研究生: |
吳傳照 Ted Chuan-chao Wu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台中一中電腦輔助英文寫作練習之個案研究 The Effectiveness of Computer-enhanced Writing: A Case Study in Taichung First Senior High School |
指導教授: |
周中天
Chou, Chung-Tien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 80 |
中文關鍵詞: | 電腦輔助寫作 、英文作文 、紙筆寫作 、網際網路 、電子郵件 、文字處理 |
英文關鍵詞: | computer-enhanced writing, English composition, paper-and-pencil writing, Internet, e-mail, word processing |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:135 下載:13 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文摘要
本研究旨在探究電腦輔助高中學生寫作之效益;許多英文教師最關心的事,莫過於如何教導學生擷取電腦科技最佳優點,並且應用在書寫英文作文上面。例如,學生熟悉電腦的各項技巧,是大有裨益的;他們能夠容易地進行諸如修訂、編寫、或豐富自己文章的動作。另外,如果他們能夠培養上網尋找資料的習慣,他們的文章會更加多采多姿。畢竟,將思想轉化為文字並非單單依賴內省式的思考,更需要外在的,和週遭的人、以及可能獲得的資訊之互相激盪。作文本身十分艱難與神秘,所以本研究發現有些學生針對改變寫作工具與方式並不積極,然而筆者深信,長期訓練使用電腦科技幫助產生思想,轉而促進寫作,是絕對必要的。本研究採用學生的作文、問卷、以及九次個別面談來蠡測學生寫作品質之改變,並辨識學生對於寫作與利用科技進行寫作的微妙觀感。本研究固然存在著某些限制與不足,希望至少能為往後研究提供若干啟示與線索。
Abstract
This study aims at exploring the effectiveness of
computer-enhanced writing in senior high school. How to reap the optimal advantages of computer technologies and apply them in writing English compositions has been a great and grave concern for many English teachers. For example, it is helpful for student writers to familiarize themselves with the skills of computers; they will have a much easier time revising, editing, or enriching their writings. Also, if they foster the habit of surfing the net for more resources, their writings will become more abundant. After all, putting one’s thoughts into words depends not merely on one’s introversive thinking, but also upon external brainstorming with others around oneself as well as with various information available to one. Writing itself is extremely difficult and mysterious, and this study found that some of the students were not inspired or improved by the innovated writing tools. The researcher is still convinced that long-term training of utilizing computer technologies to help generate more thoughts that contribute to writing is essential. This study employed the students’ compositions, a questionnaire, and nine individual interviews to calibrate the change in the students’ writing quality and to identify some nuanced attitudinal inclinations towards writing and using technology for writing. While there may be some limitations and insufficiencies to this implementation, at least, hopefully, it could provide some implications and clues for future research.
References
APA. (1994). Publication Manual. (4th ed.). Washington, D. C.:
American Psychological Association.
Bailey, J. (1996). Teaching about technology in the foreign
language classroom. Foreign Language Annals,29,82-
88.
Beach, R., & Bridwell, L. S. (Eds.). (1984). New directions in
composition research. New York: The Guilford Press
Bridwell, L. S., Sirc, G. & Brooke, R. (1985). Revising and
computing: Case studies of student writers. In S. W.
Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language (pp.
160-171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Britton, J. (1978). The composing processes and the functions
of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research of
composing: Point of departure (pp. 13-28). Urbana, Il:
National Council of Teachers of English.
Chapman, D. W. (1999). A Luddite in Cyberland, Or How to Avoid
Being Snared by the Web. Computers and Composition 16, 247-
252
Chuo, C. C. (1998). An investigation of Taiwanese middle school
teachers’ attitudes toward Taiwanese middle school
education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
of Montana.
Collier, R. M. (1983). The word processor and revision
strategies. College Composition and Communication, 35, 149-
155
Dickinson, D. K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a
computer: integrating a computer into a first-second grade
writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20,
141-159.
Dorman, S. M. (1998). Using Email to enhance instruction. The
Journal of School Health, 68, 160-261.
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders.
Urbana, Il: National Council of Teachers of English.
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College
Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for
problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-37.
Graves, D. H. (1975). An examination of the writing processes
of seven-year-old children. Research in the Teaching
English, 9, 227-241
Haas, C. (1999). On the Relationship Between Old and New
Technologies. Computers and Compositions, 16, 209-228.
