研究生: |
李瑩玓 Ying-Ti Li |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小寫字困難學童與普通學童寫字相關認知能力之分析研究 The cognitive components relating to handwriting performance of students with and without Chinese handwriting difficulties |
指導教授: |
洪儷瑜
Hung, Li-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 183 |
中文關鍵詞: | 寫字困難 、認知能力 、國小學生 |
英文關鍵詞: | handwriting difficulties, cognitive components, elementary students |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:243 下載:150 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討國小寫字困難學童各寫字能力表現、錯誤類型犯錯情形、寫字技能及態度與普通學生之差異,並分析各寫字表現與認知能力的關係。
研究對象為台北縣國小三年級聽寫表現有顯著困難,認字能力無明顯困難之寫字困難個案23名,以及與之配對的普通學生23名,分別進行抄字、抄短文、自發性書寫等寫字表現測驗,以及視覺動作統整、注意力刪除、記憶廣度、序列記憶、組字規則、部件辨識及拼音等認知能力測驗。
研究結果發現如下:
1. 寫字表現方面
(1) 在寫字速度方面,兩組皆以抄短文的速度最快,自發寫最慢,且熟悉字顯著高於罕見字、罕見字的近端抄寫顯著高於遠端,兩組不同之處在於普通配對學生在熟悉字的近遠端抄寫並沒有顯著差異,但寫字困難組近端抄寫顯著高於其遠端抄寫。
(2) 普通學生抄字、抄短文與自發寫三項寫字表現皆有顯著相關,但寫字困難學生僅抄字與抄短文有顯著相關。
2. 寫字相關表現方面
寫字困難學生的特徵包括:所寫字體忽大忽小、在遠端抄寫及抄短文時間架結構問題較為明顯、抄寫時易犯部件錯誤結構正確的錯字、自發寫時易犯部件正確結構正確的錯字、較不喜歡寫字且覺得寫字很累。
3. 認知能力方面
(1) 寫字困難學生在拼音測驗的得分顯著低於普通配對學生,其餘認知能力兩組並無顯著差異。
(2) 各項寫字能力與認知能力的相關在寫字困難組及配對組有差異,就普通學生而言,抄字與注意力及部件辨識有相關,抄短文與注意力有相關,但自發寫則與各認知能力的相關皆不明顯;而就寫困組而言,抄字與部件辨識有相關,抄短文與部件辨識、拼音及序列記憶有相關,而自發寫與部件辨識及拼音有相關。
Two major purposes of this study were to compare the handwriting performance, error types, skill and attitudes of the third graders with and without handwriting difficulties (HWD in short), and to analyze the cognitive components that relate to handwriting performances.
Twenty-three non-dyslexia third graders with HWD and twenty-three grade-match (GM in short) normal students served as subjects. All the participants were measured their handwriting performance which were copying characters, copying a short essay, free writing, and their cognitive abilities included visual-motor integration, attention, visual serial memory, aural memory span, radical recognition, Chinese orthographic rule and phoneme blending tasks.
The main findings of this research were stated as follows:
1. The characteristics of handwriting performances:
(1) The handwriting speed in copying a short essay was faster than other tasks, copying familiar characters were faster than unfamiliar characters, and near copying unfamiliar characters were faster than far copying unfamiliar characters in GM and HWD groups. The difference between GM and HWD group was that the near copying familiar characters were faster than far copying familiar characters in HWD group but wasn’t found in GM group.
(2) The performances of copying characters, copying a short essay and free writing were correlated with each other at significant level in GM group, and the performances of copying characters and copying a short essay were correlated in HWD group.
2. The characteristics of HWD group were observed as follows: irregular word sizes, inconsistent radical sizes and spacing in far copying and copying a short essay, more error characters with non-exist radicals or wrong structures in copying task, more error characters with wrong structures in free writing tasks, and more negative attitudes toward handwritings than GM group.
3. The characteristics of cognitive abilities:
(1) The phoneme blending scores of HWD group were significant poor than GM group.
