隨著數位科技的進步，數位學習（e-Learning）逐漸成為當今熱門的學習模式。然而，傳統影音教材的製作歷程卻無自動化設計，導致影音教材的重用性低落、製作時間成本高，無法因應學習材料的多元性需求。

本篇研究回顧數位學習和數位影音教材的發展脈絡，並結合多媒體學習理論、科技批判的角度，彙整出未來數位影音教材製程應具備的四項特性：「可重用性」、「可互動性」、「可調整性」和「學習效果還原」。

作為理論的實踐，本篇研究提出數學詳解影音自動化生成系統（explanatory math animation auto-generating system, EMA system），此系統能夠自動分析解題過程中會用到的數值資料，並能將該資料與 Manim 動畫引擎、 Microsoft Azure 語音生成服務結合，讓一部原長 118 秒的數學詳解影音，平均僅需24.428 秒即可製作完成。此技術相較於傳統影音教材的製程，除了大幅縮減影音教材的製作時間，也能解決現今影音教材的多元性需求。

With the advancement of digital technology, e-Learning has gradually become a popular learning method. However, the traditional process of producing instruction videos lacks automated design, resulting in low reusability, high production time costs, and the inability to meet the diverse needs of learning materials.

This thesis reviews the development of the production process of multimedia learning material. This thesis also combines the perspectives of multimedia learning theory and technological criticism to summarize four characteristics that future video learning materials auto-generating systems should have: "reusability," "interactivity," "adjustability," and "learning effect restoration."

Besides, this thesis proposes the Explanatory Math Animation Auto-Generating System (EMA System). EMA System can automatically analyze the numerical data used in the problem-solving process and combine the data with the animation engine - Manim and the speech generation service. In EMA system, the production time of a 118-second explanatory math animation is an average of only 24.428 seconds. This technology can significantly reduce the production time of instruction videoscompared to traditional processes.

[1] S. Pokhrel and R. Chhetri, “A literature review on impact of covid-19 pandemic on teaching and learning,” Higher education for the future, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2021.
[2] J. Cross, “An informal history of elearning,” On the Horizon, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 103– 110, 2004.
[3] D. Holzberger, A. Philipp, and M. Kunter, “How teachers＇self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis.,” Journal of educational psychology, vol. 105, no. 3, p. 774, 2013.
[4] M.-H. Lin, H.-g. Chen, et al., “A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3553–3564, 2017.
[5] V. Arkorful, N. Abaidoo, et al., “The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education,” International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2015.
[6] T. Keane, “Leading with technology: 21st century skills= 3rs+ 4cs,” Australian Educational Leader, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 44, 2012.
[7] C. Reas and B. Fry, “Processing: programming for the media arts,” Ai & Society, vol. 20, pp. 526–538, 2006. 61
[8] The Manim Community Developers, “Manim – Mathematical Animation Framework,” 12 2022.
[9] A. Maxima, “Computer algebra system,” Version, 2009.
[10] I. Parker, “Absolute powerpoint,” The New Yorker, vol. 28, pp. 76–87, 2001.
[11] S. D. Sorden, “The cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” Handbook of educational theories, vol. 1, no. 2012, pp. 1–22, 2012.
[12] S. Downes, “E-learning 2.0,” ELearn, vol. 2005, no. 10, p. 1, 2005.
[13] I. Zinovieva, V. Artemchuk, A. V. Iatsyshyn, O. Popov, V. Kovach, A. V. Iatsyshyn, Y. Romanenko, and O. Radchenko, “The use of online coding platforms as additional distance tools in programming education,” in Journal of physics: Conference series, vol. 1840, p. 012029, IOP Publishing, 2021.
[14] K. Jordan, “Massive open online courses completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition, june 2015,” Retrieved June, vol. 21, 2019.
[15] E. Rabin, Y. M. Kalman, and M. Kalz, “An empirical investigation of the antecedents of learner-centered outcome measures in moocs,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2019.
[16] L. Bell and G. Bull, “Digital video and teaching,” Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2010.
[17] D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. O. Briggs, and J. F. Nunamaker Jr, “Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness,” Information & management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2006.
[18] R. E. Mayer, “Multimedia learning,” in Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 41, pp. 85–139, Elsevier, 2002. 62
[19] R. Mayer and R. E. Mayer, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge university press, 2005.
[20] H. Arendt, The human condition. University of Chicago press, 2013.
[21] J. V. Wertsch, “The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues,” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, vol. 1984, no. 23, pp. 7–18, 1984.
[22] C. Piech, J. Bassen, J. Huang, S. Ganguli, M. Sahami, L. J. Guibas, and J. Sohl-Dickstein, “Deep knowledge tracing,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 28, 2015.
[23] S. Livingstone and E. Helsper, “Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide,” New media & society, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 671–696, 2007. [24] M. Weimer, Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[25] OpenAI, “Gpt-4 technical report,” 2023.
[26] Microsoft Azure, “Speech studio - custom neural voice -overview,” 2023.
[27] The Manim Community Developers, “Manim voiceover v.0.3.0,” 2023.