簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許美鈞
Hsu, Mei Chun
論文名稱: 一所高中教師專業學習社群的社會資本之探究
A Case Study on the Social Capital of Professional Learning Communities in a High School
指導教授: 陳佩英
Chen, Pei-Ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育政策與行政研究所
Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 181
中文關鍵詞: 社會資本教師專業學習社群信任學校革新
英文關鍵詞: social capital, professional learning communiity, trust, school reform
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:161下載:29
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 許多研究顯示發展教育改革的進步與教師個人及群體的教育知能息息相關,更是學校變革能力及促進學生學習的關鍵,因應103學年度十二年國教的到來,教育當局訂定102學年度為「教師專業發展行動年」,希望透過此年度的教師總動員,為十二年國教有更好的準備,而教師專業學習社群(Professional Learning Community, PLC)更被當局視作教師專業成長支持系統之一 (教育部,2013)。

    在近年來,教師專業發展的趨勢下,專業學習社群被視為建立教師持續進步專業知能的最佳的途徑,加上政策的誘因,教師專業學習社群在許多學校紛紛成立,縱觀歷年PLC相關研究,鮮少從資源或關係角度觀看學校內PLC發展。本研究以社會資本的角度對臺北市某所高中教師專業學習社群發展狀況進行研究分析,探討社會資本於社群實踐及學校發展的影響,研究者透過個案研究法對其社群發展狀況做全面性的了解。

    研究結果顯示教師專業學習社群的社會資本蘊含著三種型態面-關係、資源及行動。隨著社群性質的不同(自發性 vs. 計畫主導性),其社群社會資本發展的模式亦不相同。倘若三種型態的能量齊聚,則較易展現社群社會資本之效能,形塑出使社群永續發展的社群歸屬感。而學校領導則為活化社群社會資本的重要推進力。由個案學校之例,研究者進一步發現教師間的社會關係,尤其是信任,是教師專業學習社群持續發展的基石。其所促成學校組織文化氛圍的改善,是為學校革新的脈動之輪。

    According to the research, it suggests that education reform progress depends on teacher’s individual and collective capacity for promoting pupils’ learning. Nowadays, professional learning communities (PLCs) has become a hot reforming approach in many counties. Due to the government policies, such as “Teacher Professional Development Evaluation” and “School Actualization Program”, PLCs have been one of methods for curriculum innovation or teacher development in Taiwan high schools. More and more PLCs took root in many schools little by little.
    Over the past decades, the concept of PLCs has gained increasing attention in teaching quality and thereby in student learning outcomes. However, the researches on teachers’ professional relationships that shape and influence PLCs are scarce. Hence, this study adopts a social capital perspective to investigate teachers’ professional relationships in one of senior high schools in Taipei and its influence as elements that characterize professional communities. In order to realize the genuine development of the social capital in PLCs, the researcher used case study methods of interviews, observation, and study of related documents.
    Based on the research analysis, it indicates that the social capital of professional learning communities (PLC social capital) includes three domains: relationship, resources, action. The variances of community characteristics (spontaneous vs. policy-related) would lead to different capital development modals. With the convergence of these three domains, it is highly possible that the power of PLC capital could transform into the sense of community to promote the sustainability of PLCs. Beside, school leadership also plays important role to empower the development of PLC social capital. To sum up, the research shows that teacher social relationship, especial trust relationship, is crucial in the sustainability of PLCs, and also becomes a cornerstone to empower school reform.

    中文摘要.................................................i 英文摘要.............................................. iii 目錄.................................................. v 表次…………………………………………………………………………......................vii 圖次…………………………………………………………………………………......................ix 第一章 緒論 .........................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.................................1 第二節 研究目的與問題................................. 5 第三節 名詞釋義.......................................5 第四節 研究範圍限制...................................6 第二章 文獻探討 ...................................9 第一節 社會資本之探究 .................................9 第二節 教師專業學習社群之探究.........................24 第三節 社會資本與教師專業學習社群相關研究..............34 第三章 研究設計與實施 ................................43 第一節 研究取徑 ..................................43 第二節 研究場域 ..................................45 第三節 資料蒐集 ..................................47 第四節 資料的處理及分析 ...............................51 第五節 研究倫理 ......................................56 第六節 研究限制 ......................................58 第四章 研究結果分析與討論..............................59 第一節 飛揚高中教師專業學習社群發展 .....................59 第二節 教師專業學習社群的「關係」社會資本..............71 第三節 教師專業學習社群的「資源」社會資本..............96 第四節 教師專業學習社群的「行動」社會資本............120 第五節 教師專業學習社群「關係」、「資源」、「行動」社會資本 交互關係......................................129 第六節 學校領導與教師專業學習社群社會資本的響............141 第五章 研結論建議與研究省思..........................155 第一節 研究結論.......................................155 第二節 研究建議............................... ......160 第三節 研究省思.......................................164 參考文獻 ..............................................165 附錄 ..............................................178 附錄一 訪談大綱(社群教師)............................178 附錄二 訪談大綱(校長)................................180 附錄三 訪談同意書………………………………………......................181

