簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李啟龍
Chi-Lung Lee
論文名稱: 網路上的合作探究學習
Web-based Collaborative Inquiry Learning
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: 探究學習合作學習合作探究學習合作探究式概念構圖
英文關鍵詞: Inquiry Learning, Collaborative Learning, Collaborative Inquiry Learning, Collaborative Inquiry Concept Mapping
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:198下載:37
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的目在設計出一個可以整合探究學習策略、合作學習策略與概念圖知識表徵法,且以全球資訊網為知識探究來源的「網路上的合作探究式概念構圖系統」;其次為提出適用於網路上的合作式探究學習模式及學習活動;最後探討學生在網路上的合作式探究學習之學習歷程和學習效果。
    研究結果發現: 1.網路上的合作探究式概念構圖系統,可以有效整合探究學習策略、合作學習策略與概念圖知識表徵法,並提供學生一個相互合作以進行探究知識和表徵知識成果的學習環境。 2.本研究依據認知和教學理論,提出網路上的合作探究學習模式及學習活動,包含定錨與計畫、個人探究學習、合作探究學習、建構小組成果以及成果展示與討論等階段,可以作為在教室情境中有效的教學策略。 3.在定錨與計畫階段,學生在閱讀教材完畢後,可以根據問題先形成假設再到教材中尋找證據,建構出個人概念圖。但學生構圖的成品個別差異相當大。 4.在個人探究學習階段,學習者相當熱衷於到網路上探究證據,且其瀏覽的網頁也與主題相關,惟將閱讀後的成果加以組織和表達在記事本上的成果較為缺乏。 5.在合作探究學習階段,學習者可以透過討論工具充分進行資料、成品和觀念上的分享。學生最熱衷於討論區中觀念的溝通,其次是記事本的分享,最後是概念圖的分享。 6.在建構小組成果階段,投票機制可以協助成員產生小組的共同成果,但是在協商、溝通、妥協的過程中,往往需要犧牲自己的想法,遷就成品較完整的同學,達成共識的情形較少。

    There are two purposes in this study. The first is to integrate the inquiry learning strategy, the collaborative learning strategy, and the concept mapping strategy to develop a Web-based Collaborative Inquiry Concept Mapping (WCICM) system. The second is to propose an appropriate learning model along with learning activities on web-based collaborative inquiry learning.
    The major findings are as following: (a) The WCICM system can efficiently integrate the inquiry learning strategy, the collaborative learning strategy, and the concept mapping strategy. (b) The web-based collaborative inquiry learning activity including anchoring and planning phase, inquiry by individual phase, collaborative inquiry phase, building group’s product phase, and product presentation and discussion phase. (c) In anchoring and planning phase, the student’s concept mapping product showed significant individual differences. (d) In inquiry by individual phase, students crave for search evidence on Internet but the product are not fruitful for every student. (e) In collaborative inquiry phase, students can collaboratively complete their inquiry task by the idea sharing, data sharing, and product sharing processes. (f) In building group’s product phase, voting mechanism can help group member produce group’s product but students seldom have a common consensus.

