摘要
本研究旨在探討北市高職工科教師的「特教能力內涵」及「特教進修需求」，並根據研究結果，提出具體建議，做為當前高職工科教師參加特教進修之參考，同時亦可提供舉辦特教研習相關單位做研習課程方向之參考。
本研究採用調查研究法，研究資料的蒐集則以研究者透過文獻分析為理論基礎，之後編成「北市高職工科專業教師特教能力問卷調查表」，並經專家審訂之後做為研究工具。研究對象為「北市高職工科專業教師」，於民國八十九年四月間針對五十位高職工科教師進行問卷預試，隨後於民國八十九年五月間以叢集抽樣方式，抽取高職工科及特殊學校教師共計350位進行正式調查，其中有效回收問卷為247份，有效回收率為71%。蒐集所得資料經統計分析，並獲至以下主要結論：
一、 組別種類為不同「教師」、「性別」高職工科教師對「整體」特教能力需要程度意見具有顯著差異。
二、 高職工科教師對「各構面」特教能力需要程度意見具有顯著差異主要表現在「工場實習特教能力」構面上。
三、 各組之高職工科教師認為「各項」特教能力需要程度較高者為：「特殊學校」、「女性」、「具有特教經驗」以及「特教年資五年以上」教師。
四、 高職工科教師對「特教能力進修需求」意見在「最需要的特教能力」與「特教課程方向需求」上百分比不同質。
最後，本研究根據研究發現、結論及研究心得提出四點建議，期對高職工科輕度障礙的特教環境有所幫助。

Abstract
The main purpose of the study was to discuss the intention of special education competence and the need of special education further study of vocational-industrial high school teachers. Based on the result, not only could concrete suggestions be proposed for present vocational-industrial high school teachers as reference if they attend any special educational further study, also, it could be used as the guideline when more special education advanced courses were held.
The study adopted survey study. The study first conducted a literature analysis to form the necessary theoretical basis for study data collecting, and then to develop the questionnaires for use in vocational-industrial high school teachers in Taipei, which invested the abilities of special education for mild handicapped students. The questionnaires were well revised by professional experts and were used as survey tools.
As the subjects of the survey, fifty vocational-industrial high school teachers were conducted pretests of the questionnaires in April, 1999. Three hundred and fifty sampled vocational-industrial high school teachers and special education school teachers were then conducted formal invest in cluster sampling survey in May, 1999.
Of all the questionnaires, two hundred and forty-seven valid questionnaires were retrieved, and the rate of the valid retrieval was seventy percent. After statistics analysis, the collected data were analyzed and the study concluded as following:
1. different divided vocational-industrial high school teachers classified into "teacher" and "gender" appeared that, the degree of the teachers' need for whole special education were obviously different from each other
2. according to the special education abilities in structures, vocational-industrial high school teachers showed obvious discrepancy, especially in the structure of "the ability of special education work shop intern."
3. among all the divided groups, vocational-industrial high school teachers showed that the following special education abilities were especially in need: "special education school", "female", "with special education experiences", and "over-five-year special education qualification".
4. according to "the need of further study for special education abilities", vocational-industrial high school teachers gave non-homogeneity of proportions on "the most necessary special education ability" and "the need of the direction of special education courses.
At the end of the study, it proposed four suggestions according to the study discovery, conclusion, and gains , and the suggestions were expected to be helpful for vocational-industrial special education environment for mild handicapped students.

參考書目
壹、中文部分
王振德（民88）。資源教室方案。台北：心理。
內政部社會司(民80)。殘障等級。台北：編者。
江明瞱（民86）。國民中學啟智班教師專業能力運用程度之研究。
國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
何華國（民85）。啟智教育研究。台北：五南。
吳天方（民84）。殘障者技能教學工場之佈置與管理。職訓局：殘
障者職業訓練與就業輔導之理論與實務。
吳培安（民84）。國中階段智障學生「職業教育科」教師專業能力
之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育系。
李永俊（民80）。職訓局辦理殘障職業訓練概況及展望。就業與訓
練。第九卷，四期，6-10頁。
吳武典（民79）。工商企業機構對於殘障者職業訓練及就業輔導之
意見調查。職訓局。
林孟宗（民68）。特殊教育師資專業能力分析研究。國立台灣師範
大學教育研究所。
林千惠（民84）。工作分析與職業技能訓練。職訓局：殘障者職業
訓練與就業輔導之理論與實務。
茂榮書局（民83）。建築設計規則。台北：茂榮。
林宏熾（民88）。智能障礙者職業教育與訓練。台北：五南。
林坤燦（民88）。智能障礙者職業教育與訓練。台北：五南。
林清山（民81）。心理與教育統計學。台北：東華。
徐享良（民83）。特殊教育導論。台北：心理。
徐昊杲（民79）。影響高工冷凍空調科學生職業認知與職業成熟態
度基本因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學工教研究所。
洪榮照、張昇鵬（民86）。特殊教育導論。台北：心理。
教育部（民73）。特殊教育法。臺北：教育部。
教育部社教司（民81）。語言障礙、身體病弱、性格異常、行為異
常、學習障礙暨多重障礙學生鑑定標準及就學輔導原則要點。
臺（81）社字09057。
教育部（民76）。特殊教育教師登記及專業人員進用辦法。台北：
教育部。
教育部（民76）。特殊教育法施行細則。台北：正中。
教育部（民81）。我國第二次特殊兒童普查報告。臺北：教育部。
教育部（民86）。特殊教育法。臺北：教育部。
教育部（民87）。工業職業學校課程標準。台北：教育部。
郭為藩（民64）。教育治療的策略。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研
究所集刊，13輯，56頁。
馮丹白（民81）。我國智能不足者職業訓練與就業安置問題之研究。
台北市。國科會專題研究。
馮丹白（民79）。殘障職業訓練如何規劃。就業與訓練，第八卷
，四期。15-17頁。
許天威（民84）。推動殘障者職業訓練與就業安置之途徑。行政院
勞委會職訓局。
董媛卿（民83）。特殊教育的教學走向。台北：師苑。
黃禹昌（民76）。淺談殘障者職業訓練師的進修。就業與訓練，第
五卷，五期，20-23頁。
楊國樞（民74）。教育專業精神之內涵與策進。台灣教育，417期。
2-5頁。
楊朝祥（民73）。技術職業教育理論與實務。台北：三民。
蔡瑞美（民88）。回歸主流高中職身心障礙學生資源方案實施現況
及問題調查研究。國立台灣師大特教研究所。
蔡崇建（民75）。特殊教育教師職業行為之探討。特殊教育研究學
刊。第二期。53-70頁。
職訓局（民86）。職業訓練局推動身心障礙者職業訓練評鑑報告。
貳、英文部分
Adams, P. R. Quintero, M., Killoran, J., Striefel, & Frede, E.（1987）. A
review and synthesis of teacher competencies necessary for effective
mainstreaming. （ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED
290289）
Berdine, W. H., Cegelka. P. T., & Kelly, D.（1977）. Practice evaluation : A
competency based teacher education system. Education and Training of
the Mentally Retarded,12（4）, 381-385.
Calho, C. C., & Finch, A. V.,（1982）. Vocational education: concepts and
operations (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Erikson, E. H.（1982）. The life cycle completed: A review. New York:
Norton.
Ellis, E. S. Rountree, & Larkin, M. J. （1993）. Pacticing master teacher
perceptions of inclusion teacher competencies. （ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 362 491）
Gajar, A., Goodman, L., McAfee, J.（1993）. Secondary schools and beyond:
Transition of individuals with mild disabilities. New York: Macmillan.
Hallahan, D. P. & Kauffman, J. M.（1991）. Expectional children :
Introduction to special education（5th ed.）. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Haring, D. P. & McCormick, L.（1990）. Expectional children and youth : An
introduction to special education（5th ed.）. Columbus : Merrill.
Halpern, A. S.（1993）. Quality of life as a conceptual framework for
evaluating transition outcomes. Exceptional Children, 59. 486-498.
Kerk, S. A., & Gallagher, J. j.（1986）. Educating exceptional children (5th
ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lilly, s. 1980）. Personnel preparation in special Education. In L. Mann & D.
A. Sabatino（eds.）, Fourth Review of Special Education. New York:
Grune and Stratton.
Mallory, B. L.（1996）. Life-cycle transition. Exceptional Children,
62(6), 551-563.
Meers, G. D. （Ed.）. （1987）. Handbook of Vocatoal special needs
ducation. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Powers, P. J.（1992）. The effect of special education coursework upon the
preparation of preservice teachers. （ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 377 183）
Russo, T., & Stark, N. B.（1976）. Teacher certification trends. Mental
Retardation, 14（5）, 24-26.
Reston（1995）. What every special educator must know: What international
standards for the preparation and certification of special education
teachers. （ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED
387 958）
Szymanski, E. M., Hanley-Maxwell, C., & Asselin （1992）. System
interface: Vocational rehabilitation, special education, and vocational
education. In F. R. Rusch, L. DeStefano, J. Chadsey-Rusch, Phelps, L.
A., & E. Szymanski（Eds.）. Transition from school to adult life: Model,
linkages, and policy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. （1997）. Teaching mainstreamed,
Diverse, and at-risk students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wehman, P.（1992）. Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for
young people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Will, M. C.（1984）. OSERS programming for the transition of youth with
disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Programs for the
Handicapped 2(1). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.