教師的生活故事和實務經驗隱含智慧與理論。教師是真正具備有教學設計專業知識背景的人，研究MOOC授課教師經驗是有其重要性。本論文採取實踐的現象學觀點探討MOOC授課教師的實務歷程。
本論文聚焦在熱門的MOOC授課教師經驗，採取立意抽樣方式選取學聯網平台課程排名前茅的授課教師為研究對象。研究目的有二；描述MOOC授課教師經驗本質，以及探求MOOC授課教師經驗本質的意義。
研究發現教師需要瞭解及適應MOOC教學模式，更需要培養因應這種教學模式的教學專業素養。從描述MOOC授課教師經驗本質中，體現出MOOC的教學追求宏觀的教學目標，學用零落差的教學內容，編排故事性的教材形態，是較具有吸引學生參與MOOC的元素。受訪教師經驗本質的意義有展現親和力、說故事的能力、持宏觀的態度、抱著利他的心、做中學的精神等五項。本論文研究結果可以提供MOOC授課教師足以遵循及觀摩的實務經歷，有助於教師實踐MOOC教學的省思。
建議未來後續的研究，持續追蹤MOOC授課教師在MOOC平台挑戰創新教學作法的經驗。

The life story and practical experience of instructors often imply wisdom and brings forth theories. Instructors are professionals with expertise in instructional design knowledge. Therefore, it magnifies the importance of massive open online course (MOOC). This paper explores the practicality of MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) from a phenomenology point of view.
In order to invesitgate the attractiveness of MOOC to the mass public, the paper focuses on the teaching experience of popular MOOC instructors that are chosen from judgemental sampling of the top rated instructors. There are two main objectives in this paper. The first objective outlines the essences of the instructors’ experience and the second objective investigates the meaning behind the essence.
Studies have found out that teachers are required to understand and adopt MOOC teaching model. Further more, they need to develop their professional teaching characteristic in response to this model. The MOOC instructors’ teaching experience reflects MOOC’s macroscopic teaching objective. Moreover, learning to use zero variance teaching content and story line teaching material are the attractive factors for students’ involvement in MOOC. From the interview with MOOC instructors, the instructors’ experience presents five core significance. They are their friendly and amicable appeal, story- telling skill, macroscopic point of view, altruistic personality and learn-by-doing attitude. This study’s result will be able to provide MOOC instructors experiences which is inspiring and helpful in MOOC’s practice. It aids instructors in reflecting on their MOOC teaching practices.
It is recommended to follow up with investigation of MOOC instructors’ experience in innovating their teachings on the MOOC platform.

一、中文部份
王梅玲(2013)。數位課程教學法模式與應用：「知識組織與資訊取用課程」實例探討。大學圖書館，17(1)，1-21。
卯靜儒(2008)。全球化效應下的課程改革─知識社會學的幾點觀察。 教育研究月刊， 170， 5-14。
史美瑤(2012)。21世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。 評鑑雙月刊，36。
施偉隆(2009)。從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，2(1)，127-151。
高淑清(2000)。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所主編之「質的研究方法」 (pp. 93-134)。高雄： 麗文.
曹家榮(2013)。 理解技術實作：現象學取徑初探。社會分析(7)，1-43。
甄曉蘭(2003)。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊，49(1)，63-94.
蔡麗美(1990)。胡賽爾。台北：東大。

