研究生: |
蔡靜宜 Ching-yi Tsai |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台北縣市資優生與普通生生活壓力與因應策略之研究 The study of life stress and coping strategies of gifted and regular students in Taipei area |
指導教授: |
陳美芳
Chen, Mei-Fang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 256 |
中文關鍵詞: | 資優生 、生活壓力 、因應策略 |
英文關鍵詞: | gifted student, life stress, coping strategies |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:323 下載:169 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討不同背景變項(組別、年級、性別)學生、不同安置方式資優生生活壓力與因應策略的差異及不同生活壓力感受程度學生因應策略的差異。本研究採取問卷調查法,研究對象為台北縣市五到九年級共1044位學生,包括518位資優生與526位普通生。研究工具為自編之「學生生活壓力與因應策略量表」,資料分析採t考驗、單因子與三因子變異數分析,研究結果如下:
一、在學生生活壓力現況方面,全體學生生活壓力感受輕微,壓力最高者為個人自我期許壓力,壓力最低者為同儕關係壓力。在學生生活壓力之比較方面,資優生在學校課業、課外學習、親子關係及個人健康四層面的壓力感受低於普通生;國中學生在學校課業、個人健康及個人自我期許三層面的壓力感受高於國小學生;女生在學校課業、個人健康及個人自我期許三層面的壓力感受高於男生;而在師生關係壓力方面,組別與年級有交互作用。
二、在學生因應策略現況方面,全體學生因應策略使用頻率最高為問題解決與情緒調適策略,其次是擱置問題策略,最低為情緒發洩與尋求社會支持策略。在學生因應策略現況之比較方面,資優生的因應策略與普通生沒有差異;不同年級學生的因應策略沒有差異;女生在情緒發洩與社會支持策略的使用頻率高於男生,在擱置問題策略的使用頻率低於男生;而在問題解決與擱置問題策略方面,組別與年級有交互作用。
三、集中式資優生在學校課業、課外學習與個人自我期許壓力的感受高於分散式資優生;兩組學生的因應策略沒有差異。
四、不同生活壓力感受程度學生的因應策略有差異,高壓組學生在情緒發洩與擱置問題策略的使用頻率高於中壓組,中壓組又高於低壓組;而低壓組學生在情緒調適策略的使用頻率高於中壓組與高壓組。
The purposes of this study were to (a) find out the differences in life stress and coping strategies with respect to students of different background variables (groups, grades and sex), (b) compare the differences in life stress and coping strategies of gifted students with different types of placement, (c) investigate the differences in coping strategies of students with different levels of life stress. A self-made Questionnaire “Life Stress and Coping Strategies of Students Scale” was adopted in this study. Subjects consisted of 1044 students including 518 gifted and 526 regular students from fifth to ninth grades in elementary and junior hight schools in Taipei area. The collected data were analyzed by t-test, one-way and three-way ANOVA. The main findings were as follows:
On the aspect of student life stress, the overall life stress of all students was at a slight level. Among various types of life stress, “Individual Self-expectation Stress” was the highest one and “Peer Relationships Stress” was the lowest one. Gifted students were lower than regular students in “School Academic Stress”, ” Cram School Stress”, “Parent-child Relationship Stress” and “Individual Health Stress”. Junior high school students were higher than elementary school students in “School Academic Stress”, “Individual Health Stress” and “Individual Self-expectation Stress”. Female students were higher than male students in “School Academic Stress”, “Individual Health Stress” and “Individual Self-expectation Stress”. There were interaction between groups and grades on “Teacher-Student Relationship Stress”.
On the aspect of coping strategies, the most frequently used coping strategies by all students were “Solving Problem Strategies” and “Emotional Adaptation Strategies”. The next was “Temporary-tabling Strategies”. The least frequently used ones were “Emotional Venting Strategies” and ”Seeking Social Support Strategies”. There were no significant differences in coping strategies between gifted and regular students and between elementary and junior high school students. Female students used more “Emotional Venting Strategies” and “Seeking Social Support Strategies”, but used less “Temporary-tabling Strategies” than male students did. There were interactions between groups and grades on “Solving Problem Strategies” and “Temporary-tabling Strategies”.
Gifted students on self-contained programs had higher stress than those on pull-out programs in “School Academic Stress”, ” Cram School Stress”, and “Individual Self-expectation Stress”. But no significant differences were found in coping strategies in these two groups.
There were differences in coping strategies from students with different levels of life stress. Studends in the high-stress group used “Emotional Venting Strategies” and “Temporary-tabling Strategies” more frequently than those in mid-stress group which again has a higher frequency than the low-stress group. Students in low-stress group used more frequently than those in mid and high-stress groups in ” Emotional Adaptation Strategies”.
