簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周珮儀
Chou, Pei-I
論文名稱: 季胡課程理論之研究
Study on Giroux's curriculum theory
指導教授: 黃光雄
Huang, Kuang-Hsiung
楊深坑
Yang, Shen-Keng
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 208
中文關鍵詞: 課程理論批判理論後現代主義文化研究
英文關鍵詞: curriculum theory, critical theory, postmodernism, culture studies
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:2022下載:23
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 季胡課程理論之研究
    摘 要
    本研究旨在探討Giroux的課程理論, 主要研究結果如下:
    一﹑Giroux的學術淵源包括:批判理論、後現代主義、後
    現代女性主義與民主教育思想。
    二﹑Giroux 在整個課程理論領域的立場與影響,早期以社
    會批判的觀點對科學化課程理論與現象學課程理論提出
    批判,但對於社會批判理論的核心----再製理論和抗拒
    理論仍然不滿而提出修正,近年來結合後現代主義和文
    化研究的觀點,積極發展批判的後現代的課程理論。
    三、Giroux 在社會批判時期的課程理論主要的方向包括:
    批判再製理論與抗拒理論,重建意識型態、文化霸權、
    權力和文化等社會批判核心概念,強調課程的政治性和
    權力的積極作用,形成一種兼具批判性和可能性的課程
    理論。
    四、Giroux在後現代時期的課程理論主要的方向包括:結
    合文化研究與教育,形成一種" 邊界教育論 ";加強大
    眾文化與媒體表徵的研究,並促使其成為課程理論中合
    法化的學術領域和重要的課程內容。
    五、Giroux的課程理論雖然有許多優點,但是必須針對理論
    和實施層面中若干自相矛盾的問題加以批判和修正,才
    能提高理論的價值和可行性。

    Study On Giroux's Curriculum Theory

    Pei-I Chou

    Abstract

    The main propose of the study is to examine Giroux's curriculum theory. The major findings of the study are as follows:
    1. The spheres of Giroux's learning which have influenced his curriculum theory
    included critical theory , postmodernism ,postmodern feminism and educational
    thoughts for democracy.
    2. The position of Giroux,s curriculum theory first stood on social critical theory
    to criticize scientific and phenomenological curriculum theory ,and revised the theories of reproduction and resistance, then turn toward postmodernism and cultural studies to develop the curriculum theory. of critical postmodernism.
    3.In social critical period the main content of Giroux's curriculum theory included
    criticizing the theories of reproduction and resistance, reconceptualizing
    ideology, hegemony, power and culture which are the key concepts of
    curriculum theory of social critical study, and using the language of critique
    and possibility to build critical pedagogy.
    4.In postmodern period the main concept of Giroux's curriculum theory consist of
    combining culture study with education , strengthening the research on popular
    culture ,mass media and representation, and developing his "border pedagogy".
    5.Althought lots of virtues , Giroux's curriculum theory must be revised to make
    it feasible and practical.

    Key Words: curriculum theory, critical theory , postmodernism, culture studies

    季胡課程理論之研究 目 次 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1 第二節 研究方法與研究立場 8 第三節 重要名詞探討 8 第二章 Giroux課程理論的學術淵源 13 第一節 批判理論 13 第二節 後現代主義 25 第三節 後現代女性主義 35 第四節 民主教育思想 42 第三章 Giroux在當代課程理論中的立場 50 第一節 科學化的課程理論 50 第二節 現象學的課程理論 60 第三節 社會批判的課程理論 72 第四節 後現代的課程理論 81 第四章 Giroux 的社會批判課程理論 94 第一節 再製理論的批判 95 第二節 意識型態、文化霸權、權力與文化 104 第三節 批判性與可能性的課程理論 112 第五章 Giroux 的後現代課程理論 123 第一節 文化研究與課程 125 第二節 大眾文化與課程 135 第三節 表徵教育論 143 第四節 邊界教育論 151 第五節 小結--從社會批判到後現代 159 第六章 批判 161 第一節 理論內部的問題 162 第二節 理論與實施的問題 172 第三節 小結 180 第七章 結論與啟示 183 第一節 結論 183 第二節 啟示 186 參考文獻 195

    參考書目

    行政院教育改革審議委員會 (民85)教育改革總諮議報告書。
    周昌忠譯,Feyerabend,P.著(民85) 反對方法。台北:時報。
    施忠連譯,McLellan,D.著(民80) 意識型態。台北:桂冠。
    高宣揚(民80) 新馬克思主義導引。台北:遠流。
    唐維敏(民84) 破媒體時代--科技與文化的思考。當代,116, 28-43頁。
    孫紹誼(民84) 通俗文化、意識型態與話語霸權--伯明罕文化研究學派評
    述。當代,114,68-89頁。
    教育部(民82) 國民小學課程標準。台北:教育部。
    教育部(民84) 中華民國教育報告書。台北:教育部。
    教育部(民87) 國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。教育部。
    陳光興(民86) 文化研究和國際化政治--霍爾訪談之二。當代 ,77,50-65頁。
    陳伯璋(民72) 課程研究的第三勢力--美國再概念化學派課程理論之評介。
    國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,25,129- 226頁。
    陳明珠譯,Fiske,J.著(民79)物質主義的影像研究。當代,51, 28-43頁。
    陳學明(民83) 西方馬克思主義的探索。台北:唐山。
    黃政傑(民80) 課程設計。台北:東華書局。
    楊深坑(民77) 理論、詮釋與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
    李錦旭譯,Blackledge,D. & Hunt,B.著(民76) 教育社會學理論。台北:桂冠。
    劉維公譯,Honneth,A.著(民81)片斷化的象徵世界 --波笛爾的文化社會學的
    省思。當代,77, 14-31頁。
    鄭明椿編譯,Gramham,N.& Williams,R.著(民81) 波笛爾的文化社會學。當代, 77,42-52頁。
    羅世宏(民81) 民意與文化的生態--波笛爾的文化社會學初探。當代77, 42-51頁。
    謝錦芳譯,Kaplan,A.著(民79) 消費影像--美國文化與文化研究中的影像與修辭。 當代,51,32-41頁。
    顧昕(民80) 烏扥邦與集權主義。當代,61, 56-65頁。
    Adorno,T.W.(1967).Sciology and Psychology:Part I.New Left Review,46.
    Adorno,T.W.(1968).Sciology and Psychology:Part II. New Left Review,47.
    Adorno,T.W.& Horkheimer(1972).Dialectic of enlightment. N.Y.:
    Seabury Press.
    Aggleton,P.(1987).Rebels without a cause? Middle class youth and
    the transition from school to work. London: Falmer.
    Alcoff,L.(1988).Cultural feminism vs. poststructuralism: The
    identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs,13(3),405-436.
    Althusser,L.(1971).Lenin and philosophy and other essays.
    ( B. Brewer trans.).New York: Monthly Review Press.
    Althusser,L.(1972).Ideology and ideological state apparatuses.
    In B.R. Cosin(Ed.),Education: Structure and Society. Haemondworth: Penguin.
    Anderson,V.(1956).Principles and procedures of curriculum
    improvement. New York: Ronald Press.
    Anyon,J.(1994).The retreat of marixism and socialist feminism:
    Postmodern and poststructural theories in educaton. Curriculum Inquiry ,24(2),
    115-133.
    Aoki,T.(1988).Toward a dialectic between the conceptual word and the
    lived world. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.402-416).
    Scottsdale. AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
    Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge.
    Apple, M.(1985). Education and Power. Boston: Routledge & Kegan
    Paul.
    Apple,M.(1981). On Analyzing Hegemony: Toward a political economy of
    curriculum. In H. Giroux, A. N. Penna, & W.F.Pinar (Eds.). Curriculum &
    Insrtuction(pp.109-123). California: McCutchan.
    Apple,M.(1992a). Education,culture,and class power: Basil Bernstein and the
    neo-Marxist sociology of education. Educational theory,42(2),127-145.
    Apple,M.(1992b,October).The text and culture politics. Educational
    Researcher,21(7),4-11.
    Apple,M.(1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a
    conservative age. N.Y.: Routledge.
    Apple,M.& Weis,L.(Eds.).(1983).Ideology and practice in schooling.
    Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    Aronowitz,S.(1987/1988).Postmodernism and Politics. Social Text,18, 94-114.
    Aronowitz,S.(1989).Working class identity and celluloid fantasy. In H. A. Giroux, & R. I. Simon,(Eds.). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life(pp.197-218). Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
    Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.A.(1985). Education under siege: The conservative,
    liberal and radical debate over schooling. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
    Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.A.(1991). Postmodern education : Politics, culture
    and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press.
    Bartky, S. L.(1988). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal
    power. In Diamond and L. Quinby(Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: reflections on
    resistance(pp. 61-86).
    Baudrillard, J.(1988).Selected writings ( M. Poster ed.). Standford: Standford
    Univeristy Press.
    Beauchamp, G.(1975). Curriculum theory. Illinois: Kagg Press.
    Beauchamp,G.(1981). Curriculum theory(4th ed.). Illinois:Peacock.
    Bell,D.(1976).The cultural contradictions of capitalism. N. Y.: Basic books.
    Best,S. & Kellner,D.(1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. London:
    Macmillan.
    Bernstein,B.(1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational
    transmissions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Bloom,B.S. et.al.(1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives : Cognitive domain.
    N. Y.: David McKay.
    Bloom,A.(1987).The closing of the American Mind. N. Y.: Simon & Schuster.
    Bobbitt,F.(1918).The Curriculum. Boston :Houghton Mifflin.
    Bourdieu,P.& Passeron,J.C.(1977a).Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage.
    Bourdieu, P.& Passeron, J.C.(1977b). Outline of theory and practice. Cambridge
    University Press.
    Bowles, S. & Gintis, H.(1976).Schooling in capitalist America. N.Y.: Basic Books.
    Boyne, R. & Rattansi, A.(eds) (1990).Postmodernism and society. London: Macmillan.
    Buckinggham.D.(1996). Critical pedagogy and media education: A theory in search of a practice. Curriculum studies, 28(6),627-650.
    Cherryholmes,C.H.(1988).Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. N.Y.:Teachers College.
    De Lauretis,T.(1984).Alice doesn't: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    De Lauretis,T.(ed.).(1986).Feminism studies/critical studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    De Lauretis, T.(1987).Technologies of gender. Bloomington:
    Indiana University Press.
    Derrida, J.(1976).Of Grammatology (G. Spivak.trans.). Baltimore:
    Jhon Hopkins University Press.
    Dewey,J.(1916).Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. N.Y.: The Macmillan .
    Doll, W. E.(1989). Foundations of a post-modern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies ,21(3).243-253.
    Doll,W.E.(1993a). Curriculum possibilities in a post-future. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,8(4),277 -292.
    Doll,W.E.(1993b) A post-modern perspective on curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,8(4),277-292.
    Ellsworth,E.(1989).Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review,59(3),297-324.
    Ellsworth,E.(1991).I pledge allegiance: The politics of reading and using educational
    films. Curiculum Inquiry,21(1), 41-64.
    Fraser,N.(1989). Unruly practices: Power,discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Fraser,N.& Nicholson,L.(1988). Social critcism without philosophy: an encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In A. Ross.(Ed), Universal abandon? the politics of postmodernism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Foucault,M.(1972).The archaeology of knowledge. ( Alan Sheridan trans.). London: Tavistock and New York:Pantheon.
    Foucault,M.(1973).The order of thing: An archaeology of human sciences. N. Y.: Vintage Books.
    Foucault,M.(1977). Language, Counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interview(.D.Bouchard ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Foucault,M.(1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. N. Y.: Vintage Books.
    Foucault,M.(1980). Power and knowledge: Selected interview and other writings(C. Gordon ed.). N. Y.: Pantheon.
    Freire, P.(1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, Middle sex, Penguin Books.
    Giroux,H.(1981a). Hegemony, resistance and the paradox of educational reform. In H.Giroux, A. N. Penna, & W.F. Pinar, (Eds.), Curriculum & Insrtuction(pp.400-430.). California: McCutchan.
    Giroux,H.(1981b).Ideology, culture & the process of schooling. Temple University Press.
    Giroux,H.(1981c). Toward a new socialogy of curriculum. In H.Giroux, A.N.Penna, & W.F. Pinar,(Eds.), Curriculum & Insrtuction(pp.98-107). California: McCutchan.
    Giroux,H.A.(1982).Critical theory and educational practice. Theory and Research
    in Social Education,9(4)pp.22-56.
    Giroux,H.A.(1983).Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the
    opposition. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
    Giroux,H.A.(1988a). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the
    modern age. London & New York:Routledge.
    Giroux.H.A.(1991a).Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism:Rethinking the Boundaries of Educational Discourse. In H.A.Giroux,(ed). Postmodernism, Feminism,
    and Cultural Politics(pp1-59). State University of New York Press.
    Giroux.H.A.(1991b). Border pedagogy in the age of postmodernism.
    In Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.A.(1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and
    social criticism (pp.114-135). University of Minnesota Press. .
    Giroux.H.A.(1992). Border crossing:Cultural workers and theculture.
    London & New York:Routledge.
    Giroux.H.A.(1994a). Disturbing pleasure: learning popular politics of education
    London & New York:Routledge.
    Giroux.H.A.(1994b). Doing cultural studies : Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review,64(3),278-308.
    Giroux,H.A.(1996). Fugitive cultures: Race, violence and youth. New York &
    London: Routledge.
    Giroux,H.A.(1997).Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and
    schooling: a critical reader. Colorado: Westview Press.
    Giroux, H.& Penna, A.(1983). Social eduaction in the classroom: The dynamics of the hidden curriculum. In H. Giroux, & Purpel , D.(Eds.). The hidden curriculum and moral education(pp.100-121). California : McCutchan.
    Giroux,H.A., Penna,A.N. & Pinar,W.F.(1981).(eds) Curriculum & Insrtuction. California: McCutchan.
    Giroux,H.A. & Shannon,P.(eds).(1997).(eds) Education and cultural studies :
    toward a performative practice. New York & London : Routledge.
    Giroux,H.A.& Simon,R.I.(1989). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. Massachusette: Bergin & Garvey.
    Gore,J.(1993).The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as
    regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
    Grumet,M.(1976). Existential and phenomenological foundations. In W. Pinar & M. Grumet(Eds.),Toward a poor curriculum(pp.31-50). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Grumet,M.R.(1981).Autobiography and reconceptualization. In H. Giroux, A. N. Penna,& W.F. Pinar, (Eds.), Curriculum & Insrtuction(pp.139-144). California: McCutchan.
    Grumet,M.R.(1988).Bitter milk: woman and teaching. Amherst ,
    MA: University of Massachusetts.
    Habermas,J. (1983).Modernity-An incomplete project. In H. Foster (ed.), The Antiaesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture(pp.3-16). Portownsend, Wash. :Bay Press.
    Hall,S. & Jeffson,T.(1976).Resistance through Rituals. London: Hutchinson & C. Haraway,D.(1989).Situated knowledge: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studues 14(3), 575-599.
    Hartsock, N.(1987).Rethinking modernism: Minority vs. majority theories.
    Cultural critique,7,187-206.
    Horkheimer, M.(1972). Critical theories. New York: Seabury Press.
    Hooks. B.(1989).Talking Back. Boston: South End Press.
    Hooks. B.(1990).Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Toronto:
    Between the Lines Press.
    Horowitz,I.(ed)(1963).Power, Politics, and People: The collected essay
    of C.Wright Mills. New York:Oxford University Press.
    Huebner,D.(1975a).Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar
    (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp.217-237). Berkeley,CA:
    McCutchan.
    Huebner,D.(1975b).Curriculumas concern for man's temporality. In W. Pinar (Ed.),Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptual ists. (pp.217-237). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
    Hunter, I.(1994).Rethinking the School. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
    Jameson, F.(1993). Postmodernism or the Culture Logic of Late Capitalism.
    Duke University Press.
    Jameson,F.(1988).Regarding Postmodrnism- a conversation with Fredric
    Jameson. In A. Ross(Ed.), Universal Abandon? Minneapolis,Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
    Jardine,D.(1987).Reflection and self-understanding in Piagetian theory: A phenomenological critique. The Journal of Educational Thought,21(1),pp.10-19.
    Jenks, C.(1993).Culture. London: Routledge.
    Johnson,R.(1967,April).Defunitions and models in curriculum theory.
    Educational Theory,17(2),pp.127-140.
    Johnson,R.(1983). Educational politics: The old and the new. In A. Wolpe
    & Donald (Eds.), Is There Anyone Here from Education. London: Pluto.
    Kaplan,C.(1987).Deterritorializations:the Rewriting of home and exile in
    Western feminist discourse. Cultural Critique ,6,.187-98.
    Kaplan,C.(ed.).(1988).Postmodernism and its discontents, theories pratices. London:Verso.
    Kanpol,B.(1991,August).Teacher group formation as emancipatory critique: Necessary conditions for teacher resistance. The Journal of Educational Thought,
    25(2),134-149.
    Kellner,D.(1988).Postmodernism as social theory: Some challenges
    and problems. Theory,Culture and Society,5 (2 and 3),239-269.
    Kincheloe, J.(1993).Toward a political politics of teacher thinking: Mapping
    the postmodern. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
    Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P. & Steinberg, S. R.(1997).Series editors'
    foreword. In H. A. Giroux(Ed.), Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope.( pp.ix-xiv)
    Colorado: Westview..
    Kliebard,H.M.(1975). Bureaucracy and curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.) ,
    Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists(pp.51-69). California: McCutchan.
    Laclau,E.(1988).Politics and the limits of modernity.In A. Ross(Ed.), Universal adandon? The Politics of Postmodernism(63-82). Minneapolis: University of
    Minnesota press.
    Laclau,E.& Mouffe,C.(1985).Hegemony and socialist strategy.
    London: Verso Books.
    Langeveld,M.(1983a). The stillness of the secret place. Phenomenology
    Pedagogy,1(1),11-17.
    Langeveld,M.(1983b). The secret place in the life of the child.
    Phenomenology Pedagogy,1(2),181-191.
    Lash,S.& Urry,J.(1987).The end of organized capitalism. Madison:
    University of Wisconsin Press.
    Lather,(1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy
    with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
    Lather,(1992). Post-critical pedagogy:A feminist reading. In C. Luke & J.
    Gore (Ed.),Feminism and Critical Pedagogies(pp.120-137). New York &
    London: Routledge.
    Lincoln,Y.S.(1992).Curriculum studies and the tradtions of inquiry : The
    Humanistic Tradition. in P. W. Jackson,(Ed.), Handbook of Reserch on
    Curriculumpp(70-97).N.Y.:Macmilan.
    Luke,C. & Gore,J.(Ed.).(1992). Feminism and critical pedagogy.
    New York & London: Routledge.
    Lyotard,J.(1984). The Postmodern Condidtion.Minneapolis:
    University of Minnesota Press.
    Mazza,K.A.(1982). Reconceptual Inquiry as a alternative mode
    of curriculum theory and pratice: A critical study. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing.4(2),pp5-89.
    Marcuse, H.(1955).Eros and civilization. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Marcuse, H.(1960).Reason and revolution. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Macurse, H.(1964).One Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Macuse,H.(1972).Counter-Revolution and revolt. Boston: BeaconPress.
    McLaren,P.(1988). Foreword: Critical theory and the meaning of hope. In
    H.A. Giroux(Ed.),Teachers As Intellectuals: Toward A Critical Pedagogy Of Learning(pp.ix-xxi). New York:Bergin & Garvey.
    McLaren,P.(1989).Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy
    in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.
    McLaren,P.(1991a).Decentering culture: Postmodernism, resistance, and critical pedagogy.In N.Wyner(Ed.),Current perspectives on the culture of schools(pp.231-257).Boston, MA: Brookline Books.
    McLaren,P.(1991b).Field relations and the discourse of the other.In
    W.Shaffir & R.Stebbins (Eds.),Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research(pp. 149-163).Newbury park,CA: Sage.
    McLaren,P.(1991c).Post-colonial pedagogy: Post-colonial desire and
    decolonized community. Education and Society,9,(2), 135-158.
    McLaren,P.& Hammer,R.(1989,Fall).Critical pedagogy and the
    postmodern challenge: Toward a critical postmodernist pedagogy of liberation.
    Educational Foundations ,pp.29-62.
    Miller,J.L.(1982).The sound of silence breaking: Feminist
    pedagogy and curriculum theory .JCT,4(1),pp.5-11.
    Mills,C.W.(1951). White collar:The American middle classes. New York:
    Oxford University Press.
    Mills,C.W.(1956).The power elite.New York:Oxford University
    Press.
    Mills,C.W.(1959).The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford
    University Press.
    Morrow,R.A.& Torres,C.A.(1995).Social theory and education: A
    critical of theories of social and cultural reproduction. State University of
    New York Press.
    Mouffe,M.(1988).Radical democracy:Modern or Postmodern?.In A.M
    Ross (Ed.), Universal Adandon? The Politics of Postmodernism(pp.31-45).
    Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press,
    Mouffe,M.(1989).Toward a radical democractic citizenship,
    Democratic Left 17(2).
    Owens,C.(1983).The discourse of others: feminists and post-
    modernism. In Foster,H.(Ed.). The Anti-aesthetic: essays on postmodern
    culture(pp.57-82).. Washington: Bay Press,
    Pagano,J.(1990).Exiles and communities : Teaching in the patriarchal
    wilderness. Albany,NY: State university of New York Press.
    Pinar, W.F.(1975).Search for a method. In W.Pinar(Ed.)
    Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists(pp.415-426). California: McCutchan.
    Pinar, W.F.(1980,Winter). The voyage out. Journal of
    Curriculum Theorizing2:1
    Pinar,W.F.(1988)."Whole, bright, deep understanding." Issues in
    qualitative research and autobiographical method. In W. Pinar. (Ed.),
    Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.134-153). Scottsdale. AZ:
    Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
    Pinar,W.F.& Grumet,M.(1976). Toward a poor curriculum.
    Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
    Pinar, W.F., & Reynolds, W.M., (1992). Understanding curriculum:
    An introducation to study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. N.Y.:Teachers College.
    Pinar, W.F., Reynolds, W.M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P.M. (1995).
    Understanding Curriculum: An introducation to study of historical and
    contemporary curriculum discourses. N.Y.:Peter Lang.
    Poster,M.(1989).Critical theory and poststructuralism.Ithaca:
    Cornell University Press.
    Rorty,R.(1985).Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity. In R
    Bernstein,ed., Habermas and Modernity(pp161-176). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Schwab,J.(1983) The pratical 4 :Something for curriculum
    professors to do.Curriculum Inquire,13 (Fall) ,239-266.
    Scott,J.W.(1988).Gender and the politics of history.New York:
    Columbia University Press.
    Silvers,R.(1984). Teaching phenomenology. Phenomenology +
    Pedagogy, 2(1),18-31.
    Simons,H.(1994). Teaching the pedagogies: a dialectical approach
    to an ideological dilemma. In H. Simons & M. Billing(eds),
    After Postmodernism: Reconstucting Ideology Critique(pp.133-149).
    London: Sage.
    Slattery, P.(1995).Curriculum development in the postmodern era.
    N.Y.: Garland.
    Smart,B.(1993).Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
    Smith,P.(1988).Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University
    of Minnesota Press.
    Smith,D.(1988). Experimental eidetics as a way of entering
    curriculum language from the group up. In W. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.437-452). Scottsdale ,AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
    Stanley,W.(1992).Curriculum for utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodern era. Albany,NY: State University of New York Press.
    Strike,K.(1989).Liberal justice and the Marxist critique of education.
    New York:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Tanner,D.&Tanner,L.N.(1981).Emancipation from research:The
    reconceptualist prescription. In H.Giroux, A.N.Penna,& W.F. Pinar, (Eds.).
    Curriculum & Insrtuction(pp.383-391).California: McCutchan.
    Tyler,R.W.(1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction.
    Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Usher, R. & Edwards, R.(1994). Postmodernism and education.
    London:Routledge.
    van Manen,M.(1988).The relation between research and pedagogy.
    In W.Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary Curriculum Discourses(pp. 437-452).
    Scottsdale. AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
    Wardekker,W.L.& Miedema,S.(1997). Critical pedagogy: An
    evaluation a direction for reformulation. Curricuum Inquiry 27(1).pp.45-61.
    Weeden,C.(1987).Feminist practice and poststructuralist
    theory.London: Blackwell.
    Weis, L.(1990). Working class without work: High school students
    in a deindustrialized economy. New York: Routledge.
    Wexler,P.(1987). Social analysis of education: After the new
    sociology. Boston,MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Whitson,J. (1988).The politics of "non-political" curriculum: Heteroglossia
    and the discourse of "choice "and "effectiveness". In W.Pinar.(Ed.),Contemporary curriculum discourses( pp.279-331) .Scottsdale.AZ:Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
    Whitty,G.(1985).Sociology and school knowledge: Curriculum
    theory, research, and politics. London:Metheun.
    Willis,P.(1981).Learning to labour.Hampshire: Gower.
    Wright,H.K.(1995).Reconceptualising pedagogy as cultural praxis.
    Education and Society,13(1),pp67-81.
    Young,M. (1971).Knowledge and control: New directions for the
    sociology of education.London: Collier-Macmillan.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE