簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱發忠
Chiou, Fa-Chung
論文名稱: 創造力認知運作機制之探究
The Cognitive Process of Creativity
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 220
中文關鍵詞: 內隱與外顯主觀標準正負向情緒多重結構多重處理模式時間觀點創造策略動機焦點激發與抑制
英文關鍵詞: activation and inhibition, creative strategies, implicit and explicit processes, motivation focus, Multiple Structures and Multiple Processes model, positive and negative emotion, temporal perspective, subjective standard
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:351下載:228
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    本研究目的在探討創造力的認知運作歷程,筆者在整合過去認知取向的創造力模式後,並以近期認知科學發展的概念為基礎,建構認知取向的「多重結構多重處理模式」(MSMP) 。整體而言,MSMP創造模式可區分為「結構」 (structure) 與「處理」(processes) 兩個部份。其中還包含了次結構 (sub-structures) 及次歷程 (sub-processes) 、內隱 (implicit) 及外顯 (explicit) 認知的運作,基本上,創造活動是「結構」與「處理」互動的結果。基於MSMP模式的思考,本研究進行7個實驗來探討「激發與抑制」及「內隱與外顯認知」對創造力的影響。依據MSMP模式的假設,當激發優勢基模,則其它基模的激發會受到抑制,則創造力將較低;若降低優勢基模的激發,則其它基模的抑制將減小,創造力則會提升。因此,實驗1、2操作增加及降低優勢基模激發,發現在新編創造思考測驗表現上,當操作增加優勢基模之激發將會抑制其它無關基模,而創造力降低。而操作降低優勢基模之激發將會減少抑制其它無關基模,創造力將會提升。由實驗1、2實驗結果可知,激發與抑制在創造力表現上扮演重要的角色。MSMP模式也主張,創造力的認知歷程包含了內隱及外顯的認知處理,為了驗證此假設,以操作內隱或外顯處理,並觀察其對內隱及外顯作業的影響。若內隱的認知處理 (獨變項) 只影響內隱作業,而不影響外顯作業,及外顯的認知處理 (獨變項) 只影響外顯作業,而不影響內隱作業,則可以推測這兩個作業是分別倚賴兩個獨立分離的心理機制,因此,實驗假設當操弄內隱處理時只會影響內隱作業的表現,而不會影響外顯作業的表現,而當操弄外顯處理時,則反之。實驗3至5分別探究「時間觀點」(temporal perspective)、「正負向情緒」及「動機焦點」(motivation focus) 等內隱促發因素對創造力的影響。實驗3、4結果發現,時間觀點、正負向情緒的內隱促發的操作只影響內隱作業或內隱外顯兼具的作業表現,但不影響外顯作業表現。實驗5結果發現動機焦點的內隱促發只影響內隱作業或內隱外顯兼具作業的表現,但不影響外顯作業表現的預測獲部分的支持。實驗6主要操弄外顯主觀標準對內隱及外顯創造作業的影響,而實驗7為操弄外顯的創造策略教導對內隱、外顯作業的影響,實驗6、7結果發現,外顯的主觀標準、創造策略教導操作只影響外顯作業或內隱外顯兼具的作業,但不影響內隱作業的假設獲得大部分的支持。由實驗3至7可知,內隱的促發只會影響內隱,或內隱外顯兼具的作業,但不影響外顯的作業,而外顯的主觀標準高低、創造策略教導不影響內隱作業,但會影響外顯或內隱外顯兼具的作業,由此支持創造力包含了內隱及外顯認知歷程。本研究成果未來可以做為創造力課程或教育實務的參考,俾有效培養及提升個體創造力。

    關鍵詞:內隱與外顯、主觀標準、正負向情緒、多重結構多重處理模式、時間觀點、創造策略、動機焦點、激發與抑制

    ABSTRACT
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the cognitive process of creativity. A “Multiple Structures and Multiple Processes model (MSMP)” was built up based on the concepts of contemporary cognitive psychology and modern creative theories. In general, MSMP could be divided into two parts, one is “Structure” and the other is “Process”, and it assumed that creative behavior is the interaction of the two. According to the prediction of MSMP, seven experiments were conducted in this study to testify two assumptions, including the influences of “activation or inhibition of priority schema” and “the implicit and explicit cognition” on creativity. Experiment 1 and 2 were conducted to testify the first assumption, assuming that when the priority scheme is activated, other schema would be inhibited, thus reduced the performance of creativity, and vice versa. The results showed that when the priority scheme was activated and other schema were inhibited, participants’ performance on New Creativity Test would get worse, whereas when the priority scheme was inhibited and other schema were less inhibited, participants’ performance on New Creativity Test would get better. Experiment 3 to 5, investigating the influence of implicit cognition on creative behaviors such as the “temporal perspective”, “positive and negative emotion” and “motivation focus”, were used to testify the second assumption which suggests that the cognitive process of creativity includes both the implicit and explicit processes. The results of experiment 3 and 4 supported the assumption, showing that manipulating the implicit priming through using “temporal perspective” and “positive and negative emotion” only influenced the implicit task and the hybrid of implicit and explicit tasks but not the explicit task. The result of experiment 5 supported the hypothesis partially through using “motivation focus” to manipulate the implicit priming. As to experiment 6 and 7, “subjective standard” was manipulated (experiment 6) and the creative strategies were instructed (experiment 7) to influence participants’ performance on implicit and explicit tasks. The results demonstrated that the subjective standard and the creative strategies only influenced participants’ performance on the hybrid of the explicit and implicit tasks but not the implicit task. According to experiment 3 to 7, it was found that the implicit priming would only influence the implicit task or the hybrid of implicit and explicit tasks but not the explicit task. It was also found that the explicit subjective standard and creative strategies instruction would only influence the hybrid of implicit and explicit tasks but not the implicit task. The results supported that the cognitive process of creativity includes both the explicit and implicit processes. The research could be applied on creative curriculum and education practice in the future.

    KEY WORDS: activation and inhibition, creative strategies, implicit and explicit processes, motivation focus, Multiple Structures and Multiple Processes model, positive and negative emotion, temporal perspective, subjective standard

    目 錄 摘要 ……………………………………………………………... Ⅰ 目錄 ……………………………………………………………… Ⅴ 附錄目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅶ 附表目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅷ 附圖目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅹ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的與假設………………………………………… 4 第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 創造力的定義…………………………………………… 14 第二節 創造力理論……………………………………………… 17 第三節 認知取向創造力理論的總結…………………………… 54 第四節 認知取向創造力模式擴展的思考背景………………… 56 第三章 假想的多重結構多重處理模式(MSMP)及模式預測 第一節 多重結構多重處理模式………………………………… 83 第二節 研究焦點與模式預測…………………………………… 94 第四章 預備性研究:頓悟性問題測驗之發展 第一節 頓悟性問題測驗之項目分析…………………………… 98 第二節 頓悟性問題測驗之信、效度研究……………….…… 104 第五章 正式研究 第一節 實驗一:增加優勢基模激發對創造力表現的影響…… 111 第二節 實驗二:降低優勢基模激發對創造力表現的影響... 116 第三節 實驗三:近距及遠距時間觀點促發對創造力表現之影響 ..............................................120 第四節 實驗四:正、負向情緒促發對創造力表現的影響…… 128 第五節 實驗五:促進焦點及預防焦點動機促發對創造力表現 之影響.........................................137 第六節 實驗六:高、低主觀標準對創造力表現之影響……… 144 第七節 實驗七:創造策略教導對創造力表現的影響………… 149 第六章 綜合討論 第一節 MSMP創造力模式………………………………………… 157 第二節 頓悟性問題測驗……………………………………… 158 第三節 實驗結果討論………………………………………… 159 第四節 對創造力教育的建議………………………………… 169 第五節 研究限制……………………………………………… 171 第六節 未來研究發展………………………………………… 172 第七節 結語…………………………………………………… 174 參考文獻…………………………………………………………. 175 附錄 附錄1頓悟性問題測驗A、B版本………………………………… 188 附錄2 頓悟性問題測驗測驗……………………………………… 197 附錄3 同儕提名問題……………………………………………… 200 附錄4 身心狀態調查表…………………………………………… 201 附錄5 聯想法講義………………………………………………… 203 附錄6 提示列舉法講義…………………………………………… 208 附錄7 實驗7的變異數分析摘要表……………………………… 219 附錄8 新編創造思考測驗使用同意書…………………………… 220

