研究生: |
蘇景儀 Su, Ching-Yi |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中特殊教育教師自我效能及教學行為之關係研究—兼探討組織氣氛的中介效果 Relationships between Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teaching Behavior of Special Education Teachers in Junior High School – Organizational Climate as a Mediation Variable |
指導教授: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong |
口試委員: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong 佘永吉 Sher, Yung-ji 林燕玲 Lin, Yen-Ling |
口試日期: | 2024/01/05 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 123 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教師自我效能 、教學行為 、組織氣氛 |
英文關鍵詞: | teacher self-efficacy, teaching behaviors, organizational climate |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400113 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:166 下載:30 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討新北市立國民中學特殊教育教師自我效能及教學行為之關係,並探討組織氣氛的中介效果。研究方法採問卷調查法,研究對象為新北市立國民中學特殊教育教師共收回198份有效問卷。問卷資料透過SPSS23.0進行描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關及SPSS外掛PROCESS Model4處理中介效果等統計方法進行分析,得到以下結論:
一、新北市國中特殊教育教師在自我效能有中度以上的傾向,五個向度中,平均得分由高到低為「班級經營」、「自我成長」、「有效教學」、「資源整合」及「外在影響」。
二、新北市國中特殊教育教師在教學行為有中度以上的傾向,三個向度平均得分由高到低為「教學準備」、「教學活動」及「教學回饋」。
三、新北市國中特殊教育教師在組織氣氛有中度以上的傾向,六個向度平均得分由高到低為「教師同儕行為、「教師承諾行為」、「校長支持行為」、「校長指示行為」、「教師疏離行為」及「校長限制行為」。
四、不同教育背景的國中特殊教育教師在教學行為有顯著差異;不同教學年資、職務、任教學校規模以及任教學校區域的國中特殊教育教師在組織氣氛有顯著差異。
五、國中特殊教育教師的教師自我效能與其教學行為具高度正相關。
六、學校組織氣氛對教師自我效能及教學行為具有部分中介效果。
最後依據研究結果,提供相關權責單位、學校、教師及未來研究者給予具體的建議。
The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between self-efficacy and teaching behavior of special education teachers in New Taipei municipal junior high schools, and investigate the mediating effect of organizational climates. Using the questionnaire survey method, this study obtained 198 valid questionnaires from special education teachers in New Taipei municipal junior high schools. The data was using the statistical package software, SPPS23.0 for descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, and the PROCESS Model4 method. The conclusions of the study were as follows:
1.Special education teachers in New Taipei municipal junior high school tend to have a moderate to high tendency in self-efficacy. “Classroom Management” was the dimension with the highest average scores, followed by “Self-Growth”, “Effective Teaching”, “Resource Integration”, and “External Influence”.
2.Special education teachers in New Taipei municipal junior high school tend to have a moderate to high tendency in teaching behavior. “Teaching preparation” was the dimension with the highest average scores, followed by “Teaching activities”, and “Teaching feedback”.
3.Special education teachers in New Taipei municipal junior high school tend to have a moderate to high tendency in the category of organizational climate. “Teacher Collegial Behavior” was the dimension with the highest average scores, followed by “Teacher Commitment Behavior”, “Principal Supportive Behavior”, “Principal Directive Behavior”, “Teacher Disengaged Behavior”, and “Principal Restrictive Behavior”.
4.There are significant differences in the teaching behavior of junior high school special education teachers with different educational backgrounds. And there are significant differences in the organizational climate of junior high school special education teachers with different teaching experience, positions, school sizes, and teaching school regions.
5.There is a direct correlation between the self-efficacy of junior high school special education teachers and their teaching behavior.
6. School organizational climate has a partial mediating effect on teachers’ self-efficacy and teaching behavior.
Finally, based the research results, specific recommendations and guidance for the relevant authorities, schools, teachers, and future researchers.
中文文獻
何千綺(2013)。臺南市國中小特教教師專業發展與教學效能之相關研究。﹝碩士論文。南台科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3pjcnt
何明奮(2017)。高雄市完全中學教師工作壓力對兼任行政職務意願影響之研究-以學校組織氣氛之個人認知為調節變項。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/85t6r9。
何素華(2001)。在融合的教育環境中如何設計課程。融合教育論文集,133-160。
吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。高等教育。
吳清山、黃美芳和徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。高等教育。
林生傳(1988)。新教學理論與策略。五南。
林呈隆(2018)。新北市高級中學校長領導力與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/94vnv5
林秋榮(2007)。特殊教育教師自我效能與教學行為之研究。﹝博士論文。國立彰化師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
林進財(1999)。教學研究與發展。五南。
林錦伶(2015)。臺南市特殊教育教師知覺特教評鑑與教學效能之研究。﹝碩士論文。南台科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q4937k
邱從益(2005)。組織氣氛與學校經營。學校行政,(36),71-86。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200503.0071
洪宏蔚(2009)。澎湖縣國小教師數學學習領域有效教學行為、自我效能及教學效能相關之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4rxzye
洪怡婷(2014)。國中教師自我效能感與身心障礙學生學習成果關係之研究:以特殊教育長期追蹤資料庫為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/924prj
洪秋玲(2002)。國民小學學校組織氣氛之評量研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2nf545
洪雪卿(2004)。優質學校營造之研究--以教師效能為主。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yhv37j。
洪惠娟(2014)。學校組織氣氛、教師自我效能與教師創新行為關係之研究—以高雄市立國民中學為例。﹝碩士論文。正修科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c5tk54
胡心慈(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要與特殊教育。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,(2019),1-7。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=a0000110-201911-201912050009-201912050009-1-7
胡心慈、張育琳(2019)。攜手同行:建構特教初任教師導入方案之旅。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),53-80。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0003
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-152。
秦夢群(1997)。教育行政。五南。
秦夢群(2007)。教育行政—理論部分。五南。
秦夢群(2011)。臺灣校長專業領導能力培育制度之分析研究。教育行政研究, 1(1),97-126。
國民教育法施行細則(民國105年7月1日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070008
特殊教育法(民國 112 年 06 月 21 日)修正公布。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080027
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
張俊紳(1997)。國民小學教師教學效能之研究—不同教學效能信念類型教師的教學表現及其教學生產力。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4k9852
張春興(1997)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實際。東華。
張春興(2001)。教育心理學。東華。
張美婷(2014)。教師幸福感與教學效能關係之研究-以桃園縣私立國中小學為例。﹝碩士論文。中原大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q55m3a
張德銳(1996)。國小教師成績考核系統之研究。教育研究資訊,4(5),89-99。
許曼珊(2014)。教保員工作特性、組織氣氛與工作滿意度之相關研究 ─以新北市、臺中市、高雄市公立國小附設幼兒園為例。﹝碩士論文。朝陽科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ars4z3
郭峰偉(2000)。國中教師工作壓力與教師效能關係之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vd34b7
陳怡廷(2022)。南部地區國小特殊教育教師人格特質、壓力因應與教學效能之現況與相關。﹝碩士論文。國立屏東大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d79a3m。
陳怡蓁(2010)。從組織氣氛分析校長與教師對校長領導行為的知覺、差異與回應—以一所小學為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5dbpsw
陳姿吟(2012)。臺北市國中校長服務領導與學校組織氣氛、學校效能關係之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/e8vp8x
陳昱宣(2013)。宜蘭縣國民中學學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5qanx8
陳堅志(2021)。國民小學組織氣氛與教師自我效能及教學實踐關係之研究:以TALIS 2018調查資料為主。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6sy45d
彭琪莉(2018)。教師人格特質、學校組織氣氛、專業認同與自我效能關係之研究—以新北市立國小為例。﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2ezv24
鈕文英(2021)。研究方法與設計─量化、質性與混合方法取向(第三版)。雙葉書廊。
黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政學。東華。
黃識勳(2013)。國民小學教師人格特質、學校組織氣氛與專業學習社群關係之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p7ken8
葉金裕(2001)。教師有效教學行為之探討。國立編譯館通訊,14(4),15-22。
葉金裕(2002)。國民小學教師有效教學行為之研究-以澎湖地區國小教師為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xpdghy。
潘杏宜(2016)。初任特殊教育教師導入輔導需求之研究。﹝碩士論文。中原大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3a85yf。
蔡培村(1985)。台灣地區國民中小學學校組織行為之比較研究。﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/95csqg
戴志璁、洪惠娟、張美瑤、陳信宏(2019)。學校組織氣氛與教師自我效能關係之研究-以高雄市立國民中學為例。Journal of Data Analysis,14(1),49-72。https://doi.org/10.6338/JDA.201902_14(1).0004
鍾文緣(2011)。屏東縣國民小學校長教學領導與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。﹝博士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fg6f6k
顏志龍、鄭中平(2019)。給論文寫作者的統計指南:傻瓜也會跑統計I(第三版)。五南。
鄭怡君、蔡俊傑(2016)。Bootstrap中介效果結構方程模式分析。體育學系系刊,(15),102-114。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000434-201608-201612060011-201612060011-102-114
英文文獻
Button, S.B., Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M. (1996) Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063"
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education,35(5), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500507
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concepual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Billingsley, B. S., Griffin, C. C., Smith, S. J., Kamman, M., & Israel, M. (2009). A Review of Teacher Induction in Special Education: Research, Practice, and Technology Solutions. NCIIP Document Number RS-1.National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development.
Brunsting, N. C., Sreckovic, M. A., & Lane, K. L. (2014). Special education teacher burnout: A Synthesis of Research from 1979 to 2013. Education & Treatment of Children, 37(4), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0032
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Study at the School Level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
Croll, P., & Moses, D. (1985). Some aspects of classroom behavior and interactions of slow learning pupils in the junior school. Understanding Learning Disabilities: International and Multidisciplinary Views, 145-150.
Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 3-10.
Dembo M. H., & Gibson S. (1985). Teachers' sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 173–184.
Englert, C. S. (1983). Measuring Special Education Teacher Effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 50(3), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298305000308
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
Good, T. L., Cooper, H. M., & Blakey, S. L. (1980). Classroom interaction as a function of teacher expectations, student sex, and time of year. Journal of educational Psychology, 72(3), 378.
Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders' literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/665816
Guskey, T. R. (1982). Differences in teachers' perceptions of personal control of positive versus negative student learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7(1), 70-80.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
Hall, B. W., Pearson, L. C., & Carroll, D. (1992). Teachers' long-range teaching plans: A discriminant analysis. The Journal of educational research, 221-225.
Halpin, W. and Croft, D.(1962). The Organizational Climate of School. D.C. Office of Education.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O., & Brissie, J. S. (1987). Parent involvement: Contribution of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 417-435.
Hoy, W. K., & Clover, S. I. R. (1986). Elementary School Climate: A Revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X86022001007
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, G. G. (1987). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. Random House Trade.
Kirsch, I. (1982). Efficacy expectations or response predictions: The meaning of efficacy ratings as a function of task characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 132.
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
McCormick, W. J. (1979). Teachers Can Learn to Teach More Effectively. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 59-60.
Newmann, F.M., Rutter, R.A. & Smith, M.S. (1989) Organizational Factors That Affect School Sense of Efficacy, Community, and Expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112828
Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers' beliefs in their control over student outcome. The journal of educational research, 185-190.
Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51–65. doi:10.2307/1495395
Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 385-400. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00046-M
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Expanding conceptions of inquiry and practice in supervision and evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(4), 355-365.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, M. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611-625. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
Sweigart, C. A., & Collins, L. W. (2017). Supporting the needs of beginning special education teachers and their students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(4), 209-212. doi:10.1177/0040059917695264
Tatem, M. G. (2004). Experience/training with autistic spectrum disorder children and teacher efficacy beliefs. Hofstra University. https://0-www.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/dissertations-theses/experience-training-with-autistic-spectrum/docview/305197259/se-2
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 783-805.
Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Davis, H. (2005). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and adolescent achievement. Adolescence and education, 5, 117-137.