研究生: |
張淑玉 Chang, Su-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
準退休族群退休後理想居住方式之探討-以大台北地區為例 Housing Preferences of Retirement for Pre-Retirees-A Case of Taipei City and New Taipei City |
指導教授: |
沈永正
Shen, Yung-Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 43 |
中文關鍵詞: | 孤獨感 、人格特質 、退休居住 、高齡住宅 、集群分析 |
英文關鍵詞: | Loneliness, Personality Trails, Retired Living, Senior Housing, Cluster Analysis |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202334 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:253 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣於1993年進入高齡化社會,人口老化速度較其他成熟國家更加快速,針對高齡人口居住的規劃及配套迫在眉睫,然而政府及民間團體普遍對高齡人口之實際需求了解有限,故本研究報告針對大台北地區準退休族群 (45-64歲),對其退休後理想居住規劃進行調查,再分別以人口統計變數、孤獨感及人格特質等三種不同面向,對於退休後理想居住規劃的相關性進行探討。本研究依據孤獨量表 (UCLA Loneliness Scale) 將受訪者分為高、低孤獨感二個族群;以大五人格 (Big Five Personality Trails) 作為人格特質的判斷依據,按照同情心、缺乏自信、創新創意、領導統御、積極向上、外向社交等六個構面,將受訪者分成不同集群。研究結果發現,除了孤獨感高低對其選擇退休後理想居住規劃的結果部分不顯著之外,人口統計變數如教育、職務、年收入與現居地區的差異等皆對結果存在顯著性的影響;就人格特質來看,大體上具有創新、積極及社交特質的集群在居住條件與居住方式上有較為明顯的偏好。最後,將研究結果進行後續分析,探討不同面向的族群對未來退休居住的偏好與考量,可作為未來政府或民間單位在規劃老年人口住宅時的參考方向。
Taiwan has entered the aging society since 1993, and the population is aging more severe than other well-developed countries. Therefore, the supporting of senior housing facilities have become necessary and urgent, but the government and non-government organizations do not seem to fully recognize how the elderly people shape their retirement life. To further explore this topic, this research paper dived deeply into what the ideal living environments are for those who are heading into their retirement (45-64 years old) based on self-designed survey. The research paper then looks for the connections among different people by using Demographic Variables, Loneliness, and Personality dimensions.
First, the research divided people into high and low loneliness groups based on UCLA Loneliness Scale and then used another analysis method, which is Big Five Personality Trails to divide the people into 6 groups by evaluating their compassion, confidence, innovation, leadership, determination, and social communication.
This paper find that the loneliness is not the significant factor for choosing living environment, but the demographic variables such as education, jobs, annual incomes, and the current living areas are significant. Based on personalities, the people who are more innovative, positive, and socially active have more significant living preferences. At last, the research has further analyzed the information gathered from the self-designed survey and evaluated the preference and concerns from different groups of people. It can also be the reference for the government and non-government organization when planning the “Senior Housing” projects in near future.
中文文獻
內政部營建署 (2008),「整體住宅政策及住宅法草案介紹-高齡化社會與老人住宅之開發實現」,社區發展季刊,第121期,14-25。
江亮演 (1983),老人福利理論與實務。台北:宏光文化。
吳仕丞 (2009),「中年人的老年居住型態偏好:以高雄市公教人員為例」,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
吳明隆 (2007),SPSS統計應用學習實務─問卷分析與應用統計。台北市:知城。
李瑞金 (1996),「高齡者社會參與需求-以台北市為例」,社會建設季刊,第95期,7-19。
周世玉、陳麒文、張為詩 (2004),「人格特質與品牌個性關係之研究:以運動鞋産品爲例」,中華管理學報,第5卷,第3期,1-16頁。
洪嘉鴻 (2006),「人格特質、價值觀與產品屬性關係之研究」,嶺東學報,第20期,161-188。
張立龍 (2015),「居住安排對老年人孤獨感的影響」,老齡科學研究, 第3卷,第2期,59-66。
張孝銘 (2008),休閒消費者行為,台北:華都文化。
張春興(1981),心理學。台北:東華書局
張雅惠 (2006),「台灣高齡者居住型態選擇之研究:兼論台灣老人住宅政策」,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
教育部健康醫學學網健康心理工作小組,人格特質,Available at: https://market.cloud.edu.tw/search/search.jsp?keywordArea=C&q=%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E5%81%A5%E5%BA%B7%E9%86%AB%E5%AD%B8%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E7%B6%B2%E5%81%A5%E5%BA%B7%E5%BF%83%E7%90%86%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E5%B0%8F%E7%B5%84 (accessed 05.04.17).