中文部分
丁明潔(民92):國中生樂觀悲觀傾向、課業壓力評估、課業壓力因應方式、與學校生活適應之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王文琪(民83):國中生學習困難、學習壓力、社會支持與生活適應的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王蓁蓁(民90):臺北縣國中生之壓力源、因應方式與生活適應之相關研究。生活科學學報,7,61-86。
台北市政府教育局(2005.1.21):臺北市九十三學年度特殊教育概況。檢索日期:2005年3月1日。取自http://www.syrc.tp.edu.tw/2004/spc/93_spc_si.htm
台北縣特殊教育資訊網(2005.11.12):特教班統計概況。檢索日期:2005年3月1日。取自http://www.set.edu.tw/spcs2003/statistic/sta0.asp
江承曉(民80):青少年的生活壓力、因應行為與其身心健康之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
李欣瑩(民90):桃園市國中生主觀生活壓力、社會支持、因應行為與身心健康之關係研究。衛生教育學報,15,115-132。
何雪珍(民86):護理科應屆畢業生憂鬱傾向及其與生活壓力、社會支持、自殺傾向之相關,高雄醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文。
呂敏昌(民82):國中學生的生活壓力、因應方式與心理社會幸福感之關係。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
邱富琇(民93):兒童之親子溝通、壓力因應方式與其幸
福感之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
林銘宗(民88):國小六年級學童的課業壓力、因應方式及社會支持之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林麗琳(民83):國小資優班與普通班學生學習風格、學習適應與學業成就關係之研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文。
林續琴(民92):國中生生活壓力、因應策略與負向情緒經驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳麗娟(民87):父母自我分化、教養態度對青少年子女自我分化、因應策略及適應影響之研究。教育心理學報,30(1),91-132。
紀怡如(民91):國中生依附關係、壓力知覺與其因應策略之相關研究。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
胡悅倫(民86):兒童壓力源的文獻探討研究,國立新竹師院初等教育學報,5,1-53。
胡素慈(民91):國小學生因應日常生活問題策略及其影響因素之徑路分析研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
施雅薇(民93):國中生生活壓力、負向情緒調適、社會支持與憂鬱情緒之關聯。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
孫瑜成(民93):國中資優學生人格特質、壓力調適及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部(民91)。特殊教育法規選輯。台北:教育部。
教育部特殊教育通報網(2005.11.12):各縣市國中、國小資優班設置概況。檢索日期:2005年3月1日。取自http://www.set.edu.tw/frame.asp
張春興(民80):現代心理學。台北:東華書局。
張敏芳(民94):與壓力共舞-國小音樂資優生學習壓力之研究。屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文。
崔珮玲(民93):青少年生活壓力、人格特質對其身心健康影響之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文。
陳佳琪(民90):青少年生活壓力、家庭氣氛與偏差行為之關係研究。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳玫伶(民85):國小資優學生完美主義傾向與自我觀念及學業成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
陳柏齡(民89):國中生生活壓力、失敗容忍力與憂鬱傾向之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
陳淑芬(民92):國中生獨處能力與主觀生活壓力.身心健康之關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳筱瑄(民92):台中縣某國中學生內外控人格特質、主觀生活壓力、因應行為與自覺身心健康之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學/衛生教育研究所碩士。
梁培勇(民82):小學兒童壓力觀初步探討。中華心理學刊,35(2),87-114。
郭靜姿(民75):集中式資優生、分散性資優生及前段班學生之心理適應分析與比較。特殊教育研究學刊, 2,251-263。
游文寶(2005,10月25日):建中生遺書「留在武陵可快樂一點」。聯合報,A3版。
楊玉女(民80):兒童的生活壓力、自我能力評估及其適應行為之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
彭武德(民81):國中生的社會網絡與主觀壓力之研究。東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
彭偉峰(民93):國小高年級學童人格特質、父母管教方式對生活壓力影響之研究-以中部地區為例。臺中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文。
曾建章(民85):國中資優學生與普通學生之他人期望與壓力感受及成就動機之比較。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
曾淑華(民91):國小學生行為困擾、求助對象與因應策略之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
曾肇文(民85):國小學童學校壓力、因應方式、社會支持與學校適應之相關研究。國立新竹師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文。
黃玉真(民83):國中資優學生與普通學生學校生活壓力、因應行為及學校適應之比較研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
黃淑馨(民82):臺北市參加「國中畢業生自願就學輔導方案」學生升學壓力﹑因應行為﹑身心健康與班級氣氛之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
薛雪萍(民89):青少年家庭功能、親子衝突、因應策略與生活適應之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
鄒浮安(民86):著名高中學生生活壓力及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
鄒浮安(民87):高中分散式、集中式數理資優生與普通生在生活壓力與身心健康之比較研究。雄中學報,1,317-343。
蔣桂嫚(民82):高中學生生活壓力、因應方式與身心健康關係之研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡明富、吳武典(民90):國小資優學生學校生活壓力與學校適應之相關研究。資優教育研究,1(1),41-56。
蔡素美(民93):國小學童課業壓力與因應策略之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡婉莉(民91):生活壓力、因應方式與身心健康之相關 研究~以高中多元入學方案為背景。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
蔡嘉慧(民87):國中生的社會支持、生活壓力與憂鬱傾向之相關研究。彰化師範大學/輔導與諮商學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
歐慧敏(民85):國小學生因應策略與行為困擾之相關研究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭秀足(民93):國中生生活壓力、自尊與偏差行為之相關研究。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
