研究生: |
彭慧芳 Hui-Fang Peng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
愛特伍《浮出水面》與《末世男女》中的加拿大主題 Margaret Atwood’s Canadian Motifs as Presented in Surfacing and Oryx and Crake |
指導教授: |
田維新
Tien, Wei-Hsin |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 201 |
中文關鍵詞: | 愛特伍的加拿大主題 、受迫處境與態度分析 、非二元思維 、生態與泛神論觀點 、國家與政治議題 、藝術家與社會文化關係 |
英文關鍵詞: | Atwood’s Canadian motifs, victim positions and mentality, non-binary conceptualization, ecological and pantheist concerns, nationalist and political attitudes, artist and socio-cultural dimensions |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:167 下載:3 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文以探討愛特伍在《生存》(Survival) 一書中提出的加拿大主題為出發,擴大至其思想論述中的相關主題,以試圖拼湊出愛特伍思想系統之基石,並以此思想網絡為理論來閱讀愛特伍的兩本小說《浮出水面》 (Surfacing) 與《末世男女》(Oryx and Crake)。理論論述的基礎除了建立在《生存》(Survival) 一書中的分析之外還包括愛特伍在其他非文學作品的專書、專文、與訪談中的重要看法。
論文共分五章。第一章簡介愛特伍其人與其加拿大的成長背景,強調其幼時家庭教育強調的嚴謹科學觀察態度與其廣泛人文興趣與關懷的養成之間有密不可分的關係。本章並簡要指出其在美國就學的經驗啟發了其民族意識,並進一步促成她對加拿大文學與民族特質上的分析探討。此外,本章也就其在《生存》一書中的主要論述、研究方法與特質、和論述目的加以介紹。最後並概略介紹本論文的研究方法與章節安排。
第二章以愛特伍的生態與泛神論觀點為主軸,從加拿大早期的拓墾主題到其泛神論中呈現的非二元關係的思想觀,進一步談到愛特伍對宗教、真實、虛構與科學等議題之間的密切關係之觀察與看法。
第三章主要關切愛特伍的國家意識與政治態度等相關議題。全章由愛特伍對美加文學中的動物故事之分析開始,探討美加兩國民族特質之不同與形成差異的不同歷史背景等。此章並進一步分析愛特伍主張的文化國家論述中的政治態度,與其對女性主義、神權政治、與無神論的相關看法與態度。
第四章以愛特伍對社會文化和藝術家之間的密切關係為出發,探討在1970以前,呈現在加拿大文學中的老中青三代家庭意象裡充滿約制與逃脫的張力此一現象。老一代的嚴謹清教徒思維成為早期加拿大社會的共同潛意識,抑制文化與創造力的發展。愛特伍的分析強調已有第三代作家試著用呈現自身的問題與處境來揭露文化與殖民的壓迫現象,藉以喚醒民眾自覺。本章並對愛特伍對存在於藝術與社會責任間的張力,商業市場對藝術家的一些誘惑與挑戰等相關看法加以探討。
在第二章到第四章的論述安排上,作者在介紹完理論部分後將就愛特伍的兩本小說加以討論。 論文最後一章對愛特伍的人文觀點與特質提出進一步的探討。此外,作者以《末世男女》中的例子來說明愛特伍文本中的一些看似矛盾的複雜現象,可以在對愛特伍的思想有大略的整體領會之後獲得進一步的理解與澄清。
This study starts from a thesis that Margaret Atwood is a serious thinker whose writing reflects the imprints of her Canadian background and her general outlook toward life and the world. Further, her analysis of Canadian thematic motifs in Survival can serve as a starting point for us to approach her mind as a general whole which contributes to better comprehending her novels. The theoretical part of this study comprises Atwood’s important ideas presented not only in Survival but also in her other nonfiction books, articles, and interviews.
There are five chapters in this dissertation. Chapter One provides a general profile of Atwood, the major ideas, methodology, characteristics, and objectives of her analyses in Survival, and then briefly explains the arrangement of major arguments in the following chapters. Chapter Two focuses on Atwood’s ecological and pantheist concerns. It starts from the Canadian settlement theme and the non-binary mentality in Atwood’s pantheism. The author then extends the discussion to relevant topics such as the close relations among religion, truth/reality, science, and fiction.
Chapter Three centers on Atwood’s nationalist concerns and her overall political attitudes. My discussion starts from Atwood’s analyses of typical American and Canadian mindsets as reflected in animal stories and of the historical aspects of the formation of these two mindsets. This chapter also explores Atwood’s subtle political attitudes in her cultural nationalism, as well as toward feminism, theocracy, and atheism.