(2) The correlation between handwriting performances and cognitive abilities of HWD group was different from GM group. As to the GM group, the copying characters task was correlated with attention and radical recognition, the copying a short essay task was correlated with attention, but the free writing task didn’t correlated with any of the cognitive components; as for the HWD group, the copying characters task was correlated with radical recognition, the copying a short essay task was correlated with radical recognition, phoneme blending and visual serial memory abilities, and the free writing task was correlated with radical recognition and phoneme blending.
一、中文部份
王萬清(民86):國語科教學理論與實際。台北:師大書苑。
方金雅(民85):國小學生一般字彙知識、認字能力與國語文學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李白芬(民83):國小學童認知風格及其錯字錯誤類型之關係研究。嘉義師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李郁周(民82):硬筆寫字要領淺析─從小學寫字教學談起。載於國小作文寫字教學學術研討會論文集,台南師院語教系主編,207-253頁。
李俊仁(民87):聲韻處理能力與閱讀能力的關係。中正大學心理系博士論文,未出版。
呂美娟(民88):基本字帶字識字教學對國小識字困難學生成效之探討。台灣師大特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
李振清(民77):漢字教學的理論與實際。華文世界,50,1-6頁。
林尹(民60):文字學概說。台北:正中書局。
林建平(民83):整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版。
林寶貴、黃瑞珍(民86):兒童書寫語言發展指標研究。國科會專題研究計畫。
林寶貴、錡寶香(民89):國小學童書寫語言測驗指導手冊。台北:師大特教系。
林素貞(民87):國小輕度障礙學生語文科學習錯誤類型分析及有效學習策略之研究─國小低年級中文讀寫障礙學生注音符號和字詞學習特質及有效學習策略之研究。國科會專題研究計畫。
吳英成(民88):手寫漢字識別在識字教學的應用。載於語文與評估,199-209頁,香港教育學院語文教育中心出版。
孟瑛如、陳麗如(民89):學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表上顯現之特質研究。特殊教育季刊,74,1-11。
柯華葳、李俊仁(民85):國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與認字能力的發展─一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報,7(1),49-66。
胡志偉(民78):中文詞的辨識歷程。中華心理學刊,31(1),33-39。
孟令夫、林幸台(民87):預防第二類型錯誤與推演效果值於量化研究中的重要性,中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,219-238。
洪儷瑜(民84):學習障礙者教育。台北:心理。
洪儷瑜 (民85):國語文低成就學生在視知覺和聽覺理解能力之研究(I)。國科會專題研究計畫,未出版。
洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬、陳慶順(民88):國小高頻字能力測驗編製研究。載於教育心理測驗學術研討會手冊,中國測驗學會。
洪儷瑜(未出版):識字困難的類型與因應之教學策略之研究。台北:師大特教系。
紀李美瑛(民79):中國兒童早期的讀寫發展,載於第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集─理論與分析(下冊)。世界華文教育協進會編印,243-252頁。
馬顯慈(民88):倉頡取碼原則與漢字結構的一些問題。載於語文與評估,170-189頁,香港教育學院語文教育中心出版。
許淑娟(民84):台南市低年級學童錯別字之分析。國語文教育通訊,10,61-83。
陳弘昌(民88):國小語文科教學研究。台北:五南。
陳秀芬(民87):中文一般字彙知識教學法在增進國小識字困難學生識字學習成效之探討。台灣師大特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
陳俊隆(民85):書寫困難學童視知覺相關因素探討。彰化師大特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
陳慶順(民89a):識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成分之比較研究。國立台灣師大特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
陳慶順(民89b):書寫障礙個案診斷報告。89年學習障礙個案研討會會議手冊,中正大學心理學系。
陳靜子(民85):國語文低成就學童之生字學習:部首歸類與聲旁歸類之教學效果比較。國立彰化師大特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
郭為藩(民67):我國學童閱讀缺陷問題的初步調查及其檢討。教育研究所集刊,20,57-78。
教育部編(民72):罕用字體表。台北:正中書局。
黃秀霜(民86):兒童早期音韻覺識對其三年後中文認字關係之縱貫性研究。國立台南師院學報,30,263-288。
黃秀霜(民90):中文年級認字量表:指導手冊。台北:心理出版社。
黃沛榮(民85):漢字部件研究。載於第七屆中國文字學全國學術研討會論文集,343-359頁。
崔永華(民86):詞彙文字研究與對外漢語教學。北京:北京語言文化大學出版社。
張勝成(民79):弱視學生閱讀書寫能力探討。特殊教育學報,5,113-158。
葉德明(民76):漢字書寫錯誤之分析與教學。華文世界,43,56-66頁。
葉德明(民79):漢字認知基礎─從心理語言學看漢字認知過程。台北:師大書苑。
葉靖雲(民88):作文能力與作文評量。中華民國特殊教育學會八十八學年度年刊─迎千禧談特教,台北:中華民國特殊教育學會。
萬雲英(民80):兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。載於楊中芳、高尚仁主編,中國人.中國心:發展與教學篇(頁403-448)。台北:遠流。
蔡金涼(民81):國小易誤字之研究。國教月刊,39(3、4),25-29。
鄭昭明(民70):漢字的認知歷程。中華心理學刊,20,39-43。
鄭昭明、陳學志(民80):漢字的簡化對文字讀寫的影響。華文世界,62,86-104。
劉興漢(民76):國小學生學習寫中文字錯誤之分析。教育與心理研究,10,189-198。
劉鴻香、陸莉(民86):拜瑞─布坦尼卡視覺動作統整發展測驗實施、評分及教學手冊。台北:心理。
戴汝潛(民88):漢字教與學。濟南:山東教育出版社。
蘇淑貞、宋維村、徐澄清(民73):中文閱讀障礙之類型及智力測驗。中華心理學刊,26(1),14-48。
顧大我(民79):筆畫指導與識字寫字能力之關係。載於第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集─教學與應用篇(中冊),254-264頁。
