簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 解凱筑
Hsieh, Kai-Chu
論文名稱: 互惠式教學法:臺灣國中學生的看法及其對英語摘要寫作能力之影響
Reciprocal Teaching: Taiwanese Junior High School Students’ Perceptions and Its Effect on English Summary Writing
指導教授: 陳秋蘭
Chern, Chiou-Lan
口試委員: 羅美蘭
Lo, Mei-Lan
陳琇娟
Chen, Hsiu-Chuan
陳秋蘭
Chern, Chiou-lan
口試日期: 2023/07/03
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 讀寫能力互惠式教學法閱讀策略學生觀點閱讀理解摘要寫作能力
英文關鍵詞: reading and writing skills, reciprocal teaching, reading strategy, students’ perceptions, reading comprehension, summary writing
研究方法: 混和性研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300648
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:114下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 有鑒於現行十二年國民教育課程中強調「素養」教育,學生的閱讀和寫作能力的培養受到高度重視。互惠式教學法是經由研究證明可以有效提高學生閱讀理解能力的教學方法。然而,目前缺乏針對互惠式教學法對學生摘要寫作影響之研究。本研究旨在探討學生對互惠式教學法的看法以及其對他們的英文摘要寫作技巧的影響。本研究為教學介入混和性研究,以互惠式教學法進行為期六週的課程。58位臺灣國中學生參與這項研究。主要資料來源為17名學生所提交的三份閱讀日誌及學生在六週內透過互惠式教學法學習英語閱讀的問卷調查。受測者所撰寫的摘要寫作是根據Frey et al.(2003)研究中所使用的一個四分制摘要寫作評分表進行評分。研究結果顯示,大多數學生對使用互惠式教學法持正面的態度。互惠式教學法展現出提高學生英文能力的可能性,特別是在閱讀技巧、詞彙和文法方面。此外,三篇摘要寫作之間存在顯著差異。近乎所有參與者(94%)在最後一次摘要寫作中都獲得更高的分數,呈現學習成效;三分之一的學生成績增長超過4分(滿分16分)。本研究結果凸顯了互惠式教學的效果,能提高臺灣國中生英文閱讀和摘要寫作技巧。因此,本研究建議以英語為第二語言或外語的教師在教英語閱讀和摘要寫作時,可以採用此方法。

    Given the emphasis on “competency-based” education in the current 12-year Curriculum for Basic Education, the development of students’ reading and writing skills is highly valued. Reciprocal teaching, a research-based teaching technique, has been proven to effectively enhance students’ reading comprehension. However, there is a lack of studies examining the impact of reciprocal teaching on students’ summary writing competencies. This study aims to explore students’ perceptions of reciprocal teaching and its effect on their English summary writing skills. The study employed a mixed-methods approach incorporating a six-week intervention using reciprocal teaching. 58 Taiwanese junior high school students participated in this study. The major data sources were collected from 17 students submitting 3 reading journals and the questionnaires over six weeks in which they learned English reading through reciprocal teaching. Their writing pieces were evaluated using a four-point rubric for summary writing based on a previous study of Frey et al. (2003). The findings revealed that the majority of students held positive attitudes toward the implementation of reciprocal teaching. Reciprocal teaching demonstrated promising potential in improving students’ English proficiency, particularly in reading skills, vocabulary, and grammar. Moreover, significant differences were observed among the participants’ three summary assignments. Nearly all participants (94%) received higher scores in their final summary writing pieces, and one third of their (35%) scores increased by more than 4 points (the full mark is 16). The results of the study highlighted the effectiveness of reciprocal teaching as a teaching technique to enhance Taiwanese junior high school students’ English reading and summary writing skills. Therefore, ESL/EFL teachers are encouraged to employ this method when teaching reading and summary writing.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background and Motivation of the Study 1 Significance of the Study 4 Research Questions (RQs) 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 Reading and Writing Relationship 7 Definition of Reading 7 Definition of Writing 7 Reading and Writing Relationship 8 Strategies for Reading and Writing Instruction 9 Strategy Instruction 9 Reading Strategies 9 Summary Writing Strategy 11 Reciprocal Teaching 14 Studies on Reciprocal Teaching 15 Relationships Between Reciprocal Teaching and Summary Writing 17 Chapter 3 Methodology 21 Setting 21 Participants 22 Grouping 23 Materials 24 Data Collection 25 English Learning Background Questionnaire 26 Perception Questionnaire 27 Reciprocal Teaching Reading Journal 27 Procedures 28 Data Analysis 30 Chapter 4 Results 33 Students’ English Learning Background 33 Students’ Perceptions of Reciprocal Teaching 36 The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on English Summary Writing 44 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 53 Summary of Major Findings 57 Pedagogical Implications 57 Limitations and Future Research 58 Conclusion 59 References 61 Appendix A: Reciprocal Teaching Role Cards 79 Appendix B: Reading Materials 80 Appendix C-1: English Learning Background Questionnaire (Chinese version) 84 Appendix C-2: English Learning Background Questionnaire (English version) Appendix D-1: Perception Questionnaire (Chinese version) Appendix D-2: Perception Questionnaire (English version) Appendix E: Reciprocal Teaching Reading Journal 90 Appendix F: Rubric for Accessing Summary Writing 92

    Abadiano, H. R., & Turner, J. (2002). Reading expository text: The challenges of students with learning disabilities. New England Reading Association Journal, 38(2), 49.
    Ahangari, S., Hejazi, M., & Razmjou, L. (2014). The impact of scaffolding on content retention of Iranian post-elementary EFL learners’ summary writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.392
    Ahmad, Z. (2014). Improving students’ speaking ability by using reciprocal teaching strategy at the twelve grade students of SMKN 1 Rambah Rokan Hulu Regency. Edu Research, 3(1), 17-20.
    Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2012). Improving vocabulary learning in foreign language learning through reciprocal teaching strategy. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(6), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i6.2882
    Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
    Anderson, N. J. (2003). Teaching reading. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 67-86). McGraw Hill Publishers.
    Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. National Institute of Education and the Center for the Study of Reading.
    Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney, (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 193-226). Erlbaum.
    Back, K. W. (1951). Influence through social communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058629
    Baker, J., & Emerson, L. (2014). Reciprocal teaching: Seeing is believing. https://education.wm.edu/centers/ttac/resources/articles/teachtechnique/reciprocalteaching/index.php
    Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. International Reading Association.
    Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye. Prentice Hall Regents.
    Beckman, P. (2002). Strategy Instruction. ERIC Digest.
    Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295
    Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587008
    Budianto, A., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2022). Summaries writing to enhance reading comprehension: Systematic literature review from 2014 to 2021. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 149-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911526
    Cahyono, B. Y., & Kusumaningrum, S. R. (2015). Idea representation and summarizing strategies in article summaries written by Indonesian EFL students. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v10i1.658
    Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.x
    Chern, C. L. (2005). The role of junior high school EFL reading and instruction in Nine Year Integrated Curriculum. In W. Chang (Ed.), The challenge and solution of English instruction in Nine Year Integrated Curriculum. NTNU.
    Choo, T. O. L., Eng, T. K., & Ahmad, N. (2011). Effects of reciprocal teaching strategies on reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 11(2): 140-149.
    Choy, S. C., & Lee, M. Y. (2012). Effects of teaching paraphrasing skills to students learning summary writing in ESL. Journal of teaching and learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v8i2.3145
    Chung, Yi-Chun (2016). Exploring junior high school students' perception on the effects of reciprocal teaching in English reading courses. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Newbury House.
    Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? IRAL, 41, 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.013
    Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 29-45). Oxford University Press.