Chapter Four orients around Atwood’s socio-cultural concerns in relation to victimization and the role of the artist in particular. It begins with her analysis of the Canadian motifs family-as-trap and the paralyzed artist, and her exploration on the causes of the entrapment/paralysis. Atwood’s analysis accentuates the political significance of writing as a social means for consciousness-raising. The author then discusses Atwood’s more sophisticated speculations on the tension between writing/art and social responsibility, and on the temptations from the market which could threaten the artist’s survival and challenge his conscience.
In each of the three main chapters, after illustrating the theoretical part, the author reads Atwood’s Surfacing and Oryx and Crake within the theoretic framework to demonstrate their close connections. The last chapter (Chapter Five) of this study proposes some further speculations on Atwood’s humanism. The major objective is to distinguish her humanism, especially her pantheism, from some major traits in English Romanticism and American Transcendentalism to foreground its uniqueness and the influence of her Canadian background. After that, the author cites some examples from Oryx and Crake to demonstrate the belief that to grasp Atwood’s main ideas as a theoretical system can contribute to better comprehending not only her mind as a whole but also some textual complexities in her literary presentations.
Atwood, Margaret. “Amnesty International: An Address.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 393-97.
---. Bodily Harm. NY, Toronto, London, Sydney and Auckland: Anchor, 1981/1998.
---. “Canadian-American Relations: Surviving the Eighties.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 371-92.
---. Cat’s Eye. Toronto: Seal, 1988/1999.
---. The Edible Woman. Toronto: Seal, 1969/1998.
---. “Eleven Years of Alphabet.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 90-96.
---. “An End to Audience.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 334-57.
---. The Handmaid’s Tale. NY: Anchor, 1986/1998.
---. “The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake in Context.” PMLA 119.3 (May 2004): 513-17.
---. Interview. 12 November 2008. <http://www.randomhouse.com/features/atwood/ interview.html>.
---. Interview with Jo Brans. “Using What You’re Given.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 140-151.
---. Interview with Eleanor Case and Maggie McDonald. “Life After Man.” New Scientist 178.2393 (3 May 2003): 40-43. <http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/ opintreview.jsp ?id=ns23931>.
---. Interview with Kathryn Crabbe and Gregory Fitz Gerald. “Evading the Pigeonholers.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 131-39.
---. Interview with Jim Davidson. “Where Were You When I Really Needed You.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 86-98.
---. Interview with Danita J. Dodson. “An Interview with Margaret Atwood.” Critique 38.2 (1997): 96-104.
---. Interview with Irene D’Souza. “Margaret Atwood.” Horizon 17.4 (Spring 2004): 16-21.
---. Interview with Graeme Gibson. “Dissecting the Way a Writer Works.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 3-19.
---. Interview with Mary Ellis Gibson. “Thinking About the Technique of Skiing.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 33-39.
---. Interview with Karla Hammond. “Articulating the Mute.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 109-20.
---. Interview with Karla Hammond. “Defying Distinctions.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 99-108.
---. Interview with Geoff Hancock. “Tightrope-Walking Over Niagara Falls.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 191-220.
---. Interview with Bonnie Lyons. “Using Other People’s Dreadful Childhoods.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 221-33.
---. Interview with Elizabeth Meese. “The Empress Has No Clothes.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 177-90.
---. Interview with Beatrice Mendez-Egle. “Witness Is What You Must Bear.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 162-70.
---. Interview with Bill Moyers. On Faith & Reason. Public Broadcasting Service. 28 July 2006. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/video/flv/generic.html?s=moyj06sf17q608>.
---. Interview with Joyce Carol Oates. “Dancing on the Edge of the Precipice.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 74-85.
---. Interview with Catherine Sheldrik Ross and Cory Bieman Davies. “More Room for Play.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 152–61.
---. Interview with Linda Sandler. “A Question of Metamorphosis.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 40-57.
---. Interview with Alan Twigg. “Just Looking at Things That Are There.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 121-30.
---. Interview with Sue Walker. “Managing Time for Writing.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations. Ed. Earl G. Ingersoll. London: Virago, 1992. 171-76.
---. Lady Oracle. NY, Toronto, London, Sydney and Auckland: Bantam, 1976/1996.
---. Life Before Man. NY, Toronto, London, Sydney and Auckland: Anchor, 1979/1998.