    參考文獻
    毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台 (2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理出版社。
    王強之 (1998)。心情一致性主觀機率判斷的理論模式檢證。輔仁大學應用心理學研究所碩士論文。
    任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲 (2004)。創造力測量的輔助工具:中文遠距聯想量表的編製。應用心理研究,21,195-218。
    何偉雲、葉錦燈 (2003)。RAT-like測驗中的擴散性思考分析。科學教育學刊,11,195-210。
    吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。
    李秀瓊 (1999)。高低創造力者在詞彙連結型態上有否差異?-檢驗Mednick的連結層級假說。台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    李德高 (1992)。創造心理學。台北:五南出版公司。
    林緯倫、連韻文和任純慧 (2005)。 發散性思考是創意問題解決的前提嗎?「中華心理學刊」付印中。
    張世慧( 1988)。創造性解決方案對國小資優班和普通班學生創造性問題解決能力、創造力和問題解決能力之影響。台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
    張豫人 (2002)。軍事情境中情緒感受、情緒智力對問題解決的影響-以政戰學校學生為例。政治作戰學校軍事社會行為科學研究所軍事心理組碩士論文。
    教育部 (2002)。創造力教育白皮書。
    郭有遹 (1991)。創造心理學。台北:正中書局。
    陳昭儀 (1995)。增強創造力的方法。資優教育研究,54,8-20。
    陳學志 (1991)。幽默理解的認知歷程。台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
    陳龍安、朱湘吉 (1999)。創造與生活。台北:五南。
    陳龍根編 (2002)。智力遊戲集錦。香港:讀者文摘社。
    葉玉珠 (2001)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32,1-28。
    劉英茂 (2003)。基本心理歷程。台北:大洋出版社。
    練竑初 (2002)。閾下刺激之單純曝光效果研究。輔仁大學應用心理學研究所碩士論文。
    鄭昭明 (1997)。認知心理學-理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
    饒見維 (2004)。創造思考訓練。台北:五南。

    Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1989). Independence and cognitive ability in gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. Journal Youth Adolescent, 18, 221-230.
    Amabile, T. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: Crown.
    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Amabile, T. M. (1987). The motivation to be creative. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beond the basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
    Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Cognition. New jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Attneave, F. (1971). Multistability in perception. Scientific American, 225, 62-71.
    Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp.47-89). New York: Academic Press.
    Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
    Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 76-98). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Basadur.M. S., Rraen, G. B., & Gree, S. G. (1982). Traning in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding in an allied research organization. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41-70.
    Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E.(1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 209-231.
    Bink, M. L. & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 4, 59-78.
    Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Brown, A. L. (1975). The development of memory: knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp.104-152), New York: Acdamic Press.
    Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity(pp. 3-30). New York: Plenum Press.
    Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Crites, S. L. (1996). Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological arousal and response. In E. T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 72-101). New York: Guilford Press.
    Carson, H. C., Peterson, J. B., & Hiffins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 85, 499-506.
    Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the ctrative process. Personality Individual Difference, 14, 155-162.
    Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What makes an insight problem? The roles of Heuristics, Goal conception, and solution in knowledge-lean problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 30, 14-27.
    Clapham, M. M. (2001). The Effects of affect Manipulation and Information Exposure on Divergent Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 335-350.
    Clifford, M. M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk taking in ten to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, publishers.
    Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428
    Coney, J., & Serna, P. (1995). Creative thinking from an information processing perspective: a new approach to Mednidk’s theory of associative hierarchies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 109-132.
    Crawford, R. P. (1954). The techniques of creative thinking. New York: Hawthorn.
    Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp.190-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Haepercollins.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York: HarperCollins.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: a study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 47-52.
    Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
    DeBono, E. (1968). New think: The use of lateral thinking in the generation of new ideas. New Yorks: Basic.
    Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
    Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory process: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 157-173.
    Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart’s eye: emotional influences in perception and attention (pp.167-196). New York: Academic Press.
    Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Health.
    Dominowski, R. L. (1995). Productive problem solving. In S. M. Smith., T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    Dominowski, R. L., & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp.33-62). The MIT Press.
    Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A. & Kihlstrom, J. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. Underwood (Eds.), Implicit cognition (pp.257-296). Oxford University Press.
    Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, whole No. 270.
    Eberle, R. (1971). SCAMPER: Games for imagination development. NY: D. O. K. Publisher, Inc.
    Eberle, R. (1982). Visual think: A ‘SCAMPER’ tool for useful imaging. NY: D. O. K. Publisher, Inc.
    Eindhoven, J. E., & Vinacke, W. E. (1952). Creative processes in painting. Journal of general Psychology, 47, 139-164.
    Eisenman, R. (1987). Creativity, birth order, and risk taking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 87-88.
    Epstein, S. (1994). An integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
    Evans, F. J., & Thorn, W. A. F. (1966). Two types of posthypnotic amesia: Recall amnesia and source amnesia. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 14, 162-179.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1996). The measurement of creativity. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity (pp.199-242). The MIT Press.
    Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Camridge Press.
    Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery and the inventions in visualization. Hillsadle, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Finke, R. A., Slayton, K. (1988). Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory and Cognition, 16, 252-257.
    Finke, R. A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
    Forster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319.
    Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth.
    Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1908)
    Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
    Friedman, R., Fishbach, A., Forster, J., & Werth, L. (2003). Attentional Priming Effects on Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 277-286.
    Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263-276.
    Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed. Big Apple Tuttle-Mori Agency, Inc.
    Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. Taylor & J. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 90-116). Chicago: Aldine.
    Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp.30-43). New York: Wiley.
    Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: directed, undirected and creative. NY: Academic Press.
    Gordon, W. J. J. (1970). Synectices. NY: Harper & Row Pubuishers.
    Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766-779.
    Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Liu, T. J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory & Cognition. 17, 35-47.
    Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. Americn Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
    Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Eds.), Prentice Hall International: UK.
    Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical Thinking. NJ: Lawrence Associates, Inc.
    Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. r. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51, 37-54.
    Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685-691.
    Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. NY: Plenum Press.
    Hennessey, B. A. (2003). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 3, 253-271.
    Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M. (1988). Story-Telling: A Method for Assessing Children's Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 235-246.
    Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
    Hill. K. (1991). An ecological approach to creativity and motivation: Trait and environment influences in the college classroom. Unpuished Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
    Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. In J. R. Anderson & K. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory (pp.193-218). New York: Freeman.
    Hoppe, K. D., & Kyle, N. L. (1990). Dual brain, creativity, and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 150-157.
    Howard-Jones, P. A. & Murray, S. (2003). Ideational productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity research journal. 15, 153-166.
    Howe, A. (1982). Biographical evidence and the development of outstanding individuals. American Psychologist, 37, 1071-1081.
    Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
    Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive effect. In T. Dalgleish & M. Powers (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 75-94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Isen, A.M. (1985). The asymmetry of happiness and sadness in effects on memory in normal college students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 388-391.
    Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
    Kaufmann, D. (2003). What to Measure?A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 235-251.
    Kay, S. (1991). The figural problem finding and problem solving of professional and semiprofessional artists and nonartists. Journal of creativity research, 4, 233-252.
    Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, s. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the Nine-Dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 3-13.
    Kihlstrom, J. f. (1984). Conscious, subconscious, unconscious: A cognitive perspective. In K. S. Bowers & D. Meichenbaum (Ed.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp.149-211), New York: Wily.
    Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237, 1445-1452.
    Kihlstrom, J. F. (1990). The psychological unconscious. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 445-464). New York: Wiley.
    Kihlstrom, J. F. (1995). The rediscovery of the unconscious. In J. Singer & H. Morowitz (Eds.), The mind, the brain, and complex adaptive systems (pp.123-143). Santa Fe institute studies in the Science of Complexity. MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Kihlstrom, J. F. (1999). Conscious versus unsconscious cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Cognition (pp.173-203). MIT press.
    King, L., Walker, L., & Broyles, S. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189-203.
    Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilfords Press.
    Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G.E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & cognition, 29, 1000-1009.
    Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.
    Kossly, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. J., & Fliegal, S. L. (1983). Generating visual images: Units and relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 278-303.
    Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. New York: International Press.
    Kubie, L. S. (1958). The neurotic distortion of the creative process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
    Liberman, N., & trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
    Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp.289-332). New York: Academic.
    Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
    Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditional attention theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54 (6, Whole No.248).
    MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 26, 484-496.
    Magyari-Beck, I. (1988). New concepts about personal creativity. Creativity and Innovation Yearbook, Manchester: Manchester Business School, 121-126.
    Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181-194.
    Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
    Martindale, C. (1989). Personaility, situation, and creativity. In R. R. J. Glover & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp.211-232). New York: Plenum.
    Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Martindale, C., Anderson, K., Moore, K., & West, A. N. (1996). Creativity, oversensitivity, and the rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 423-427.
    Martisen, O. (2003). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 227-233.
    Matlin, M. w., & Stang, D. (1979). The Polyanna Principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
    Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search for insight: grappling with Gestalt psychology’s unanswered questions. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp.1-32). The MIT Press.
    Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty tears of creativity research. In R. j. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.449-460). Camridge Press.
    McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1263.
    Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44, 220-232.
    Mellou, E. (1996). The two-condition view of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 126-149.
    Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288-294.
    Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623-634.
    Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 15, 238-246.
    Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp.215-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Morris, C. D. (1989). Mood: the frame of mind. NY: Springer-Verlag.
    Mouchiroud, C. (2001). Children’s Original Thinking: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Measures Derived from Divergent Thinking Tasks. The Journal of Psychology, 162, 382-401.
    Mumford, M. D. (2003) Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-121.

    Mumford, M. D., & Whetzel, D. L. (1996). Insight, creativity, and cognition: on Sternberg and Davidson’s the nature of insight. Creativity research Journal, 1, 103-107.
    Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Pallmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
    Murry, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411-425.
    Nancarrow, C., & Brace, I. (2000). Saying the "right thing": Coping with Social Desirability Bias in Marketing Research. Bristol Business School Teaching and Research Review Issue 3, 1468-4578
    Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.
    Newell. A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257-269.
    Ochse, R. (1990). Before the Gates of Excellence. The Determination of Creative Genius. Cambigde University Press, Cambridge, England.
    Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited: Ⅰ. A summary and critique of the gestalt theory of problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 67-78.
    Oldham, G. R; Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
    Osborn, A. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: scribner.s.
    Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribner’s.
    Oswald, M., & Gadenne, V. (2000). Are controlled processes conscious?In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th Birthday of August Flammer (pp.87-101). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, publishers.
    Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    Paulus, P. P., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity. New York: Oxford Press.
    Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.
    Perkins, D. (2000). The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. Norton & Company.
    Plukcer, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.35-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Pterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and Extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137-1147.
    Quillian, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the Association for Computing machinery, 12, 459-476.
    Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 317-327.
    Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
    Reber, A. s., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6, 189-221.
    Reingold, E. M., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1996). Separating consciously controlled and automatic influences in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 397-406.
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa, 42, 305-310.
    Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L., & The PDP research Group (Eds.), (1986). Parallel distributed processing, Volume1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Runco, M. A. (1990). Implicit theories and ideational creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp.234-252). Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
    Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311-319.
    Runco, M. A. (1994). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw, & M. A. Runco, (Eds.). Creativity and affect. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
    Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. American review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
    Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243-267.
    Runco, M. A., & Walbarg, H. J. (1998). Personal explicit theories of creativity. The Journal of Creativity Behavior, 32, 1-17.
    Runco, M. A., Albert, R. A. S. (1985). The Reliability and Validity of Ideational Originality in the Divergent Thinking of Academically Gifted and Nongifted Children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.

    Runco, M. A., Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem Finding, Problem Solving and Creativity (pp.40-76), NJ: Ablex, Norwood.
    Runco, M.A. , & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem-discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 17, 211-220.
    Russ, S. W. (1999). Article Discussion: Accentuate the Positive in Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 225-229.

    Santanen, E. L., Briggs, R. O., & de Vreede, G.J. (2004). Causal Relationships in Creative Problem Solving: Comparing Facilitation Interventions for Ideation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 167-197.
    Schooler, J. w., ohlsson, S., & brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: when language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166-183.
    Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. N Y: Guilford.
    Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16,141-148.
    Segal, H. (1957). A psycho-analytic approach to aesthetics. In M. Klein, P. Heiman, & R. Money-Kyrle (eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic.
    Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
    Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14
    Showers, C. & Cantor, N. (1985). Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 275-305.
    Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Short selling investment theories of creativity? A reply to Runco. Journal of creativity research, 4, 202-205.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Camridge Press.
    Stokes, A. (1963). Painting and the inner world. London: Tavistock.
    Stokes, P. (1999). Novelty. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp.237-304). San Diego, CA: Academic.
    Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of Creative Thinking. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
    Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 201-237.
    Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
    Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory: New York: Oxford University.
    Vernon, P. E. (1970). Creativity. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
    Vinacke, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Vosburg, S. K. (1998), The Effects of Positive and Negative Mood on Divergent-Thinking Performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 165-172.
    Wakefield, J. F.(1992). Creative thinking: Problem-Solving Skills and the Art Orientation. Norwood, New Jersey
    Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brance.
    Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968). Nature, 217, 972-974.
    Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Case studies of creative thinking: Reproduction versus restructuring in the real world. In S. M. Smith., T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 53-72). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
    Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
    Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of fixation in the solution of several insight problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 110, 169-192.
    Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
    Wile, J. & Bondi, J. (1980). Teaching for creative thinking in the Intermediate Grades. Poeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 3, 4-6.
    Williams, F. E. (1967). Intellectual creativity and the teacher. Journal of creative Behavior, 1, 173-180.
    Wilson, T. D. & Stone, J. I. (1985). Limitations of self-knowledge: More on telling more than we can know. Review of personality and Social Psychology, 6, 167-183.
    Wilson, T. D. (1985). Strangers to ourselves: The origins and accuracy of beliefs about one's own mental states. In J. H. Harvey Sc G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution in contem¬porary psychology (pp. 9-36). New York: Academic Press.
    Wisniewski, E. J., & Gentner, D. (1991). On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: Minor and major disturbances to meaning. In G. B. Simpson (Eds.), Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Yaniv, I., & Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible information. Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 187-205.

    QR CODE