    中文部分
    朱盈叡(2010)。臺北市國民小學教師社會資本與專業學習社群關係之研究。臺
    北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林南(2005),社會資本。臺北:弘智文化。
    林南(2007),社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢,11(1),1-32。
    林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所
    主編,質的研究方法(頁239-262)。高雄:麗文。
    林明貴、陳怡雲、許珍琳、廖純英、薛仲平(2011)。臺北市國民中學教師專業學習社群運作現況分析。臺北市100學年度市立國民中小學候用校長儲訓班專題研究成果,56-81。
    江明修、陳欽春(2005)。充實社會資本之探究。載於新世紀第二期國家建設計
    畫研擬.專題研究系列III,177-252。
    柳雅梅(譯)(2006)。學校是專業的學習社群:專業發展的合作與策略(原作
    者:Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E. Z.)。臺北:心理出版社。
    李宛蓉(譯)(1998)。信任─社會德性與繁榮的創造。(原作者 Fukuyama,
    Francis)。臺北市:立緒。
    李玲惠(2012)。一群羊的故事〜記一所優質化高中專業學習社群發展的軌
    跡。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(10),89-92。
    沈秀春、黃哲彬(2009)。淺析社會資本及其對教育政策與教育實踐之啟示。教育趨勢導報,32,132-141。
    何文純(2006)。國民小學社會資本與學習社群關係之研究。國立臺北教育大
    學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑研究 (原作者:Patton, M. Q.) 。臺北:桂
    冠。
    邱文仁(2005)。做個職場大紅人。臺北:聯合文學。
    周啟葦(2006)。以「學習社群」促進教師專業發展之分析。中等教育,57(5),94-113。
    周倢如(2013)。夥伴關係的調適對話-以中學及大學的研發課程為例。國立台
    灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    周麗華(2000)。教師專業學習社群的發展與實踐—以臺北市民生國小為例。
    臺南大學第九屆「教育經營與管理」學術研討會。
    高傳晃(2009)。臺北市國民小學校長領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研
    究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北
    市。
    孫志麟(2010)。專業學習社群:促進教師專業學習發展的平台。學校行政,69,138-158。
    教育部(2013年3月14日)。102年教師專業發展行動年期盼培育高素質教
    師。教育部電子報,554,取http://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?topical_sn=77.
    畢恆達(2010)。教授為什麼沒有告訴我。臺北:小畢空間出版社。
    張淑宜、辛俊德(2011)。學習社群與教師專業表現關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報,25(1),83-103。
    張淑珠、陳世佳、林啟超(2008)。輔導員學習社群知覺與其專業發展之關係
    研究—以彰化縣九年一貫課程與教學輔導團為例。師資培育與教師專業發
    展,1(2),77-100。
    張新仁(2012)。臺灣中小學教師專業發展的推動策略。教育人力與專業發展,29(1),13-24。
    張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅編(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊(再版)。臺北:教育部。
    張德銳、王淑珍(2010)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與
    實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報,41(1),61-90。
    陳佩英(2008)。從培力的對話觀點探討教師的專業成長。高師大學報,24,
    21-48。
    陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教
    育,60(3),68-88。
    陳佩英、焦傳金(2009)。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構:一所高中教學
    創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),55-86。
    陳佩英(2012)。教師專業發展的第四條路:學習社群實踐的理論轉化。載於洪
    仁進、陳佩英(編),2020教育願景(頁307-358)。臺北:學富文化。
    陳佩英、王婷、彭新強,Huffman, J. B., Olivier, D., & Salleh, H (2012) 。全球專業學習社群網絡:專業學習社群概念之定義與概念化。載於2020教育願景國際學術研討會手冊。
    陳佩英、高嘉徽、尹應甄(2012)。促進高中優質化的專業學習社群發展。臺
    灣教育評論月刊,1(11),36-42。
    陳佩英(2013)從心學習:聽專業學習社群老師說故事。臺北:國立臺灣師範
    大學出版中心。
    陳雅慧(2012)。9成5國中老師想變不到2成有行動。親子天下,38,108-
    111。
    童新峯(2012)。專業學習社群運作及其促進學校文化改變之個案研究。國立台灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    黃源協、劉素珍(2009),社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵,行政暨政策學
    報,48,155-191。
    黃郁倫、鐘啟泉(譯)(2012)。學習的革命:從教室改革的出發 (原作者:佐藤學)。臺北:天下文化。
    黃維(譯)(2003)。實踐社群:推動學習型組織之輪 (原作者:Wenger, E.,
    McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M.) 。臺北市:天下文化。
    潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。
    蔡進雄(2003)。學校領導的新思維:建立教師學習社群。技術與職業教育雙月刊,78,42-46。
    鄭錫楷(2002)。社會資本與政府再造。載於蘇永欽(編),政府再造:政府角色功能的新定位(頁41-62)。臺北:新台灣人文教基金會。
    應尹甄(2013)。高中英語教師專業學習社群之社會網絡形構探究。國立台灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。

    英文部分
    Astuto, T.A., Clark, D.L., Read, A.M., McGree, K., & Fernandez, L.K.P. (1993).
    Challenges to dominant assumptions controlling educational reform. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for the Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
    Adler, P. S., & Kwon S.W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review,27 (1), 17-40.
    Allison, J., Gorringe, S., & Lacey, J. (2006). Building learning communities: Partnerships, social capital and VET performance. NCVER, Adelaide.
    Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and
    sustaining professional learning communities.Research Report Number 637.
    Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J, G, Richardson (Ed), Handbook of
    Theory of Sociology Education, (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood
    Press.
    Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and
    Culture. London: SAGE.
    Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L.J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for
    improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B, & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309-329.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American
    Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement): S95-S120.
    Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
    Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for
    school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4),
    375-395.
    Collinson, V., & Cook, T.F. (2001). I don’t have enough time: Teachers’ interpretations of time as a key tolearning and school change. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(3), 266–281.
    Cross, R., & Borgatti, S. P. (2004). The ties that share: relational characteristics that facilitate information seeking. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social Capital andInformation Technology (pp. 137-161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
    DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). New insights into professional learning communities at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
    Dasgupta, P.(1988). Trust as commodity. In Deigo G, ( Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
    Driscoll, M. E., & Kerchner, C. T. (1999). The implications of social capital for schools, communities, and cities: Educational administration as if a sense of place mattered. In J. Murphy &K. S. Louis (Eds.), The handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.,pp. 385-404). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2007). Leadership in networked learning communities: defining theterrain, School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 239-58.
    Fairholm, G. (1994). Leadership and the culture of trust. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    Fullan, M.( 2002). Leadership in a culture of Change. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Fullan, M. (2007).The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). NewYork, NY: Teachers College.
    Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
    Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22 (1), 23-37.
    Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. CA: Sage Publications-Thousand Oaks.
    Gewirtz, S., Dickson, M., Power, S., Halpin, D., & Whitty, G. (2005). The deployment of social capital theory in educational policy and provision: The case of Education Action Zones in England. British Educational Research Journal, 31(6), 651–673.
    Gamarnikow, E., & Green, A. (1999). The third way and social capital: Education action zones and a new agenda for education, parents and community? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 9, 3–22.
    Glaser, E, L. (2001). The Formation of Social Capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 35-40.
    Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405-424.
    Halpern (2007). Social Capital. UK: Cambridge.
    Hargreaves, D. (1999). The knowledge-creatingschool. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–44.
    Hargreaves, D. (2003a). Teaching in the knowledge society. Buckingham: Open
    University Press.
    Hargreaves, D. (2003b). Education epidemic: transforming secondary schools throughinnovation networks. London Demos.
    Hargreaves, A. (2008).Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. Stoll, & L. K. Seashore (Eds.), Professional Learning Communities: Divergence,Depth and Dilemmas. (pp.181-195). London: Open University Press and McGraw Hill.
    Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. (Eds.) (2008) International Perspectives on School Improvement. London: Routledge.
    Harris, A., Jones, M., Sharma, S. & Kannan, S. (2013). Leading educational transformation in Asia: Sustainingthe knowledge societies. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(2), 212–221.
    Haüberer, J. (2011). Social Capital Theory: Toward a Methodological foundation. NJ: VS Research.
    Helliwell, J., & Putnam, R. (1999). Education and social capital. NBER Working paper, no. 7121.
    Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (Eds.). (2010). Demystifying the concept of professional learning communities. In J.B. Huffman & K.K. Hipp (Eds.), Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best (pp.11-22). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
    Hopkins, D. (2007). Every School a Great School: Realizing the Potential of System Leadership. New York, NY: Open University Press.
    Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). What is a PLC? Professional learning communities: Definition and effects. In S. M. Hord & W. A. Sommers (Eds), Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice (pp. 5-25). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
    Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
    Huffman, J.B. & Hipp, K.K. (2003). Professional learning community organizer. In