    附表目錄 ……………………………………………………………. iii 附圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………. iv 第一章、 緒論 …………………………………………………………1 1-1研究背景與動機 ……………………………………………………1 1-2研究目的 ……………………………………………………………4 第二章、 文獻探討 ……………………………………………………5 2-1探究學習的意義、模式與應用……………………………………5 2-1-1探究學習的意義 …………………………………………………5 2-1-2探究學習的模式 …………………………………………………6 2-1-3電腦輔助探究學習 ………………………………………………8 2-2合作學習的意義、理論與應用……………………………………10 2-2-1合作學習的意義與類別 ………………………………………10 2-2-2合作學習的理論基礎 …………………………………………13 2-2-3電腦輔助合作學習 ……………………………………………15 2-3概念構圖的意義與應用……………………………………………22 2-3-1概念構圖的意義 ………………………………………………22 2-3-2合作式概念構圖 ………………………………………………23 2-3-3合作探究式概念構圖 ……………………………………………25 第三章、 網路上的合作探究學習流程及型態 ………………………27 3-1網路上的合作探究學習流程 ………………………………………27 3-2網路上的合作探究學習型態 ………………………………………33 第四章、 網路上的合作探究式概念構圖系統架構 …………………36 4-1網路上的合作探究式概念構圖系統的特色 ………………………36 4-2系統的開發技術與工具 ……………………………………………40 4-3系統功能 ……………………………………………………………41 第五章、 實驗方法、結果與討論 ……………………………………57 5-1實驗方法 ……………………………………………………………57 5-1-1實驗對象 ………………………………………………………57 5-1-2實驗教材 …………………………………………………………57 5-1-3實驗程序 …………………………………………………………58 5-2實驗結果與討論 ……………………………………………………59 第六章、 結論與未來發展方向 ………………………………………77 6-1結論 …………………………………………………………………77 6-2未來發展方向 ………………………………………………………78 附錄一 實驗教材—神秘的埃及金字塔之謎 …………………………80 附錄二 問卷調查表 ……………………………………………………82 參考書目 ……………………………………………………………….83 附表目錄 表1:定錨與計畫階段的流程、目標及作品 …………………………28 表2:個人探究學習階段的流程、目標及作品 ………………………29 表3:合作探究學習階段的流程、目標及作品 ………………………30 表4:建構小組成果階段的流程、目標及作品 ………………………31 表5:成果展示與討論階段的流程、目標及成品 ……………………32 表6:實驗程序與時間分配表 …………………………………………58 表7:分組狀況表 ………………………………………………………59 表8:每位同學曾經瀏覽的網頁個數 …………………………………63 表9:小組核心概念圖、假設統計與投票狀況表 ……………………71 表10:問卷調查統計表 ………………………………………………74 附圖目錄 圖1:概念圖範例 …………………………………………………….26 圖2:老師--學生角色互動圖 …………………………………………35 圖3:系統功能選擇區 …………………………………………………41 圖4:老師編輯區的功能選擇區 ………………………………………42 圖5:老師登入視窗 ……………………………………………………43 圖6:學號、密碼與組別設定視窗 ……………………………………44 圖7:文章設定視窗 ……………………………………………………45 圖8:題目、概念與連結語設定 ………………………………………46 圖9:學習階段與學習時間設定視窗 …………………………………47 圖10:學生學習區的學習階段選擇視窗 ……….……………………48 圖11:學生登入視窗 ………………………………………………….49 圖12:編輯概念節點功能區 ………………………………………… 50 圖13:編輯概念連結功能區 ………………………………………….51 圖14:合作探究階段的記事本畫面 ………………………………… 52 圖15:線上合作討論區 ……………………………………………….53 圖16:分享記事本畫面 ……………………………………………….54 圖17:分享概念圖操作畫面 …………………………………………55 圖18:分享小組對話操作畫面 ………………………………………56 圖19:正反意見統計表 ………………………………………………56 圖20:4c同學的第一階段概念圖作品 ………………………………60 圖21:3b同學的第一階段概念圖作品 ………………………………60 圖22:6a同學的第一階段概念圖作品 ………………………………61 圖23:3a同學的記事本作品 …………………………………………64 圖24:5b同學的記事本作品 …………………………………………65 圖25:4c同學的第三階段概念圖作品 ………………………………68 圖26:3b同學的第三階段概念圖作品 ………………………………68 圖27:1a同學的記事本作品 …………………………………………72

    毛松霖(1996)。國中生地球科學觀測資料之「解釋能力」與「概念形成」之教學策略研究。行政院國家科學委員會印行。
    王康宇和張國恩(1998)。遞迴程式之蘇格拉底式合作學習系統。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
    行政院國家科學委員會科學教育發展處科學教育學門資源整合規劃小組(1996)。科學教育。學門資源整合規劃資料。
    宋曜廷(德忠),王康宇和張國恩(1998)。網際網路上的合作學習初探。中國心理學會,1998年會,台北。
    宋曜廷(德忠),張國恩和陳淑芬(1997)。電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用。發表於第三屆海峽兩岸測驗學術研討會。台北。
    李咏吟(1985)。教學原理。台北:遠流。
    林寶山(1998)。教學原理與技巧。台北:五南。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
    張國恩,宋曜廷(德忠)和陳淑芬(1997)。電腦化概念構圖在生物科學習的應用。發表於第十三屆科學教育研討會。臺北。
    張國恩,陳世旺和宋曜廷(德忠)(1997)。電腦化概念構圖在科學教育的應用研究(I):概念構圖學習與評量系統的建立。國科會研究計劃: NSC87-2511-S-003-042。
    張國恩,陳世旺和宋曜廷(德忠)(1998)。電腦化概念構圖在科學教育的應用研究(II):概念構圖學習與評量系統的建立。國科會研究計劃:NSC88-2520-S-003-003 ,國科會研究報告。
    張國恩,陳世旺和宋曜廷(德忠)(1999)。電腦化概念構圖在科學教育的應用(III)。國科會研究報告:NSC89-2520-S-003-009。
    張瑞賓和張國恩(1999)。具有開放式連結語的命題式屬性化概念構圖系統。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳嘉成和余民寧(1996)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃正傑主編(1997)。教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
    Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    Bell, P., & Davis, E. A. (1996). Designing an activity in the Knowledge Integration Environment. Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
