簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉懷傑
Liu, Huai-Chieh
論文名稱: 幽默類型廣告對廣告效果與組織人才吸引力之影響-以信義房屋、永慶房屋社群媒體招募廣告為例
The Impact of Humorous Advertisement on the Advertising Effectiveness and Organizational Attractiveness: The Study of Sinyi Realty and Yung Ching Realty's Social Media Advertising Recruitment
指導教授: 吳彥濬
Wu, Yen-Chun
口試委員: 黃仕斌
Huang, Shih-Ping
謝焸君
Hsieh, Ying-Jing
吳彥濬
Wu, Yen-chun
口試日期: 2023/07/14
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 72
中文關鍵詞: 幽默廣告招募廣告效果組織人才吸引力
英文關鍵詞: humorous advertisements, recruitment, advertising effectiveness, organizational attractiveness
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301618
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:169下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 國內民眾會根據興趣、所學專業、企業形象、薪資等因素作為未來選擇投入的產業、職業之評估標準。企業競爭力也來自於優秀的人力,如何提升企業在就業市場上的競爭力也相當重要。科技的進步也使企業有別於採用過往傳統招攬人才的方式,改為社群媒體進行人才招募或是拍攝有趣的短廣告。若在招募的階段以幽默型式的影音廣告方式吸引潛在應徵者,是否能提高組織之人才吸引力以提升工作求職應徵意圖與更清楚的透過廣告方式傳遞徵才資訊及企業對於這個職位所該具備的特質的期許。故本研究根據本國不動產產業企業的徵才廣告做研究,探討不同幽默類型招募廣告(情感型/認知型)與非幽默型招募廣告對於廣告效果以及組織之人才吸引力是否會有不同差異。本研究以求職者的觀點,透過問卷調查蒐集資料,以完整之實證資料探討不同幽默類型招募廣告(情感型/認知型)與非幽默型招募廣告對廣告效果和組織人才吸引力的影響與差異。
    研究結果顯示,情感型與認知型幽默招募廣告相較於非幽默型招募廣告有較佳的廣告內容知曉度,而情感型與認知型幽默招募廣告在廣告內容知曉度則無差異;情感型相較於認知型幽默招募廣告有較佳的廣告效果偏好度,而認知型相較於非幽默型招募廣告有較佳的廣告效果偏好度;情感型與認知型幽默招募廣告相較於非幽默型招募廣告有較佳的組織人才吸引力,而情感型與認知型幽默招募廣告在組織人才吸引力則無差異。本次研究在理論方面的貢獻為探討採取不同幽默類型的招募廣告對於求職者觀看後的影響;實務上期望可以提供企業未來在拍攝、製作相關招募廣告時能進行參考。

    Domestic citizens evaluate their future choice of industry and occupation based on their own interests, school majors, company image, salary, and other factors. The competitiveness of enterprises also comes from excellent human resources, and it is important to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises in the job market. The advancement of technology has also prompted enterprises to change from the traditional way of recruiting talents to the promotion of talent recruitment through social media or placed funny short advertisements. If the recruitment stage used in the form of humorous audio-visual advertisements to attract potential candidates, will it be able to increase the attractiveness of the organization's talents and enhance the intention of job applications? If we also use humor to attract potential applicants in the recruitment stage, can we increase the attractiveness of the organization to enhance the intention of job hunting and more clearly convey the recruitment information and the expectation of the enterprise on the qualities of the position through the advertisement. Therefore, this study is based on the recruitment advertisements of the real estate enterprises in Taiwan to investigate whether there are differences in the advertising effects and the attractiveness of the organization for different types of humorous recruitment advertisements.
    This study measured the effects of different kind humorous recruitment advertisements (affective/cognitive) and non-humorous on the effectiveness of the advertisements and the attractiveness of the organization from the viewpoints of the job seekers. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data to investigate the effects and differences of different humor types of recruitment advertisements (affective /cognitive) and non-humorous on advertisement effectiveness and organizational attractiveness with complete empirical data.
    The results of this study show that affective and cognitive humor recruitment ads have better content knowledge than non-humor recruitment ads, while there is no difference in content knowledge between affective and cognitive humor recruitment ads; affective humor recruitment ads have better ad effectiveness preference than cognitive humor recruitment ads, while cognitive humor recruitment ads have better ad effectiveness preference than non-humor recruitment ads; affective and cognitive humor recruitment ads have better ad effectiveness preference than non-humor recruitment ads. Affective and cognitive humor recruitment ads have better organizational attractiveness than non-humorous recruitment ads, while there is no difference in organizational attractiveness between affective and cognitive humor recruitment ads.
    The theoretical contribution of this study is to investigate the effects of adopting different types of humor in recruitment advertisements on job seekers' viewing; the practical contribution is expected to provide a reference for companies when placing recruitment advertisements in the future.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範圍與對象 5 第四節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 社群媒體招募 7 第二節 幽默廣告 9 第三節 廣告效果 12 第四節 組織人才吸引力 16 第五節 各項研究變項之關係 19 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究架構與假設 23 第二節 研究變項操作性定義與衡量 25 第三節 前測 31 第四節 研究對象與抽樣方式 34 第五節 問卷設計 35 第六節 資料分析法 37 第四章 研究結果分析 39 第一節 描述性統計分析 39 第二節 信度分析 43 第三節 操作之檢定分析 43 第四節 廣告效果與組織人才吸引力變異數分析 46 第五節 研究結果 53 第五章 結論與建議 54 第一節 研究之結果與討論 54 第二節 研究貢獻 57 第三節 研究限制與未來建議 58 參考文獻 60 附錄 68

    中文文獻
    104學習精靈 (2022年6月2號)。2022年上半年 | 4大職類 TOP 10 熱搜證照排行榜。104求職網。2023/3/15取自:https://nabi.104.com.tw/posts/nabi_post_4fe1de95-a005-4d3c-abe2-fa0e12284fb2
    王婉如 (2021年11月24號)。房市熱!不動產經紀人報考人數激增逾700人。三民輔考。2023/3/15取自:https://lurl.cc/qZ7hdW
    林宜慧 (2009)。幽默廣告對廣告效果之影響-以廣告代言人與品牌知名度為干擾變項。龍華科技大學,商學與管理學系碩士論文,桃園縣。
    林耀南、陳柏佑、林介中 (2010)。幽默廣告類型對廣告態度之影響-以比較式廣告與廣告訴求為干擾變項。萬能商學學報(15),213-231。
    林耀南、曹毓珊、林怡君 (2011)。幽默廣告類型與訊息正反性對廣告喜好度之影響-以恐懼訴求爲干擾變項。輔仁管理評論,18 (3),19-47。
    洪賢智 (2007)。廣告原理與實務。臺北市:五南書局。
    陳志豪 (2007)。個人化 DM 的廣告效果。國立中山大學,傳播管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    陳尚永 (1999)。如何判定廣告有沒有效,人力培訓專刊,4月號,頁39。
    陳佳蓓 (1999)。幽默廣告類別與廣告效果。世新大學,傳播研究所未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
    許琬琦 (2022)。Instagram 美食廣告之廣告形式,廣告訴求與標籤產品一致性對廣告效果之影響。國立臺灣師範大學,國際與社會科學學院大眾傳播與研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    黃心薇 (2012)。公司特性,品牌特性與組織吸引力關係之硏究。國立中山大學,人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    黃凌莉 (2010)。房仲業業務人員工作的敘說分析。國立中山大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    游欣融 (2012)。雇主品牌對人才吸引及留任。國立中山大學,人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    劉文良 (2010)。《網際網路行銷》。臺北:碁峰資訊。
    蔣受傑 (2011)。網路影音廣告閱聽者的動機,態度,行為與廣告效果之研究。國立中山大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    蔡維奇、黄嘉雄、顔麗真 (2008)。人力資源管理制度及其組合封組織人才吸引力之影響。臺大管理論叢,19(1),1-28。
    戴軒廷、馬恆、張紹勳 (2004)。影響網路廣告效果之相關因素。中華管理評論國際學報,7(2),1-29。
    顏溢呈 (2015)。社交媒體是否有助於企業推行整合行銷傳播-以口碑效果的觀點,國立臺南大學,經營與管理學系科技管理研究所碩士論文,臺南市。
    三、英文文獻
    Aaker, D. A. (2012). Building strong brands. Simon and Schuster. New York, United States.
    Banerjee, P., Saini, G. K., & Kalyanaram, G. (2020). The role of brands in recruitment: mediating role of employer brand equity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(2), 173-196.
    Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, California, United States.
    Barber, A. E., Wesson, M. J., Roberson, Q. M., & Taylor, M. S. (1999). A tale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personnel Psychology, 52(4), 841-868.
    Beard, F. K. (2005). One hundred years of humor in American advertising. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 54-65.
    Boulding, W., Lee, E., & Staelin, R. (1994). Mastering the mix: Do advertising, promotion, and sales force activities lead to differentiation? Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 159-172.
    Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34-51.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
    Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2001). Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (p. 115-163). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bingley, England.
    Charles, A., & Martin, B. (1983). Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers.
    Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 54-62.
    Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), 466-476.
    Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (2007). The influence of humor strength and humor—message relatedness on ad memorability: A dual process model. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 55-67.
    Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25-40.
    Collins, C. J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 685-717.
    Collins, C. J., & Stevens, C. K. (2002). The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1121.
    Coulter, K. S., & Punj, G. (1999). Influence of viewing context on the determinants of attitude toward the ad and the brand. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 47-58.
    Djambaska, A., Petrovska, I., & Bundaleska, E. (2016). Is humor advertising always effective? Parameters for effective use of humor in advertising. Journal of Management Research, 8(1), 1-19.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Ehrhart, K. H., & Ziegert, J. C. (2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations? Journal of Management, 31(6), 901-919.
    Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 37, 191-203.
    Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254-280.
    Hatch, M. J., & Erhlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), 505-526.
    Heilman, C. M., Bowman, D., & Wright, G. P. (2000). The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 139-155.
    Herman, R. E., & Gioia‐Herman, J. L. (2001). What companies do beyond the basics to retain scarce talent. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 20(3), 35-40.
    Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986-1001.
    Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.
    Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, 2, 4-39.
    Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486.
    Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59-62.
    Long, D. L., & Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 35-60.
    Madden, T. J., & Weinberger, M. G. (1984). Humor in advertising: A practitioner view. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(4), 23-29.
    Markiewicz, D. (1974). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, (Vol. 37). 407-422. Northern Illinois University. DeKalb, Illinois, United States.
    McCollum, Spielman, & Co. Inc. (1982). Focus On Funny. Topline, 3(3), 1-6.
    McGhee, P. E., & Goldstein, J. H. (1983). Handbook of Humor Research (Vol. 2). Springer. New York, United States.
    Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 796-821.
    Moon, J., Chadee, D., & Tikoo, S. (2008). Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 31-39.
    Muehling, D. D., & McCann, M. (1993). Attitude toward the ad: A review. Journal of Current Issues & Research In Advertising, 15(2), 25-58.
    NAR (2004). Research Reports. National Association Of REALTORS®. Retrieved from https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/research-reports
    O'guinn, T., Allen, C., Semenik, R. J., & Scheinbaum, A. C. (2014). Advertising and Integrated Brand Promotion. Cengage Learning. Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
    Pallister, J. G., Wang, H.-C., & Foxall, G. R. (2007). An application of the style/involvement model to financial services. Technovation, 27(1-2), 78-88.
    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81.
    Rynes, S. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. Dunnettem, & Hough, L. (Eds) , Handbook Of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.), (2), 399-444.
    Spotts, H. E., Weinberger, M. G., & Parsons, A. L. (1997). Assessing the use and impact of humor on advertising effectiveness: A contingency approach. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 17-32.
    Sandage, C. H., Fryburger, V., & Rotzoll, K. (1967). Advertising Theory and Practice. Richard D. Irwin. Homewood, Illinois, United States.
    Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659-679.
    Sharma, A. K. (2020, September 1). Meme Marketing-A Serious Business. Retrieved from https://hicentrik.com/meme-marketing-guide-memevertising-2021/
    Speck, P. S. (1987). On Humor and Humor In Advertising.(Volumes I and II). Texas Tech University. Lubbock, Texas, United States.
    Stewart, D. W., & Furse, D. H. (1986). Effective television advertising: A study of 1000 Commercials. Lexington Books. Lexington Mass, United States.
    Strick, M., Holland, R. W., Van Baaren, R., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2009). Humor in the eye tracker: Attention capture and distraction from context cues. The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 137(1), 37-48.
    Teixeira, T. S., & Stipp, H. (2013). Optimizing the Amount of Entertainment in Advertising: What's So Funny about Tracking Reactions to Humor? Journal of Advertising Research, 53(3), 286-296.
    Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
    Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2005). Recruitment‐related information sources and organizational attractiveness: Can something be done about negative publicity? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 179-187.
    Weinberger, M. G., Spotts, H., Campbell, L., & Parsons, A. L. (1995). The use and effect of humor in different advertising media. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(3), 44-57.
    Weinberg, M. G., & Gulas, C.S.(1992).The impact of humor in radio advertising: a review. Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35-39.
    Zunick, P. V., Teeny, J. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2017). Are some attitudes more self-defining than others? Assessing self-related attitude functions and their consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(8), 1136-1149.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE