本研究的目的為開發一個以jQuery與PHP為基礎之行動線上同儕評量系統，期望藉由網路應用程式以瀏覽器作為執行環境的特性，以及jQuery符合各平台瀏覽器解析度的優點，讓學生可以使用平板電腦進行同儕評量。本研究系統採用3-tier網路架構，以jQuery及PHP為主要開發語言，Apache伺服器做為系統的架設平台，以及MariaDB作為系統資料的存取資料庫，在系統建置完成後，並實際邀請新北市某國中29位七年級學生在平板電腦上使用本系統進行同儕評量，於學生完成同儕評量後針對系統易用性進行評估。本研究使用SUS（System Usability Scale）問卷蒐集使用者評估意見，經由29位學生評估系統易用性的結果，得知本評量系統在平板電腦上具有良好的易用性，能順利讓學生使用本系統進行同儕評量，應可應用於使用平板電腦進行學習的課程中。此外，本研究提供建議予未來開發線上同儕評量系統或擬使用本系統進行同儕評量的研究參考。

This study developed and evaluated a mobile online peer assessment system based on jQuery and PHP. The system was coded in jQuery and PHP using 3-tier architecture. The system was installed on Apache web server and used MariaDB as system database. In order to understand the usability of this system, this study invited 29 seventh-grade students to conduct a peer assessment via this system on tablet PC and evaluate the system usability by the System Usability Scale (SUS). The results suggest that this system has a good usability for students conducting peer assessment on tablet PC, and could be introduced in the courses with peer assessment. The suggestions for instructional implementations and future research are also provided.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.
Bhalerao, A., & Ward, A. (2001). Towards electronically assisted a case study.Research in Learning Technology, 9(1).
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189, 194.
Danesh, A., Inkpen, K., Lau, F., Shu, K., & Booth, K. (2001, March). GeneyTM: designing a collaborative activity for the palmTM handheld computer. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 388-395). ACM.
Dochy, F. J. R. C., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher education,24(3), 331-350.
Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment.Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175-187.
Falchikov, N. (1998). Involving students in feedback and assessment. SEDA PAPER, 9-22.
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational research, 70(3), 287-322.
Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
Farland, M. Z., Sicat, B. L., Franks, A. S., Pater, K. S., Medina, M. S., & Persky, A. M. (2013). Best Practices for Implementing Team-Based Learning in Pharmacy Education. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77(8).
Gardner, A., & Willey, K. (2011). Peer Feedback–what are students telling each other?. In Proceedings of the 39th SEFI Annual Conference (pp. 437-444).
Gartner. (2014). Gartner Says Worldwide Traditional PC, Tablet, Ultramobile and Mobile Phone Shipments On Pace to Grow 7.6 Percent in 2014. Retrieved January 7, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2645115
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 719-735.
Hanks, B., Fitzgerald, S., McCauley, R., Murphy, L., & Zander, C. (2011). Pair programming in education: a literature review. Computer Science Education,21(2), 135-173.
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing Self-and Peer-assessment: the students' views. Higher education research and development, 20(1), 53-70.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44-49.
Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N., & Ercag, E. (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers & Education, 52(2), 381-389.
Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning.
Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 95-98). IEEE.
Leung, C. H., & Chan, Y. Y. (2003, July). Mobile learning: a new paradigm in electronic learning. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2003. Proceedings. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on (pp. 76-80). IEEE.
Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Human Centered Design (pp. 94-103). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Loddington, S., Pond, K., Wilkinson, N., & Willmot, P. (2009). A case study of the development of WebPA: An online peer‐moderated marking tool. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 329-341.
Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Woehr, D. J. (2013). Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 0273475313499023.
Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275.
Magerkurth, C., & Tandler, P. (2002, September). Interactive Walls and Handheld Devices-Applications for a Smart Environment. In Collaboration with Interactive Walls and Tables, Workshop at UbiComp (Vol. 2).
McCann, K. & Kniivila, L.(2004). Michigan students use imagiprobe to gather aquatic data for the national JASON Project. Retrieved October 28, 2005 from http://www.imagiworks.com/Pages/ForTeachers/MichiganStudents.html
McConnell, D. (1999). Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 232-243.
Melograno, V. J. (1997). Integrating assessment into physical education teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(7), 34-37.
Nielsen. (2013). A computer in every classroom and a tablet in every backpack? Retrieved August 27, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2013/a-computer-in-every-classroom-and-a-tablet-in-every-backpack.html
Ohland, M., Bullard, L., Felder, R., Finelli, C., Layton, R., Loughry, M., ... & Schmucker, D. (2009). CATME and Team-Maker Tools for Teamwork.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,21(3), 239-250.
Passig, D., & Levin, H. (2000). Gender preferences for multimedia interfaces.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 64-71.
Paterson, J., Wilson, J. N., & Leimich, P. (2012). Uses of peer assessment in database teaching and learning. In Data Security and Security Data (pp. 135-146). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Pinkwart, N., Hoppe, H. U., Milrad, M., & Perez, J. (2003). Educational scenarios for cooperative use of Personal Digital Assistants. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 383-391.
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, Wireless and In-Your-Pocket Learning. Line Zine Magazin. http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
Raban, R., & Litchfield, A. (2012, October). Peer assessment in large group projects: forming professional attitudes in IT students. In Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).
Resnick, M. (1996, July). Distributed constructionism. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 280-284). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Ruiling, L., Liu, H., Ren, Z., & Allen, D. (2004). Effects of Anonymous e-Peer Feedback vs. Identifiable Member e-Peer Feedback on College Student Writing Performance. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2004, No. 1, pp. 676-680).
Saito, N. A., Ogata, H., Paredes, R. G., Yano, Y., & San Martin, G. A. (2005, November). Supporting classroom activities with the BSUL environment. InWireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2005. WMTE 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.
Searby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 371-383.
Strumpel, C. A. (2011). Peer Assessment in the Team-Based Learning Classroom (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY of BRITISH COLUMBIA).
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27.
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
Torno, W. W. (1993). Editor's note: Introduction to special issue on 360‐degree feedback. Human Resource Management, 32(2‐3), 211-219.
Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 220-230.
Venkataramanujam, V., & Larochelle, P. (2011, January). Panther Peer: A Web-Based Tool for Peer and Self Evaluation. In ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (pp. 85-91). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.