陳政雄 (2006),「老人住宅整體規劃理念」,台灣老年醫學雜誌,第1卷,第3期,122-137。
陳映樺 (2004),「探討我國老人住宅之服務創新」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
陳章維 (2004),「銀髮住宅商機爭奪戰」,台灣新生報6月14日。
陳鳳音 (2002),「機構式的長期照顧的品質及相關影響因素」,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
黃富順 (2004),高齡學 (初版)。台北:五南。
黃慧敏 (2005),「台灣嬰兒潮世代生活型態對退休準備及保健習慣之分析」,台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
葉志誠 (2012),老人長照政策。揚智出版社。
劉梅君 (1993),「退休研究對中高齡人力資源運用的意義」,政大勞動學報,第3卷,169-195。
劉曜華 (2004),「台灣都市發展史」
蔡淑瑩 (2001),「台北市居家老人生活空間與環境體驗之探討」,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。
衛生福利部 (2014),「102年老人狀況調查報告」。
薛承泰 (2003),「台灣地區人口特質與趨勢:對社會福利政策的幾個啟示」,國家政策季刊,第2卷,第4期,1-22。
鍾建安、段锦云 (2004),「『大五』人格模型及其在工業與組織心理學中的應用」,心理科學進展,第12卷,第4期,578-583。
顧秀琴(2006),「公務人員退休後再就業之研究-以台北市政府交通局為例」,國立政治大學行政管理學程碩士論文。
英文文獻
Atchley, R. C. (1976). The sociology of retirement. Halsted Press.
Big Five,Available at: https://meetype.com/bigfive-test-result (accessed 05.04.17).
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old, the process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
Dailey, N. (1998). When baby boom women retire. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Evandrou, M., & Falkingham, J. (2000). Looking back to look forward: lessons from four birth cohorts for ageing in the 21st century. Population Trends, 99, 27-36.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329-344.
Forman, A. M. Sriram, V., (1991). The Depersonalization of Retailing: Its Impact on the “Lonely” Consumer Journal of Retailing, 67(2), 226.
Francese, P. (2003). Working women. American Demographics, 25(2), 40-41.
Holak, S. L. (1988). Determinants of innovative durables adoption an empirical study with implications for early product screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(1), 50-69.
Hughes, B. (1995). Older people and community care. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Laser, W. (1963). Life Style Concept and Marketing. Toward Scientific Marketing, Chicago: AMA, 141-150.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509.
Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. Peplau, L. A., Perlman, D. (eds). Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1-18.
Plummer, J. T. (1974). The concept and application of life style segmentation. Journal of Marketing, 33-37.
Rubenstein, C., & Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 206-223.
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472-80.
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290-294.
Tauber, E. M. (1972). Why do people shop?. Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 46-49.
Turner, J. S., & Helms, D. B. (1989). Contemporary Adulthood. Holt McDougal.
Wells, W. D., & Tigert, D. J. (1971). Activities, Interests, and Opinions. Journal of Advertising Research, 11(4), 27-35.
Wen-Jung, C., & Lee, C. (2005). The impact of web site image and consumer personality on consumer behavior. International Journal of Management, 22(3), 484.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1992). Psychology and life. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.