鄭照順(民86):高壓力青少年所知覺的家庭、社會支持及其因應效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。
魏俊華(民87):國中聽覺障礙學生心理壓力、因應方式與生活適應之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文。
蘇彙珺(民87):社會支持、自我效能與國中學生壓力因應歷程中認知評估及因應策略的相關研究。國立師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
西文部分
Ahmad, W. Z. (1992). A comparison of coping mechanisms,
coping resources, and levels of self-esteem between gifted and nongifted adolescents (Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana State University, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2259.
Baker, J. A. (1992). An examination of environmental stressors, social mediators, depression and suicidal ideation in academically gifted and non-gifted adolescents (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin – Madison, 1992). Dissertations Abstracts International, 53, 1842.
Basch, C. E. , & Kersch, T. B. (1986, June/July). Adolescent perceptions of stressful life events. Health Education, 4-7.
Baska, L. K. (1989). Characteristics and needs of the gifted. In J. Feldhusen, J. Van Tassel-Baska, & Seeley (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted the gifted (3th ed.) (pp.15-28).Denver, CO: Love publishing.
Belle, D. (1991). Gender difference in the school moderators of stress. In A. Monat & R.S. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (pp.21-35). New York: Columbia University Press.
Buescher, T. M. (1985). A framework for understanding the social and emotional development of gifted and talented adolescents. Roeper Review, 8, 10-15.
Coddington, R. D. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children: I- a survey of professional workers. Journal of Psyshosomatic Research, 16, 7-13.
Coleman, M. R. B. (1990). A comparison study of how gifted/learning-disabled and average/learning-disabled boys cope with school frustration (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 2344.
Compas, B. E. (1987). Stress and life events during childhood and adolescence. Clinical Psychology Review, 7, 275-302.
Compas, B. E., Malcarne, V.L. & Fondacaro, K.M. (1988). Coping with stressful events in order children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 405-411.
Compas, B. E., Worsham, N., E., S., & Howell, D. C. (1996). When mom or dad has cancer: Coping, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress in children of cancer patients. Health Psychology, 15, 167-175.
Cox, T. (1978). Stress. Baltimore: University of Park Press.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm S. B. (2004). Education of
gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Delisle, J. R. (1986). Death with honors: Suicide among gifted adolescents. Journal of Couseling and Development, 64, 558-560.
Di Gangi, L. J. (1988). The effects of a self-contained and pull-out program on gifted elementary school students (Doctoral dissertation, Hofstr University, 1988 ). Dissertations Abstracts International, 49(5), 1094.
D’Onofrio, J., & Klesse, E. (1990). Adolescent stress. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED325774).
Erikson, E. H. (1985). Childhood and society (35th ed.). New York: Norton.
Evans, E. S. (1982). A study of stress in families with gifted children (Doctoral dissertation, The University of South Carolina, 1982). Dissertations Abstracts International, 43(7), 2272.
Fallon, T., & Schwab-stone, M. (1994). Determinants of reliability in psychiatric surveys of children aged 6-22. Journal of Children Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 1391-1408.
Fanshawe, J. P. (1989). An investigation of the importance of stress as a factor in the academic performance of Australian adolescents.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED309360)
Ferguson, K. (1981). Gifted adolescents, stress and life changes. Adolescence , 16(64), l973-1985.
Fimian, M. J. (1988). Predictors of classroom stress and burnout experienced by gifted and talented students. Psychology in the Schools, 25(4), 392-405.
