本研究旨在探究汽車技術實作課程應用「認知學徒制」教學方法，對
學生學習歷程及學習表現的影響，並進一步提出「認知學徒制」用於技術
課程教學之建議。本研究之目的包括探討：認知學徒制教學對學生汽車技
術能力學習表現之影響、認知學徒制教學對學生汽車技術專業知識學習的
影響、學生在認知學徒制教學的學習歷程。本研究之對象計有 20位車輛專
長大學生，隨機分 派 實驗組及控制組各 10位學生，分別實施認知學徒制教學方法與傳統教學方法之實驗教學，並以 前測、後測及 深度訪談瞭解學生的學習歷程及其對認知學徒制的看法。經由資料分結果，本研究提出的結論如下：實驗組在起動系統、進氣系統、點火系統、燃油系統及整體檢修能力等方面的技術能力顯著高於控制組；汽車專業知識與檢修技術能力之關係密不可分，學生具備各元件、電路圖及各系統等專業知識者，有助於發展汽車故障檢修能力；認知學徒制之學生於講授示範、指導協助、汽車故障檢修等學習歷程中，經質性分析得到 20項主題，此 20項主題對汽車修護技能學具重要性；本研究發展一套有助於汽車技術學習的實作課程教學模式及流程，有助於技術實作課程之發展與推廣。

The study aimed to explore the effects of applying cognitive apprenticeship in automobile technology practical curriculums, and also to propose some advices of this teaching method in line with the results. The purposes of the present study included revealing the learning effects on skill performance, knowledge acquirement, and the learning processes when the participants were applying cognitive apprenticeship in automobile technology practice. Twenty college students majored in automobile technology were randomized and distributed to the experimental and control group equally. The participants took part in the automobile technology practical curriculums which executed either cognitive apprenticeship or conventional shadowing. The in-depth interview was conducted to understand their learning processes and perception. The results show that the learning outcomes of the experimental group (e.g. starting system, intake system, ignition system, fuel system, and troubleshooting) was significantly better than the control group. There are inseparable relations between the development of domain knowledge and troubleshooting ability. That is, the participants who have basic domain knowledge of components, circuit diagram, and automobile systems would help them to enhance their troubleshooting ability. The main stages of cognitive apprenticeship are lecturing, instructions, and practices. Moreover, the present study concluded 20 sub-activities based on the qualitative data. The suggested teaching models of cognitive apprenticeship in practical curriculums were developed to ensure the quality of skill learning.

中文部分
王永和（2009）。情境學習與教學研究。臺北市：國立編譯館。

方吉正、張新仁（2000）。認知學徒制在國小數學解題教學成效之究。課程與教學，3（4），49-72。

方妙如（2014）。以認知學徒制實施 Polya 解題策略教學之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣海洋大學，基隆市。

田耐青（1996）。認知學徒制及其對成人教育教學設計之啟示。臺北師院學報，9，1-18。

朱則剛（1994）。建構主義知識論與情境認知的迷思--兼論其對認知心理學的意義。教學科技與媒體，13，3-14。

朱敬先（1997）。教育心理學：教學取向。臺北市：五南。

何俊青（2004）。認知學徒制在社會領域教學之應用。教育資料與研究，60，53-61。

何彥儒（2019）。以社會認知理論及社群網絡技術建構牙體技術所認知學徒制教育訓練之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。

李建興（2018）。55.4%上班族學非所用技職學用落差高於普大。遠見。取自 https：//www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=42808

李耀宗（2012）。認知學徒制理論在國術教學上的應用。學校體育，129，101-107。

呂淑英（2012）。認知學徒制融入國中數學教學之實驗研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。

吳木崑（2009）。杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示。臺北市立教育大學學報，40，35-54。

吳和堂（1999）。國中實習教師教學反省的內容與層次之分析。教育學刊，15，143-170。

吳清山、林天祐（1999）。教育名詞：教育指標。教育資料與研究，88，145-146。

沈文寅（2010）。高職汽車科噴射引擎實習課程多媒體教學之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。

周春美（2010）。技專校院商科教師教學實務之應用分析：認知學徒制的觀點。商管科技季刊，11（2），303-313。

周春美、沈健華（2007）。認知學徒制對實習生專業社會化之研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，22，93-110。

林宜樺（2015）。行動專題合作學習能力動態評量的發展與應用（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。

韋佳伶（2015）。國中數學課進行合作學習輔以認知學徒制之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學，桃園市。

洪若烈（2007）。Vygotsky近側發展區（ZPD）的理論意涵及其在教學研究上的啟示。國立教育研究院，105，307-318。

洪圓詠（2016）。畢業生職涯規劃與修課課程推薦之資料關聯性研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。

姜宣宇（2018）。基於反思性學習的漢彌爾頓線上數學遊戲之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。靜宜大學，臺中市。

徐照麗（2000）。教學媒媒：系統化的設計與運用。臺北市：五南。

郭生玉（1985）。心理與教育研究法。臺北市：精華。

陳木金（1995）。教與學的另一種原理-認知學徒制。教育研究，45，45-52。

陳木金（2007）。問題導向學習法與反思學習法在校長學習之應用。校長的學習國際學術研討會，237-252。臺北市：國立臺北市教育大學。

陳木金、陳添丁（2006）。高中初任校長職前培育之學徒校長輔導制度的建構與探討。學校行政，41，215-230。

陳木金、吳佩陵（2013）。反思學習法在領導人才培訓的應用。反思學習法在領導人才培訓研討會。臺北市：國立政治大學。

陳聖謨（1999）。國民小學教師教學反省之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。

陳思莊（2010）。以認知學徒策略進行網路探究活動對學童問題解決能力之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南市。

陳夏蓮（2018）。認知學徒制於護理臨床實習之應用。長庚科技學刊，28，87-94。

陳國泰（2012）。協助國小數學資深專家教師運用認知學徒制促進生手教師的學科教學知識發展之協同行動研究。高雄：復文。

陳國泰（2015）。認知學徒制在九年一貫社會數學與自然領域教學之應用。國民教育學報，12，43-65。

陳國泰（2017）。善用認知學徒制提升教師專業學習社群之運作成效。臺灣教育評論月刊，6（10），35-40。

陳嘉彌（1998）。自情境教學探討徒式教育實習。教育研究資訊，6（5），21-41。

陳嘉彌（2002）。學徒式專業成長研究--學徒式教育實習可以促使教師專業成長嗎﹖教育學刊，18，135-161。

陳郁儂（2015）。合作學習結合認知學徒制對國小二年級學生數學學習成效之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學，桃園縣。

許煌珠（2020）。虛擬實境美髮與衛生技能訓練之系統設計與應用研究（未出版之博士論文）。亞洲大學，臺中市。

張春興（1996）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐（修訂版）。臺北市：東華。

張春興（2011）。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。

張新仁、邱上真、張酒雄（2003）。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北市：心理。

張菀珍（2015）。休閒農業經營者推動體驗學習歷程之探究。成人及終身教育學刊，25，79-115。

黃子榕（2014）。職前教師於STEM實作課程的知識整合行為研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

黃界堯（2008）。情境式「認知學徒制」教學策略對高職學生物理運動概念學習成效的影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。

黃鳳俞（2009）。情境學習理論在教學上的啟示。北縣教育，69，60-63。

楊忠斌（2015）。Piaget基模理論的哲學基礎-從Kant到Hegel。教育科學期刊，14（1），1-17。

蔡易芷（2005）。國民中小學師傅校長教導課程對校長專業能力之影響研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市市。

蔡居澤（2016）。戶外體驗教育：身體力行與反思的學習。童軍月刊，53（7），5-9。

蔡孟錡（2016）。認知學徒制教學策略在國中生物課程上之應用-以養分單元為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。

蔡俊彥（2009）。以認知學徒制網路論證系統促進論證能力、概念學習與批判思考成效之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。

彭巧綾（2004）。運用認知學徒制於國小數學領域補救教學之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北市師範學院，臺北市。