Available E-mail: chaas@kent.edu
Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the
revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition
and Communication, 33, 1, 76-88.
Hawisher, G. E. (1988). Research update: Writing and word
processing. Computers and Composition, 5, 7-27.
Hawisher, G. E. & Selfe, C. L. (1998). Reflections on computers
and composition studies. In Ilana Snyder (Ed. ), Page to
screen: The spaces of electronic literacies (pp. 3-19).
London: Routledge
Hayes, J. R. (1970). Cognition and the Development of Language.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Howard, R. M. (1984). Language philosophy in composition theory
and its pedagogical implications for native and non-native
speakers of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
West Virginia University.
Hudelson, S. (1988). Writing in a second language. Annual
Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 210-222.
Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural
education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., Honan, E., & Crawford, J. (1998).
The wired world of second-language education. In Ilana
Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: The spaces of electronic
literacies (pp. 20-50). London: Routledge
King, M. (1978). Research in composition: A need for theory.
Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 193-202.
Liebman-Kleine, J. D. (1984). Reading, writing, and thinking:
Toward a problem-solving theory of reading literary
narrative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
of Minnesota.
Linder, D. (2000). Making e-mail exchanges really work. Modern
English Teaching, 9, 3, 40-45.
Murray, D. M. (1978). Internal revision: A process of
discovery. In C. R. Cooper, & L. Odell (Eds.), Research of
composing: point of departure (pp. 85-103). Urbana, Il:
National Council of Teachers of English.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. Toronto, ON: Random House.
Patterson, N. (2001). Computers and writing: Feeling the power.
Voices from the Middle [ProQuest Education Complete], 9,1,
60-64. Available: http://global.umi.com/pqdweb
Perl, S. (1980). Understanding composition. College Composition
and Communication, 31, 363-370.
Petrosky, A. R. (1982). From story to essay: Reading and
writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 19-36.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the
teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 3, 407-430.
Rinehart, P. S. (2001). Internal student use of electronic mail
to communicate with faculty at a four-year public research
institution [ UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations-24 Page
Preview]. University of Arkansas. Available:
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview_all
Ruhe, V. (1998). E-mail exchanges: Teaching language, culture,
and technology for the 21st century. TESL Canada Journal,
16, 1, (winter 1998), 88-95.
Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction:
Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll
(Ed.), Second language writing (pp. 11-23). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S., Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (1998). Expanding the
writing process to the Web. Teaching Exceptional Children
[ProQuest Education Complete], 30, 5, 22-26. Available:
http://global.umi.com/pqdweb.
Snyder, I. (1998). Page to screen. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to
screen (pp. xx-xxxvi). London: Routledge.
Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and
experienced adult writers. College Composition and
Communication, 31, 378-388.
Sommers, N. (1981). Intentions and revisions. Journal of Basic
Writimg. 3, 41-49.
Spack, R. (1984). Invention strategies and the ESL college
composition student. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 4, 649-670.
Stallard, C. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of
good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English,
8, 206-218.
Tsai, C. H. (2002). The practice of cooperative language
learning in Web-based environment. Unpublished master
thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Tseng, David S. D. (1989). Monitoring phenomena in EFL writing:
A protocol analysis. In S. M. Chang, David S. D. Tseng, &
B. C. Hwang (Eds.), A Collection of Papers Presented in
the Sixth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in
the Republic of China (pp. 341-366). Taipei: The Crane
Publishing Co., Ltd.
Uchniat, J. D. (1991). Language and culture: N. T. U. students
of English composition and their responses and reactions
to a Western pedagogy of modern composition theory. In Y.
F. Lin (Ed.), Papers from the Seven Conference on English
Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 117-
129). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Woolever, K. R. (1991). The writing process. In A. Gantner
(Ed.), About writing: A rhetoric for advanced writers (pp.
1-17). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Young, R. (1978). Paradigm and problems: Needed research in
rhetorical invention. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.),
Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 29-47).
Zamel, V. (1983). The composition of advanced ESL students: Six
case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 2, 165-187.
Zeni, J. (1994). Writinglands: Composing with old and new
writing tools. Urbana, Il: NCTC, 1994.
Zinsser, W. (1983). Writing with a word processor. New York:
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
王家聲 (1991). 中學英語教學成效不彰的幾個癥結. 中華民國第七屆英
語文教學研討會英語文教學論文集 (133-135)。 台北:文鶴出版公
司。