---. “Mathews and Misrepresentation.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 129-50.
---. “Midnight Birds: Stories of Contemporary Black Women Writers.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 358-62.
---. Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
---. Oryx and Crake. NY: Nan A. Talese, 2003.
---. The Robber Bride. London: Virago, 1993/2002.
---. Surfacing. NY, Toronto, London, Sydney and Auckland: Anchor, 1972/1998.
---. Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. Toronto: Anansi, 1972.
---. “Survival, Then and Now.” Maclean’s 112.26 (1999): 54-8.
---. “Travels Back.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 107-13.
---. “Writing Oryx and Crake.” Writing with Intent: Essays, Reviews, PersonalProse-- 1983-2005. NY: Carroll & Graf, 2005. 284-6.
---. “Writing the Male Character.” Second Words: Selected Critical Prose. Toronto: Anansi, 1982. 412-32.
Atwood, Margaret and Victor-Lévy Beaulieu. Two Solicitudes: Conversations. Trans. Phyllis Aronoff and Howard Scott. Toronto: M&S, 1998.
Baym, Nina, et al., eds. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. Second Edition. NY: W. W. Norton & Company, c 1985.
Beran, Carol L. “Strangers within the Gates: Margaret Atwood’s Wilderness Tips.” Margaret Atwood’s Textual Assassinations. Ed. Sharon Rose Wilson. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2003. 74-87.
Bethune, Brian. “Atwood Apocalyptic.” Maclean’s 116.17 (28 Apr. 2003): 44-48.
Bouson, J. Brooks. Brutal Choreographies: Oppositional Strategies and Narrative Design in the Novels of Margaret Atwood. Amherst: Massachusetts UP, 1993.
---. “‘It’s Game Over Forever’: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” Journal of Commonwealth Literature 39.3 (2004): 139-56.
Castro, Jan Garden and Kathryn VanSpanckeren, ed. Margaret Atwood: Vision and Forms. Carbondale, Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP, 1988.
Cooke, Nathalie. Margaret Atwood: A Biography. ON: ECW, 1998.
---. Margaret Atwood: A Critical Companion. London: Greenwood, 2004.
Cuder, Pilar. Margaret Atwood: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2003.
Davis, Roger. “A White Illusion of a Man: Snowman, Survival, and Speculation in Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” 12 October 2007. <http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/ ati/Monsters/M5/s12.html>.
Day, Martin S. A Handbook of American Literature: A Comprehensive Study from Colonial Times to the Present Day. 1975. Queensland: U of Queensland P; Taiwan: Bookman, 1984/1997.
---. History of English Literature: to 1660. 1963. NY: Doubleday; Taiwan: Bookman, 1987/2002.
---. History of English literature: 1660-1837. 1963. NY: Doubleday; Taiwan: Bookman, 1987/2004.
---. History of English literature: 1837 to the Present. 1963. NY: Doubleday; Taiwan: Bookman, 1987/2004.
Devine, Maureen. Woman and Nature: Literary Reconceptualizations. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1992.
DiMarco, Danette. “Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained: Home Faber and the Makings of a New Beginning in Oryx and Crake.” Papers on Language and Literature 41.2 (Spring 2005): 170-95.
Dunning, Stephen. “Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake: The Terror of the Therapeutic.” Canadian Literature. 186 (2005): 86-101.
Freud, Sigmund. Ed. Peter Gay. NY and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.
Frazer, James G. The New Golden Bough. A new abridgment of the classic work, edited with notes and foreword by Theodor H. Gaster. New York: Criterion Books, 1959.
Goetsch, Paul. “Margaret Atwood: A Canadian Nationalist.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 166-79.
Hatch, Ronald B. “Margaret Atwood, the Land, and Ecology.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 180-201.
Hengen, Shannon. “Margaret Atwood and Environmentalism.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 72-85.
---. “Strange Visions: Atwood’s Interlunar and Technopoetics.” Margaret Atwood’s Textual Assassinations. Ed. Sharon Rose Wilson. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2003. 42-53.
Hönnighausen, Lothar. “Margaret Atwood’s Poetry 1966-1995.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 97-119.
Howells, Carol Ann. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 161-75.
---. “The Robber Bride; or, Who Is a True Canadian?” Margaret Atwood’s Textual Assassinations. Ed. Sharon Rose Wilson. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2003. 88-101.
---. “Transgressing Genre: A Generic Approach to Margaret Atwood’s Novels.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 139-56.
Huyssen, Andreas. After the Great Divide. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 1986.
