

    陳鈺芳 (2004)。探索運動員追求自我實現的可能性-從交易領導與導理論探討之。中華體育季刊,18(2),43-49。

    章淑婷 (1989)。幼兒人際問題解決能力與同儕關係研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。

    黃怡姿 (1999)。員工之組織信任的形成與影響 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。臺北市。

    黃俊龍 (2009)。高中排球選手知覺教練領導行為、同儕關係與組織承諾之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。屏東縣。

    黃俊龍、蔡俊傑 (2009)。排球選手同儕關係之研究。排球教練科學,14,10-18。

    賈馥茗 (1991)。教育心理學。臺北:空大。

    劉秀娟、林明寬 (1996)。兩性關係-性別刻板化與角色。臺北市:揚智。

    賴美秀 (1993)。父母的性別角色、兒童的性別角色與兒童的自尊同儕接納度之關係 (未出版碩士倫文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北市。

    賴素玲、賴素英、蘇榮基 (2011)。大專網球國手不同性別、勝負及教育程度對低、中、高自信心程度與歸因情形影響之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,10(2),69-84。

    顏裕峰 (1993)。國中生的社會興趣與同儕人際關係之相關研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。彰化縣。

    二、英文文獻
    Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Alper, S., Tjosvoldb, D., Lawc, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1),33-52.

    Anderson, E. B. & Weitz. (1990). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4),310-323.

    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
    Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

    Berk, L. E. (1997). Child development. Boston:Allyn & Bacon.

    Brustad, R. J., Babkes, M. L., & Smith, A. L. (2001). Youth in sport: Psychological considerations. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), (2nd ed., pp. 604-635). New York: Wiley.

    Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A.F., & Hartup, W.W. (1996). Friendship and its
    significance in childhood and adolescence: Introduction and comment. NY: Cambridge University,1-15.

    Butler, D. N. (1983). Reciprocity of trust between professionals and their secretaries. Psychological Reports, 53, 411-416.

    Carron, A., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. (1988). Group cohesion and individual
    adherence to physical activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 127-138.

    Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups:Interpretations and consideration.
    Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-131.

    Carron, A. V., Hausenblas, H. A., & Eys, M. A., (2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

    Cowel, C. C.(1970). The contributions of physical activity to social development. In H. S. Slusher & A. S. Lockhart (Eds), Anthology of contemporary readings, 100-121.
    Cratty, B. J. (1989). Psychology in Contemporary Sport (Social–psychological dynamics of the team). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA
    basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004-1012.

    Dirks, K. T. & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.

    Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of
    national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620.

    Durkin, K. (1995). Developmental social psychology: From infancy to old age. Blackwell Publishing Developmental social psychology, 776.

    Gifford-Smitha, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks, Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235-284.

    GundlachG, T., & Cadotte, R. E. (1994). Exchange interdependence and interfirm interaction: Research in a simulated channel setting. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4),516-532.

    Harter. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered. Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21, 36-64.

    Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental
    significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.

    Horn, T. S. (2004). Developmental perspectives on self-perception in children and
    adolescents. In M. R. Weiss (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology:
    A lifespan perspective (pp. 101-143). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information
    Technology.

    Horn, T. S., Lox, C. L., & Labrador, F. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy theory: When
    coaches' expectations become reality. In J.M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport
    psychology: Personal growth to peak performance, 74-91. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Kozub, S. A., & Mcdonnell, J. F. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23,120-129.

    Laursen, B. (1996). Closeness and conflict in adolescent peer relationships: Interdependence with friends and romantic partners. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 186-210). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Lewicki, R. J., McAllister D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 1,438-458.

    Lewis, G. H. (1972). Role differentiation. American Sociological Review,37,424-434.

    Mabry, E. A., & Barnes, R. E. (1980). The dynamics of small group communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Mayer, R.C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of
    organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonalcooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

    Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communicationMohr. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.

    Moran, M. M., & Weiss, M. R. (2006). Peer leadership in sport: Links with friendship,
    peer acceptance, psychological characteristics, and athletic ability. Journal of
    Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 97-113.

    Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, Linda. (1993). Children's peer
    relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial,
    and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99-128.

    Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1984). Reasoning about the ability of self and others: A developmental study. Child Development, 55, 1990-1999.
    Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all:
    A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.

    Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.) (pp. 621-700).New York: Wiley.

    Shields, D. L. L., Gardner, D. E., Bredemeier, B. J. L., & Bostro, A. (1997). The relationship between leadership behaviors and group cohesion in team sports.
    Journal of Psychology, 131(2), 196-210.

    Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367-392.

    Smith, A. L. (1999). Perceptions of peer relationships and physical activity participation in early adolescence. Journal of sport & Exercise Psychology, 21,329-350.

    Smith, A. L. (2003). Peer relationships in physical activity contexts: A road less traveled in youth sport and exercise psychology research. Psychology of Sport
    and Exercise, 4, 25-39.

    Smith, A. L. (2007). Youth peer relationships in sport. In S. Jowett, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 41-54). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and group productivity. New York: Academic.

    Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of group. New York: Wiley.

    Vealey, R. S. (1986). Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of
    Sport Psychology, 8, 221-246.

    Vealey, R. S. (2005). Coaching for the inner edge. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technologies.

    Vealey, R. S., Hayashi, S. W., Garner-Holman, M., & Giacobbi, P. (1998). Sources of
    sport-confidence: Conceptualization and instrument development. Journal of
    Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 54-80.

    Weiss, M. R., & Smith, A. L. (1999). Quality of youth sport friendships: Measurement development and validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 21, 145-166.

    Weiss, M. R., & Smith, A. L. (2002). Friendship quality in youth sport: Relationship to age, gender, and motivation variables. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 420-437.

    Weiss, M. R., & Stuntz, C. P. (2004). A little friendly competition: Sport and physical
    activity contexts. Morgantown, WV: FitnessInformation Technology, 165-196.

    Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers asinitiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerialtrustworthy behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530.

    White, R. W. (1959).Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66,297-233.

    Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. American Psychological Association The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success (pp. 363).

    Zuker, L. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 53-111.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE