研究生: |
吳育榕 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Moodle平台上數學擬題類型對國小五年級學生擬題能力之影響 Effects of Problem-posing Types on Moodle on Elementary School Students’ Problem-posing Ability |
指導教授: | 何榮桂 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 52 |
中文關鍵詞: | 擬題類型 、Moodle 、擬題能力 、等值分數 |
英文關鍵詞: | problem-posing material, Moodle, problem-posing ability, equivalent fraction |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:160 下載:10 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究之研究目的以Moodle平台用以探究擬題類型對於學生在擬題能力及學習成效之影響。本研究採用準實驗之不等組前後測設計,受試者為高雄市國小五年級學生,共三班,96名學生,分為結構擬題、半結構擬題和自由擬題,三組受試者分為實驗組及控制組,分別接受結構擬題教材、半結構擬題教材和自由擬題教材,讓受試者進行擬題活動,四次擬題活動後,實施後測。
在資料分析上,進行量的分析,研究結果顯示,結構擬題在擬題能力中的正確性及精緻性的表現皆優於半結構擬題及自由擬題;後測部分,結構擬題也優於半結構擬題及自由擬題。
The purpose of this research was investigated whether the different of problem-posing types can improve elementary school students’ ability. We also conducted a posttest to determine whether the different of problem-posing types would have positive effect on fifth graders’ learning affect. A quasi experimental non-control group designed was used in this design. Participants were 96 numbers of fifth-grade of elementary students in Kaohsiung. There were three classes assigned to experimental groups and control group. The experimental groups received structure materials and semi-structure materials while the control group received free problem-posing materials. After four times practice, we conducted posttest.
In quantitative data analysis, the results show that, the experimental group, who received structure materials, demonstrated better problem-posing ability than the control group. In posttest, the experimental group, who received structure materials, rendered better performance than the control group in learning affect.
呂玉琴(1991)。分數概念文獻探討。國立台北師範學院學報,4,537-606。
吳進寶(2005)。國小五年級擬題教學之研究~以整數四則混合運算為例。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
周幸儀(2002)。國小二年級數學科合作擬題教學之行動研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
林敏慧、陳慶帆( 2004)。快速建構網路教學平台的新方案:Moodle。教育研究月刊,126,85-98。
林群雄(2004)。『教』與『學』之成長實錄─擬題活動教學融入國小三年級數學課堂之行動研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
徐文鈺(1996)。不同擬題教學策略對兒童分數概念、解題能力與擬題能力之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
康滋容(2005)。擬題活動對國小二年級學生解題能力和擬題能力的影響。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
康軒書局(2008)。國民小學數學課本第九冊。台北:康軒書局。
康軒書局(2008)。國民小學數學習作第九冊。台北:康軒書局。
康軒書局(2008)。國民小學數學教師手冊第九冊。台北:康軒書局。
梁淑坤(1994)。擬題的研究及其在課程的角色。國民小學數學科新課程概說(低年級)(頁152-167)。台北:台灣省國民學校教師研習會彙編。
梁淑坤(1997)。擬題能力之評量:工具之製作。國科會補助研究計畫的成果報告(NSC 84-2511-S-023-006)。
梁淑坤(1999)。從擬題研究提出數學教學建議。載於高雄市政府公教人力資源發展中心(主編),新典範數學(頁184-220)。高雄:高雄市政府公教人力資源發展中心。
歐展嘉(2006)。Moodle 數位學習課程管理平台。臺北市:文魁。
Baxter, J. A. (2005). Some reflections on problem posing: a conversation with Marion Walter. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 122-128.
Barlow, A. T. & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106( 2) 64-73.
Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U. S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 37-50.
Cunningham, R. F. (2004). Problem posing: an opportunity for increasing responsibility. Mathematics and Computer Education, 38, 83-89.
Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children's made up mathematics problems--a new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 261-271.
English, L. D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 172-179.
English, L. D. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83-106.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. New York: Macmillan.
Hasemann, K. (1981). On difficulties with fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 71-87.
Hashimotto, Y.,(1987). Classroom practice of problem solving in Japanese elementary schools. In J. P. Becker & T. Miwa (Eds), Proceedings of the US-Japan seminar on mathematical problem solving, 94-119.
Keil, G. E. (1965). Writing and solving original problems as a means of improving verbal arithmetic problem solving ability. Doctoral dissertation.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: where do good problems come from? In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.) Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, 123-147. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moses, B., Bjork, E., & Goldenberg, E. P. (1993). Beyond problem solving: problem posing. In S.I. Brown & M. I. Walter (Eds), Problem posing: Reflections and applications (pp. 178-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Silver, E.A. (1994). On mathematical problem solving, For the Learning of Mathematics,14(1), pp. 19-28.