詹志禹（2002）。建構論：理論基礎與教育應用。臺北市：正中。

廖炳煌（2013）。能力，是探索出來的。臺北市：商業周刊。

鄭晉昌（1993）。電腦輔助學習的新教學設計觀-認知學徒制。教育資料與 圖書館學，1，55-66。

甄曉蘭（1997）。教學理論-教學原理。臺北市：師大書苑。

甄曉蘭、曾志華（1997）。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究學報，3，23-24。

鄭仰峻（2016）。職場倫理的新思維。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（6），44-47。

謝州恩（2013）。鷹架理論的發展，類型，模式與對科學教學的啟示。科學教育月刊，364，2-16。

鍾鳳香（2005）。合作學習對國小兒童閱讀表現影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。

簡淑真（1998）。建構論及其在幼兒教育上的應用。課程與教學季刊，1（3）， 61-80。

蘇郁雯（2003）。發展情境式資料處理科教材教法之教學網站－以認知學徒制為架構（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。

 
英文部分
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of reading research, 1, 353-394.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol.1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.

Berryman, S. E. (1991). Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive Apprenticeship Models. Retrieved From ERIC database.(ED 337689)

Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bodrova, E. & Leong, D. J.(1996).Tools of mind: The vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Merrill Pretice Hall.

Brandt, B. L., Farmer Jr, J. A., & Buckmaster, A. (1993). Cognitive apprenticeship approach to helping adults learn. New directions for adult and continuing education, 59, 69-78.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive science, 2(2), 155-192.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard educational review, 31, 21-32.

Bybee, R., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science For life and living: An elementary school science program From biological sciences improvement study (BSCS). The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92-98.

Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2000). Lessons From everyday reasoning in mathematics education: Realism versus meaningfulness. Theoretical Foundations of learning environments(pp.173-195). Mahwah, NJ: L.Erlbaum Associates.

Casey, C. (1996). Incorporating cognitive apprenticeship in multi-media. Etr&D-Educational technology research and development, 44(1), 71-84.

Cash, J. R., Behrmann, M. B., & Stadt, R. W. (1997). Effectiveness of cognitive apprenticeship instructional methods in college automotive technology classrooms. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34, 29-49.

Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Collins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Steinberg (Eds.), How much and how can intelligence be increased? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. (National Institute of Education Technical Report No. 403).Urbana, IL: Center For the Study of Readin.

Collins, A. Brown, J. s., & Newman, S. E.(1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction： Essays in honor of Robert Glaser(pp.453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications For reform (pp.121-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Collins, A. & Kapur, M. (2014). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Darabi, A. A. (2005). Application of cognitive apprenticeship model to a graduate course in performance systems analysis: A case study. Et r& D-educational technology research and development, 53(1), 49-61.

Duncan, J. M. (1996). State of the art: limit equilibrium and Finite-element analysis of slopes. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 122(7), 577-596.

Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child development, 38(4), 1025-
1034.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp.175-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hawkins, T. H. (2008). What is an apprentice? Education & Training, 50(1), 24-27.

Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications For classroom learning. studies in science education, 22, 1-41.

Hatano, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1999). Commentary: Alternative perspectives on
transfer and transfer studies. International Journal of educational
Research, 31(7), 645-54.

Herrington, J. (2005). Authentic learning environments in higher education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Idris, A. M. (2012). Effect of cognitive apprenticeship instructional method on
auto-mechanics students. AU Journal of Technology, 16(2), 89-98.

Jereb, J. (1996). The technical problem and Its didactic function. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED 391699)
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, and individualistic learning(5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a Framework For designing constructivist learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 47(1), 61-79.

Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2005). Small groups and shared constructions. In teaching science for understanding (pp. 261-279). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kelly, G. A. (1965). The strategy of psychological-research. Bulletin of the British psychological society, 18(59), 1-15.

Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers： Essential research For lasting reform. Journal of research in science teaching: The official journal of the national association for research in science teaching, 38(6), 631-645.

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160.

Larkins, D. B., Moore, J. C., Rubbo, L. J., & Covington, L. R. (2013). Application of the cognitive apprenticeship framework to a middle school robotics camp. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp.89-94). New York, NY: ACM.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological science, 1(4), 240-246.

Loring, R. (1998). Situated learning: Understanding contextual learning. Connections: National Tech Prep Network. Waco, TX: National Tech Prep Network center.

Lyons, K., McLaughlin, J. E., Khanova, J., & Roth, M. T. (2017). Cognitive
apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Advances
in health sciences education, 22(3), 723-739.

MacPherson, R. T. (1998). Factors affecting technological trouble shooting skills. journal of industrial teacher education, 35(4), 5-28.

Maigida, J. F. (2016). Effect of Cognitive Apprenticeship Instructional Method on Students’ achievement, Retention and Skill performance in Automobile Mechanics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Department of VTE, UNN.

Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of management journal, 35(4), 828-847.

Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2012). Collaborative learning in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(3),764-769.

McDaniel, M. A., & Schlager, M. S. (1990). Discovery learning and transfer of problem-solving skills. Cognition and instruction, 7(2), 129-159.

Mcpeck, J.E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking. New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman and hall.

Merritt, C., Daniel, M., Munzer, B. W., Nocera, M., Ross, J. C., & Santen, S. A.(2018).A cognitive apprenticeship-based faculty development intervention for emergency medicine educators. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19(1), 198–204.

Morris, N. M., & Rouse, W. B. (1985). Review and evaluation of empirical research in troubleshooting. Human Factors, 27(5), 503-530.

Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The lementary school journal, 94(3), 285-297.

Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Reflective practice For educators: Improving schooling through professional development. New bury Park CA: Corwin Press.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension Fostering and monitoring activities: Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Parker, R. E. (1985). Small-group cooperative learning-improving academic, social gains in the classroom. Nassp Bulletin, 69(479), 48-57.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.(1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning From text. The reading Teacher, 39(8), 771-777.

Piaget (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176-186.

Piaget (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York, NY: The Viking Press.

Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Pess.

Quinones, M. A. (1995). Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as Feedback. Journal of applied psychology, 80(2), 226-238.

Sharan, S. és Shachar, H.(1988). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag

Sharan, S., Shachar, H., & Levine, T. (1999). The innovative school: Organization and instruction. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

ShaFFer, D. (2002). Development psychology: Childhood and adolescence. Wadsworth CA: Belmont.

Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers & Education, 59(3), 893-906.

Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of research in science teaching: The Official journal of the national association for research in science teaching, 33(7), 799-815.

Rogoff, B. E., & Lave, J. E. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing a reflective approach. Journal of teacher education, 40(2), 22-30.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Schön, D. (1983). A.,(1983), The reflective practitioner. Pediatrics, 116(6), 1546-52.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Seezink, A., Poell, R. F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Teachers’ individual action theories about competence‐based education: the value of the cognitive apprenticeship model. Journal of vocational education and training, 61(2), 203-215.

Spindler, G. (1974). The transmission of culture. Education and cultural process Toward an anthropology of education (pp.279-310). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Simon, H. A. (1980). Cognitive science: The newest science of the artificial. Cognitive science, 4(1), 33-46.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools. Journal of social issues, 41(3), 45-62.

Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: What makes group-work work?. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp.161–178). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Smith, M. U. (1988). Toward a unified theory of problem solving: A view from biology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research, Association, New Orleans. LA.

Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility For the Field of learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 31(4), 344-364.

Stein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. Retrieved From ERIC database.(ED 418250)

Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics(pp.3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in mathematics education series: 6. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc.

Van Joolingen, W. R. (2000). Designing for collaborative discovery learning. In International Conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 202-211). Berlin: Springer.

Van Manen, M. (1991). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. Journal of curriculum studies, 23(6), 507-536.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. systems thinker, 9(5), 2-3.

Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science education, 75(1), 9-21.

Wilson, B. G., Jonassen, D. H., & Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. The ASTD handbook of instructional technology, 4, 21-21.

Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. Theoretical foundations of learning environments(pp.57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wood, C., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.