    Craik, F. I., & Lockhart. R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
    Dew, T. P., Swanto, S., & Pang, V. (2021). The effectiveness of reciprocal teaching as reading comprehension intervention: a systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 6(2), 156-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp156-184
    Druitt, E. E. (2002). Investigating students’ achievement before and after a reading intervention program. Masters Abstracts International, 40(06), 1341. (UMI No. 1409408).
    Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1981)
    Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the teaching of L2 reading. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00060.x
    Ferris D. & Hedgcock J. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose process and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Freeman, Y., & Freeman, D. (2009). Academic language for English language learners and struggling readers: How to help students succeed across content areas. Heinemann. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/109931
    Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hernandez, T. (2003). What’s the gist? Summary writing for struggling adolescent writers. Voices From the Middle, 11(2), 43-49.
    Friend, R. (2001). Effects of strategy instruction on summary writing of college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1999.1022
    Fung, I. Y., Wilkinson, I. A., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students’ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and instruction, 13(1), 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00033-0
    Gauthier, C., Bissonnette, S., & Richard, M. (2013). Enseignement explicite et réussite des élèves. La gestion des apprentissages. De Boeck.
    Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Gerd Stabler Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
    Ghorbani, M. R., Gangeraj, A. A., & Alavi, S. Z. (2013). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies improves EFL learners' writing ability. Current Issues in Education, 16(1). http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1046
    Grabe, W. (2004). 3. Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000030
    Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Alliance for Excellent Education.
    Greenway, C. (2002). The process, pitfalls and benefits of implementing a reciprocal teaching intervention to improve the reading comprehension of a group of year 6 pupils. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18(2), 113-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360220144557
    Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.477
    Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach Writing. Longman
    Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002099
    Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2009). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.834902
    Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of educational research, 56(4), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004473
    Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., Blazevic, P., & Ritchie, J. M. (2019). Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: An analytical review. Computers & Education, 128, 427-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.003
    Johnson, P., & Keier, K. (2010). Catching readers before they fall: Supporting readers who struggle, K-4. Stenhouse Publishers.
    Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
    Komariah, E., Ramadhona, P. A. R., & Silviyanti, T. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehension through reciprocal teaching method. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v2i2.2693
    Küçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113
    Kula, S. S. (2021). The effects of reciprocal teaching on the perceived reading comprehension self-efficacy of 2nd-grade pupils: Reflections of the pupils and their teacher. African Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 679-686. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.93.21.102
    Langan, J. (1993). Ten steps to advancing college learners reading skills. Townsend.
    Lee, I. (2000). Exploring reading-writing connections through a pedagogical focus on 'coherence'. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(2), 352-356. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.2.252
    Li, J. (2014). The role of reading and writing in summarization as an integrated task. Language testing in Asia, 4, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-4-3
    Lindsey, M. (1996). Connections between reading and writing: What the experts say. The Clearing House, 70(2), 103-105.
    Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 44(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084237
    Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1961). Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041109
    Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies. A&C Black.
    Macaro, E., & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the Achievement of Young-beginner Readers of French through Strategy Instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 90-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm023
    Mateos, M., Martín, E., Villalón, R., & Luna, M. (2008). Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: Online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks. Reading and Writing, 21, 675-697.
    Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J., & Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structure. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
    Navaie, L. A. (2018). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 26-30.
    Nelson, N., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.). (1998). The reading-writing connection (Vol. 972). University of Chicago Press.
    Noyce, R. M., & Christie, J. F. (1989). Integrating reading and writing instruction in Grades K-8. Allyn and Bacon Order Dept., 200 Old Tappan Rd., Old Tappan, NJ 07675.
    Numan Khazaal, E. (2019). Improving postgraduates’ academic writing skills with summarizing strategy. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 10. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.29
    Nunan D. (2003). Practical English language teaching (1st ed.). McGraw Hill/ Contemporary.
    Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: An empirical investigation. RELC journal, 28(2), 56-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829702800204
    Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
    O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner‐Manzanares, G. L. O. R. I. A., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
    Oded, B., & Walters, J. (2001). Deeper processing for better EFL reading comprehension. System, 29, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00023-9
    Ozdemir, S. (2018). Effect of summarization strategies teaching on strategy usage and narrative text summarization success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2199-2209. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061018
    Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Improving the reading comprehension of junior high students through the reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring strategies. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional children, 53(2), 118-124.
    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. Advances in research on teaching, 1, 35-71.
    Paris, S. G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 105-120). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1099-4_8
    Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
    Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 815-860). Longman.
    Poole, D. (2008). Interactional differentiation in the mixed‐ability group: A situated view of two struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 228-250. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.2
    Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuel (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291-309). International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0872071774.13
    Ransom, G.A. (1978). Preparing to Teach Reading. Little Brown Company.
    Rawengwan, W., & Yawiloeng, R. (2020). Reciprocal teaching method for enhancing Thai EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. Sripatum Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(1), 105-123. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/spurhs/article/view/235680
    Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/747614
    Risemberg, R. (1996). Reading to write: Self‐regulated learning strategies when writing essays from sources. Literacy Research and Instruction, 35(4), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079609558221
    Rogers, K. B. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, 82(595), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659808259506
    Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479
    Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
    Ruiz‐Funes, M. (1999). Writing, reading, and reading‐to‐write in a foreign language: A critical review. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 514-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb00880.x
    Shiau, A. J. (2010). Using reciprocal teaching to develop thinking in a senior high EFL classroom in Taiwan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Slater, W. H., & Horstman, F. R. (2002). Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: The case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 46(4), 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880209604416
    Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6023
    Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and instruction, 19(3), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003
    Stotsky, S. (1983). Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions. Language arts, 60(5), 627-642.
    Su, Wen-Ching (2019). The adoption of reciprocal teaching in a senior high school English class. (Unpublished technical report for the master’s degree). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Sundahry, S., Fitria, Y., & Rakimahwati, R. (2018). The effect reciprocal teaching strategy of critical thinking skills in learning thematic class V. International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology, 816-822. https://doi.org/10.29210/20181118
    Sung, Y. T., Liao, C. N., Chang, T. H., Chen, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (2016). The effect of online summary assessment and feedback system on the summary writing on 6th graders: The LSA-based technique. Computers & Education, 95, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.003
    Taylor, B. M. (1982). A summarizing strategy to improve middle grade students’ reading and writing skills. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 202-205.
    Tierney, R. J. (1982). Essential considerations for developing basic reading comprehension skills. School Psychology Review, 11(3), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1982.12084978
    Tsai, Han-Ju (2013). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of students with different competence in English. (Unpublished in-service master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    Williams, E. (1996). Reading in the language classroom. Modern English Publications
    Yang, Y. F. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1193-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.016
    Zafarani, P., & Kabgani, S. (2014). Summarization strategy training and reading comprehension of Iranian ESP learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1959-1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.629
    Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667039
    Zhang, L. J. (2003). Research into Chinese EFL learner strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. RELC Journal, 34(3), 284-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400303
    Zhang, L. J., Gu, P. Y., & Hu, G. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupils’ use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 245-271. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X218179
    Zuhra, C. M., Muslem, A., & Daud, B. (2022). The effectiveness of reciprocal scaffolding technique on students’ writing skill. English Education Journal, 13(1), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i1.24549
    Zwiers, J. (2008). Building academic language: Essential Practices for Content Classrooms, Grade5-12. John Wiley & Sons. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/109931
    李婉瑜(2014)。不同分組方式進行專題導向學習之研究-以綜合活動學習領域為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文,台北市。[Li, Wan-Yu (2014). A study of different grouping methods in project-based learning – A case study for integrative activities learning area. (Unpublished in-service master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.]

    下載圖示
    QR CODE