Ingersoll, Earl G. “Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake.” Extrapolation: A Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy. 45.2 (Summer 2004): 162-75.
Irvine, Lorna. “Recycling Culture: Kitsch, Camp, and Trash in Margaret Atwood’s Fiction.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 202-14.
Jokinen, Anniina. “Margaret Atwood Page.” Luminarium. 27 October 2008. <http://www.luminarium.org/contemporary/atwood/atwood.htm>.
Keefer, Janice Kulyk. “Hope Against Hopelessness: Margaret Atwood’s Life Before Man.” Margaret Atwood: Writing and Subjectivity. Ed. Colin Nicholson. N Y: St. Martin’s, 1994. 153-76.
Kirk, Russell. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Regnery, 2001. 250-259.
Kirtz, Mary K. “(Dis)unified Field Theories: The Clarendon Lectures Seen through (a) Cat’s Eye.” Margaret Atwood's Textual Assassinations. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2003.
Kolodny, Annette. “Margaret Atwood and the Politics of Narrative.” Margaret Atwood. Edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea, 2000. 29-48.
Lai, Larissa. The “I” of the Storm. Diss. U of Calgary, 2006. 204-40.
“Margaret Atwood.” New World Encyclopedia. 10 January 2010.<http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Margaret_Atwood>.
Mendelsohn, Daniel. “After the Fall.” The New York Review of Books. 50.11(3 July 2003): 43-45.
Michael, Magali Cornier. Feminism and the Postmodern Impulse. Albany: State U of New York P, 1996.
Müller, Klaus Peter. “Re-Constructions of Reality in Margaret Atwood’s Literature: A Constructionist Approach.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Reingard M. NY: Camden, 2000. 229-58.
Mundler, Helen E. “Heritage, Pseudo-Heritage and Survival in a Spurious Wor(l)d: Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood.” Commonwealth Essays and Studies. 27.1 (Autumn 2004): 89-98.
Mycak, Sonia. In Search of the Split Subject: Psychoanalysis, Phenomenology, and the Novels of Margaret Atwood. ON: ECW, 1996.
Newell, Mary. A Bittersweet Belonging: Embodied Paradigms for Reconnection to the Environment in Contemporary American Women Authors. Diss. Fordham U, 2006. 193-258.
Parker, Emma. “You Are What You Eat: The Politics of Eating in the Novels of Margaret Atwood.” Margaret Atwood. Edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom. Philadelphia: Chelsea, 2000. 113-30.
Peng, Hui-Fang. “Language, Truth, and History in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Journal of Applied Foreign Languages. National Kaohsiung First U of Science and Technology. 12 (December 2009): 1-26.
Posner, Richard A. “The End is Near.” New Republic. 22 Sept. 2003: 31-36.
Quartermaine, Peter. “Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing: Strange Familiarity.” Margaret Atwood: Writing and Subjectivity. Ed. Colin Nicholson. NY: St. Martin’s, 1994. 119-32.
Rao, Eleonora. "Home and Nation in Margaret Atwood's Later Fiction." The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 100-13.
Rigney, Barbara. Margaret Atwood. Totowa: Barnes and Noble, 1987.
Somacarrera, Pilar. “Power Politics: Power and Identity.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 43-57.
Staines, David. “Margaret Atwood in Her Canadian Context.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 12-27.
Stein, Karen F. Margaret Atwood Revisited. NY: Twayne, 1999.
Sullivan, Rosemary. The Red Shoes. ON: HarperCollins, 1998.
Tong, Rosemarie. Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction. London: Routledge, 1998.
Tranquilla, Ronald. “Ranger and Mountie: Myths of National Identity in Zane Grey’s The Lone Star Ranger and Ralph Connor’s Corporal Cameron.” Journal of Popular Culture 24.3 (1990): 69-80.
VanSpanckeren, Kathryn. “Humanizing the Fox: Atwood’s Poetic Tricksters and Morning in the Burned House.” Margaret Atwood’s Textual Assassinations. Ed. Sharon Rose Wilson. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2003. 102-120.
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Translated from the 3rd edition (1744). Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1984.
Warkentin, Traci. “Dis/Integrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption.” AI & Soc 20 (2006): 82-102.
Wilson, Sharon Rose. “Blindness and Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Major Novels.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 176-89.
Woodcock, George. Introducing Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing. ON: ECW, 1990.
Yang, Nai-nu. Utopias and Machines: From Utopian Literature to the Posthuman Diss. National Taiwan U, 2007. 171-210.