Forman, S.G. (1993).Coping skills interventions for children and adolescents, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Frydenberg, E. (1993). The coping strategies used by capable adolescents. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 3(1), 1-9.
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1993). Adolescent coping scale: Administrator’s manual. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Genshaft, J., & Broyles, J.(1991). Stress management with the Gifted Adolescent. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent (pp. 76-87). New York : Teachers College Press
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaaum.
Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
Holmbek, G. N. (1998). Adolescence. In H.S. Friedman (Eds), The encyclopedia of mental health (pp.1-12). San Diego: Academic Press.
Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Howe, I. H. (1986). Effects of four-day and five-day academic weeks on stress and depression levels in gifted secondary students (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, 1986). Dissertations Abstracts International, 47, 4356.
Jackson, C. R. (1993). The relationship between the perceived ability of middle school students to meet the expectations of significant others and measured levels of stress in both gifted and average populations (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tulsa, 1993). Dissertations Abstracts International, 55, 47.
Karnes, F. A., & Oehler-sinnett, J. J. (1986). Life events as stressor with gifted adolescents. Psychology in the School, 23, 406-414.
Klein, A. G., & Zehms, D. (1996, Sep). Self-concept and gifted girls: A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades 3, 5, 8. Roeper Review, 19, 30-34.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1988).Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3),467.
Martin, G. L., & Osborne, J. G.(1989). Psychology adjustment and everyday living. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Moos, R. H.(1992). Conceptualiaing and measuring coping resources and process. In L. Goldberger & S.Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress (pp.212-230). NY: The Free Press.
Moos, R.H. & Billings, A. G. (1982). Conceptualising and measuring cooping resources and processes. In L. Goldber & S. Brenitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp.212-230). New York: Free Press.
Moos, R. H., & Billings, A. G. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (4), 877-891.
Paterno, J., Henderson, P., & Dickey, S. W. (1987). Children’s identification of stress related factors and coping strategies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED288149).
Patterson, J. M. & McCubbin, H. I. (1987). Adolescent coing style and behaviors: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescence, 10(2), 163-186.
Plucker, J. A. (1998). Gender, race, and grade differences in gifted adolescents' coping strategies. Journal for The Education for The Gifted, 21(4), 423-436.
Preuss, L. J., & Dubow, E. F. (2004). A comparison between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor. Roeper Review, 26(2), 105-111.
Rimm, S. B.(1991). Underachievement and superachievement: Flip sides of the same psychological coin. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp.328). Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
Ritchie, M. A.(1992). Psychosocial functioning of adolescents with cancer: a developmental perspective. Oncology Nursing Forum, 19(10), 1947-1501.
Ryan-Wenger, N. M.,& Copeland, S. G.(1994). Coping strategies used by school-age Black children from low-income families. Journal of Pediatric Nursing , 9(1),33-40.
Sanlder, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Mackinnon, D., Ayers, T. S.,& Roosa, M.W. (1997). Developing linkages between theory and interventions in stress and coping processes. In S. A. Wolchik & I. N. Sander (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention (pp.3-40). New York: Plenum Press.
Sarafino, E. P. (1994). Health psychology. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York:McGraw Hill Book Company.
Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. New York Lippincott.
Slavin, L. A., Rainer, K. L., McCreary, M. L. & Gowda, K. K. (1991). Toward a multicultural model of the stress process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 156-164.
Stone, A. A. & Neale, J.M.(1984). New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 892-906.
Swiatek, M. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(1), 19-39.
Taylor., J. W. (1995). Family structure and the coping strategies of gifted adolescents (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 3515.
Tomchin, E., M. & Callahan, C. M. (1996). Coping and Self-Concept: Adjustment Patterns in Gifted Adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8(1), 16-27.
Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 92.
Vedhara, K., Shanks, N., & Lightman, S. (2000). The role of stressors and psychosocial variables in the stress process: A study of chronic caregiver stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 374-375.
Wooding, G. S., & Bingham., R. D. (1988). Gifted children’s responses to a cognitive stressor. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(3), 330-333.
Woodward, J. C., & Kalyan-Masih, V. (1990). Loneliness, coping strategies and cognitive styles of the gifted rural adolescent. Adolescence, 25(100), 977-988.
Yadusky-Holahan., M.,& Holahan., W. (1983). The effect of academic stress upon the anxiety and depression levels of gifted high-school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(1), 42-46.
Zeidner, M. (1995). Adaptive coping with test situations: A review of the literature. Educational Psychologist, 30, 123-133.
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). Test anxiety in intellectually gifted school students. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12(2), 163-190.