摘要
本研究旨在探討高中女學生之科學家意象及其性別取向的關係，研究對象為高二自然組和社會組女學生各兩班共118人。以主題統覺測驗收集學生持有的科學家意象，並以語意分化量表分析學生之科學家、人文學家、男生、女生和自我意象間的關係。研究主要發現如下：
一、自然組與社會組女學生科學家意象的差異
（一） 對於女科學家的成功歸因而言，社會組相較自然組有較多外在不穩定不可控的歸因。
（二） 對於男科學家成功歸因而言，自然組相較社會組有較多外在穩定不可控的歸因。
二、科學家形象的性別取向與自我形象的性別取向關係
（一）在科學認同程度不同的組群中，認同科學的學生（自然組女學生），自我形象的性別維度和科學家的性別維度相符（皆具男性特質），而和人文學家的性別維度相差較多；而認同人文者（社會組女學生）自我的性別維度和人文學家的性別維度相符（皆具女性特質），而和科學家的性別維度相差較多。
（二）在性別認同程度不同的組群中，較認同女性者（女性化者），自我形象的性別維度和女生的性別維度相同（皆具女性特質），且科學家形象、人文學家形象亦皆位於女性維度；而較認同男性者（男性化者），自我的性別維度和男生的性別維度相同（皆具男性特質），而科學家形象亦位於男性維度。

An Exporation of the Relationships between High School Girls' Scientist Image and Their Gender Tendency
Su-Chiang Sue
Abstract
This study intented to investigate the relationships between high school girls' scientist image and their gender tendency. One hundred eighteen 11th graders of a girl school in Tainan were sampled as participants, they are ethier science or non-science majors.The Thematic Apperception Test was employed to investigate the scientist images they held, and "the semantic differential scale" was applied to analyze the relationships among students' images of scientists, literature writers, boys, girls, and self:
Our major findings are listed as the follows:
1. There are differences of scientist image between science majors group and non-science majors group. As for the attributions for success of female scientists, non-science majors group tends to have external, uncontrollable and unstable attributions.
2. The relationships between gender tendency and their images of scientist and self be stated as the follows:
(1) For science major girl, their gender identity is similar with that of scientist, which is somehow masculine and different from that of literature writhers. For non-science major girl student, their self gender identity is just on the other way around.
(2) For those students who are more feminine, the gender characteristics of self image is the same as that of girls, and also the images of scientists and literature writers tends to be more feminine. For those with more masculine identity, the result is just the opposite of this.

中文部分：
林邦傑（1991）：性別角色與自我防衛、生活適應、認知能力的關係。中華心理學刊，23，2，107-129。
佘曉清（1999）：影響我國中小學學生科學家印象因素之綜論。教育研究資訊，7(2)，47-60。
李美枝（1993）：社會心理學－－理論研究與應用。臺北。大洋出版社。
吳曲輝等譯(J. H. Turner著)（1992）。社會學理論的結構。臺北。桂冠圖書公司。
莊嘉坤（1999）：國小學童科學與科學家意象之分析研究。屏東師院學報，第12期，37-64。
郭重吉、蔣佳玲（1995）：評析學生對科學家的形象之相關研究。科學教育月刊，第179期，2-14。
黃孝宗（2000）：高雄縣大寮國小學童科學家意象之研究。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
游恆山編譯(P. G. Zimbardo著)（1989）：心理學。臺北。五南圖書。
張春興（1994）：教育心裡學。台灣東華書局。
張惠博等（2000）：國中學生對於科學與科學家的認識之研究。教育研究資訊，8(5)，136-152。
楊文金（1998a）：從「社會認同」探討「科學家意象」的意義。科學教育月刊，第206期，3-10。
楊文金（1998b）：從「社會認同」探討「科學家意象」的意義(續)。科學教育月刊，第207期，18-24。
蔣佳玲（1994）：「我心目中的科學家」----國小學童所持有的科學家的形象。第十屆科學教育學術研討會彙編，師大。
蔣佳玲（1995）：從符號互動論的觀點探討國小學生科學家形象的建構。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
鍾孟蓉（2001）：實驗室組內的性別刻板印象。第十七屆科學教育學術研討會，高雄。
楊龍立（1996）：男女學生科學差異的評析。台北。景文。
英文部分：
Aronson, E.; Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M.(1995).Social Psychology. HarperCollin College Publishers.
Augoustino, M. & Walker, I.(1995). Social Cognition:An Integrated Introduction. London: SAGE.
Barman, C. ( 1996 ) . How do students really view science and scientist? Science and Children, 34 (1), 30-33.
Barman, C. ( 1997 ) . Students' views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35 (1) , 18-24.
Barman, C. ( 1999 ) . Completing the study: high school students' views of scientists and science. Science and Children, 36 (8) , 16-21.
Bem, S. L.(1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of personality and social psychology, 31(4), 634-643.
Beardslee, D. C. & O’Dowd, D. D. (1961). The college-student image of the scientist. Science, 133, 997-1001.
Burr, V.(1995).An Introduction to Social Constructionism.London and New York.
Boylan, C. R., Hill, D. M., Wallace, A. R. & Wheeler, A. E.(1992). Beyond stereotypes. Science education, 76(5), 465-476.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist：The-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265.
Duschl, R. A. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72(1), 51-62.
Dorkins, H. ( 1977 ) . Sixth forms attitudes to science. New Scientists, 75, 523-524.
Festinger, L.,Schachter, S.,& Back, K.(1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factor in housing. New York:Harper &Bros.
Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, R. L. ( 1995 ) . Development of a field test of a checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95 (4), 195-205.
Flick, L. (1990). Scientist in residence program improving children's image of
science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 204-214.
Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989) . How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26 (8) , 8-13.
Gagne, E. D.; Yekovich,C. W. & Yekovich, F. R.(1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning.Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Gordon, D. (1984). The image of science, technological consciousness, and the
hidden curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(4), 367-400.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum.
Science Education, 72(1), 1940.
Head, J. (1985). The Personal Response to Science. NY：Cambridge University Press.
Hill, D. & Wheeler, A. (1991). Towards a clearer understanding of student’s ideas about science and technology：An exploratory study. Research in Science & Technological Education, 9(2), 125-137.
Hills, P. & Shallis, M. (1975). Scientists and their images. New Scientist, 28, 471-475.
Kahle, J. B. (1989). Images of scientists: Gender issues in science classroom. In B. J. Fraser (Ed.). Research Implications for Science and Mathematics Teachers, Vol. 1. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Kelly, A. (Ed.)(1987). Science for girls? Milton, Keynes, Open University Press.
Gordon, D. (1984). The image of science, technological consciousness, and the
hidden curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(4), 367-400.
Gottfredson, L. S.(1981).Circumspection and compromise:a developmental theory of occupational aspiration . Journal of counseling psychology,28,545-579.
Krajkovich, J. G. & Smith, J. K. (1982). The development of the image of science and scientists scale. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 39-44.
Maoldomhnaigh, M. O. & Hunt, A. (1988). Some affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(2), 159-165.
Mason, C.L., Kahle, J.B., & Gardner, A. L.(1991). Draw-A-Scientist Test: Future implications. School Science andMathematics, 91(5), 193-198.
Maugh, T. H. (1978). The media: The image of the scientist is bad. Science, 200, 4337.
Markus, H.(1997).Self-schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of Personality And Social Phychology,35,63-78.
Mead, M., & Mertraux, R. (1957). Image of the Scientist among High-School Students. Science, 126, 384-390.
Moore, P. ( 1957 ) . Science and Fiction. London: Harrap.
Newton, L. D. and Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children’s conceptions of science and the scientist：is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype？International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1137-1149.
Parsons E. C. (1997). Black High School Females’ Images of the Scientist：Expression of Culture. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 34(7), 745-768.
Rae, I. D. (1982). Dustcoats in dustjackets. Chemistry in Australia, 49(4), 162-165.
Rampal, A. (1992). Images of science and scientists: A study of school teachers'
views. I. Characteristics of scientists. Science Education, 76(4), 415-436.
Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of Scientists：A Comparison of Biology and Liberal Studies Majors. School Science and Mathematics, 94(4), 212-216.
Russell, T. & Munby, H. (1989). Science as a discipline, science as seen by students and teachers' profession knowledge. In R. Millar(Ed.), Doing Science: Images of Science in Science Education. New Tork: The Falmer Press.
Schibeci, R. A. & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14-20.
She, H. C. ( 1995 ) . Elementary and Middle School Students' Perception of Science, Scientists, and Their Work. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. Repub. China, Part D :Mathematics, science,and technology Education 5 (1), 19-28.
She, H. C. (1998) . Gender and Grade Level Differences in Taiwan Students'
Stereotypes of Science and Scientists. Research in Science & Technological
Education, 16 (2) , 125-135.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and a second look.London：Cambridge University Press.（林志成、劉藍玉譯，2000，貓頭鷹出版社）
Song, J. & Kim, K. S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists:the images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977.