二、外文部份
Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: the tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35(2), 202-216.
Al-Atabi, M., & DeBoer, J. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship using massive open online course (MOOC). Technovation, 34(4), 261-264.
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. New York: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca, Canada: AB Athabasca University.
Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249.
Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding Teacher Change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367.
Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368-378.
Baggaley, J. (2014). MOOCS: Digesting the facts. Distance Education, 35(2), 159-163.
Bates, T. (2012). What's wrong and right about Coursera-style Moocs. Online Learning and Distance Education Resources. Retrieved October 23, 2014, from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
Bates, T. (2014). MOOCs: Getting to know you better. Distance Education, 35(2), 145-148.
Baxter, J. A. (2013). Professional inspector or inspecting professional? Teachers as inspectors in a new regulatory regime for education in England. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 467-485.
Bell, F. (2010). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 99-118.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129-136.
Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Journal of Distance Education, 39, 1-17.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303-317.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 18. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-18
Downes, S. (2005). An introduction to connective knowledge. Stephen's Web Retrieved October 16, 2014, from http://www.downes.ca/post/33034
Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
Downes, S. (2013). Week 2: The quality of massive open online courses. MOOC Quality Project. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://mooc.efquel.org/week-2-the-quality-of-massive-open-online-courses-by-stephen-downes/
Drew, N. (1993). Reenactment interviewing: A methodology for phenomenological research. Image, 25(4), 345-351.
Ellul, J. (1954). The technological society. New York: Vintage.
Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 127-134.
EP-Library. (2013, October 02, 2015). Open education: OER, OCW and MOOCs. Retrieved October 02, 2014, from http://libraryeuroparl.wordpress.com/2013/10/01/open-education-oer-ocw-and-moocs/
Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35(2), 178-201.
Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: Identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149-158.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. D. P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault:Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicage.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and Psychological Research (pp. 1-12). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Glasersfeld, E. V. (1996). Radical constructivism: A way of Knowing and learning. London, UK: Falmer Press.
Goodson, I. F. (1998). Storying the self: Life politics and the study of the teacher’s life and work. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward New Identities (pp. 3-20). New York: Garland.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246-259.
Griesbaum, J. (2014). Students as teachers in MOOCs? The double gain of MOOCs as an in-class teaching method experiences from a student-made MOOC “online data privacy”. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 29-34.
Haggard, S., Lawton, W., Katsomitros, A., Gore, T., & Inkelaar, T. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning (pp. 123): Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic Writings: From Being and Time to the Task of Thinking (pp. 306-341). New York: HarperCollins.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12(0), 45-58.
Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2006). Introduction to international relations theories and approaches (3rd ed.). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, B. (2007). Which radical discontinuity? BILL KERR. Retrieved July 09, 2015, from http://billkerr2.blogspot.tw/2007/02/which-radical-discontinuity.html
King, D. B., & Wertheimer, M. (2007). Max Wertheimer and Gestalt Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Transaction.
Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177.
Kolowich, S. (2013). The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 22, 2013, from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=overview
Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 171-196.
Leontyev, A., & Baranov, D. (2013). Massive open online courses in chemistry: A comparative overview of platforms and features. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1533-1539.
Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Reasearch: Theories and Issues (2nd ed., pp. 195-219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mackness, J. (2013, October 22). cMOOCs and xMOOCs - Key differences. Jenny Mackness Blog. Retrieved June 14, 2015, from http://jennymackness.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/cmoocs-and-xmoocs-key-differences/
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83.
Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 250-262.
McDonald, J., & Reushle, S. (2002). Charting the role of the online teacher in higher education: winds of change. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education http://eprints.usq.edu.au/4363/
McDonald, J., & Reushle, S. (Dec 8-11, 2002). Charting the role of the online teacher in higher education: winds of change Paper presented at the The 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Auckland, New Zealan.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three p's of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Parr, C. (2013). Mooc creators criticise courses' lack of creativity. Times Higher Education. Retrieved September 3, 2015, from https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/mooc-creators-criticise-courses-lack-of-creativity/2008180.article
Pinar, W. F. (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. San Pablo, CA: McCutchan.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1987). The formation of school subjects and the political context of schooling In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The Formation of the School Subjects (pp. 1-24). New York: Falmer Press
Popkewitz, T. S. (1999). A social epistemology of educational research. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Critical Theories in Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politicsa (pp. 17-42). New York: Routledge.
Raposo-Rivas, M., Martínez-Figueira, E., & Sarmiento-Campos, J. A. (2015). A study on the pedagogical components of massive online courses. Comunicar, 22(44), 27-35.
Roth, M. S. (2013). My modern experience teaching a MOOC. Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(34), 18-21.
Sandbergh, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 203-212.
Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2013). Narratives of learning to teach: Taking on professional identities. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 35-46.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-8.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Tuomi, I. (2013). Open educational resources and the transformation of education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58-78.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: SUNY Press
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Pres
Wikipedia. (2012). Connectivism. The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved July 19, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism
Young, J. R. (2013). What professors can learn from 'hard core' MOOC students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(37), A4.