    J.B. Huffman & K.K. Hipp (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Initiation to implementation. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
    Hunt, D. (2008). Social capital and teacher perceptions of professional control: An analysis using SASS.Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
    Inkeles, A.(2000).Measuring social capital and its consequences. Policy Sciences,33, 245-268.
    Israel, G. D., Beaulieu, L. J., & Hartless, G. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational attainment. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 43-68.
    Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2007). Creating new knowledge: Evaluating networked learning communities. Education Canada, 47(1), pp. 34-37.
    Katzenmeyer, M., & G. Moller (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
    Kilpatrick, S., Bell, R., & Falk, I. H. (1999). The role of group learning in building social capital. Journal of Vocational Education and Training,51 (1), 129-144.
    King, M.B., & Newmann, F.M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional
    development: Conceptual and empirical considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86–93.
    Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing
    school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. D. Kruse (Eds.),
    Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp.23-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Krogh, G. V., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. London: Oxford Press.
    Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning in schools.
    Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    Lesser, E. (2000). Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications.
    MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (1999). Communities of Practice, Social Capital and Organizational Knowledge. White Paper, IBM Institute for Knowledge Management. Retrieved from http://ikm.ihost.com.
    Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006).Social capital and organizational performance: evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17, 353–68.
    Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to
    instructional improvement: The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
    Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement: A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121-148.
    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H.,& Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
    McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teacher College Press.
    Merriam (1988). Case Study research in education: A qualitative approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Minckler, C.F. (2011). Teacher Social Capital: The Development of a Conceptual Model and Measurement Framework with Application to Educational Leadership and Teacher Efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisiana, Lafayette.
    Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a
    learning community. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Moolenaar, N.,M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Social networks, trust and innovation: The role of relationships in supporting an innovative climate in Dutch Schools. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social Network Theory and Educational Change (pp.137-159. MA: Harvard University Press.
    Mulford, B. (2008). Building social capital in professional learning communities: importance, challenges and a way forward. In L. Stoll & L.K. Seashore (Eds), Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas (pp.166-180). London: Open University Press and McGraw Hill.
    Murphy, J. (1999). Reconnecting teaching and school administration: A call for a united profession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companiescreate the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Naylor, C. (2005). A Teacher Union’s Collaborative Research Agenda and Strategies: One Way for Canadian Teacher Union in Supporting Teachers’ Professional Development. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the
    Organization Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–66.
    OECD (2001). The Well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    Oh H., Chung M. H., & Labianca G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1): 65-78.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Patterson, J., & Patterson, J. (2004). Sharing the lead. Educational Leadership, 61(7),
    74-78.
    Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools.
    NewYork: Longman.
    Robinson, L. J., Schmid, A. A, & Siles, M.E. (2002). Is social capital really capital? Review of Social Economy, 60 (1), 1–21.
    Sandfeur, R.L., & Lauman, E. O. (1998). A paradigm of social capital.Rationality and Society, 10, 481-501.
    Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., & Wallace, M. T. S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258.
    Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social Capital: A Review and Critique. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives ( pp.1-38 ).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Stone, W. (2003). Bonding, bridging and linking with social capital. Stronger Families Learning Exchange Bulletin, 4, 13-16.
    Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    Westheimer, J. (1999). Communities and consequences: An inquiry into ideology and practice in teachers’ professional work. Education Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 71–105.
    Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy frame-work. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208.
    Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research design and methods. CA: Sage Publications

    下載圖示
    QR CODE