二、英文部份
American Psychiatric Association(1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, the 4th ed. Washington, D. C., Author.
Askov, E., Otto, W., & Askov, W. (1970). A decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospect. The Journal of Educational Research, 64(3), 99-111.
Berninger, V. W. (1994). Future directions for research on writing disabilities. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for assessment of learning disability: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.
Berninger, V. W. & Whitaker, D. (1993). Theory-based branching diagnosis of writing disabilities. School Psychology Review, 22(4), 623-642.
Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991). Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57-79.
Cornhill, H. & Case-Smith, J. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(9), 732-739.
Dobbie, L. & Askov, E. N. (1995). Progress of handwriting research in the 1980s and future prospects. The Journal of Educational Research, 88 , 339-351.
Graham, S. (1982). Measurement of handwriting skills: A critical review. Diagnostique, 8(1) , 32-42.
Graham, S. (1986). A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 63-72.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1999). Instruction to learning disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hamstra-Bletz, L. & Blote, A. W. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(10), 689-699.
Hooper, S. R., Montgomery, J., Swartz, C., Reed, M. S., Sandler, A. D., Levine, M. D., Watson, T. E., & Wasileski, T. (1994). Masurement of written language expression. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for assessment of learning disability: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Holt, L. K., & Graves, K. (1990). Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development : Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Mesulam, M. M. (1985). Attention,confusional states,and neglect. In M. M. Mesulam(Ed.), Principles of behavioral neurology(pp.125-168). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
Philip H. M., Patricia S., & Rose M. M. (1979). Teacher’s handbook of diagnosis inventories: Spelling, reading, handwriting, arithmetic-A practical guide with duplicator masters. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Peck, M., Askov, E., & Fairchild, S. (1980). Another decade of research in handwriting: Progress and prospect in the 1970s. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(5) , 283-298.
Simer, M. L. (1985). An evaluation of a new printing instrument to aid in identifying the failure-prone preschool child. (ERIC document : 262 864).
Towle, M. (1978). Assessment and remediation of handwriting deficits for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(6), 370-377.
Tseng, M. H. & Murray, E. A. (1994). Differences in perceptual-motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14(1), 19-36.
Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting : Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165-191.
Weintraub, N. & Graham, S. (1998). Writing legibly and quickly: A study of children’s ability to adjust their handwriting to meet common classroom demands. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(3), 146-152.
Yost, L. W. & Lesiak, J. (1980). The relationship between performance on the developmental test of visual perception and handwriting ability. Education, 101, 75-77.
Ziviani, J. & Elkins, J. (1984). An evaluation of handwriting performance. Educational Review, 36, 249-261.