    Brown, A. L., & Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (ED.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of R. Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring. International Journal of Artifical Intelligence in Education. 8(1),1-29.
    Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., Wang, K. Y.,& Dai, C. Y. (under review). Web_Soc : Socratic dialectic based collaborative recursion learning on the world wide web. Paper submitted to International Journal of Computers and Education.
    Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T.,& Chen, S. F.(in press). Computerized concept Mapping with scaffolding learning aid. Paper to appear in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
    Chang, K. E., Wang, K. Y., Dai, C. Y., & Sung, T, C. (1999). Learning Recursion Through a Collaborative Socratic Dialectic Process. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(3), 303-315.
    Chavero, J. C., Carrasco, J., Rossell, M. A., & Vega, J. M. (1998). A Graphical Tool for Analyzing Navigation Through Educational Hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(1), 33-49.
    Chiappetta, E. L., & Russell, J. M. (1982). The relationship among logical thinking, problem solving instruction, and knowledge and application of earth science subject matter. Science Education, 66(1), 85-93.
    Chung, W. K., O'Neil, F., Herl, E., & Dennis, A. (1997). Use of Networked Collaborative Concept Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
    Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N. & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. The Journal of The Learning Science, 8(3?), 391-450.
    Esiobu, G. O. & Soyibo, k. (1995). Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning modes on students cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 971-995.
    Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359048).
    Herl, H., Baker, E.,& Niemi, D.(1996). Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge. Journal of Education Research, 89, 213-230.
    Hoadley, C. M., Bell, P., & The KIE Research Group .(1996). Web for your head – The design of digital resources to enhance lifelong learning. D-Lib Magazine, September 1996.
    Igelsrud, D., & Leonard, W. H. (1988). Labs: What research says about biology laboratory instruction. American Biology Teacher, 50(5), 303-306.
    Inaba, A., & Okamoto T. (1996).Development of the intelligent discussion support system for collaborative learning. Proceedings of ED-Telecom 96, 137-142.
    Jehng, J. C. (1997). The psycho-social processes and cognitive effects of peer-based collaborative interactions with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 19-46.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: International Book Company.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.(1985).The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups. In Slavin, R. , et al. (Eds.) Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, 103-124.
    Katz, S., & Lesgold, A. (1993). The role of the tutor in computer-based collaborative learning situations. In S. Lajoie, & S. Derry (Eds.). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaun Associations.
    Light, P. H., & Mevarech, Z. R. (1992). Cooperative learning with computers: An introduction. Learning an Instruction, 2, 155-159.
    Lin, J. M.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Liu, H.-J.(1999). Using SimCPU in cooperative learning laboratories. Journal of Educational Research. Vol 20(3),259-277.
    Looi, C. K. (1998). Interactive learning environments for promoting inquiry learning. J. Educational Technology Systems, vol. 27(1) 3-22, 1998-99.
    Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 129-138.
    Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J. & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 91-104.
    Marx, R. D., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S.,& Soloway, E.(1998). New Technologies for Teacher Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol 14, No. 1, pp 33-52.
    McConnell, D. (1994). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page.
    Mcmanus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (1995). Monitoring computer-based collaborative problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307-336.
    Mevarech, Z. R. (1993). Who benefits from cooperative computer-assisted instruction? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9:4, 451-464.
    Mevarech, Z. R., & Light P. H. (1992). Peer-based interaction at the computer. looking backward, looking forward. Learning and Instruction, 2, 275-280.
    Noavk, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. Science Teacher, 45-49.
    Novak, J. D. (1990a). Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
    Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, And Using Knowledge : Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools In Schools and Corporations.
    Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge, London:Cambridge University Press.
    Novak. J. D. (1990b). Concept Mapping : A Useful Tool for Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (10), 937-949.
    O’Donnel, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Hall, R. H., & Rocklin, T. R. (1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 431-437.
    O’Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads:A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance.In R. Hartz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. London: Cambridge University Press,120-141.
    O’Malley, C. (1994). Designing computer support for collaborative learning. In C. Malley (Eds.). Computer supported collaborative learning.
    Okada, T. & Simon, H. A. (1997). Collaborative Discovery in a scientific domain. Congitive Science, 21(2), 109-146.
    Owston, R. D. (1997). The world wide web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 27-33.
    Pryor, A., Soloway, E., & Hi-C Research Group. (1997). Foundations of science : Using technology to support authentic science learning. http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/.
    Roth, W. M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534.
    Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1998). Iterative design of a technology-supported biological inquiry curriculum. Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
    Saunders, W. L., & Shepardson, D. (1987). A comparison of concrete and formal science instruction upon science achievement and reasoning ability of sixth grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(1), 39-51.
    Slavin, R. E. (1985). Team-Assisted Individualization: Combining Cooperative Learning and Individualized Instruction in Mathematics. In Slavin, R. E., Sharan, S., Kagan, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C.& Schmuck, R. (Eds). Learning to Cooperative, Cooperating to Learn. New York: Plenum, 177-209.
    Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
    Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
    Spitulnik, M. W. & Krajcik, J. (1998). Technological Tools to Support Inquiry in a Science Methods Course. Jl. of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 17(1), 63-74.
    Sung, Y. T., Chen, I. D., & Chang, K. E.(2000). The effect of concept mapping for improving reading comprehension and summarizing abilities: A scaffold-fading approach. Paper to be presented in the 2000 Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
    Sung, Y. T., Chen, I. D.,& Chang, K. E.(in preparation). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization abilities: A comparison of the map-correction, scaffold-fading and self-generation approaches. Paper to be submitted to Contemporary Educational Psychology.
    Suthers, D. & Jones, D. (1997). An Architecture for Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems. AI&ED’97, Kobe Japan.
    Suthers, D. & the Advlearn Project. (1996). Distributed tools for Collaborative Learning and Coached Apprenticeship Approaches to Critical Inquiry. ITS’96, Montreal, June 12-14th.
    Suthers, D., Toth, E., & Weiner, A. (1997). An Integrated Approach to Implementing Collaborative Inquiry in the Classroom. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning ’97, Dec. 10-14, 1997, Toronto.
    Tabak, I., Smith, B. K.,Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Combining General and Domain-Specific Strategic Support for Biological Inquiry. ITS’96, Montreal, June 12-14th.
    Tina, S.(1990). On the High Road to Achievement : Cooperative Concept Mapping. ED335140.
    Tinnesand, M., & Chan, A. (1987). Step 1:Throw out the instructions. ScienceTeacher, 54(6), 43-45.
    Tobin, K., Briscoe, C. & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409-420.
    Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2000). Mapping to know : The effects of evidence maps and reflective assessments on scientific inquiry skills. . Paper to be presented in the 2000 Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
    Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a Theoretical Model of Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.& Miller, N.(Eds.), Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical anatomy of Group Learning. New York: Cambridge Univ, Press, 102-119.
    Wolcott, J. R., & Robertson J. E. (1997). The world wide web as an environment for collaborative research: An experiment in graduate education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication, 3(2/3), 219-236.

    QR CODE